EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Communication Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Class 4 Jan. 27 th, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mobile Communications
Advertisements

EE359 – Lecture 8 Outline Capacity of Fading channels Fading Known at TX and RX Optimal Rate and Power Adaptation Channel Inversion with Fixed Rate Capacity.
Chapter 3. Noise Husheng Li The University of Tennessee.
S Digital Communication Systems Bandpass modulation II.
Fading multipath radio channels Narrowband channel modelling Wideband channel modelling Wideband WSSUS channel (functions, variables & distributions)
1 Small-scale Mobile radio propagation Small-scale Mobile radio propagation l Small scale propagation implies signal quality in a short distance or time.
EE359 – Lecture 7 Outline Multipath Intensity Profile Doppler Power Spectrum Shannon Capacity Capacity of Flat-Fading Channels Fading Statistics Known.
Comparison of different MIMO-OFDM signal detectors for LTE
Propagation Characteristics
Diversity techniques for flat fading channels BER vs. SNR in a flat fading channel Different kinds of diversity techniques Selection diversity performance.
1 SYSC4607 – Lecture 5 Outline Announcements: Tutorial important: Review of Probability Theory and Random Processes Review of Last Lecture Narrowband Fading.
EE359 – Lecture 5 Outline Review of Last Lecture Narrowband Fading Model In-Phase and Quad Signal Components Cross Correlation of RX Signal in NB Fading.
Physical Layer: Channel models and digital modulation techniques
A New Methodology for the Design of High Speed Wireless Communication Systems Based on Experimental Results Tim Gallagher University of Kansas July 21,
Mobile Radio Propagation - Small-Scale Fading and Multipath
Doppler shifts: Effect on Communication systems Kartik Natarajan.
Wireless and Mobile Communication Systems
Wireless Communication Channels: Small-Scale Fading
ECE 4730: Lecture #10 1 MRC Parameters  How do we characterize a time-varying MRC?  Statistical analyses must be used  Four Key Characteristics of a.
Wireless Communication Channels: Small-Scale Fading
WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS Assist.Prof.Dr. Nuray At.
Chapter 4 Mobile Radio Propagation: Small-Scale Fading and Multipath
1 Lecture 9: Diversity Chapter 7 – Equalization, Diversity, and Coding.
Lecture 3. 2 Outline Signal fluctuations – fading Interference model – detection of signals Link model.
ECE 480 Wireless Systems Lecture 14 Problem Session 26 Apr 2006.
Modelling and analysis of wireless fading channels Geir E. Øien
EE359 – Lecture 5 Outline Announcements: HW posted, due Thursday 5pm Background on random processes in Appendix B Lecture notes: No need to take notes.
EE 6331, Spring, 2009 Advanced Telecommunication Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Class 11 Feb. 24 th, 2009.
EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Communication Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Class 3 Jan. 22 nd, 2014.
EELE 5490, Fall, 2009 Wireless Communications Ali S. Afana Department of Electrical Engineering Class 5 Dec. 4 th, 2009.
The Wireless Channel Lecture 3.
Abdul-Aziz .M Al-Yami Khurram Masood
EE 6331, Spring, 2009 Advanced Telecommunication Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Class 7 Feb. 10 th, 2009.
EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Communication Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Class 11 Feb. 19 th, 2014.
© 2002 Pearson Education, Inc. Commercial use, distribution, or sale prohibited. Wireless Communications Principles and Practice 2 nd Edition T.S. Rappaport.
Wireless Communications Principles and Practice 2 nd Edition T.S. Rappaport Chapter 5: Mobile Radio Propagation: Small-Scale Fading and Multipath as it.
Performance analysis of channel estimation and adaptive equalization in slow fading channel Chen Zhifeng Electrical and Computer Engineering University.
1 What is small scale fading? Small scale fading is used to describe the rapid fluctuation of the amplitude, phases, or multipath delays of a radio signal.
EE 6331, Spring, 2009 Advanced Telecommunication
A Distributed Relay-Assignment Algorithm for Cooperative Communications in Wireless Networks ICC 2006 Ahmed K. Sadek, Zhu Han, and K. J. Ray Liu Department.
Adaphed from Rappaport’s Chapter 5
Statistical Description of Multipath Fading
TI Cellular Mobile Communication Systems Lecture 3 Engr. Shahryar Saleem Assistant Professor Department of Telecom Engineering University of Engineering.
EE359 – Lecture 6 Outline Review of Last Lecture Signal Envelope Distributions Average Fade Duration Markov Models Wideband Multipath Channels Scattering.
Fading in Wireless Communications Yan Fei. Contents  Concepts  Cause of Fading  Fading Types  Fading Models.
EE359 – Lecture 4 Outline Announcements: 1 st HW due tomorrow 5pm Review of Last Lecture Model Parameters from Empirical Measurements Random Multipath.
EE359 – Lecture 6 Outline Announcements: HW due tomorrow 5pm Next 3 lectures rescheduled: 10/12 (Mon), 10/16 (Fri), 10/19 (Mon), all in Huang Eng. Center,
Case Study (ZigBee): Phase IV Transmitter & Receiver Simulation.
Midterm Review Midterm only covers material from lectures and HWs
EEE-752 Emerging Wireless Networks MIMO Simulation Riaz Hussain FA08-PCE-003 Ph.D. Student Department of Electrical Engineering.
Diana B. Llacza Sosaya Digital Communications Chosun University
EEE 441 Wireless And Mobile Communications
Small-Scale Fading Prof. Michael Tsai 2016/04/15.
Mobile Radio Propagation - Small-Scale Fading and Multipath
الخبو صغير المقياس أو(المدى)
Doppler shifts: Effect on Communication systems
EE359 – Lecture 6 Outline Announcements: Review of Last Lecture
Modulation Techniques
Basics of Small Scale Fading: Towards choice of PHY
EE359 – Lecture 11 Outline Doppler and ISI Performance Effects
Advanced Wireless Networks
Advanced Wireless Networks
Advanced Wireless Networks
Wireless Communications Principles and Practice 2nd Edition T. S
Chen Zhifeng Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Florida
Radio Propagation Review
EE359 – Lecture 5 Outline Announcements:
EE 6332, Spring, 2017 Wireless Telecommunication
EE359 – Lecture 5 Outline Announcements:
EE359 – Lecture 6 Outline Review of Last Lecture
Presentation transcript:

EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Communication Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Class 4 Jan. 27 th, 2014

Outline Review (important) –RMS delay vs. coherent bandwidth –Doppler spread vs. coherent time –Slow Fading vs. Fast Fading –Flat Fading vs. Frequency Selective Fading Rayleigh and Ricean Distributions Statistical Models

Fading Distributions Describes how the received signal amplitude changes with time. –Remember that the received signal is combination of multiple signals arriving from different directions, phases and amplitudes. –With the received signal we mean the baseband signal, namely the envelope of the received signal (i.e. r(t)). It is a statistical characterization of the multipath fading. Two distributions –Rayleigh Fading –Ricean Fading

Rayleigh Distributions Describes the received signal envelope distribution for channels, where all the components are non-LOS: –i.e. there is no line-of–sight (LOS) component.

Ricean Distributions Describes the received signal envelope distribution for channels where one of the multipath components is LOS component. –i.e. there is one LOS component.

Rayleigh Fading

Rayleigh Fading

Rayleigh Fading Distribution The Rayleigh distribution is commonly used to describe the statistical time varying nature of the received envelope of a flat fading signal, or the envelope of an individual multipath component. The envelope of the sum of two quadrature Gaussian noise signals obeys a Rayleigh distribution.  is the rms value of the received voltage before envelope detection, and  2 is the time-average power of the received signal before envelope detection.

Rayleigh Fading Distribution The probability that the envelope of the received signal does not exceed a specified value of R is given by the CDF: r peak =  and p(  )=0.6065/ 

Rayleigh PDF     mean =  median =  variance =  

A typical Rayleigh fading envelope at 900MHz.

Ricean Distribution When there is a stationary (non-fading) LOS signal present, then the envelope distribution is Ricean. The Ricean distribution degenerates to Rayleigh when the dominant component fades away.

Ricean Fading Distribution When there is a dominant stationary signal component present, the small- scale fading envelope distribution is Ricean. The effect of a dominant signal arriving with many weaker multipath signals gives rise to the Ricean distribution. The Ricean distribution degenerates to a Rayleigh distribution when the dominant component fades away. The Ricean distribution is often described in terms of a parameter K which is defined as the ratio between the deterministic signal power and the variance of the multipath. K is known as the Ricean factor As A  0, K  -  dB, Ricean distribution degenerates to Rayleigh distribution.

CDF Cumulative distribution for three small-scale fading measurements and their fit to Rayleigh, Ricean, and log-normal distributions.

PDF Probability density function of Ricean distributions: K=-∞dB (Rayleigh) and K=6dB. For K>>1, the Ricean pdf is approximately Gaussian about the mean.

Rice time series

Nakagami Model u r: envelope amplitude u Ω= : time-averaged power of received signal u m: the inverse of normalized variance of r 2 –Get Rayleigh when m=1

Small-scale fading mechanism Assume signals arrive from all angles in the horizontal plane 0<α<360 Signal amplitudes are equal, independent of α Assume further that there is no multipath delay: (flat fading assumption) Doppler shifts

Small-scale fading: effect of Doppler in a multipath environment f m, the largest Doppler shift

Carrier Doppler spectrum Spectrum Empirical investigations show results that deviate from this model Power Model Power goes to infinity at fc+/-fm

Baseband Spectrum Doppler Faded Signal Cause baseband spectrum has a maximum frequency of 2fm

Simulating Doppler/Small-scale fading

Simulating Doppler fading Procedure

Level Crossing Rate (LCR) Threshold (R) LCR is defined as the expected rate at which the Rayleigh fading envelope, normalized to the local rms signal level, crosses a specified positive going direction threshold level R in a positive going direction. It is given by:

Average Fade Duration Defined as the average period of time for which the received signal is below a specified level R. For Rayleigh distributed fading signal, it is given by:

Fading Model: Gilbert-Elliot Model Fade Period Time t Signal Amplitude Threshold Good (Non-fade) Bad (Fade)

Gilbert-Elliot Model Good (Non-fade) Bad (Fade) 1/ANFD 1/AFD The channel is modeled as a Two-State Markov Chain. Each state duration is memory-less and exponentially distributed. The rate going from Good to Bad state is: 1/AFD (AFD: Avg Fade Duration) The rate going from Bad to Good state is: 1/ANFD (ANFD: Avg Non-Fade Duration)

Simulating 2-ray multipath a 1 and a 2 are independent Rayleigh fading  1 and  2 are uniformly distributed over [0,2  )

Simulating multipath with Doppler-induced Rayleigh fading

Review

Review

Review

Review

Homework due 2/5 Communication toolbox –TS, sample time, FD Doppler shift, K Rician factor, number of antenna NT=NR=2 –awgn –rayleighchan (TS, FD) –ricianchan(TS, FD, K) –stdchan: select 3 channels –mimochan(NT, NR, TS, FD) Task 1: Plot channel characteristics for above channels Task 2: Plot BER for BPSK for above channels –qammod and qamdemod –berawgn –berfading –biterr

Task 1 Example: ts = 0.1e-4; fd = 200; chan = stdchan(ts, fd, 'cost207TUx6'); chan.NormalizePathGains = 1; chan.StoreHistory = 1; y = filter(chan, ones(1,5e4)); plot(chan);

Task 2 clear N = 10^6 % number of bits or symbols % Transmitter ip = rand(1,N)>0.5; % generating 0,1 with equal probability s = 2*ip-1; % BPSK modulation 0 -> -1; 1 -> 0 Eb_N0_dB = [-3:35]; % multiple Eb/N0 values for ii = 1:length(Eb_N0_dB) n = 1/sqrt(2)*[randn(1,N) + j*randn(1,N)]; % white gaussian noise, 0dB variance h = 1/sqrt(2)*[randn(1,N) + j*randn(1,N)]; % Rayleigh channel % Channel and noise Noise addition y = h.*s + 10^(-Eb_N0_dB(ii)/20)*n; % equalization yHat = y./h; % receiver - hard decision decoding ipHat = real(yHat)>0; % counting the errors nErr(ii) = size(find([ip- ipHat]),2); end simBer = nErr/N; % simulated ber theoryBerAWGN = 0.5*erfc(sqrt(10.^(Eb_N0_dB/10))); % theoretical ber EbN0Lin = 10.^(Eb_N0_dB/10); theoryBer = 0.5.*(1-sqrt(EbN0Lin./(EbN0Lin+1))); % plot close all figure semilogy(Eb_N0_dB,theoryBerAWGN,'cd-','LineWidth',2); hold on semilogy(Eb_N0_dB,theoryBer,'bp-','LineWidth',2); semilogy(Eb_N0_dB,simBer,'mx-','LineWidth',2); axis([ ^-5 0.5]) grid on legend('AWGN-Theory','Rayleigh-Theory', 'Rayleigh-Simulation'); xlabel('Eb/No, dB'); ylabel('Bit Error Rate'); title('BER for BPSK modulation in Rayleigh channel');