ERCOT Draft NPRR Phase 2 ORDC RATF July 8, 2014. 2 ERCOT draft NPRR Phase 2 ORDC Draft NPRR will include the following clarifications or additions: Updates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPACT TO FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING STARTUP AND SHUT DOWN OF UNITS
Advertisements

NPRR 532 Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin David Kee CPS Energy Energy Supply & Market.
CSWG Update Blake Holt ERCOT CSWG 02/23/ CRR Balancing Account $2,179, CRRBACRTOT $67,789.11CRRFEETOT DACRRSAMTTOT $500, $1,747,349.16CRRBAF.
ORDC Phase 2 Analysis Summary Wholesale Market Subcommittee March 4, 2015 David Thompson.
SBBH Flag Implementation QMWG October 11, SBBH Flag - Background SBBH Flag - Background: –The SBBH acronym stands for “SCED Base Point Below HDL”
March 30, 2015 SCED Event Follow up: Proposed Improvements QMWG, May 08, 2015.
QSE Managers Working Group July 11, 2011 Base Point Deviation – NPRR377 ERCOT Settlement & Billing Group.
1 Generator Telemetry and Market Prices WebEx Training July 28 th, 2015.
ERCOT Tool to manage unexpected incremental load November 16, 2006.
NPRRs NPRR680 Allow QSEs to Self-Arrange AS Quantities Greater Than Their AS Obligation. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes to allow.
COMMUNICATIONS AND SETTLEMENTS WORKING GROUP (CSWG) April 2015 Update to COPS.
NPRR 511 and QSGR MOC ERCOT Settlements Meeting Title: WMS Date: March 13, 2013.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
1 Settlement Changes R5 (SEP 2015) and R5.5 (OCT 2015) Blake Holt ERCOT COPS 9/14/2015.
August 17, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting Updated Analysis of Non-Spin Deployments and RUC John Dumas Director Wholesale Market Operations.
PRS - RPRS Task Force Status Summary - August 14, PRS RPRS Task Force Status Summary Prepared for WMS and PRS August 2006.
NPRR 097 DSR and Small Capacity / Low Operating Level Issues for Compliance Monitoring.
WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
NPRR425 - Creation of a WGR Group for GREDP and Base Point Deviation Evaluation and Mixing Turbine Types Within a WGR Art Deller, P.E. RARF Workshop 8/29/13.
QMWG – Feb. 26, 2014 Discussion topic: NPRR585 Clarification of Administrative Pricing Requirements for Self-Committed Combined Cycle Combustion Turbines.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
Resource Adequacy Task Force (RATF) Update to WMS June 12, 2013.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
QMWG Update to WMS S. Looney February 5, NPRRs Referred by WMS NPRR589, Ancillary Service Offers in the Supplemental Ancillary Services Market –
October Project Release (NPRRs 710, 706, 698 and 595) ERCOT Operations & Market Operations WebEx Training October XX, 2015.
July 10, 2008 ROS Early Delivery Systems Status – R6.3 2 Hour Test John Dumas and Jeff Gilbertson.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino.
PDCWG Report to ROS David Kee Chair CPS Energy Sydney Niemeyer Vice Chair NRG Energy.
QMWG Report to WMS S. Looney April 9, NPRRs Assigned to QMWG NPRR595, RRS Load Treatment in ORDC – Provides ORDC payment for non-controllable Load.
Resource Parameters Needed for LFC NATF WebEx Meeting 05/11/2010 Dave Maggio Operations Engineer, Supply Integration and Grid Applications.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
WMS Meeting, October 10, RCWG Continuing Efforts  NPRR 747 Price Correction No consensus on this issue  RCWG needs additional guidance on the.
QSE Managers Working Group Report to WMS, April 8, 2011 S. Looney, Luminant.
NPRRs NPRR649 Lost Opportunity Payments for HDL Manual Overrides. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes two options for a lost opportunity.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 27, 2010.
Analysis of August 13, 2015: ORDC, RRS & PRC Changes Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) November 13, 2015.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
ORDC Settlements Overview Matthew Tozer & Blake Holt ERCOT CSWG 4/21/2014.
PDCWG Report to ROS January 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
A Broad Review of August 13, 2015 and Similar Historical Situations Luminant Energy January 22, 2016.
Resource Adequacy Task Force (RATF) Update to WMS October 8, 2013.
RATF Policy Decisions Progress Report of RATF May 29, 2014.
1 Project Prioritization Review May 14, Approved Revision Requests “Not Started” – Planned to Start in Future Months Revision Request Target Start.
Text reason for Deviation from Defined High Sustained Limit/Low Sustained Limit John Adams January 5, 2010 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Reliability Unit Commitment (RUC) Settlements Business Requirements.
July 15, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting ERCOT Studies and Proposal on Reliability Energy Pricing John Dumas Director Wholesale Market.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
NPRRs 705NPRR Provides Consistency for References to the End Date of the Generation Interconnection Process. In the Resource Interconnection Handbook,
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
1 EEA Workshop 3 April 2, /3/2015For the purpose of discussion only.
Settlement of Ancillary Service Infeasibility ERCOT QMWG April 15, 2016.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris May 5, 2011.
1 February, 2012 QMWG S&B Protocol Clarifications QSE-Requested Decommitment of a DAM Commitment ERCOT Mandy Bauld.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
QSE Managers Working Group October 12, 2010 Base Point Deviation Issues – Short Term and Long Term Solutions Nodal Settlement & Billing Group.
Non-Spin Deployment Resmi Surendran. RUC Awarded Ancillary Service Bring Resources On-Line if awarding REG or RRS When awarding Non-Spin – First award.
Use of ONTEST Resource Status over Telemetry: – ERCOT protocol permits the use of telemetered Resource Status code “ONTEST” during periods of start-up.
ERCOT Market Education Market Role in Emergency Operations OTS 2016.
ERCOT Market Design & Operations
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
RTDF Overview of Data Analysis & Status of “Consesus Items”
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services
QSE Managers Working Group July 11, 2011 Base Point Deviation – NPRR377 ERCOT Settlement & Billing Group 1.
Presentation transcript:

ERCOT Draft NPRR Phase 2 ORDC RATF July 8, 2014

2 ERCOT draft NPRR Phase 2 ORDC Draft NPRR will include the following clarifications or additions: Updates to the RARF for OFF10 and OFF30 Registration OFF10 and OFF30 Qualification OFF10 and OFF30 Unannounced Testing OFF10 and OFF30 Operational Data Requirements Continue to include OFFNSHSL in Off-Line Capacity Draft NPRR concepts that require Stakeholder input: Settlement On-Line Capacity when Resource HSL < RTMG Settlement for 15 minute Settlement interval when Resource output < 95% of LSL, or Resource status is Startup, Shutdown, or ONTEST for partial interval Base Point Deviation for Under Generation – Pricing adjustment

3 ERCOT draft NPRR Phase 2 ORDC Concepts still under consideration: Load Resources included in OFF10 and OFF30 Capacity Oscillation issue when PRC falls at or below 2300 (QMWG) Removing RDF from input calculation (RTMG, HSL, etc.)

4 RARF changes via draft RRGRR The Resource Registration Glossary Revision Request (RRGRR) proposes modifications to the Resource Registration Glossary to include OFF10 and OFF30 capacity for Generators and Combined cycle configuration below: Generation Resources: Add the row for “OFF10 Capacity from On-Line state” under Parameters Add the row for “OFF30 Capacity from On-Line state” under Parameters Add the row for “OFF10 Capacity from Off-Line state” under Parameters Add the row for “OFF30 Capacity from Off-Line state” under Parameters Combined Cycle Resources: Add the row for “OFF10 Capacity” under CC Configurations Add the row for “OFF30 Capacity” under CC Configurations Add the row for “OFF10 Capacity from Off-Line state” under Unit Info - TRAIN Add the row for “OFF30 Capacity from Off-Line state” under Unit Info - TRAIN

5 OFF10 Qualification Capacity designated as OFF10 shall not be used for SCED or any Ancillary Service and cannot be included in the telemetered HSL of the On-Line Resource. The Resource will be qualified to provide the requested OFF10 MW if the Resource satisfies the below conditions. If the Resource is On-Line, the output of the Resource should increase from HSL to HSL plus the OFF10 qualification request amount within ten minutes. The OFF10 telemetered value should change according to the increase in output. If the Resource is Off-Line, the Resource should be online and the output of the Resource should increase from zero to the OFF10 qualification request amount within ten minutes. The OFF10 telemetered value should change according to the increase in output. The Resource asset registration information for any unit that has passed a certified OFF10 test shall be updated to show the corresponding capacity certified in the test.

6 OFF30 Qualification Capacity designated as OFF30 shall not be used for SCED or any Ancillary Service and cannot be included in the telemetered HSL of the On-Line Resource or the HSL of the Off-Line Resource providing Non-Spin or OFF10. The Resource will be qualified to provide the requested OFF30 MW if the Resource satisfies the below conditions. If the Resource is On-Line, the output of the Resource should increase from HSL to HSL + OFF10 + OFF30 qualification request amount within thirty minutes. The OFF30 telemetered value should change according to the increase in output. If the Resource is Off-Line, the Resource should be online and the output of the Resource should increase from zero to the OFF10 + OFF30 qualification request amount within thirty minutes. The OFF30 telemetered value should change according to the increase in output. The Resource asset registration information for any unit that has passed a certified OFF30 test shall be updated to show the corresponding capacity certified in the test.

7 OFF10 and OFF30 Unannounced Testing For On-Line Resources, once the designated Generation Resource reaches its HSL, the QSE shall reach its HSL+ OFF10 capacity within an additional ten minutes or HSL+ OFF10 +OFF30 capacity within an additional 30 minutes. For Off-Line Resources, once the QSE receives the VDI, the Resource shall reach its OFF10 capacity within ten minutes or OFF10 + OFF30 capacity within 30 minutes. The OFF10 or OFF30 value for the designated Generation Resource shall be determined based on the maximum Real-Time MW telemetered by the Resource at the end of 10 minutes for OFF10 and at the end of 30 minutes for OFF30. After each test, the QSE representing the Generation Resource will complete and submit the test form using the NDCRC application located on the MIS within two Business Days. The tested value of OFF10 or OFF30 shall be the basis for telemetered OFF10 or OFF30 capacity for the remainder of the Season unless the QSE seeks requalification.

8 OFF10 and OFF30 Operational Data Requirements OFF10: On-Line Resources and Quick Start Generation Resource (QSGR) that is available for deployment by SCED, Only include capacity that has been tested by ERCOT to be available in the appropriate time frame; and, Not already captured in the telemetered HSL or telemetered OFF30 capacity of the Resource. Off-Line Resources Only include capacity that has been tested by ERCOT to be available in the appropriate time frame; and, Not already captured in the telemetered OFF30 capacity of the Resource. OFF30: On-Line Resources and Quick Start Generation Resource (QSGR) that is available for deployment by SCED Only include capacity that has been tested by ERCOT to be available in the appropriate time frame; and, Not already captured in the telemetered HSL or telemetered OFF10 capacity of the Resource Off-Line Resources Only include capacity that has been tested by ERCOT to be available in the appropriate time frame; and, Not already captured in the telemetered OFF10 capacity of the Resource.

9 Adjustment to RTOFFCAP Current implementation of Phase 1 RTOFFCAP: Included Resources with Cold Start Time less than or equal to 30 minutes (RTCST30HSL) and HSL of Off-Line Resources with Non-Spin Responsibility (RTOFFNSHSL) as a proxy until Phase 2 OFF30 telemetry Adjustment needed for Phase 2: Replace RTCST30HSL with RTOFF30 however do not remove RTOFFNSHSL as this capacity will not be included in RTOFF30 [NPRR568: Replace the above equation RTOFFCAP q with the following upon Phase 2 system implementation:] RTOFFCAP q =RTOFF30 q + RTOFFNSHSL q + RTCLRNS q

10 Settlement of AS Imbalance Issues Settlement for On-Line Capacity when Resource HSL < RTMG ERCOT noticed some resources (mostly WGR) where the RTMG has been greater than the integrated HSL this could result in negative RTOLCAP Proposed solution is to cap the HSL at RTMG Settlement for 15 minute Settlement interval when Resource output < 95% of LSL, or Resource status is Startup, Shutdown, or ONTEST for partial interval Current implementation: if Resource has a one of the above telemetered status at ANY time during the 15 minute interval, they are excluded from RTOLCAP Does market want to make this exclusion more of an inclusion? 1.If at any time during the 15 minute interval you are one of the “ON” statuses, HSL and RTMG are included 2.If any “ON” statuses for at least ½ of 15 minutes, HSL and RTMG are included Base Point Deviation for Under Generation – Pricing adjustment or Disallow AS Imbalance payment? Current Base Point Deviation for UGEN prices deviations as follows: -1*(min(-20,RTSPP)* UGEN There is incentive to adjust the HSL above what is operationally viable because the maximum price that Resource would be charged for the deviation would be $20 while at the same time collecting the price adder for the difference in HSL – RTMG. Suggested solutions: MAX[20, ABS(RTSPP)]*UGEN OR for any 15 minute interval when UGEN > 0 then AS Imbalance payment for QSE doesn’t include the capacity from the Resource that is getting UGEN BP deviation

11 Base Point Deviation for Under Generation Example: Online Reserve Price Adder = 40 $/MW Original System lambda = 50 $/MW Final System lambda = 90 $/MW (50+40) Gen Resource A = No AS Responsibility true HSL = 100 MW a. Gen Resource telemeters HSL = 120 MW (20% more than capability) b. ERCOT issues base point of 120 MW c. Gen Resource A can deliver only 100 MW d. For a give 15 minute interval, Gen Resource A assessed base point deviation charge for under gen = -1 * Min(PR2,RTSPP)*Min(1,KP)*UGEN UGEN=max(0,(min((1-k2)*AABP*0.25, 0.25*(aabp-q2)-TWTG)) TWTG = 100*0.25, AABP=120 UGEN=max(0,min(28.5,3.75))=3.75 Base point deviation charge for under gen = -1*(min(-20,90)*3.75=75 $ The resource gets a ORDC payment of 0.25*(HSL-RTMG)*online reserve price adder = 0.25*( )*40 = 200 $ Possible extra profit = 200 – 75 = 125 $ K2=5% KP=1.0 q2=5, PR2=-20 when RTSPP>-20 K2=5% KP=1.0 q2=5, PR2=-20 when RTSPP>-20