Nitrogen source tracing in the Choptank River Watershed Midshore Riverkeeper Conservancy University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
Forms of Nitrogen N2N2
N stable isotopes: how it works
The 15 N: 14 N ratio can vary depending on how nitrogen is used 15 N 14 N Ratio referred to as 15 N
Amount of nitrogen (%N) does not equal 15 N %N 15 N %N 15 N < >
Nitrogen Cycle Atmospheric nitrogen Atmospheric fixation
Nitrogen Cycle Atmospheric nitrogen Atmospheric fixation
Nitrogen Cycle Atmospheric nitrogen Atmospheric fixation Biological fixation
Nitrogen Cycle Atmospheric nitrogen Atmospheric fixation Industrial fixation Biological fixation
Nitrogen Cycle Atmospheric nitrogen Atmospheric fixation Volatilization Industrial fixation Biological fixation
Nitrogen Cycle Atmospheric nitrogen Atmospheric fixation Denitrification Ammonium Nitrite Nitrate Volatilization Industrial fixation Biological fixation
Nitrogen Cycle Atmospheric nitrogen Atmospheric fixation Denitrification Ammonium Nitrite Nitrate Volatilization Industrial fixation Biological fixation
% Nitrogen 15 N Denitrification Animal Waste Volatilization enrichment Fertilizer source Low nitrogen and activity
Objectives Delineate the nitrogen contribution of different activities in the Choptank River Watershed (e.g. poultry, dairy, sewage, cropping, sod, slaughterhouse) Adopt combination of water quality and nitrogen stable isotope composition in aquatic plants and water samples. Relate findings to land-use practices Identify focus areas for further work / targeting of management activities
Sampling Sites Easton STP Cambridge STP Denton STP Cordova Oakland Farm Colliers Farm
What we collected Phragmites along Choptank River – 15 N – %N Grasses in Choptank watershed – 15 N – %N Water quality – MRC – This project
Sample analysis
Denitrification Animal Waste Volatilization enrichment Fertilizer sourceLow nitrogen and activity Results
DenitrificationAnimal Waste Volatilization enrichment Fertilizer source Low nutrients and activity River Watershed Results
DenitrificationAnimal Waste Volatilization enrichment Fertilizer source Low nutrients and activity Opposite Cambridge STP Denton Tuckahoe R. Huntington Ck. Gaineys Wharf Choptank Above Tuckahoe Easton STP Results
DenitrificationAnimal Waste Volatilization enrichment Fertilizer source Low nutrients and activity Opposite Cambridge STP Denton Tuckahoe R. Huntington Ck. Gaineys Wharf Choptank Above Tuckahoe Easton STP Results
DenitrificationAnimal Waste Volatilization enrichment Fertilizer source Low nutrients and activity Oakland (corn – unirrigated /manure) Oakland (corn - irrigated) Oakland Spray irrigated dairy Cordova Ck Trib (poultry, manure, slaughterhouse) Oakland (pond grass) Oakland (manure) Cordova Ck Trib (Downstream Poultry) Colliers (corn – chicken manure) Cordova Ck (downstream slaughterhouse) Masons Branch Trib. Upstream poultry Masons Branch Trib. Downstream poultry Results
DenitrificationAnimal Waste Volatilization enrichment Fertilizer source Low nutrients and activity Oakland (corn – unirrigated /manure) Oakland (corn - irrigated) Oakland Spray irrigated dairy Cordova Ck Trib (poultry, manure, slaughterhouse) Oakland (pond grass) Oakland (manure) Cordova Ck Trib (Downstream Poultry) Colliers (corn – chicken manure) Cordova Ck (downstream slaughterhouse) Masons Branch Trib. Upstream poultry Masons Branch Trib. Downstream poultry Results
Tuckahoe Results
Tuckahoe Results
DenitrificationAnimal Waste Volatilization enrichment Fertilizer source Low nutrients and activity
Results
Oakland Pond Cordova Ck Down. Slaughterhouse Cordova Ck Down. Poultry Cordova Ck Trib (poultry, manure, slaughterhouse) Masons Branch Trib. Upstream poultry Masons Branch Trib. Downstream poultry Results
River Watershed Watershed is distinct whereas river is a mixing bowl
Summary Demonstrated the river is sink of varied catchment activities Management needs to target N and P separately. Make sure any nutrient removal process targets the relevant nutrient. Emphasis on poultry appears to be P and not N Unclear why %N is inverse of TN in the river Shift over the past 10 years in N influence in the Choptank from animal waste to mixed animal waste/fertilizer source.
Next steps… Follow up on the turf farm Investigate above Denton and below Cambridge Consult with other scientists about the inverse relationship with TN and %N (water problem is deposited downstream in the mud???)
Results fix
Results fix