PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 ETISEO Project Ground Truth & Video annotation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INRETS, Villeneuve dAscq, December 15 th -16 th 2005 Project Overview Video Understanding Evaluation David CHER R&D department R&D department SILOGIC S.A.,
Advertisements

Université du Québec École de technologie supérieure Face Recognition in Video Using What- and-Where Fusion Neural Network Mamoudou Barry and Eric Granger.
ETISEO Project Corpus data - Video sequences contents - Silogic provider.
Learning Trajectory Patterns by Clustering: Comparative Evaluation Group D.
ETISEO, Nice, May PETS International Workshops on Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance James Ferryman Computational Vision Group.
ViSEvAl ViSualisation and EvAluation
ETISEO Benoît GEORIS and François BREMOND ORION Team, INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France Lille, December th 2005.
INRETS, Villeneuve d’Ascq, December 15 th -16 th 2005 ETISEO Annotation rules Data structure Annotation tool and format Ground truth creation rules Reference.
EVENTS: INRIA Work Review Nov 18 th, Madrid.
Adviser : Ming-Yuan Shieh Student ID : M Student : Chung-Chieh Lien VIDEO OBJECT SEGMENTATION AND ITS SALIENT MOTION DETECTION USING ADAPTIVE BACKGROUND.
Characteristics of on-line formation courses. Criteria for their pedagogical evaluation Catalina Martínez Mediano, Department of Research Methods and Diagnosis.
Learning Semantic Scene Models From Observing Activity in Visual Surveillance Dimitios Makris and Tim Ellis (2005) Presented by Steven Wilson.
Supervised by Prof. LYU, Rung Tsong Michael Department of Computer Science & Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong Prepared by: Chan Pik Wah,
Multiple Human Objects Tracking in Crowded Scenes Yao-Te Tsai, Huang-Chia Shih, and Chung-Lin Huang Dept. of EE, NTHU International Conference on Pattern.
Vigilant Real-time storage and intelligent retrieval of visual surveillance data Dr Graeme A. Jones.
Background Subtraction for Urban Traffic Monitoring using Webcams Master Graduation Project Final Presentation Supervisor: Rein van den Boomgaard Mark.
Trinity College Dublin PixelGT: A new Ground Truth specification for video surveillance Dr. Kenneth Dawson-Howe, Graphics, Vision and Visualisation Group.
Jacinto C. Nascimento, Member, IEEE, and Jorge S. Marques
1 Video Surveillance systems for Traffic Monitoring Simeon Indupalli.
INRIA, NICE, December 7 th -8 th 2006 Data Set and Ground Truth.
BMVA CANTATA – INRIA, December 12, 2007 page 1 JL-1 Content Aware Networked systems Towards Advanced and Tailored Assistance BMVA 2007 December 12, 2007.
Object detection, tracking and event recognition: the ETISEO experience Andrea Cavallaro Multimedia and Vision Lab Queen Mary, University of London
INRIA, Nice. December 7 th -8 th 2006 Evaluation protocol Evaluation process.
Video Event Recognition Algorithm Assessment Evaluation Workshop VERAAE ETISEO – NICE, May Dr. Sadiye Guler Sadiye Guler - Northrop Grumman.
Dynamic 3D Scene Analysis from a Moving Vehicle Young Ki Baik (CV Lab.) (Wed)
ViPER Video Performance Evaluation Resource University of Maryland.
Modeling and simulation of systems Model building Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
FLAVIUS Description of Overblog, Qype, TVTrip - WP5 Evaluation and dissemination.
ETISEO Benoît GEORIS, François BREMOND and Monique THONNAT ORION Team, INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France Nice, May th 2005.
1 ETISEO: Video Understanding Performance Evaluation Francois BREMOND, A.T. Nghiem, M. Thonnat, V. Valentin, R. Ma Orion project-team, INRIA Sophia Antipolis,
ETISEO Evaluation Nice, May th 2005 Evaluation Cycles.
Leader subcommittee meeting- 26/11/ THE CONTACT POINT OF THE EUROPEAN NETWORK FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT Main tasks of the Contact Point in relation to.
Benchmarking ontology-based annotation tools for the Semantic Web Diana Maynard University of Sheffield, UK.
Vehicle Segmentation and Tracking From a Low-Angle Off-Axis Camera Neeraj K. Kanhere Committee members Dr. Stanley Birchfield Dr. Robert Schalkoff Dr.
Communication Systems Group Technische Universität Berlin S. Knorr A Geometric Segmentation Approach for the 3D Reconstruction of Dynamic Scenes in 2D.
Tracking and event recognition – the Etiseo experience Son Tran, Nagia Ghanem, David Harwood and Larry Davis UMIACS, University of Maryland.
AVITRACK Project FP INRIA WP1 - Apron Activity Model WP3 - Scene Tracking WP4 - Scene Understanding Brussels, January 17th 2006.
ETISEO Benoît GEORIS and François BREMOND ORION Team, INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France Lille, December th 2005.
ETISEO Project Evaluation for video understanding Nice, May th 2005 Evaluation du Traitement et de l’Interprétation de Séquences vidEO.
INRIA, NICE, December 7 th -8 th 2006 Etiseo Tools.
Recent Advances in ViPER David Mihalcik David Doermann Charles Lin.
INRETS, Villeneuve d’Ascq, December 15 th -16 th 2005 ETISEO Project Evaluation process.
ViPER Video Performance Evaluation Toolkit viper-toolkit.sf.net.
1 SAFNWC/MSG User Survey Results & WORKSHOP DISCUSSION AND OUTPUT 18 th October 2005 Madrid Marcelino Manso Rejón Instituto Nacional de Meteorología.
Suspicious Behavior in Outdoor Video Analysis - Challenges & Complexities Air Force Institute of Technology/ROME Air Force Research Lab Unclassified IED.
Data Mining for Surveillance Applications Suspicious Event Detection Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham.
Target Tracking In a Scene By Saurabh Mahajan Supervisor Dr. R. Srivastava B.E. Project.
ETISEO François BREMOND ORION Team, INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France.
SciencePAD Open Software for Open Science Alberto Di Meglio – CERN.
PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 ETISEO Project Video Providers Corpus Data Video contents.
Multi-view Synchronization of Human Actions and Dynamic Scenes Emilie Dexter, Patrick Pérez, Ivan Laptev INRIA Rennes - Bretagne Atlantique
V-Shaped Software Development Life Cycle Model. Introduction: Variation of water fall model. Same sequence structure as water fall model. Strong emphasis.
BUDGET 4Distribution of budget per phases of the project; 4Itemization of budget; 4Division of budget per source of contribution; 4Division of budget between:
FISCO2 – Financial and Scientific Coordination Work Package dedicated to ENSAR2 management WP leader: Ketel Turzó WP deputy: Sandrine Dubromel ENSAR2 Management.
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. A scalable platform for learning and evaluating a real-time vehicle detection system.
Video object segmentation and its salient motion detection using adaptive background generation Kim, T.K.; Im, J.H.; Paik, J.K.;  Electronics Letters 
REAL-TIME DETECTOR FOR UNUSUAL BEHAVIOR
Learning Patterns of Activity
Real-Time Soft Shadows with Adaptive Light Source Sampling
Guillaume-Alexandre Bilodeau
Tasks processing Strong participation . Large results comparison on
Scene Understanding Francois BREMOND
Vehicle Segmentation and Tracking in the Presence of Occlusions
MPR Intersection Experiment
SILOGIC S.A. , Toulouse, France
Progress Report Meng-Ting Zhong 2015/9/10.
Evaluation of UMD Object Tracking in Video
Airport Parking Space Navigation
REU Program 2019 Week 6 Alex Ruiz Jyoti Kini.
Presentation transcript:

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 ETISEO Project Ground Truth & Video annotation

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 ETISEO - GT For each video sequence, the evaluator will generate the corresponding GT: - Using the Viper-GT Annotation tool ( U Maryland ). Video sequences are characterized considering: - day time : day, sunrise, nightfall, night - day time : day, sunrise, nightfall, night - Weather conditions: sun, cloud, rain, fog, snow - Illumination variations: none, slow or fast - Shadows: no shadows, weak shadow or contrasted - … Enabling a graduation of difficulties from easy to hard.

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 Ground Truth Physical object annotations include: - Bounding Box - Type of the object: Person, Vehicle, Group, … - Sub-Type : as Car, Truck or Loader for vehicle … - States: Static, occluded … Event annotations include: - Event type ( Ontology ) - Starting time (frame), - Ending time (frame),

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 Contextual Information Camera calibration : - Set of 2D and 3D points - Calibration matrix (with or without distorsion) Contextual information associated to videos: - 3D empty scene model Minimum information : few 3D distances drawn on the image Maximum information: 3D scene model made available

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 ETISEO Project Tasks&Metrics

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 Tasks evaluated GT & Metrics are designed to evaluate tasks all along the video processing chain: Task 1: Detection of physical objects, Task 2: Localisation of physical objects, Task 3: Classification of physical objects, Task 4: Tracking of physical objects, Task 5: Event recognition.

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 ETISEO Metrics A variety of metrics is proposed for a detailed analysis of the algorithms : - Based on quantitative evaluations, - Based on quantitative evaluations, - Applied on large diversity of sequences. - Applied on large diversity of sequences. Working documents are on : - metrics definition, - Video annotation rules.

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 ETISEO Criteria - Number of correctly detected objects in each frame, - Precision of 2D localisation (centroid, bounding box) - Objects fragmentation (splitting & merging), -Tracking persistence with partial occlusion (static or dynamic), - Objects’ ID persistent across the video, - Object classification & Object recognition, - Number of recognised events in the video sequences, - Correct scenario recognition on time (starting & ending time) - Precision 3D trajectories. Following criteria are applied to qualify algorithms:

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 Partners Results Partners must submitted their results : - in suitable time, - with XML compatible format. Participants answer questionnaire associated to algorithms results (time processing, learning phase, parameters data set, mask, calibration…). The Evaluator provides necessary utilities in order to allow participants to exploit existing software being compatible with GT.

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 ETISEO Project EvaluationCycles Procedures&Rules

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 Basic evaluation process - Participant registration, - Ask for corpus data trough ETISEO web-site formulary, - Acceptance of limited usage of the videos. - Receive video corpus, - Process tests on its own, - Send back results to the evaluator. - The evaluator computes the comparison with GT, - Send metric values to the participant.

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th Phases - Definition & Preparation, 2005: - Metrics definition, tools creation - video sequences recording - Test cycle for validation, 1st semester 2006: Realisation of an entire evaluation cycle with participants on the test data set. - ETISEO evaluation cycle, 2rd semester 2006: Final ETISEO evaluation cycle.

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th Seminars - 1st seminar : may 2005, Nice, France : - Definition process & ressources generation. - 2rd seminar : INRETS, Dember, Villeneuve d’Asc,France Villeneuve d’Asc,France - resources distribution, - starting test cycle with participants. - 3rd seminar : INRIA, end of 2006 Sophia-Antipolis, France - evaluation results communication, - new knowlegde analysis, - End of ETISEO project ….

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 ETISEO – 2006 steps 2 Evaluation Cycles 2 Seminaries

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 ETISEO Project Results&Dissemination

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 Participants Results - Results are transmitted by the evaluator : - to each participant, - to INRIA, the scientific leader - During the project results are not diffused by the evaluator. - Results publication will be realised with participant’s agreement.

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 ETISEO Dissemination - New knowledge on the evaluation processing, pertinence of the video dataset, the annotation and of the metrics will be discuss. - The assembly of the results will be presented during the last ETISEO seminar (end 2006). - ETISEO Ressources & tools will be diffused contributing to evaluation good practices diffusion.

PETS’05, Beijing, October 16 th 2005 Project coordinator Mr. David CHER silogic.fr Phone : + 33 (0) Scientific leader Mr. François BREMOND www-sop.inria.fr /orion sophia.inria.fr Phone : + 33 (0) Phone : + 33 (0)