Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Federal Technology Transfer Process: Licenses and Cooperative Research and Development Agreements ADVANCED LICENSING INSTITUTE AT.
Advertisements

Summary Slide Management of Intellectual Property Rights Enterprises, R&D Organizations and Universities Wayne H. Watkins - University of Akron.
Intellectual Property HEY Trusts New IP Policy and Role of Medipex Will it enable me to turn this…. into.
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
CONFIDENTIAL © 2012 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of.
Patent or Perish? Presented By: John F. Letchford Archer & Greiner, P.C. October 19, 2006.
Building on Research Innovation A new resource in the Faculty of Science since Spring 2006.
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
University Technology Transfer Presentation to Legislative Biotechnology Task Force 29 September 2005 Gene A. Merrell Assistant Vice President - Research.
So you’ve invented something? A Guide for UMass Faculty, Researchers and Students.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Intellectual Property and CRDs February 19, 2015.
1 University Based Technology Transfer Steve Bauer Director, RERC on Technology Transfer State of the Science Conference RERC on Advancing Cognitive Technologies.
Welcome and Introduction: Market Timing and Licensing Options
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
Industrial Partnerships & Technology Transfer Keeping Your Name Out Of The Gossip Columns Of Nature and Science BC Cancer AgencyJ. D. Litster March 24,
MIIE activities are supported by a grant from the C.S. Mott Foundation. 1 Michigan Initiative for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (MIIE) Pilot Program.
February 25, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Material Transfer and Confidentiality Agreements.
Commercialization of University Technology Innovation, Technology Transfer and Licensing Jack Turner, Associate Director M.I.T. Technology Licensing Office.
Technology Transfer Commercial Opportunities in Research J. Heidjer Staecker Partner.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (ISURF) and the Office of Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (OIPTT) Kenneth Kirkland, Executive.
Wyoming Research Products Center Intellectual Property and Licensing Services Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 12, 2008 Davona K. Douglass, Acting.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
Technology Transfer at Rice
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
10/19/2011F. B. Bramwell1.  Thanks to conversations with: ◦ HU Office of General Counsel  John Gloster  Dan McCabe ◦ University of Kentucky Intellectual.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
+ Faculty Orientation UAMS BioVentures September 23, 2015 Christopher A. Fasel Associate Director of Licensing Patent Attorney UAMS BioVentures.
Invention Disclosure Analysis / Triage. Overview Decision making Components of an invention disclosure Review process Qualitative factors – art vs. science.
Organizing a Technology Licensing Office (TLO) Jon Sandelin Senior Associate Emeritus
Navigating the University Technology Transfer August 23, 2012 Christopher Moulding Sr. Manager, Technology Advancement and Licensing I’ve got an idea…now.
Government Funded Inventions Mark L. Rohrbaugh, Ph.D., J.D. Acting Director Office of Technology Transfer National Institutes of Health.
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
Elements of a Workable Intellectual Property Policy OPIC IP Roundtable Noel Courage Bereskin & Parr November 21, 2007.
Office of Technology Commercialization Chuck Rancourt Director.
Intellectual Property Know-How for University Research Administrators Gregory C. Slack Director of Research and Technology Transfer.
Ignite Technology Transfer NUI Galway Technology Transfer Office Seamus Coyne, Ph.D Neil Ferguson, Ph.D Commercialisation Executives Technology Transfer.
Academic Technology Transfer Operations and Practice Knowledge Economy Forum IV Istanbul, Turkey March 22-25, 2005 Alistair Brett Oxford Innovation.
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
Wyoming Research Products Center Technology Transfer and Licensing Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 20, 2013 Phillip Wulf, Intellectual Property.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 101 CHASE KASPER, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Industry’s Perspective on Industry-University Intellectual Property External Research Directors Network Industrial Research Institute, Inc. April 17, 2001.
Intellectual Property Valorization
Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.
HOW DO PATENTING AND LICENSING AFFECT RESEARCH? JOAN S. LEONARD VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE The National Academies.
Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.
Vermont's 21st Century Economy: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Dr. Corine Farewell Director, Office of Technology Commercialization University of.
Small Business Innovation Research Small Business Technology Transfer Research Prepared by: Susan Malone Back, PhD, MBA Director, SBIR/STTR Resource Center.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
How to establish a successful IP Policy for Universities and Research Institutes Anton Habjanič, D.Sc. director of TechnoCenter at the UM ERF-FEMISE Expert.
OTC FELLOWS PROGRAM INFORMATION SESSION Fall 2016.
Technology Transfer Office
Taking Discoveries from Lab to the Market
So you’ve invented something?
Technology Transfer Office
Financing Small Firm Innovation in the United States
Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process
Partnering with Business and Industry
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
Intellectual Property &Technology Transfer
Presentation transcript:

Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development

Technology and Economic Development Objectives Inform researchers on issues related to intellectual property in research. Relevant laws, policies, and rationale for University approach to IP rights. Basics of patenting, commercialization, and patent licensing. Relationship of IP rights to general progress and advancement of academic research programs. Breadth versus depth – follow up for details.

Technology and Economic Development Outline Background Terminology University Policies Federal Rules Federal Contracting Issues Industrial Contracting Issues Patent Commercialization and Licensing Basics Using IP to grow your Research Program

Technology and Economic Development Terminology Ownership Sole control of an asset (Intellectual Property (IP) in this context). Subject to any legal encumbrances. License The right to use an asset/IP. Exclusive License A license under which the licensor agrees to not provide licenses to any third party. Non-Exclusive License A license under which the licensor reserves the right to provide licenses to third parties.

Technology and Economic Development University Policy - Objectives Board Of Control Policy : “The research objectives of Michigan Technological University are: 1. To encourage scholarship and to assist and improve education. 2. To discover and disclose new knowledge. 3. To promote the utilization of new discoveries for the public benefit. 4. To aid, encourage, and support industry, particularly within Michigan. 5. To support the research objectives of State and Federal agencies. The University supports research for these stated objectives and not merely because the ideas involved may be potentially profitable.”

Technology and Economic Development University Policy Highlights – IP Protection and License Revenue “The University may claim patent and/or proprietary rights where a concept is reduced to practice with the use of University facilities or in the course of employment.” ( b) “The University will seek a patent when it is judged to be an appropriate and effective means of disseminating knowledge or of promoting the utilization of new discoveries for the public benefit.” ( b) “If the University receives any royalty and/or other income from the sale or licensing of any patent or other proprietary rights, it will provide, consistent with the other provisions of this policy, a share of any royalties and/or other income received by the University for the inventor or inventors,” ( c)

Technology and Economic Development University Policy Highlights Contract Requirements and Exemptions Contract Requirements “ The University will state the terms and conditions of proprietary rights in every research contract that is negotiated” ( a) Exemptions “ The University may claim no equity in inventions developed without the use of its funds, facilities, or equipment.“ (“funds” includes grant funds) ( b) “Books, articles, manuscripts, and works of art (except to the extent that they contain proprietary information related to inventions or computer software) are not included in this policy.” (Operating Procedure 11.1)

Technology and Economic Development Relevant Federal Rules 37 CFR 401 (Bayh-Dole Act) Universities own inventions created from work sponsored by the federal government IRS Revenue Procedure (Tax Free Bond Act) Prohibits use of tax-exempt financed buildings for “private use” Private use includes transferring IP ownership to sponsors at less than market value

Technology and Economic Development Federal Contracting Issues Bayh-Dole provides the University with ownership of inventions Simplifies contracting but comes with conditions Legal and contractual obligations to disclose inventions to the funding agency. Obligation to pursue commercialization in the United States with a preference for small businesses if possible.

Technology and Economic Development Industrial Contracting Issues University owns project generated IP University grants sponsors: A royalty-free right non-exclusive license. The first option to a royalty bearing exclusive license. Tax-free bond act generally prohibits transfer of ownership and up-front designation of license terms. Research rights/Freedom to operate

Technology and Economic Development Technology Commercialization Process Enablement Demonstration Development Probability of Success Effort/Time Idea InventionPatentLicense Invention Disclosure Commercialization Stage Commercialization Steps

Technology and Economic Development Starting the Process Invention Disclosure Form at …but we will take draft publications, proposals, theses/dissertations, etc. Describe as many technical details as possible – enable someone to reproduce the invention. Identify applications and potential partners if possible.

Technology and Economic Development

Technology Assessment Technical maturity What needs to be done to reach the market What are the related research needs/opportunities Patentability Is the invention ‘enabled’ – can it be reproduced Will a patent impact our ability to attract research funding and commercial partners. Market Is there sufficient probability and magnitude value of revenue (research or royalty) to justify the investment.

Technology and Economic Development Leveraging IP for Research Technology commercialization produces funding opportunities: Corporate partner research sponsorship Federal Small Business Innovation and Technology Transfer Research (SBIR/STTR) Private Investment Specialized technology gap funds Business plan competitions

Technology and Economic Development Example of Research and Commercialization Alignment Discovery from federal research that has potentially significant public benefit and commercial potential. $20k proof of concept study Michigan Universities Commercialization Initiative (MUCI). $60k next stage proof of concept Funded by MUCI Support letter from private sector partner. $230k validation study $70k MUCI $160k from private sector partner with an option to license technology $230k development/further research NIH STTR Phase I $110k subcontract to Michigan Tech Currently preparing ~$1M NIH STTR Phase II $370k subcontract to Michigan Tech

Technology and Economic Development Example Outcomes to-date ~ $420,000 in sponsored research 3 years Ph.D. student funding 2 years lab tech funding 2 publications in preparation 4 published conference proceedings $20,000 in royalties Equity in startup company (indeterminate value)

Technology and Economic Development Funding Opportunities Early stage technologies Funding available through traditional research funding programs Mid-stage technologies Technology gap funds SBIR/STTR – need corporate partner You can create that partner or we can seek one out Startup company with private investment Demonstrated Technology Corporate sponsored research and development

Technology and Economic Development Michigan Tech Experience Base Michigan Tech is a national leader in: Proportion of research sponsored by industry Number of license agreements per dollar of research Number of invention disclosures per dollar of research As a result we have staff experienced in: Appropriate contract term negotiation Managing conflicts of interest Startup business development Commercialization planning and implementation

Technology and Economic Development Questions

Technology and Economic Development Contact Information Jim Baker Director, Technology and Economic Development