From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Transition (Indicators C-8 and B-12)
Advertisements

Special Education 101 Special Education: A SERVICE, NOT A PLACE John Payne Office of Exceptional Children SC State Department of Education.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Session Objectives Participants will: –Briefly review the special education process –Understand the interaction between the Evaluation/Reevaluation Report.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
OF ECSE COMPLIANCE PRESENTATION FOR THE 2014 MO-CASE CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 23, 2014.
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
Early Childhood Transition Presenters: Kimberly Mitchell Ginger Sheppard Jessica Spataro NOVEMBER 2011.
Potpourri: Summary of Important Points to Remember Presenters: Jill Harris Laura Duos NOVEMBER 2011.
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the Utah Special Education Law Conference August 2011 UPDATED January 2012.
IEP Definition The Individualized Education Program (IEP) is developed for a student with an identified disability by an IEP team that includes the.
Legal and Ethical Issues
September/October Prerequisite Skills Policies Governing the Services for Students with Disabilities NC IEP Team….  (4) A representative.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
CHRISTINA SPECTOR WENDI SCHREITER ERIN ARANGO-ESCALANTE IDEA Part C to Part B Transition.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
The Next Decade: Special Education and Oregon Charter Schools COSA Fall Conference October 2009.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Writing Compliant ETRs State Approved Training Module
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Pre-referral Process Student support team Student support team –General education teacher identifies a student –Meets with the SST to discuss strategies.
Creating Supports for Transition Ann Hains, UW-Milwaukee Sarah Hadden, UW-Eau Claire Jill Haglund, DPI Donna Miller, DHFS.
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
ARC Chairperson Training Introduction 1. The Language of Special Education Acronyms 2.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
Revoking Consent for Special Education Services COSA Fall Special Education Conference October 2009 Rae Ann Ray Office of Student Learning & Partnerships.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Federal Statute, Federal Regulations, State Policies, and State Procedures What’s the Difference? Mississippi Department of Education Office.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
Presented by the Early Childhood Transition Program Priority Team August 11, 2010 Updated September 2010.
Timely and Effective Transition at Age 3 David P. Lindeman, Peggy Miksch & Phoebe Rinkel Kansas Division for Early Childhood Conference Wichita, Kansas.
The New IDEA in Special Education
SPECIAL EDUCATION BASICS Adrienne Volenik Education Rights Clinic University of Richmond School of Law
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
C HAPTER 5 Individuals With Disabilities EDAD 859 By: Group 2.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
M eetings of the IEP Team Produced by NICHCY, 2007 | Updated by CPIR, 2016.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Are you smarter than the person who developed this lame quiz?
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Discipline.
Individual Family Service Plans vs
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
ARC Chairperson Training
TIMELINE DECISION TREE:
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
Who is a member? The IEP Team: How to Operate the Slide:
ARC Chairperson Training
The Iep Team: Who’s a member? How to Operate the Slide:
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
The Iep Team: Who’s a member? How to Operate the Slide:
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Presented By: Eric G. Rodriguez
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Who is a member? The IEP Team: How to Operate the Slide:
Who is a member? The IEP Team: How to Operate the Slide:
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs

IDEA 2004 Part B –Definitions –Section 611 – Funding –Section 612 – State eligibility –Section 614 – Evaluations, eligibility, IEP, educational placement –Section 619 – Preschool grants –Regulations – Part 300

Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia Guidance Document on the Implementation of the IDEA Federal Regulations – Part B, 2006

Definitions (Va.) "Age of eligibility" means all eligible children with disabilities who have not graduated with a standard or advanced studies high school diploma who, because of such disabilities, are in need of special education and related services, and whose second birthday falls on or before September 30, and who have not reached their 22nd birthday on or before September 30 (two to 21, inclusive) in accordance with the Code of Virginia. COV § ; 34 CFR § (a) (3) (ii)

§ Day; business day; school day. (a) Day means calendar day unless otherwise indicated as business day or school day. (b) Business day means Monday through Friday, except for Federal and State holidays (unless holidays are specifically included in the designation of business day, as in § (d)(1)(ii)). (c)(1) School day means any day, including a partial day that children are in attendance at school for instructional purposes. (2) School day has the same meaning for all children in school, including children with and without disabilities. (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e–3)

§ Transition of children from the Part C program to preschool programs. The State must have in effect policies and procedures to ensure that— (a) Children participating in early intervention programs assisted under Part C of the Act, and who will participate in preschool programs assisted under Part B of the Act, experience a smooth and effective transition to those preschool programs in a manner consistent with section 637(a)(9) of the Act; (b) By the third birthday of a child described in paragraph (a) of this section, an IEP or, if consistent with § (b) and section 636(d) of the Act, an IFSP, has been developed and is being implemented for the child consistent with § (b); and (c) Each affected LEA will participate in transition planning conferences arranged by the designated lead agency under section 635(a)(10) of the Act. (Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820–0030) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(9))

Evaluations and Reevaluations § Initial evaluations. (a)General. Each public agency must conduct a full and individual initial evaluation, in accordance with §§ and , before the initial provision of special education and related services to a child with a disability under this part. (b) Request for initial evaluation. Consistent with the consent requirements in § , either a parent of a child or a public agency may initiate a request for an initial evaluation to determine if the child is a child with a disability. (c) Procedures for initial evaluation. The initial evaluation— (1)(i) Must be conducted within 60 days of receiving parental consent for the evaluation; or (ii) If the State establishes a timeframe within which the evaluation must be conducted, within that timeframe; and (2) Must consist of procedures— (i) To determine if the child is a child with a disability under § 300.8; and (ii) To determine the educational needs of the child. (Va. – 65 business days from day of receipt of referral to appropriate party) (d) Exception. The timeframe described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section does not apply to a public agency if— (1) The parent of a child repeatedly fails or refuses to produce the child for the evaluation; or (2) A child enrolls in a school of another public agency after the relevant timeframe in paragraph (c)(1) of this section has begun, and prior to a determination by the child’s previous public agency as to whether the child is a child with a disability under § (e) The exception in paragraph (d)(2) of this section applies only if the subsequent public agency is making sufficient progress to ensure a prompt completion of the evaluation, and the parent and subsequent public agency agree to a specific time when the evaluation will be completed. (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1414(a))

§ IEP Team. (a) General. The public agency must ensure that the IEP Team for each child with a disability includes— (1) The parents of the child; (2) Not less than one regular education teacher of the child (if the child is, or may be, participating in the regular education environment); (3) Not less than one special education teacher of the child, or where appropriate, not less then one special education provider of the child; (4) A representative of the public agency who— (i) Is qualified to provide, or supervise the provision of, specially designed instruction to meet the unique needs of children with disabilities; (ii) Is knowledgeable about the general education curriculum; and (iii) Is knowledgeable about the availability of resources of the public agency. (5) An individual who can interpret the instructional implications of evaluation results, who may be a member of the team described in paragraphs (a)(2) through (a)(6) of this section; (6) At the discretion of the parent or the agency, other individuals who have knowledge or special expertise regarding the child, including related services personnel as appropriate; and (7) Whenever appropriate, the child with a disability.

§ IEP Team. (f) Initial IEP Team meeting for child under Part C. In the case of a child who was previously served under Part C of the Act, an invitation to the initial IEP Team meeting must, at the request of the parent, be sent to the Part C service coordinator or other representatives of the Part C system to assist with the smooth transition of services. (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1414(d)(1)(B)–(d)(1)(D)) Eligibility meeting is the first IEP team meeting

§ When IEPs must be in effect. (a)General. At the beginning of each school year, each public agency must have in effect, for each child with a disability within its jurisdiction, an IEP, as defined in §

(c) Initial IEPs; provision of services. Each public agency must ensure that— (1) A meeting to develop an IEP for a child is conducted within 30 days of a determination that the child needs special education and related services; and (2) As soon as possible following development of the IEP, special education and related services are made available to the child in accordance with the child’s IEP. (May be the beginning of the school year for spring/summer referrals depending on the child’s age. Children turning 3 during winter, early spring – services should start before their birthday.)

Indicator 12 Referrals from Part C Compliance indicator: Target = 100% All referrals from Part C Not eligible Eligible and IEP written and implemented Exceptions –Parent –System

Indicator 6 Placement With typically developing same-age peers or not Percent of time – length of day is school day Other settings

Indicator 7 Early Childhood Outcomes Functional capabilities in many settings Time 1 – initial eligibility –Can take information from Part C or share information for their Time 2 –Decide with ITC