Sifting Through the Layers: The Application of Forensic Databases to Tape and Paint Analyses Andria L. Hobbs, M.S. FBI Laboratory, Chemistry Unit, Quantico,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paint ToolMarks Tool Marks. Tool Marks A scratch or other microscopic marking left by the action of a tool on an object Evidentiary value: no two tool.
Advertisements

Forensic Paint Analysis
Chapter 3 Physical Evidence Part II Naturally shed hairs, such as a head hair dislodged through combing, display undamaged, club-shaped roots Forcibly.
Paints and Coatings. The Case of the Careening Motorcycle n A motorcyclist is charged with drunk driving (motorcycling?) and with damaging a police car.
Case management issues – from crime scene to courtroom A perspective from the FBI Laboratory Cary T. Oien Chief, Trace Evidence Unit FBI Laboratory.
Trace Evidence: Paint Criminalistics.
Physical Evidence The examination of physical evidence by a forensic scientist is generally undertaken for the purposes of identification or comparison.
Chapter 3 Physical Evidence.
Miss Stanley Middle School Science Club Forensic Division
Chapter 3: Physical Evidence. Introduction It would be impossible to list all the objects that could conceivably be of importance to a crime. Almost anything.
11-1 PRENTICE HALL ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ FORENSIC SCIENCE An Introduction By Richard Saferstein Trace Evidence ll:
Admissibility Package for Tape all Wrapped Up M ark A. Ahonen.
Forensic Chemistry/Trace Evidence
8.4 Notes Examination of Paint.
Wednesday March 4, 2015 SWBAT discuss how glass is used in criminal in order to prepare for paint. Drill: Explain how we use density to solve measuring.
Forensic Databases Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS) Fingerprint and criminal history system for 50 million subjects Operational.
Tues 9/24/13 Bellringer: ◦ Take out your notes and respond to the following:  Would sap taken from a tree be class evidence or individual evidence? Why?
Chapter Physical Evidence. OBJECTIVES (don’t write) Review the common types of physical evidence encountered at crime scenes, Explain the difference.
Hair and Fibers.
8.3 Notes Fibers. Objectives Understand the differences between natural and manufactured fibers List the properties of fibers that are more useful for.
+ Soil. + Soil Questions (1) What is soil? (2) What are the physical characteristics of soil? (3) What is the chemical composition of soil? (4) How do.
3-1 PRENTICE HALL ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ FORENSIC SCIENCE An Introduction By Richard Saferstein PHYSICAL EVIDENCE Chapter.
3-1 PRENTICE HALL ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ FORENSIC SCIENCE An Introduction By Richard Saferstein PHYSICAL EVIDENCE Chapter.
Physical Evidence Chapter 3. Types of Physical Evidence Blood, semen, saliva Document Drugs Explosives Fibers Fingerprints Firearms and ammunitions Glass.
3 - PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ CRIMINALISTICS An Introduction to Forensic Science, 9/E By Richard Saferstein.
Forensic Paint Analysis
  Any disintegrated surface material, natural or artificial that lies on or near the Earth’s surface.  Natural= rocks, minerals, vegetation, animal.
DECEMBER 5, 2012 EQ: How can synthetic fibers be used to solve crimes? WARM-UP: The following slide will have 9 pictures (A-I). Identify the animal hair.
National Trace Evidence Materials Database SWGMAT Oversight Edward G. Bartick Suffolk University Boston, MA.
Warm Up: If this car were in a hit and run accident and left the scene, what sort of evidence might you analyze from it?
Fiber Evidence - A fiber is the smallest unit of a textile material that has a length many times greater than its diameter. -A fiber can be spun with other.
CRIME SCENE. Defining a Crime Scene The only thing consistent about crime scenes is their inconsistency.
Forensic Analysis of Fibers. Types of Fibers Natural – fibers that come from plants or animals Man-made – fibers that come from natural or synthetic polymers.
8 th Grade Forensic Science Presentation developed by T. Trimpe 2006
Physical evidence Trace evidence. Small or microscopic materials that can be transferred upon contact – Hair, fiber, paint, glass, plastic, soil and pollen.
Fibers.
 Examinations can associate a hair to a person on the basis of microscopic characteristics in the hair.  The characteristics in the hair, but cannot.
Chapter 6: Fibers “Wherever he steps, whatever he touches, whatever he leaves even unconsciously, will serve as silent witness against him. Not only his.
Paint Trace Evidence K. Culbertson. Paint Physical evidence One of the most prevalent types of evidence to be analyzed Hit-and-run cases – Color, make,
Let the evidence speak for itself.
Trace Evidence Paint. Introduction Manufactured products and even most natural materials contain small quantities of elements, or trace elements, in total.
Fiber and Threads How are fibers found at a scene helpful? Why would fibers be less than helpful when found at a scene?
Fiber Examinations. Fibers are all around us Textile/Fiber Evidence Clothing Clothing Home Furnishings Home Furnishings Any Textile Product Any Textile.
Trace Evidence. Summary  Microscopic Analysis  Types of Trace Evidence  Glass  Hair (fur)  Fibers  Paint  Soil  Gunshot Residue.
Friday September 16 th, 2016 Announcements  Chapter 4 Hair Review DUE TODAY  Possible Exam 2 Day…..Monday 9/26 Agenda  Chapter 4 Part 2: Fibers “In.
Forensic Examination of Paint
Chapter 3 PHYSICAL EVIDENCE.
Trace evidence ii: metals, paint, and soil
Hairs & Fibers Forensic Science
All rights Reserved Cengage/NGL/South-Western © 2016.
Forensic Science Ms. MacCormack Spring 2017
Using Soil to Solve Crimes
Paint Ch11 Trace Evidence.
(Discussion – Evidence: Testimonial vs. Physical)
Forensic Definition of Soil
Andria L. Hobbs, M.S. FBI Laboratory, Chemistry Unit, Quantico, VA
Forensic Soil Analysis
DECEMBER 4, 2012 EQ: How can synthetic fibers be used to solve crimes?
Coating Failure at a Gas Compressor Facility
Forensic Characteristics of Soil
Examination of Paint Examine two paint samples to determine same origin Generally used in burglaries, hit-and-run accidents or vehicle accidents.
Trace Evidence Fibers.
Trace Evidence ll: Metals, Paint, and Soil
Forensic Paint Analysis
Chapter 11 Trace Evidence II
Physical Evidence.
Presentation transcript:

Sifting Through the Layers: The Application of Forensic Databases to Tape and Paint Analyses Andria L. Hobbs, M.S. FBI Laboratory, Chemistry Unit, Quantico, VA

Use of Databases The Paints and Polymers Sub-Unit of the FBI Laboratory has multiple databases and sample collections to use to provide investigative leads to investigators. The Paints and Polymers Sub-Unit of the FBI Laboratory has multiple databases and sample collections to use to provide investigative leads to investigators. Duct Tape Collection archived in SLICE Duct Tape Collection archived in SLICE Paint Data Query for automotive paints Paint Data Query for automotive paints

Duct Tape Case Homicide, in which the victim had been wrapped in trash bags and duct tape Homicide, in which the victim had been wrapped in trash bags and duct tape Request: Attempt to determine the manufacturer of the tape Request: Attempt to determine the manufacturer of the tape

Analytical Scheme Visual and Micro- scopic Examinations Physical Characteristics: Backing and Adhesive Color Backing Appearance Backing Layer Structure Width Thickness Scrim Count Fabric Weave Yarn Construction Yarn Composition

Analytical Scheme Visual and Micro- scopic Examinations FTIRSEM/EDSXRD Crystalline Information: Intact Tape Specimen, Occasionally Backing Alone Adhesive Chemistry by μ -FTIR: Organic and some inorganic information Backing Chemistry and Layer Structure by ATR Elemental Profiles of Adhesives and Backings SLICE Searches

Duct Tape Collection 80+ tapes (now expanded to ~400) 80+ tapes (now expanded to ~400) Acquired by FBI personnel Acquired by FBI personnel Purchased at common retail stores or obtained from manufacturing plant visits Purchased at common retail stores or obtained from manufacturing plant visits Most marketed as general- purpose or economy-grade Most marketed as general- purpose or economy-grade Variety of manufacturers Variety of manufacturers

SLICE Background Spectral Library Identification and Classification Explorer (SLICE) Spectral Library Identification and Classification Explorer (SLICE) Archival program for storing EDS data with data entry capabilities Archival program for storing EDS data with data entry capabilities Conventional format modified to allow for inclusion of specific characteristics of tape Conventional format modified to allow for inclusion of specific characteristics of tape Collaboration between FBI, FDLE, and MSHP Collaboration between FBI, FDLE, and MSHP

Duct Tape Case Full protocol completed Full protocol completed Relatively unique physical characteristics Relatively unique physical characteristics Multi-layered backing Multi-layered backing Textured yarns in both the warp and fill directions Textured yarns in both the warp and fill directions Relatively common chemical composition Relatively common chemical composition

Duct Tape Case Two candidates eliminated based on backing layer structure Two candidates eliminated based on backing layer structure Final candidate could not be eliminated following comparison of data from any technique Final candidate could not be eliminated following comparison of data from any technique

Duct Tape Case 3M Scotch ® Home and Shop 3M Scotch ® Home and Shop Also known as 3M TM duct tape 3900 Also known as 3M TM duct tape 3900 General purpose tape manufactured by 3M in London, Ontario, Canada General purpose tape manufactured by 3M in London, Ontario, Canada Unable to determine the distributor of a tape specimen Unable to determine the distributor of a tape specimen

Automotive Paint Case Hit-and-run Hit-and-run Victim was struck and killed by an unknown vehicle while lying on the road Victim was struck and killed by an unknown vehicle while lying on the road Request: Examine the victim’s clothing and vehicle parts left at the scene to provide any possible vehicle information Request: Examine the victim’s clothing and vehicle parts left at the scene to provide any possible vehicle information

Automotive Paint Case Three paint systems encountered Three paint systems encountered A. White non-metallic paint chips found in victim’s clothing B. Light-colored metallic paint chips found in victim’s clothing C. Silver metallic painted plastic parts left at the scene

Paint System A Following microscopic, FTIR, and SEM/EDS analyses, performed spectral searches on the OU1 and OU2 layers. Following microscopic, FTIR, and SEM/EDS analyses, performed spectral searches on the OU1 and OU2 layers. Four candidates following comparisons of OT2, OU1, and OU2 layers. All were General Motors vehicles from the Flint, Michigan, plant from Four candidates following comparisons of OT2, OU1, and OU2 layers. All were General Motors vehicles from the Flint, Michigan, plant from

Paint System B Following microscopic, FTIR, and SEM/EDS analyses, performed spectral searches on the OT2, OU1, and OU2 layers. Following microscopic, FTIR, and SEM/EDS analyses, performed spectral searches on the OT2, OU1, and OU2 layers. Reasonable hits following comparison of all layers included four samples from GEN LRD 2000 and one each from GEN LRD 2002, GEN OSH 2001, GEN OSH 2005, and GEN WEN Reasonable hits following comparison of all layers included four samples from GEN LRD 2000 and one each from GEN LRD 2002, GEN OSH 2001, GEN OSH 2005, and GEN WEN 2000.

Paint System C Following microscopic, FTIR, and SEM/EDS analyses, performed spectral searches on the OT2 layer. Following microscopic, FTIR, and SEM/EDS analyses, performed spectral searches on the OT2 layer. Make/model/year searches were unsuccessful. Make/model/year searches were unsuccessful.

Automotive Paint Case Since paint from at least two different vehicles was found, the contributor was contacted for more information. Since paint from at least two different vehicles was found, the contributor was contacted for more information. The victim’s vehicle had rolled over him prior to the hit-and-run incident. The victim’s vehicle had rolled over him prior to the hit-and-run incident. The victim was driving a white 1994 GM van manufactured in Flint, Michigan. The victim was driving a white 1994 GM van manufactured in Flint, Michigan. Therefore, no subsequent exams conducted on Paint System A. However, this provides an example of a successful PDQ search.

Paint System B Pulled out samples of 8 PDQ hits (5 different plant/year combinations). Pulled out samples of 8 PDQ hits (5 different plant/year combinations). Microscopic comparisons eliminated 2 plants/years, leaving GEN OSH 2005, GEN LRD 2000, and GEN LRD Microscopic comparisons eliminated 2 plants/years, leaving GEN OSH 2005, GEN LRD 2000, and GEN LRD Performed FTIR and SEM/EDS analysis on remaining candidates. Performed FTIR and SEM/EDS analysis on remaining candidates.

Paint System B GEN OSH 2005 GEN OSH 2005 Slight color differences of primers relative to questioned sample Slight color differences of primers relative to questioned sample Questioned SampleGEN OSH 2005

Paint System B GEN OSH 2005 GEN OSH 2005 Slight color differences of primers relative to questioned sample Slight color differences of primers relative to questioned sample Slight peak width difference at 1550 cm -1 of OT2 layers Slight peak width difference at 1550 cm -1 of OT2 layers Elemental differences between clearcoats Elemental differences between clearcoats

Database Sample Questioned Sample

Paint System B GEN OSH 2005 GEN OSH 2005 Slight color differences of primers relative to questioned sample Slight color differences of primers relative to questioned sample Slight peak width difference at 1550 cm -1 of OT2 layers Slight peak width difference at 1550 cm -1 of OT2 layers Elemental differences between clearcoats Elemental differences between clearcoats Performed a PDQ search on other samples originating from GEN OSH but all were eliminated. Performed a PDQ search on other samples originating from GEN OSH but all were eliminated.

Paint System B GEN LRD 2000 and GEN LRD 2002 GEN LRD 2000 and GEN LRD 2002 These other two hits are from the same plant but from different model years These other two hits are from the same plant but from different model years Relative colors of the primers consistent Relative colors of the primers consistent IR spectra consistent IR spectra consistent SEM analysis thus performed SEM analysis thus performed

GEN LRD 2000 GEN LRD 2002 Questioned Sample

Paint System B GEN LRD 2000 GEN LRD 2000 A representative from LRD confirmed that MY 2000 was the last year this plant used Pb-based primers. A representative from LRD confirmed that MY 2000 was the last year this plant used Pb-based primers. Next formulation change did not occur until MY Next formulation change did not occur until MY 2006.

Paint System B GEN LRD 2002 GEN LRD 2002 This sample could not be eliminated following all exams. This sample could not be eliminated following all exams. Based on the condition of the colorcoat, an accurate color evaluation could not be conducted. Based on the condition of the colorcoat, an accurate color evaluation could not be conducted. The same LRD contact confirmed that no two-toned vehicles were produced at that plant during that time frame. The same LRD contact confirmed that no two-toned vehicles were produced at that plant during that time frame.

Paint System C Using information on colors available at GEN LRD during the MY time frame, color comparisons were conducted between the questioned sample and repaint pages. Using information on colors available at GEN LRD during the MY time frame, color comparisons were conducted between the questioned sample and repaint pages. Questioned sample consistent with GM silver metallic paint color code of Color names included Ultra Silver Metallic and Silver Effect. Questioned sample consistent with GM silver metallic paint color code of Color names included Ultra Silver Metallic and Silver Effect.

Automotive Paint Case A partial VIN was constructed from the following information: A partial VIN was constructed from the following information: General Motors vehicle manufactured at the Lordstown, Ohio plant General Motors vehicle manufactured at the Lordstown, Ohio plant Model year range of Model year range of During that time, LRD produced the Chevrolet Cavalier and Pontiac Sunfire. During that time, LRD produced the Chevrolet Cavalier and Pontiac Sunfire.

Questioned Sample UOHL = GEN LRD 2000 UVAC = GEN LRD 2002

Cross-sectioning Technique