APEC Project Management: Concept Note Development to The Full Project Proposal Presented by Khemrutai Khemmarat Department of International Economic Affairs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2011 APEC Secretariat Report to 41 st EWG Meeting Vancouver 9-12 May, 2011 Presented by Luis Enrique Vertiz Program Director.
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop
Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar January 2014 Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar.
What do reviewers look for in a research proposal? Research Councils’ review criteria Dimitra Koutsantoni Research & Knowledge Transfer Manager.
Reporting on SD co-benefits using the new CDFM SD Tool and opportunities for monitoring to enhance the profile of CDM projects and CER price: what the.
Westminster City Council and Westminster Primary Care Trust Voluntary Sector Funding 2009/10 Voluntary Sector Funding Eligibility, Application Form Funding,
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism Research within Priority.
APEC Communications & Public Affairs 15 th ATCWG Meeting 3 March 2011 APEC Secretariat.
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in the Pacific SIDS Auckland, New Zealand, September 2008.
1 Swiss-Slovak Cooperation Programme April SWISS-SLOVAK COOPERATION PROGRAMME  New possibilities of financial support for the 10 new member states.
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia May 2008, Manila.
IN YEAR MONITORING & BUDGET PREPARATION WORKSHOP PREPARED BY BUDGET OFFICE MAY
APEC Project Management Workshop Presented by Rongvudhi Virabutr Department of International Economic Affairs Ministry of Foreign Affairs 19 July 2010.
Copyright © 2010 APEC Secretariat. Project Management : Implementation and Monitoring Presented by (Art) Phanpob Plangprayoon.
#ICANN49 Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation (SCI) Activities Update to the GNSO Council ICANN Singapore Meeting 22 March 2014.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 2.6 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION TWO – UNDERSTANDING THE ORGANIZATION OF CODEX 2.6 How does Codex elaborate.
2015 A PPLICATION P ROCESS FOR APEC-F UNDED P ROJECTS Chen-Sheng Ho, Ph.D. Associate Research Fellow Chinese Taipei APEC Study Center Taiwan Institute.
APEC Project Circle Presented by Khemrutai Khemmarat Department of International Economic Affairs Ministry of Foreign Affairs 15 December 2010.
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
APEC Secretariat Presented by Luis Enrique Vertiz © 2011 APEC Secretariat Report to EWG 42 Kaohsiung.
Budgetary Review and Recommendation Report Template Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Police Mkhethwa Mkhize 12 October 2010.
Compliance by Committees with the timeframes provided by the Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act No 9 of 2009 Prepared by Committee.
APEC Secretariat Presented by Penelope Howarth, Program Director, APEC Secretariat EWG49 - June 2015, Gyeongju, Korea Copyright © 2015 APEC Secretariat.
© Commonwealth of Australia 2003 The Quality Assessment Framework.
EuropeAid How to benefit from EC grants? ‘Calls for Proposals’ Thematic Operations EuropeAid Cooperation Office.
EuropeAid How can an NGO benefit from EC grants? ‘Calls for Proposals’ Thematic Operations EuropeAid Cooperation Office Athens, 25 September 2008.
APEC Secretariat Presented by Luis Enrique Vertiz © 2012 APEC Secretariat Report to EWG 43 Kuala Lumpur.
APEC Project Management Workshop Presented by Rutchanee Uerpairojkit Department of International Economic Affairs Ministry of Foreign Affairs 21 June.
Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.
Project Application 6 th edition Guidebook on APEC Projects Wednesday 15 February 2006.
Copyright © 2010 APEC Secretariat. PROJECT GUIDEBOOK & MULTI YEAR PROJECTS Presented by: NADIRA MAILEWA Director (Program) Project Management Unit (PMU)
ENHANCING OUR UNDERSTANDING OF APEC CONCEPT NOTE & PROPOSAL FORMS Chen-Sheng Ho, Ph.D. Associate Research Fellow Chinese Taipei APEC Study Center TIER.
Copyright © 2010 APEC Secretariat. Report to EWG 47 Kunming, China Jonghan Park Program Director 21 May 2014.
November 2013 Shobu Nagatani Agency for Natural Resources and Energy METI, Japan Progress of the APEC LCMT Project Phase 4 6 th APEC LOW CARBON MODEL TOWN.
Report to EWG38 Bali, Indonesia APEC Secretariat Presented by Luis Enrique Vertiz © 2009 APEC Secretariat.
APPLICATION PROCESS FOR APEC-FUNDED PROJECTS Chen-Sheng Ho, Ph.D. Associate Research Fellow Chinese Taipei APEC Study Center Taiwan Institute of Economic.
Copyright © 2010 APEC Secretariat. Report to EWG 48 Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea Jonghan Park Program Director 19 November 2014.
49 th EWG Meeting, Gyeongju, Korea June 22-26, 2015.
Regional Development Australia Fund Information for community stakeholders Autumn 2011.
Copyright © 2010 APEC Secretariat APEC Seminar Institute of Diplomacy and International Affairs Taipei, January 10-11, 2013 Prepared by Steve Chen,
1 First Nations Economic Development Readiness Questionnaire Presented By: Ontario First Nations Economic Developers Association and Ministry Of Economic.
Information by the Managing Authority on evaluations of EU funds in 2009 Monitoring Committee meeting 25 March 2009.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process RC Chair identifies 3 RC members to review Pre-Proposal & information is sent for review (within 2 weeks.
EuropeAid/152087/DD/ACT/LB Cultural activities 2016 Information Session 13 th June 2016.
Copyright © 2012 APEC Secretariat. Presented by: Andrew LLOYD, Program Director PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT (PMU) APEC Secretariat APPLYING FOR APEC FUNDS:
NATA Foundation Research Awards Process Announcements sent out (August & September) to NATA membership regarding nominations being solicited for the following.
Monitoring Forest Resources for SFM in the UNECE Region
Overview of APEC project procedures
Annex III to BS/SC/PDF/A(2003)1
Overview of APEC project procedures
Guideline for Implementing Training Programme
How to make a preparatory project application Maxi Nachtigall “How to Apply” seminar 4th February Sundsvall, Sweden European Union European Regional.
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Key APEC Developments of Relevance to EWG
Twelfth Policy Board meeting Lima, Peru 8-9 July 2014
APEC Projects: Training EWG53 margins, Singapore, 25 April 2017
General Grants Program Process
APEC Secretariat Update
Opening seminar of the project
EGNRET 27 Zhuhai, China 9-11 October 2006 Cary Bloyd
Process Reforms for Session 1, 2018
Dr. Katja Šnuderl, Contract manager
Preliminary methodology for the assessment of Member States’ reporting on Programme of Measures (Article 16) WG DIKE Sarine Barsoumian (12/10/2015, Brussels)
GEF Project Cycle Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points
EGNRET 28 Kawasaki, Japan January 29-30, 2006 Cary Bloyd
APEC Project Management
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
APEC Project Cycle Overview
Presentation transcript:

APEC Project Management: Concept Note Development to The Full Project Proposal Presented by Khemrutai Khemmarat Department of International Economic Affairs Ministry of Foreign Affairs 19 July 2010

APEC Project Circle Stage 1 Concept Note development and submission (STEP 1 - 4) Stage 2 Priority assessment of Concept Notes (STEP 5 - 9) Stage 3 Full proposal development (STEP ) Stage 4 Project implementation (STEP )Stage 5 Project Completion (STEP 16)

Stage 1 Concept Note development and submission STEP 1 Project Proponent (PP) reviews Guidebook and prepares Concept Note STEP 2 PP submits Concept Note to fora for comments and to secure co-sponsers. STEP 3 Originating Fora prioritizes endorsed Concept Notes STEP 4 PP submits endorsed and fora ranked concept note to APEC secretariat by submission deadline

STEP 1 What you need : –Concept Note Template ( เอกสารประกอบ 7) –APEC-wide Funding Criteria ( เอกสารประกอบ 5) –Guidebook on APEC Projects 7 th Ed. (under revision) Concept Note: –Objective: What does the project seek to achieve? –Relevance: How does the project meet the priorities of your forum and APEC as a whole? And Why should APEC undertake this project? –Methodology: How do you plan to implement the project?

STEP 1 Be concise and to the point ! No more than 3 A4 pages including the title page.

STEP 2 Factors to be considered: –APEC-wide Funding Criteria –Leaders/Ministerial/SOM directives –potential contribution to the forum’s work plan, APEC’s and the relevant Committee’s priorities –APEC value add and value for money : PP must find a sponsor (usually their own economy) and at least 2 co ‑ sponsors to support the project. Check with the forum’s PD!

STEP 3 To be eligible for APEC funding, PP must secure endorsement of their forum for their concept note. Fora rank all Concept Notes using the APEC-wide Funding Criteria. Example: –EWG 1, EWG 2, EWG 3. EWG 4 –SMEWG 1, SMEWG 2 –etc.

STEP 4 The endorsed and ranked concept notes, along with the fora’s endorsement justification, must be submitted to the APEC Secretariat by the advertised submission deadline. SessionSubmission deadline Session 1/2010Mon 1 February Session 2/2010Wed 9 June Session 3/2010Thursday 23 September

Stage 2 Priority assessment of Concept Notes STEP 5 Committees (CTI, EC, SCE) and SFOM categorise concept notes into broad band ranks and prioritise within these ranks. STEP 6 Secretariat combines Committee and SFOM rankings by (sub)fund. STEP 7 Secretariat calculates an APEC-wide ranking based on input from Committees (or Principle Decision-Makers where necessary). STEP 8 BMC approves concepts notes in- principle, subject to the full project proposal reaching ‘satisfactory’ quality. STEP 9 Secretariat informs PPs of results.

STEP 5 (Timeframe: 1 week) APEC Secretariat sorts the concept notes by APEC Committee (CTI, SCE, EC) and SFOM CommitteeNo. of Concept Note for session 2/2010 CTI23 SCE48 EC2 SFOM3 Total76

STEP 5 (Timeframe: 1 week) Committee members individually send their ranks, prioritization and justifications to the Secretariat. Funding Criteria Rank (1-4) Order of Priority within Rank EWG EWG EWG EWG SMEWG SMEWG 211-3

STEP 6 (Timeframe: 1 -2 days +) a two-step process: –consensus on the broad band rank is determined by majority –the priority within each broad band rank is determined by averaging member votes. APEC Secretariat then sorts the concept notes by fund. If there are more concept notes than can be funded within a particular broad band rank, the Secretariat will refer the relevant rankings of to each economy’s Principal Decision-Maker (PDM) for further prioritisation (Timeframe: 1 week)

STEP 6 (Timeframe: 1 -2 days +) Fund sourceAmount available this session (US$) Amount Requested (US$) Number of Proposals OA869,9081,966,66022 TILF1,232,3931,912,90121 ASF General715,7561,977,86119 ASF Human Security Sub-Fund458,483633,1676 ASF Avian Influenza Sub-Fund1,104,449258,2382 ASF TFAP II Sub-Fund87,518-- ASF Technology Sub-Fund68,543149,6741 ASF Energy Efficiency Sub-Fund842,203487,6805 TOTAL5,379,2527,386,18176

STEP 7 (Timeframe: 1 -2 days) Votes of individual Committee members (and PDMs where necessary) are combined.

STEP 8 (Timeframe: 3 days) The Secretariat advises the BMC on which concept notes can be funded, based on the priority assessment and the amount available in each (sub)fund. The BMC provides in-principle funding approval for concept notes, subject to the full project proposals receiving a ‘satisfactory’ quality assessment.

STEP 9 (Timeframe: 3 days) Successful PPs are invited to work with the Secretariat and Project Management Officer to submit full project proposals. Unsuccessful PPs can resubmit their concept note in the next funding round. All re-submitted concept notes will be treated as new submissions.

Stage 3 Full proposal development STEP 10 PP develops a full project proposal. STEP 11 PP submits full project proposal to the originating fora for quality assessment and endorsement. STEP 12 PP submits full project proposal and combined QAF to the Secretariat for quality assessment and funding recommendation. STEP 13 BMC (or SOM if appropriate) approves/rejects full project proposals for funding.

STEP 10 APEC Project Proposal Template ( เอกสารประกอบ ) Proposals must be succinct, to the point and address the assessment criteria. No more than 10 A4 pages.

“ REEIS “ REISS RelevanceEffectivenessEfficiencyImpactSustainability

“ REEIS “ Relevance: Whether a project is needed to achieving the APEC priorities and objectives of the target group, the recipient member economies and APEC as a whole. Effectiveness: HOW a project will take place, the likelihood that a project will meet its objectives Efficiency: HOW a project will take place, particularly measuring of the outputs (services, goods) in relation to the inputs (cost of resources) = cost-efficient Impact: WHAT the project seeks to change Sustainability: whether the benefits of a project are likely to continue after the project has finished

STEP 11 PP must secure endorsement of their forum for their full project proposal to be eligible for APEC funding. Tool : the Quality Assessment Framework (QAF) ( เอกสารประกอบ 17) A proposing economy cannot provide a QAF assessment for its own proposal. But, Co- sponsoring economies can!

STEP 12 The Project Management Unit (PMU) will draw upon the QAF comments and uses REEIS to assess proposals. Proposals must be assessed as ‘satisfactory’ against REEIS to be recommended for funding. APEC Secretariat provides a recommendation to BMC for their approval.

STEP 13 The BMC approves full project proposals requiring APEC funding up to and including USD200,000. The BMC recommends projects requiring more than USD200,000 of APEC funding to SOM for approval. The Secretariat will notify the PP of the outcome of the BMC’s considerations.

THANK YOU