Award Review Process Presenter: Kadija Baffoe-Harding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OMB Regulatory Requirements Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documen- tation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient.
Advertisements

Business and Fiscal Officers Meeting - 4/20/10 Presented by: Glen Jones, Director Post-Award Research and Sponsored Programs.
Office of Sponsored Projects Administration COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS.
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
PLENARY SESSION Financial Management and Accountability Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
Cost Share Fundamentals. Learning Objectives Todays presentation will focus on: Cost share – The What and Why The different types of cost sharing Sponsor.
Documentation, Cash & In-Kind Match. Session Objectives Gather information on proper documentation Allowable, allocable & reasonable costs Gain knowledge.
Documenting Expenses & In-Kind Contributions. 2 Donations that Aren ’ t Dollars: In-Kind Contributions Session Objectives: Have participants understand:
PAD Seminar – October, 2012 Gail L. Ryan, Assistant Vice President Sponsored Program Administration.
Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Subpart – C Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
1 Grant Award Process Monika Lacka U.S. EPA Region 5.
Award Process Grants Review for Competitive and Non-Competitive Awards All Participants Arlene Simpson Porter Grants Officer NOS/NMFS and Paulette Moss.
Indirect Cost Presented by Bonita Brown HMEP Grant Program
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Office of the Vice Provost for Research & Graduate Studies Cost Sharing Why and How Trudy M. Riley Manager, Sponsored Programs Administration Susan Tkachick.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
NOAA GRANT MANAGEMENT DIVISION BROWN BAG SEMINAR COST ANALYSIS Presented by: BTOP Project Director William Ball Grant Management Specialist Donald Gooding.
Closeouts and Equipment Disposition Marianne Eggers, NOAA GMD.
International Trade Administration 2011 Training Material Presented by: Janet Johnson Russell and Donald Gooding September 27, 2011.
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
Monitor and Closeout Awards Lamar Revis NMFS Team Leader Paulette S. Moss OAR, NWS, NESDIS Team Leader.
Version Grants Online Non-Competitive Process Maps.
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
Washington University Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrators Forum May 2002.
Fishery Management Councils Executive Director Session Grants Rimas T. Liogys Director, Grants Management Division February 25, 2009.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
Securing and Documenting Match and In-kind Support
USDOL REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM Introduction to Grants ManagementApril 26 – 29, 2005.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
2 Donations that Aren’t Dollars: In Kind Contributions Session Objectives Have participants understand: Implication of in-kind contributions as related.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
Close-Outs Presented by Stacy Tedder NOAA Grants Management Division January 31,
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Let’s Talk Cost Sharing Sherrelle Vaughn Sponsored Programs Accounting and Reporting July 17, 2012.
June 3, 2007NTIA PSIC Public Meeting1 How to Avoid Audit Problems: Matching Share and Cost Principles National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Office of Sponsored Programs All rights reserved GTRC Budgets & submitting your proposal –To give an overview of the guidelines and fundamentals of a proposal.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.
COMMUNITY FOOD COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM Award Information Webinar Thursday, October 22, 2015 Awards Management Division Office of Grants and Financial.
OnTrack Financial and Grant Compliance. Welcome The OnTrack Policies and Procedures is a draft and a living document. It may be changed based on UWGC.
Eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
JEOPARDY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT EDITION Documentation Procurement Mystery Cost Principles Administrative Requirements Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500.
Office of Sponsored Programs Matching, Cost Sharing and In-kind.
Kiev, Ukraine October 2009 Cost Share. Objectives  Understand the definition of Cost Share  Identify USAID regulations that apply to Cost Share.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
IUP Research Institute University Square 1179 Grant Street, Suite One Indiana, PA Telephone: (724) Fax: (724)
NRCS Grants and Agreements Overview of Grants, Cooperative and Contribution Agreements Arizona State Office October 30, 2013.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Matching and Cost-Share Requirements Allowable Items and Accounting for Cost Share.
1 On-Line Financial Management Workshops Cost Classification, Administrative Costs & Program Income June 2009.
Presenter: Darrick Mallad.  In the beginning………..
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: November 3, 2015 Presented by: Office of Grants.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
“The Matching Game” Session 44 Tuesday, May 22, 2012 National Extension and Research Administrative Officer’s Conference Morgantown, West Virginia.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT -
Grants Management 101 Part A
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Cost Sharing May 15, 2013.
Regional healthcare coalition match documentation
Presentation transcript:

Award Review Process Presenter: Kadija Baffoe-Harding

Award Review Process Cycle Grants.gov Grants Online Program Office Grants Office OLA/OLIA Finance/ CAMS ASAP Recipient Org Financial Assistance Award

Documentation Recipient responsibilities: -SF-424, SF-424A or SF-424C, SF-424B or SF-424D, CD- 511, SF-LLL, and CD-346 (at the request of the Grants Office if necessary) – Project description; and – Budget narrative Program Officer responsibilities: – the Request for Application (RFA) for the award, documents required for type of award (competitive, non-competitive, institutional, section 404, etc.), completed PO Checklist, Procurement Request, and NEPA documentation.

Application Review – Grants Management Specialist Responsibilities: – Review PO Checklist to determine type of award and the basis of funding There are two type of financial assistance awards : – Grants – Cooperative Agreements There are six bases of funding for financial assistance : – Competitive – Non-Competitive – Congressionally Directed (Soft Earmark) – Institutional – Formula/Allotment – Congressionally Mandated (Hard Earmark)

Application Review GMS Responsibilities cont’d : – Review CD-435 Procurement request to ensure correct accounting data and that funds are available for obligation, – NEPA to ensure approval by designated NEPA official and any other associated documentation, – Application package submitted by the recipient via Grants.gov to ensure all required documents have been submitted and signed by the recipient authorized representative, also that the Minimum Requirements List has been completed by the Program Office – Complete GMD Checklist Cost analysis Special Award Conditions GMD Checklist

Application Review – Due Diligence It is the responsibility of the Grants Management Specialist and Program Officer to ensure that the recipient requesting funding is properly prepared to receive and manage federal funds. Therefore, we perform a series of checks to ensure that the all required systems are in place. We call this due diligence. Cost analysis ensures that the recipient is in line with the OMB Circulars (A-21, A-87, A-110 and A-122) and Administrative Requirements (15 CFR 14 and 15 CFR 24) to which they are governed. System for Award Management (SAM) allows the GMS to ensure that the entity and key personnel have not been excluded from receiving federal funds. Do Not Pay permits the GMS to review payment history or delinquency of applicants in the pre-award and pre-payment process to verify eligibility of Financial Assistance. Single Audit Clearinghouse and Federal Audit Clearinghouse ensures the timely submission of the audits under the A-133 requirement and allows the review of any issues and the corrective action plans in place to address any issues to safeguard federal funds. Dunn and Bradstreet (if applicable) to verify applicant stability and credit rating.

Application Review Cost Analysis is the review of the budget narrative and line item budget in accordance with appropriate OMB cost principals and any governing NOAA/Department of Commerce statute. This ensures the costs associated with the application are reasonable, allowable and allocable. Recipient should also ensure that the costs are treated consistently in accordance with their own policies. A well written budget justification submitted by the recipient that addresses all of the object class categories allows for an easily conducted cost analysis by the GMS

Application Review The Cost Analysis is based on the object class categories outlined on the SF-424A Line Item Budget -Personnel -Fringe Benefits -Travel -Equipment -Supplies -Contractual -Construction -Other -Indirect Charges -Program Income (if applicable)

Application Review Breakdown of information required for each Object Class Category: Personnel – name, position, salary and the time commitment of all employees. Fringe Benefits – description and breakdown of benefits by personnel when rates are higher than 35%. Travel – provide a detailed breakdown of travel costs. Domestic, Foreign and local travel must state the purpose of travel, method of travel, estimate mileage, cost per mile, duration, number of travelers and per diem rate for meals and lodging.

Application Review Breakdown of information required for each Object Class Category: Equipment – any item that the unit cost is $5,000 or more and has a useful life of more than one year. A lease vs. purchase should be completed when appropriate. Supplies –provide a breakdown of cost for supplies totaling more than $5,000 or 5% of the total project (Federal and Non- Federal funds). Contractual – provide a separate budget for each contract or subcontract regardless of the dollar value. Verify subcontractor selection via System for Award Management (SAM)

Cost Sharing or Matching is the portion of project or program costs not borne by the Federal Government. The recipient’s portion of costs can be cash or in-kind donation (recipient resources or third party contributions). Once the recipient agrees to a level of cost-share or match in their award agreement, they are required to provide that level of match to complete the award.

Cost Sharing or Matching Cost sharing or Matching can be… Voluntary Required by Program Solicitation Required by Regulation or Statutory Authority

Cost Sharing or Matching All contributions, including cash and third party in-kind, shall be accepted as part of the recipient’s cost sharing or matching when such contributions meet all of the following criteria. (1) Are verifiable from the recipient’s records. (2) Are not included as contributions for any other federally-assisted project or program. (3) Are necessary and reasonable for proper and efficient accomplishment of project or program objectives.

Cost Sharing or Matching (4) Are allowable under the applicable cost principles. (5) Are not paid by the Federal Government under another award, except where authorized by Federal statute to be used for cost sharing or matching. (6) Are provided for in the approved budget when required by the Federal awarding agency (NOAA Requires). Referenced: Title 2 Sec

Cost Sharing or Matching DOC Financial Assistance Standard Terms and Conditions  Shared allowable costs  Federal and Non-Federal ratio  Expended at the same general rate as the federal share

Cost Sharing or Matching Cost Sharing or Matching Funds. Cash and in-kind contributions that are included in the budget of the award must be valued in accordance with the applicable administrative requirements and are subject to the appropriate cost principles.

Cost Share and Matching Valuation  Indirect costs  Recipient contributions  Skilled and unskilled volunteer labor  Services offered by a non-recipient employer.  The value donated supplies (expendable equipment, office supplies, etc)  Donated equipment, buildings or land (where title passes to the recipient)

Cost Sharing or Matching FINALLY A FEW THINGS TO REMEMBER…  Accurate Records of all costs  Documentation for Federal and Non-Federal Share  Valuation  Audit Finding

Award Review The special award conditions are the specific administrative and programmatic guidelines associated with the individual award. The CD-450 Financial Assistance Award is the official agreement document that is signed by a Grants Officer and countersigned by the recipient and has the award amount, cost principles, OMB Circulars and Code of Federal Regulations that govern the recipient entity.

Award Review FALD review(Financial Assistance Law Division) if applicable. Grants Officer review and approval. Once the award is approved it then goes to Finance for obligation in the Commerce Business System (CBS).

Award Review OLIA (Office of Legislative Intergovernmental Affairs) for congressional announcement, if applicable. Finance certifies the funds and the award becomes available to the recipient.

Multi-Year Awards It is the recommendation of the Grants Office for those programs who fund applications for two or more years to convert to multi-year awards. Multi-Year Awards Minimize paperwork Allow for expedient processing for out-year funding Only require FALD review and OLIA clearance (where applicable) at award inception

Questions