1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Marine Energy Technology Advancement Partnership (METAP) Hoyt Battey DOE Water.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WECC/TEPPC Response to DOE Funding Opportunity Status Update June 29, 2009 Bradley Nickell Renewable Integration and Planning Director.
Advertisements

© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Remote Monitoring of the Structural Health of Hydrokinetic Composite Turbine.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review OTEC Cold Water Pipe-Platform Sub-System Dynamic Interaction Validation Lockheed.
1 Welcome to the Growing Community Energy webinar.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Advanced Anchoring Technology Dallas Meggitt Sound & Sea Technology, Inc.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review [Project/Subtask Title] [Presenter] [Organization] [Contact Info] [Date] [Title.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review [Annex IV] Hoyt Battey Andrea Copping DOE Water Power Program
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review River Devices to Recover Energy with Advanced Materials(River DREAM) Brent Crenshaw.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review 2011 Tidal Energy System for On-shore Power Generation Dr. Allan Bruce Sunlight.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Three Port Marine Power Electronics Conversion System Mark Holveck Princeton.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Siting Study Framework and Survey Methodology for Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy.
Main Principles of the 3 rd SOLAR-ERA.NET Joint Call
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Sustainable Small Hydropower Innovative System Testing (1.2) Department of Energy,
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Wave Energy Resource Assessment and GIS Database for the U.S. Paul T. Jacobson.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review 51-Mile Hydroelectric Power Project PI: Jim Gordon Earth By Design, Inc.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review The Development of Open, Water-Lubricated Polycrystalline Diamond Thrust Bearings.
Wisconsin Technical Service Providers (TSP) Plan.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review A First Assessment of U.S. In-Stream Hydrokinetic Energy Resources Since the.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Sensor Fish Redesign Collaboration Z. (Daniel) Deng Thomas J. Carlson Pacific.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Reedsport PB150 Deployment and Ocean Test Project Dr. Philip R. Hart Ocean Power.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Acoustic Monitoring of Beluga Whale Interactions with Cook Inlet Tidal Energy.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review WET-NZ Multi-Mode Wave Energy Converter Advancement Project Justin Klure, Program.
APRE Agency for the Promotion of European Research Lifecycle of an FP 7 project Caterina Buonocore Riga, 13th September, 2007.
Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Regional Technical Forum End-use Load Shape Business Case Project Project Initiation Meeting Portland, OR March 5, 2012.
Climate Policy Development Tom Peterson The Center For Climate Strategies August 25, 2005.
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review A-WEC Franc Mouwen Wavebob LLC November 2011.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review OCGen™ Module Mooring Project Jarlath McEntee Ocean Renewable Power Company
1. Proposal deadline 2. Timeline  A grant opportunity announcement will include a sponsor deadline for receipt of the proposal.  The instructions will.
Delaware Health Benefit Exchange (HBE) Project Update Delaware Health Care Commission Meeting: March 28, 2013.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Sustainable Small Hydropower System and Component Development (1.1) Department.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Permitting and Planning Simon Geerlofs PNNL Simon Geerlofs
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Global Dialogue on Developing a Readiness Preparation Proposal August 13-14, 2009 Structure of the R-PP template Review.
National Institute of Standards and Technology Technology Administration U.S. Department of Commerce Accelerating Emerging Technologies to the Marketplace.
FY 2010 Ohio Third Frontier Funding Opportunities.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Environmentally Benign and Permanent Modifications to Prevent Biofouling on Marine.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Ocean Currents along the United.
Trade Policy Issues and challenges in SSA Session 4.4: Developing holistic approaches to trade policy making and trade related negotiations Presented by.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Poncelet Kinetics RHK100 Prototype Steven Selvaggio Whitestone Power and Communications.
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Community Energy Strategic Planning Sarah Zaleski March 30, 2012 INSERT SEVERAL PROGRAM-RELATED PICTURES.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review An Assessment of Lifecycle Cost in the U.S. over Time Mirko Previsic RE Vision.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
CLICK TO ADD TITLE [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES] The 6th Global Health Supply Chain Summit November , 2013 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Performance Based Financing.
2006 DOE Hydrogen Program Review Presentation Template (replace with your title) Name Organization Date Project ID # (this will be provided to you) This.
1 Access to the World and Its Languages LRC Technical Assistance Workshop (Part 1) Access to the World and Its Languages I N T E R.
Implementing Wave Energy Process and Permitting Issues Presented by Therese Hampton February 20, 2008.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Tidal Streams in the United States.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Abrasion Testing of Critical Components of Hydrokinetic Devices Monty Worthington.
2015 HUD Continuum of Care NOFA Bidder’s Conference 1.Review of Community Input Session 2.Local Process and Strategic Changes 3.Application Highlights.
Federal Geographic Data Committee Update Ivan DeLoatch NGAC Meeting August 26, 2009.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review MHK MA\Categorizing and Evaluating the Effects of Stressors M. Grippo and I.
Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation: The Prairie Adaptation Research Cooperative Mark Johnston Forest Ecosystems Branch, Environment and Resource Management.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Smart Choice Pre-Select Phase Transition September 2002.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Assessment of the Environmental Effects of Hydrokinetic Turbines on Fish: Desktop.
Wisconsin Biodiesel Blending Program 3 February 2011 Integrated Biorefineries Platform David Jenkins Wisconsin Office of Energy Independence This presentation.
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA SBIR/STTR A holistic Approach LK Kubendran, PhD, MBA Portfolio Executive Commercial Partnerships Programs.
2005 OBP Bi-Annual Peer Review Project Presentation Template Name Platform Date Please see the notes section for expected presentation outcomes.
First Things First Grantee Overview.
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
FY 2018 Community Capital Pre-Submittal Meeting
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
Dairy Subgroup #1: Fostering Markets for Non-Digester Projects
Presentation transcript:

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Marine Energy Technology Advancement Partnership (METAP) Hoyt Battey DOE Water Power Program November 2011

2 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Purpose, Objectives, & Integration Project Purpose: -Marine renewable energy technologies are currently in the early stages of development and establishing a clear route to market is critical to the success of the industry. This project aims to accelerate the pace of development and commercialization of marine renewable energy in the US through a strategic, collaborative approach between the state and federal sectors. Water Power Mission: -Water Power Program’s mission for market acceleration activities: to quantify and strategically reduce the time and balance-of-system costs associated with siting and deploying MHK projects, in line with programmatic goals for overall project LCOE reduction to $0.07/kWh by This project will develop a framework for agreement between DOE and interested states, for collaboration and joint funding of MHK technology development projects and will assess the effectiveness of the METAP project for encouraging state-federal cooperation in expediting technology deployment, and its applicability to other technologies. Research Integration: - This project is not currently a subtask of a larger, multi-part project but, if successful, will support the Program’s other technology development and market acceleration activities through information sharing and joint funding of research projects on marine renewable energy issues shared by state and federal entities.

3 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Technical Approach Methods: -Establishment of cooperation among DOE/NREL and state agencies -Assessment of state MHK support activities and interest in partnering with DOE -Education of: -States on the opportunities that MHK technologies present, DOE programs and promising support programs in other states -DOE and industry on MHK support activities in states -Federal and state policymakers on successful international MHK activities and support programs -Evaluation of multiple coordinated or joint funding mechanisms for marine energy projects to better leverage state and federal investments. -Providing recommendations for state/federal/industry collaboration in the establishment and support of dedicated test facilities. -Evaluation and documentation of the METAP project as a prototype to demonstrate the value of state/federal technology cooperation, and how it can be applied to other emerging technologies. Current Key Issues: -Working to finalize the framework for agreements with a number of interested states (and potentially signing them). Delays due to uncertain and limited funding for marine renewable energy interests for state and federal participants.

4 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Plan, Schedule, & Budget Schedule Subcontract Initiation date: March 5, 2010 Planned completion date: original: March 2011; extended to August 31, 2011; extended to December 31, 2011 –The subcontract POP has been extended primarily to provide time needed for legal review of MOUs. Major Milestones include: –Report on States surveyed and Recommended Agreement Framework –Report on International Experiences for MHK Development –Final approved Agreement Framework (Memorandum of Understanding) –Final Report documenting success of project and feasibility of state/federal collaborations Project does not contain “Go / No-Go Decision Points” Budget: No variances from planned budget Total CESA subcontract value: FY10 = $330k, FY11 = $152k Total = $482k Budget History (DOE Funding to NREL) FY2009FY2010FY2011 DOECost-shareDOECost-shareDOECost-share $50k$0$540k$0k

5 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Accomplishments and Results Accomplishments: -Established cooperation among DOE/NREL and state agencies through outreach activities -Assessed state MHK support activities and interest in partnering with DOE through surveys and in-person or telephone meetings with interested states -Organized an in-person meeting between 10 interested states and DOE to educate state organizations on the METAP project, DOE’s goals and funding priorities, and further engage states in the process of establishing a joint funding mechanism -Conducted 4 webinars to educate states, federal agencies, and industry on various marine technology and MHK topics -Developed a report on international experiences in MHK technology advancement which focused on MHK programs in the UK -Identified multiple coordinated or joint funding mechanisms for marine energy projects to better leverage state and federal investments -Researched and evaluated models for technology testing collaboration with interested states and made recommendations in a report

6 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Challenges to Date Challenges: -Uncertainty of near-term DOE funding through appropriations to support future MHK technology development has made it difficult to accurately represent DOE’s commitment to this effort. -Competing demands for state renewable energy funding during economic downturn of recent years has limited potential partnership opportunities and interest Resolutions: - Deferral to DOE for next steps based on the availability of funding for future MHK technology development projects dependent on the clarification of FY12 budget conditions and Program direction.

7 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Next Steps FY12 Plans: -Will evaluate the success of the project as a prototype to demonstrate the value of state/federal technology cooperation and how it can be applied to other emerging technologies and develop a final report. Next Steps: -Determine feasibility of partnerships on technology development projects upon finalization of DOE FY12 appropriations -Submit draft report of METAP project evaluation and finalize

8 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Additional Slides The following slides are for information purposes only

9 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Guidelines for number of slides (Not a template slide – for information purposes only) Most presenters this year will be allotted between 10 and 20 minutes for the presentation with 5 to 10 minutes reserved for Q&A. Thus, shorter presentations should contain a maximum of 10 presented slides, with no more than 1 slide per minute for longer presentations. The bulk of your presentation/discussion should be devoted to the “Technical Approach,” “Accomplishments and Results,” and “Next Steps” sections, depending on how much work has been completed

10 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Preparation Instructions (Not a template slide – for information purposes only) Do not include any proprietary, copyrighted, or confidential information. Do not mark any slide with “Official Use Only” or any similar restriction used by your organization. Please name your electronic MS PowerPoint presentation file as follows (use the first 4 letters of your title): [Title_Organization_LastName.ppt]. Do not incorporate animation or special effects since all presentations will be saved as PDF files for presentation and for posting on the web. Animations critical to describing the project may be presented as separate files, however they must be approved by the Program and presented within your allotted time.

11 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Final Instructions (Not a template slide – for information purposes only) Your presentation, in MS PowerPoint format, is due to Ed Eugeni at by September 27 th. If your presentation is too large to , contact Ed Eugeni at for alternative delivery options. Reviewers will be receiving your presentation prior to the meeting. In order to supply adequate time for the reviewers to review your material prior to the meeting, you MUST submit your presentation by close of business on September 27th. Your project is subject to a score reduction penalty if you fail to meet this deadline. NOTE – THIS HAS BEEN REVISED TO OCT 7.

12 | Wind and Water Power Programeere.energy.gov Questions? (Not a template slide – for information purposes only) Contact: –Hoyt Battey at –or Ed Eugeni at