Crop Canopy Sensors for High Throughput Phenomic Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Notes for teachers This presentation has been designed to complement the information provided in the Plant Phenomics Teacher Resource. Some of the slides.
Advertisements

UoL MSc Remote Sensing Dr Lewis
Chlorophyll Estimation Using Multi-spectral Reflectance and Height Sensing C. L. JonesResearch Engineer N. O. Maness Professor M. L. Stone Regents’ Professor.
SPAD Chlorophyll Meter in Greenhouse Horticulture
Jan Clevers 1 & Anatoly Gitelson 2 Results optimal band setting for CI red-edge : Coefficient of variation (CV %) of canopy chlorophyll content estimation.
Active Remote Sensing Systems March 2, 2005 Spectral Characteristics of Vegetation Temporal Characteristics of Agricultural Crops Vegetation Indices Biodiversity.
SKYE INSTRUMENTS LTD Llandrindod Wells, United Kingdom.
PhD remote sensing course, 2013 Lund University Understanding Vegetation indices PART 1 Understanding Vegetation indices PART 1 : General Introduction.
Calculation of Vegetation Indices with PAR and Solar Radiation Measurements David R. Cook Argonne National Laboratory.
Vegetation indices and the red-edge index
Remote Sensing of Aphid-Induced Stress in Wheat BAE/SOIL Precision Agriculture Oklahoma State University Victor W. Slowik April 20, 2001.
The Role of Models in Remotely Sensed Primary Production Estimates
Use of remote sensing on turfgrass Soil 4213 course presentation Xi Xiong April 18, 2003.
Relationships Between NDVI and Plant Physical Measurements Beltwide Cotton Conference January 6-10, 2003 Tim Sharp.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
Outline Introduction – Importance for SE Mississippi State – Sensor Comparison – Wavelength/Index Analysis University of Arkansas – Active detection of.
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
NUE Workshop: Improving NUE using Crop Sensing, Waseca, MN
Eric Rafn and Bill Kramber Idaho Department of Water Resources
Second part of precision farming Crop sensing by reflectance – Greenseeker Measuring fluorescence and photosynthesis – Yara N-tester Using Vegetation index.
Differences b etween Red and Green NDVI, What do they predict and what they don’t predict Shambel Maru.
SOIL 4213 BIOEN 4213 History of Using Indirect Measures for detecting Nutrient Status Oklahoma State University.
Challenges to sensor- based N-Management for Cotton E.M. Barnes 1, T. Sharp 2, J. Wilkerson 3, Randy Taylor 2, Stacy Worley 3 1 Cotton Incorporated, Cary.
Introduction To describe the dynamics of the global carbon cycle requires an accurate determination of the spatial and temporal distribution of photosynthetic.
Slide #1 Emerging Remote Sensing Data, Systems, and Tools to Support PEM Applications for Resource Management Olaf Niemann Department of Geography University.
GreenSeeker® Handheld Crop Sensor
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Field Measurements of Leaf Mass Area (LMA) in Support of Remote Sensing Studies of a Pacific Northwest Old Growth Forest Canopy Katie Berger (UMASS-Amherst)
Remote Sensing of Vegetation. Vegetation and Photosynthesis About 70% of the Earth’s land surface is covered by vegetation with perennial or seasonal.
NDVI: What It Is and What It Measures Danielle Williams.
1 Lecture 7 Land surface reflectance in the visible and RIR regions of the EM spectrum 25 September 2008.
Satellite observations of terrestrial ecosystems and links to climate and carbon cycle Bases of remote sensing of vegetation canopies The Greening trend.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
BIOPHYS A PHYSICALLY-BASED CONTINUOUS FIELDS ALGORITHM and Climate and Carbon Models FORREST G. HALL, FRED HUEMMRICH Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology.
Development of Vegetation Indices as Economic Thresholds for Control of Defoliating Insects of Soybean James BoardVijay MakaRandy PriceDina KnightMatthew.
State of Engineering in Precision Agriculture, Boundaries and Limits for Agronomy.
Calculation of Vegetation Indices with PAR and Solar Radiation Measurements David R. Cook Argonne National Laboratory.
Figure 1. (A) Evapotranspiration (ET) in the equatorial Santarém forest: observed (mean ± SD across years of eddy fluxes, K67 site, blue shaded.
A Remote Sensing Approach for Estimating Regional Scale Surface Moisture Luke J. Marzen Associate Professor of Geography Auburn University Co-Director.
Estimating Cotton Defoliation with Remote Sensing Glen Ritchie 1 and Craig Bednarz 2 1 UGA Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, GA 2 Texas Tech, Lubbock,
Interactions of EMR with the Earth’s Surface
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
SOC Camera Performance Systematic Assessment Jin Wu 11/20/2013.
Oklahoma State University Precision Agriculture / Soil Fertility / Soil Nutrient Management Why should Nitrogen Use Efficiencies be improved? What technologies.
References: 1)Ganguly, S., Samanta, A., Schull, M. A., Shabanov, N. V., Milesi, C., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B., Generating vegetation.
Farms, sensors and satellites. Using fertilisers Farming practice are changing Growing quality crops in good yields depends on many factors, including.
Image segmentation The segmentation process (Fig.7) allows separating the Photosynthetically Active Leaves (PAL) from soil based on Bayes approach [4].
QTL for vigor traits (LA, plant height, growth rate)
Using vegetation indices (NDVI) to study vegetation
Term Project Presentation
Technology description
Evolution of OSU Optical Sensor Based Variable Rate Applicator
Mapping wheat growth in dryland fields in SE Wyoming using Landsat images Matthew Thoman.
OWC/OWRF Use of Sensors and Spectral Reflectance Water Indices to Select for Grain Yield in Wheat Dr. Arthur Klatt Dr. Ali Babar Dr. B. Prasad Mr. Mario.
Basics of radiation physics for remote sensing of vegetation
Crop-based Approach for In-season N Application
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Radiometric Theory and Vegetative Indices
Hui Wang1,2*, Anders K. Mortensen1 and René Gislum1
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Why does NDVI work? What biological parameter could I use to make agronomic decisions if it could be estimated indirectly? Plant Biomass  Nitrogen Uptake.
(L, C and X) and Full-polarization
By: Paul A. Pellissier, Scott V. Ollinger, Lucie C. Lepine
UNL Algorithm for N in Corn
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Sources of Variability in Canopy Spectra and the Convergent Properties of Plants Funding From: S.V. Ollinger, L. Lepine, H. Wicklein, F. Sullivan, M. Day.
Crop Spec, A Collaborative Partnership
Precision Ag Precision agriculture (PA) refers to using information, computing and sensing technologies for production agriculture. PA application enables.
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Presentation transcript:

Crop Canopy Sensors for High Throughput Phenomic Systems Dr. Mike Schlemmer, Agronomist/Wheat Trial Manager

Bayer Field Phenomics Program Scope Exploit the potential of phenomics to provide novel insights in plant response to genetic and environmental variation. Intent Integrate phenomics with genomic marker assisted selection to create a more efficient marker based selection process.

Genotype x Nitrogen x Plant Density High Throughput Phenomic Sensor Suite Testing: Initial Phase Genotype x Nitrogen x Plant Density

Data Collection 26 Apr 6 May 3 Jun 16 Jul 14 May

Yield Results Yield Response plateaus, 40-60 lbs N ac-1. Yield Response plateaus, 0.8-1.2 M plants ac-1.

Rapid Field Phenomic Sensor Suite Optical Sensor Companion Sensor Crop Circle DAS43X 2 Chan Voltage Input/ Pulse Counter Downwelling PAR Humidity/Temp Upwelling PAR IRT

Data Collection Rate: 5Hz Rapid Field Phenomic Sensor Suite Measured Variables Reflectance from 3 bands, 10nm FWHM (Red, Red Edge(RE), NIR) Select Optical Indices - Canopy Chlorophyll Index(RE), NDVI. Canopy Chl Content. Green Leaf LAI. Canopy Height (via optical methods and ultra-sonic). Downwelling PAR, Upwelling PAR = Fractional PAR (fPAR). Relative Humidity. Ambient Temperature, Canopy Temperature = Temperature Departure (DT). Data Collection Rate: 5Hz

Upper and Lower Epidermis What spectral regions are most sensitive to Chlorophyll Content. Green and Red Edge Coefficient of determination for the relationship between reflectance and chl content for each wavelength. The peaks at 555 nm and 715 nm indicate these regions to be maximally sensitive to chl content. Those peaks show a strong linear relationship to chl content where the blue and red absorbance regions do not. Blue/Red - Absorb. Upper and Lower Epidermis Spongy mesophyll Green-Refl. Near IR-Refl. Air space Stoma Palisade Cells Chlorophyll

Canopy Chl Content as a function of the Red Edge Chl Index. Canopy Chl at the time of flowering may reach a response plateau near 100 lbs N ac-1. Yield Response plateaus near 40-60 lbs N ac-1. N Partitioning / Translocation? Grain Protein Content?

Fractionally Absorbed PAR (fAPAR). fAPAR was derived by calculating the ratio of upwelling to downwelling PAR, both measured at the height of the sensor. Provides an indication as to the efficiency of Photosynthesis and Net Primary Production.

Leaf Area Index as a function of NDVI Relationship between the NDVI function and leaf area index is not linear but reaches it’s limit more gradually at higher LAI’s. Green LAI is an exponential function of NDVI linearly related to measured LAI.

Canopy Height Plant height was determined by subtracting calculated sensor to target distance from measured sensor height. Sensor to target distance was calculated using square root of inverse NIR irradiance. Holland et al., IEEE J. Sel. Topics Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens. (JSTARS) , V5, N6, 2012

Canopy Temperature Departure Delta Temperature was calculated by subtracting IRT measured canopy temperature from measured ambient temperature. Aerial IR cameras were used to acquire late season imagery. Stay green and late season varieties are clearly identifiable.

Opportunities with Phenomic Sensor Systems in Precision Agriculture and Plant Breeding: Develop Phenomic markers to compliment Genomic markers that assist with efficient breeder selections. Utilize Greenhouse Lemnatec system to incorporate phenomic data into decision support system. Move this concept to the field scale. Future advances in high speed data capture, transfer, and analysis should enable on-the-go image based phenomic systems, providing more morphological information. UAV’s should be exploited to deliver both image and spectral sensor based systems to the field.

Parallel Phenomic Research within Bayer Image Recognition Approach (Field and Greenhouse). Lemnatec Greenhouse Activities.

Additional Information Sampling Date GDD: 26 Apr 12 – 835.7 6 May 12 – 944.3 14 May 12 – 1068.7 3 Jun 12 – 1441.9