Developing Silviculture Practices through Large-scale Studies: Some Perspective from the West-side Paul D. Anderson Land and Watershed Management Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable Development and Evolution of the Criteria and Indicators.
Advertisements

Proposed Indicators for Ecological Health & Diversity of Rangelands Rod Heitschmidt, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Miles City, MT and Linda Joyce,
Historical Creation of Early Seral Habitat: Fire, Wind, Bugs …
Marmot Creek Research Basin 50 th Anniversary Workshop March , 2013 John Diiwu Forest Management Branch Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource.
LANDSCAPE LEVEL BIODIVERSITY. Relevant FREP questions 1. Are ecosystems represented across the landscape in time and space? 2. Is there a sufficient degree.
Yakama Nation Pacific Lamprey Recovery Project Core Data And Monitoring Framework.
Silvicultural experiments exploring linkages between stand structural diversity and ecological variables in California Carl Skinner, Martin Ritchie, Eric.
PNW Strategic Plan: Developing a Blueprint for Future Direction Research for Resources.
Fuel Management Objectives within Dry Forest Landscapes on the Okanogan-Wenatchee NF Dr. Richy J. Harrod Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.
Timber Products Company Bioforestry: Measurement of forest structures within intensively managed forestlands. Stuart Farber & Geoff Kaberle Timber Products.
“The conservation objective in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley is to provide forested habitat capable of supporting sustainable populations of all forest.
Roles for Commodity Production in Sustaining Forests & Rangelands J. Keith Gilless Professor of Forest Economics UC Berkeley.
Aligning Methods for Assessing Wetland Ecosystem Services Anthony Dvarskas NOAA Assessment and Restoration Division/IMSG CNREP 2010 New Orleans, LA.
Scale & Scaling What is scale? What is scale? Why is scale important in landscape ecology? Why is scale important in landscape ecology? What are the correct.
A COMPARISON OF APPROACHES FOR VERIFYING SOUTHWEST REGIONAL GAP VERTEBRATE-HABITAT DISTRIBUTION MODELS J. Judson Wynne, Charles A. Drost and Kathryn A.
Controls on Fire in the Pacific Northwest: Climate, Fuels, and Land Management Dave Peterson & Don McKenzie Forest Service – PNW Research Station Pacific.
Effects of Climatic Variability and Change on Forest Resources Dave Peterson Forest Service – PNW Research Station Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Lab UW.
Provisions of the Spotted Owl CHU Rule: How Are We Interpreting What It Says? And How Does it Integrate with the NWFP? Bruce Hollen (BLM) and Brendan White.
An overview of a few of the methods used in landscape ecology studies.
Incorporating Ecosystem Objectives into Fisheries Management
Tom Gittings 1, George Smith 2, Mark Wilson 1, Laura French 2, Anne Oxbrough 1, Saoirse O’Donoghue 2, Josephine Pithon 1, Vicki O’Donnell 3, Anne-Marie.
Defining Responsible Forest Management FSC Forest Certification Standards Defining Responsible Forest Management Version:
What The Northwest Forest Plan says about 80+ year old trees.
A joint USDA, EPA, USGS, BLM, Univ. of Arizona, Univ. of New Mexico, and Univ. of Vermont program on the Assessment of Goods and Valuation of Ecosystem.
Bringing stand level fire risk to the landscape level: Fire risk assessment using FFE-FVS with the Landscape Management System. Kevin Ceder And James McCarter.
Using Birds to Guide Post-fire Management in the Plumas & Lassen National Forests Ryan D. Burnett, Nathaniel Seavy, and Diana Humple 4/21/2011.
Blending Science with Traditional Ecological Knowledge  Frank K. Lake  Environmental Science, Graduate Ph.D program  US Forest Service- Redwood Sciences.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Opportunities for Restoring Second Growth Ecosystems in Staney Creek: Scientific Principles.
© All rights reserved. Front Range Roundtable Project Outline: Wildlife Working Team 1 Rick & Lynne to edit by may meeting Team Scope Roundtable.
UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.
1 Cumulative Impact Management: Cumulative Impact Indicators and Thresholds Presented by: Salmo Consulting Inc. and AXYS Environmental Consulting Ltd.
Proposed Action Purpose and Need A proposal to authorize, recommend, or implement an action in response to the need identified in the Purpose and Need.
USDA Forest Service Perspective on Bonanza Creek LTER Paul D. Anderson, Program Manager Ecosystem Process and Function Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Application Landscape Ecology in Forest Management: A Glass Half Empty? Thomas Spies USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Components of Healthy Ecosystems/Ecosystem Management Wally Covington.
Ecological rationale for determining buffer width Forest Ecosystem Management and Assessment Team (FEMAT) Report.
Evaluation of sampling alternatives to quantify stand structure in riparian areas of Western Oregon forests Theresa Marquardt Oregon State University Paul.
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
EEES4760/6760 Landscape Ecology Jiquan chen Feb. 25, Fragmentation 2.Island Biogeographic Theory (IBT)
Managing Tree Species Diversity for Forest Resilience and Adaptability Andy MacKinnon - Research Ecologist -Coast Area Provincial Ecologists Nanaimo BC.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
State of the Forest: Data harmonization and management Helping us to know whether we are getting the job done.
Evaluating Fish Response to Habitat Restoration Overview of Intensively Monitored Watershed Research in the PNW Rationale for IMW approach Extent of current.
Coarse Woody Debris Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Randy G. Jensen Stephen R. Shifley Brian L. Brookshire.
Jonathan Long and Carl Skinner With Contributions from the Science Synthesis Team USDA FS Pacific Southwest Research Station SocialEcological.
Landscape Ecology: Conclusions and Future Directions.
What Can We Say About the Economic, Institutional, and Legal Framework for Sustainable Forest Management in the United States? Roundtable on Sustainable.
Breeding Bird Response to Riparian Buffer Width 10 years post-harvest Scott Pearson Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Jack Giovanini, Jay Jones,
Overstory Vegetation Overstory Vegetation 2008 MOFEP PI Meeting John Kabrick and Randy Jensen.
Establishing a Network of Intensively Monitored Watersheds in the Pacific Northwest PNAMP Effectiveness Monitoring Workgroup April 7, 2005.
Defining Landscapes Forman and Godron (1986): A
Landscape ecology methods
Southern Interior Forest Region Soils Plant Ecology Hydrology Geomorphology Silvicultural Systems Wildlife Ecology Forest Science Program Research, Consultation,
Introduction to Models Lecture 8 February 22, 2005.
Special Lecture Stand Structural Diversity
Outside Large Blocks, Inside & Outside Critical Habitat Management Hypothesis Highest timber production yields. Produces uniform stand conditions. Shorter.
Establishing Plots to Monitor Growth and Treatment Response Some do’s and don’ts A discussion.
U.S Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Designing an Integrated Monitoring Program for Coniferous Forests: beyond the forest and the trees.
4FRI Biophysical Monitoring Indicators: Assigning Metrics of Success (or Failure) 4FRI Landscape Strategy & Science and Monitoring Working Groups –
Recap from the 2005 workshop, “Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems” Silvicultural Practices Supporting Northern Spotted Owl.
Biodiversity in Functional Restoration Joan L. Walker Southern Research Station Clemson, SC.
Implementing a Dry Forest Strategy in Late-Successional Reserves: the Wenatchee Experience Bill Gaines, USFS And Jeff Krupka, USFWS.
Aquatic and Riparian Conservation Strategy
A Comparison of Riparian Vegetation Structures
Forest Planning Under the 2012 Planning Rule
Shortleaf Pine Demonstration Areas Assist Promoting Restoration
Decision support for watershed assessment, protection and restoration
Landscape ecology methods
Angela Gee, US Forest Service July 22, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Developing Silviculture Practices through Large-scale Studies: Some Perspective from the West-side Paul D. Anderson Land and Watershed Management Program Pacific Northwest Research Station

Outline Definition of LSSEs Definition of LSSEs Example findings from west-side LSSEs Example findings from west-side LSSEs Factors that contribute to a collective value Factors that contribute to a collective value Potential linkages of LSSEs to monitoring Potential linkages of LSSEs to monitoring

Silviculture in the Ecosystem Management Era Broadened ecological, social and economic objectives Broadened ecological, social and economic objectives Alternatives to clearcutting Alternatives to clearcutting Thinning for structural diversity Thinning for structural diversity Restoration management Restoration management Intensive Silviculture Intensive Silviculture

Small Plot Studies Experimental units selected for uniformity and comparability of initial conditions Experimental units selected for uniformity and comparability of initial conditions Precise implementation of treatments Precise implementation of treatments Results require scaling-up to reflect operational application Results require scaling-up to reflect operational application Subject to fall-off in scaling results to larger and more heterogeneous areas and treatments Subject to fall-off in scaling results to larger and more heterogeneous areas and treatments Cannot be used to evaluate such things as wildlife, production and visual effects Cannot be used to evaluate such things as wildlife, production and visual effects They may be relevant but commonly limited in scale of inference They may be relevant but commonly limited in scale of inference

Large-Scale Silviculture Experiments (LSSEs) Photo: USDA Forest Service, PNW Research Station Photo: Doug Maguire,

Large-scale Silviculture Experiments Silviculture experiments conducted at operational scales Silviculture experiments conducted at operational scales Randomization Randomization Replication Replication Unmanipulated references – “controls” Unmanipulated references – “controls”  Statistical rigor

Large-scale Silviculture Experiments Silviculture experiments conducted at operational scales Silviculture experiments conducted at operational scales Experimental treatment units similar in size to typical management units – generally 10 to 100 ac Experimental treatment units similar in size to typical management units – generally 10 to 100 ac Long-term – generally greater than 20 years Long-term – generally greater than 20 years Inferences directly applicable to operational management – minimize need to scale-up results Inferences directly applicable to operational management – minimize need to scale-up results

Large-scale Silviculture Experiments Joint ventures between researchers and forest managers Joint ventures between researchers and forest managers Knowledge and tool development Knowledge and tool development Demonstration Demonstration Learning experiences Learning experiences

West-side LSSEs:

Examples of What Has Been Learned We can increase stand heterogeneity through silviculture operations We can increase stand heterogeneity through silviculture operations Skips and Gaps

Examples of What Has Been Learned Green tree retention levels greater than 15% may be needed to protect residual trees, retain sensitive species, and gain public acceptance Green tree retention levels greater than 15% may be needed to protect residual trees, retain sensitive species, and gain public acceptance

Examples of What Has Been Learned Buffers on headwater streams provide amphibian habitat, mitigate upslope harvest effects on microclimate, and provide connectivity across the landscape Buffers on headwater streams provide amphibian habitat, mitigate upslope harvest effects on microclimate, and provide connectivity across the landscape

Examples of What Has Been Learned Legacy retention and recruitment of down wood in managed stands benefit ground dwelling organisms Legacy retention and recruitment of down wood in managed stands benefit ground dwelling organisms

Factors Contributing to Collective Value

Overarching conceptual framework on which to align multidisciplinary studies Increasing structural heterogeneity in young, relatively uniform Douglas-fir forests will lead to increased biotic diversity and therefore greater ecological integrity Increasing structural heterogeneity in young, relatively uniform Douglas-fir forests will lead to increased biotic diversity and therefore greater ecological integrity These young forests can be actively managed to achieve some joint distribution of ecological, social and economic benefits These young forests can be actively managed to achieve some joint distribution of ecological, social and economic benefits

Factors Contributing to Collective Value Generally strong experimental design Replication Replication Randomization Randomization Untreated references – “Controls” Untreated references – “Controls”

Factors Contributing to Collective Value Common currency response variables Common currency response variables

Factors Contributing to Collective Value Common currency response variables Common currency response variables

Factors Contributing to Collective Value Broad range of experimental treatments Broad range of experimental treatments

Factors Contributing to Collective Value Broad composite geographic distribution Broad composite geographic distribution

Realizing the Collective Value of LSSEs: Information Synthesis Information Synthesis Analytical compilation of published findings Analytical compilation of published findings Meta-analysis of published findings Meta-analysis of published findings Joint analysis of primary data Joint analysis of primary data Bayesian belief networks Bayesian belief networks

Example Synthesis: Vegetation Response to Thinning Wilson, Anderson, Puettmann (In Press)

Example Synthesis: Vegetation Response to Thinning Wilson, Anderson, Puettmann (In Press)

Can Research Studies Contribute to Monitoring? NFMA Requirements… 36.CFR (k)(1): Quantitative comparison of planned, versus actual, outputs and services 36.CFR (k)(2): Documentation of the effectiveness of measures and prescriptions 36.CFR (k)(4): Identifying what should be measured, the frequency of measurement, the precision of measurements, and the time frame for reporting results 36.CFR (a)(6): Determine population trends of management indicator species in terms of habitat changes. 36.CFR (a): Identifying research needs

Research Studies and Monitoring NFMA Requirements… 36.CFR (k)(1): Quantitative comparison of planned, versus actual, outputs and services Documentation of the effectiveness of measures and prescriptions 36.CFR (k)(2): Documentation of the effectiveness of measures and prescriptions Identifying what should be measured, the frequency of measurement, the precision of measurements 36.CFR (k)(4): Identifying what should be measured, the frequency of measurement, the precision of measurements, and the time frame for reporting results 36.CFR (a)(6): Determine population trends of management indicator species in terms of habitat changes. Identifying research needs 36.CFR (a): Identifying research needs

Monitoring vs. Research ` Treat Time T T T T AfterBeforeAfterBeforeAfter No monitoring -Post-monitoring -No control -No replication -Pre & post- monitoring -No control -No replication -Pre & post- monitoring -Control & treatment -No replication Monitoring – cause and effect cannot be statistically inferred BeforeAfter -Pre & post- monitoring -Control & treatment -Minimum replication TCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTC BeforeAfter T C T C T C T C T C T C Research – cause and effect can be statistically inferred -Pre & post- monitoring -Control & treatment -Ample replication T C T C

Research Treatments Linked to Standards and Guidelines: DEMO Green-tree Retention under the NWFP Green-tree Retention under the NWFP Retain at least 15 pct of the harvested area as green trees Retain at least 15 pct of the harvested area as green trees Retain 70 pct of those green trees in aggregates ha in size Retain 70 pct of those green trees in aggregates ha in size Retain the remainder as dispersed structures, either as individual trees or aggregates <0.2 ha in size Retain the remainder as dispersed structures, either as individual trees or aggregates <0.2 ha in size Aggregates and dispersed retention should include the largest, oldest live trees, decadent or leaning trees, and hard snags in the unit Aggregates and dispersed retention should include the largest, oldest live trees, decadent or leaning trees, and hard snags in the unit Patches should be retained indefinitely Patches should be retained indefinitely 15% A 40% A Unharvested 15% D 40% D 75%

Research Treatments Linked to Standards and Guidelines: Density Management Study Riparian Buffers under the NWFP Riparian Buffers under the NWFP Buffers a minimum of 2 Site Potential Tree Heights on fishbearing streams Buffers a minimum of 2 Site Potential Tree Heights on fishbearing streams Buffers a minimum of 1 Site Potential Tree Height on non-fishbearing streams Buffers a minimum of 1 Site Potential Tree Height on non-fishbearing streams

Linking Research and Monitoring Frame research hypotheses to provide proof of concept Frame research hypotheses to provide proof of concept Incorporate standards and guidelines into array of experimental treatments Incorporate standards and guidelines into array of experimental treatments Enhance local inference through site-level replication Enhance local inference through site-level replication Address relevant geographic and temporal scales Address relevant geographic and temporal scales Assess attributes, and using metrics, that correspond to regional monitoring guidelines and protocols Assess attributes, and using metrics, that correspond to regional monitoring guidelines and protocols

Ongoing and Recent Silviculture Studies in Dry Forests of Oregon and Washington Relatively few Relatively few Span small plot to landscape scales Span small plot to landscape scales Expanded List of Response Variables Expanded List of Response Variables Tree damage agents Tree damage agents Deer and elk habitat quality and habitat use Deer and elk habitat quality and habitat use Ground-water hydrology Ground-water hydrology Slope stability Slope stability Nutrient cycling Nutrient cycling Fuels loads Fuels loads Potential fire behavior Potential fire behavior

Conclusions LSSEs have yielded substantial information regarding early responses to silvicultural practices such as green-tree retention and variable density thinning LSSEs have yielded substantial information regarding early responses to silvicultural practices such as green-tree retention and variable density thinning The collective value of LSSEs can be increased through syntheses, but the opportunities to do so vary with respect to specific management issues or ecological and social values of interest The collective value of LSSEs can be increased through syntheses, but the opportunities to do so vary with respect to specific management issues or ecological and social values of interest Operational-scale research studies may serve in monitoring if they incorporate relevant metrics and scope of inference, and are sustained over appropriate timeframes. Operational-scale research studies may serve in monitoring if they incorporate relevant metrics and scope of inference, and are sustained over appropriate timeframes.