MWPC Commissioning: A Status Report What the MWPC’s do and how Data taking Jan-Feb 2000 Results from the Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Electronics Simulation in the Photon Transport Monte Carlo Preamp model Receiver/discriminator circuit CAFÉ driver circuit model Examples Summary January.
Advertisements

1 ALICE EMCal Electronics Outline: PHOS Electronics review Design Specifications –Why PHOS readout is suitable –Necessary differences from PHOS Shaping.
The MAD chip: 4 channel preamplifier + discriminator.
1 TOF Aging Issues Pre-history Operating history Observations related to gain loss Impact on timing resolution Possible courses of action April 6, 2006.
1 (Gerard Visser – US Belle II Electronics Meeting 7/15/2011) Belle-II bKLM Readout System Concepts, &c. W. Jacobs, G. Visser, A. Vossen Indiana University.
SPD commissioning Ricci, Míriam, Daniel, Edu, Hugo et al. from 1.
MDC-II LVL-1 Trigger Khaled Teilab for the MDC Trigger Team.
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
D. Peterson, “The Cornell/Purdue TPC”, LCWS05, Stanford, 21-March The Cornell/Purdue TPC Information available at the web site:
D. Peterson, “Status of the Cornell/Purdue Program” TPC R&D Mini Workshop, Orsay 12-January Status of the Cornell/Purdue Program: first events with.
D. Peterson, “ILC Detector Work”, Cornell Group Meeting, 4-October ILC Detector Work This project is supported by the US National Science Foundation.
D. Peterson, “The Cornell/Purdue TPC”, ALCPG, Snowmass, 23-August The Cornell/Purdue TPC Information available at the web site:
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
T0 status ShinIchi Esumi Univ. of Tsukuba contents (1) Do we really need T0? (2) rate estimate and statistics (3) design and installation.
Report of the NTPC Test Experiment in 2007Sep and Others Yohei Nakatsugawa.
Jon S Kapustinsky 11/17/2010 Jon S Kapustinsky FVTX Commissioning Plan 1.71 Jon S Kapustinsky 1.
Level 0 Topology Trigger Falk Meissner LBNL CTB Readout Topology CTB-DSM Tree Trigger Algorithm UPC Trigger Other Examples Motivation : Level 3 requires.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Ivan Vitev & E906 Muon Identifier Status Patrick McGaughey and the muon radiography team E866 Meeting at FNAL June 20-21, 2007 Large Muon Tracker at LANSCE.
Run Coordinator Weekly Report EG6 Commissioning October Raffaella De Vita.
Leo Greiner TC_Int1 Sensor and Readout Status of the PIXEL Detector.
March 12, 2006R. Abrams LCWS06 Bangalore1 ILC Prototype Muon Scintillation Counter Tests Robert Abrams Indiana University.
108 Mar 2007L. Musa TPC Commissioning ALICE Technical Forum, CERN, 8 th March 2007 L. Musa Outline Pre-commissioning above ground (2006) Preparing for.
11 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 TPAC test beam analysis tasks Paul Dauncey.
The new set of MWPCs for CB Collaboration Meeting Glasgow March 2006 A. Braghieri, P.Pedroni.
1 A.Andronic 1, H.Appelshäuser 1, V.Babkin 2, P.Braun-Munzinger 1, S.Chernenko 2, D.Emschernmann 3, C.Garabatos 1, V.Golovatyuk 2, J.Hehner 1, M.Hoppe.
Anatoli Romaniouk TRT Introduction TRT in ATLAS p. 2-4TRT in ATLAS p. 2-4 TRT design p. 5-7TRT design p. 5-7 TRT operation principles p. 8-9TRT operation.
LASER CALIBRATION SYSTEM for STAR TPC Alexei Lebedev (BNL) for STAR collaboration  Design and description  Performance  Goals and results  Future developments.
The Electromagnetic Calorimeter – 2005 Operation J. Sowinski for the Collaboration and the Builders Indiana Univ. Michigan State Univ. ANL MIT BNL Penn.
March 9, 2005 HBD CDR Review 1 HBD Electronics Preamp/cable driver on the detector. –Specification –Schematics –Test result Rest of the electronics chain.
The STAR MRPC TOF Project BNL December 1, 2005 Geary Eppley, with Jo Schambach, for the TOF Group.
Status of New TPC( Ⅱ ) Performance Study Yohei Nakatsugawa LEPS Meeting in Taiwan.
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
TGC-electronics commissioning before beam collision Y. Sugaya Osaka-U アトラス総会2004 12/23 河口湖.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
CALICE Tungsten HCAL Prototype status Erika Garutti Wolfgang Klempt Erik van der Kraaij CERN LCD International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010, October.
TB Peter Glässel, Heidelberg1 TPC Status Report Project leader: Peter Braun-Munzinger, GSI Darmstadt Deputy project leader: Johanna Stachel, Heidelberg.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May 2011 Super-ALTRO Demonstrator Test Results LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May nd November.
Leo Greiner IPHC beam test Beam tests at the ALS and RHIC with a Mimostar-2 telescope.
1 Plans for first beams - - triggers from the BRM group (BSC, BPTX) Gábor Veres for the BRM group CMS Trigger Technical Coordination Meeting 8 October,
Active polarimeter simulation Suguru Shimizu Osaka University Sep. 1, 2007 JPARC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan.
TPC electronics Status, Plans, Needs Marcus Larwill April
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
1 Jim Thomas - LBL Inner Sector Upgrade for the TPC Jim Thomas Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory UCLA Upgrades Workshop December 14 rd, 2011.
The BoNuS Detector: A Radial Time Projection Chamber for tracking Spectator Protons Howard Fenker, Jefferson Lab This work was partially supported by DOE.
TPC Detector Simulators TPC Fast Simulator & TPC Response Simulator April 9, 2000 ALICE-STAR Joint Meeting.
1 19 th January 2009 M. Mager - L. Musa Charge Readout Chip Development & System Level Considerations.
1 TPC Meeting Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Jia-Ye Chen
David Silvermyr Lund University for the PHENIX Collaboration Early global event results using the PHENIX Pad Chambers at RHIC.
A Brand new neutrino detector 「 SciBar 」 (2) Y. Takubo (Osaka) - Readout Electronics - Introduction Readout electronics Cosmic ray trigger modules Conclusion.
Lessons Learned from Real Data Xin Qian BNL 1. Outline Space Charge effect for LArTPCs on surface Field Response Calibration How to deal with noises and.
Thoughts on TPC Optimization Xin Qian BNL 1. Outline Detector Parameters – TPC angle – Wire pitch – Wire angle – Wire pattern – Wire plane gap Basic reconstruction.
Proposal for the after-pulse effect suppression  Observation of pulses and after-pulses  Shape measurement  Algorithm  Results  Efficiencies for after-pulse.
Muon Trigger Performance Run12 PP510GeV Sanghwa Park (SNU/RIKEN)
The NA61 TPCs (1) Overview: Mechanics readout Position resolution
FEE for TPC MPD__NICA JINR
Activities on straw tube simulation
A General Purpose Charge Readout Chip for TPC Applications
Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Status of the TOF Detector
String-21 Flasher Analysis
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
Presentation transcript:

MWPC Commissioning: A Status Report What the MWPC’s do and how Data taking Jan-Feb 2000 Results from the Analysis

Timeline of MWPC Installation Spring 99: Installation of MWPC FEE Cards Aug-Sep 99:Installation of MWPC Sector Controller boards, Cabling Jan-Feb 2000:First tests with STAR Trigger. Noise, Pulser, and Cosmic ray Data March 2000:Analysis of the data

What do the MWPC ’s do? – Read out the response of the TPC anode wires each RHIC beam crossing, 1/105nsec. RHIC beam crossing, 1/105nsec. – Measure the multiplicity of charged particles passing through the endcaps of the TPC. through the endcaps of the TPC.

Numerology and Definitions Inner SectorOuter Sector 170 Wires 172 Wires160 with MWPC FEE Cards 10 Orphans12 Orphans Good web documentation by R. Bossingham (STAR TPC Group pages) Each FEE is connected to 20 wires. This gives 16 FEE cards per super-sector. (In reality, only 15. The innermost connector is smaller.) The FEE cards are divided into groups of 4 cards (innermost group has only 3). Such a group is called a Sub-sector.

More Definitions Each wire returns 0 or 1 (hit or miss). No ADC Info. MWPC Multiplicity  # of wires hit Sensitivity of wires determined by adjustable discriminator threshold. 1 threshold set for the entire TPC. Read-out granularity: Trigger Level 0: Currently 1 value  summed MWPC multiplicity. Possible upgrade to 4(  ) x 4(  ) = 16 bins. Trigger Level 1 or 2: Improved granularity, 12(  ) x 8(  ) = 96 bins. 1 value per Sub-sector (4 FEE’s, 80 wires).

Noise Data Random Trigger: Read every trigger token. No Pulser, No cosmic trigger, Threshold at 70 mV. – Non-statistical noise, more probable that entire FEE cards fire than just a few wires. – Could be a pick-up + grounding problem. – Some sectors/sub-sectors worse than others.

Cosmic Ray Data Trigger: 1 CTB hit (ADC>5) +  1 MWPC Wire Used one side of the TPC, noisiest sectors disconnected, 5 active sectors (1,4,6,9,10). Took 8 runs with varying thresholds ( mV) ,000 events/run

Trigger Rate Expected rate from cosmics: Hz Noise threshold  150 mV

Meaning of threshold Intrinsic electronic noise <5 mV Noise threshold in lab (at Berkeley) 60 mV (Chin Vu) Noise threshold in Wide Angle Hall mV Min. Ionizing Particle (Calc.) mV (Spencer)

Hit Distributions – Each bin corresponds to 1 sub-sector – 80,81  Sector 9, Subsectors 1,2 – 2/3 of events in these to bins!

Correlation MWPC  TPC Tracks Select “golden” events: 1 TPC Track, 1 MWPC SubSector Hit Why are Sect 9, SubSect 1,2 more efficient than the others? This is an unsolved mystery! Could be difference in timing (CTB/MWPC) or threshold distribution.

MWPC hits  incident angle I mV threshold - As expected, more wires are likely to be hit at large incidence angles

MWPC hits  incident angle II mV threshold

Timing MWPC vs. CTB The CTB/MWC path lengths have not yet been optimized. They could be off by 1-2 RHIC Clocks! The trigger preserves the information in the 5 RHIC clocks preceding and following the triggered event. From this information it seems that MWC are lagging the CTB. An offset in timing would affect the efficiency CTB MWCFEE/RDORCVR optical fiber DSM CDBDSM

Time distribution of MWPC hits - Seems shifted toward later times. - There is a bias. There has to be an entry in bin 0, otherwise no trigger.

MWPC Slow Simulator I Vladimir Morozov Sensitive volume: gating grid  pad plane (  300ns) This corresponds to a drift time of 2-3 RHIC Clocks The shaping time of the FEE pre-amplifier is  170ns

MWPC Slow Simulator II What it will do: - Correctly model the space and time distribution of the MWPC signal - Find the optimal relation between number of wires hit  multiplicity - Simulate the electronic noise __________________________________________ Understand and correct for the trigger acceptance and efficiency.

SummarySummary The MWPC Works! Hit pattern correlated with the TPC tracks in a reasonable way (for part of the system). Outstanding issues to be solved: — High noise levels (pick-up) — non-statistical noise (entire FEE cards fire) — Timing: Synchronization of CTB and MWPC Next Cosmic Run: Need more statistics 10,000+ Events/sampleNext Cosmic Run: Need more statistics 10,000+ Events/sample