Notes.  Because Ramsey is difficult to implement must find alternative way to price for multiproduct firm  Each output’s revenue covers its costs 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Second degree price discrimination
Advertisements

Chapter 18 Pricing Policies McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Price Discrimination A monopoly engages in price discrimination if it is able to sell otherwise identical units of output at different prices Whether a.
Chapter Twenty-Five Monopoly Behavior. How Should a Monopoly Price? u So far a monopoly has been thought of as a firm which has to sell its product at.
A Disneyland dilemma: Two-part tariffs for a mickey mouse monopoly
Pure Competition in the Long Run
PAUL.S.CALEM DANIEL.F.SPULBER.   This paper examines two part pricing by a multiproduct monopoly and a differentiated oligopoly.  Two part pricing.
Chapter 12 Managerial Decisions for Firms with Market Power
Managerial Decisions for Firms with Market Power
Econ 340 Industrial Economics Product Differentiation/ Monopolistic Competition Prof. Dr. Murat Yulek.
Fundamentals of Markets © 2011 D. Kirschen and the University of Washington 1.
Monopolistic Competition
Price Discrimination Monopoly Wrap-Up Chapter 15 Completion.
Roger LeRoy Miller © 2012 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Economics Today, Sixteenth Edition Chapter 24: Monopoly.
Chapter 14 Advanced Pricing Techniques
Monopolistic competition Is Starbuck’s coffee really different from any other?
Efficient Pricing using Non-linear Prices Assume – Strong natural monopoly => MC=P => deficit – Non-linear prices are at their disposal.
Chapter Twelve Pricing.
Ch. 12: Monopoly Causes of monopoly
© 2008 Pearson Addison Wesley. All rights reserved Chapter Twelve Pricing and Advertising.
Monopolistic Competiton. Assumptions Many sellers and many buyers Slightly different products Easy entry and exit (low barriers)
Departures from perfect competition
Monopoly A monopoly is a single supplier to a market
Ch. 12: Monopoly  Causes of monopoly  Monopoly pricing and output determination  Performance and efficiency of single-price monopoly and competition.
12 MONOPOLY CHAPTER.
Equilibrium and Efficiency
slide 1Monopoly MONOPOLY A monopoly is a firm which is the sole producer of a good or service for which there are no close substitutes. The monopolist’s.
Figure 8.2 How a Competitive Firm Maximizes Profit
Managerial Decisions for Firms with Market Power
The Production Decision of a Monopoly Firm Alternative market structures: perfect competition monopolistic competition oligopoly monopoly.
Chapter 12 Price Discrimination
Monopolistic Competition
Monopoly ECO 230 J.F. O’Connor. Market Structure Perfect Competition –participants act as price takers and cannot by individual behavior affect market.
Elasticity of Demand and Supply
State and Local Public Finance Spring 2013, Professor Yinger Lecture 11 User Fees (=Public Prices)
Market Failure.
Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Managerial Economics, 9e Managerial Economics Thomas Maurice.
Chapter 10 The Theory of Monopoly
Chapter 12: Managerial Decisions for Firms with Market Power
Five Sources Of Monopoly
Pricing Examples. Bundling In marketing, product bundling offers several products for sale as one combined product. This is common in the software business.
The Four Conditions for Perfect Competition
ECON 6012 Cost Benefit Analysis Memorial University of Newfoundland
Public Finance Seminar Spring 2015, Professor Yinger Public Prices or User Fees.
1 Microeconomics, 2 nd Edition David Besanko and Ronald Braeutigam Chapter 12: Pricing to Capture Surplus Value Prepared by Katharine Rockett © 2006 John.
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc Chapter 14 Price Discrimination and Monopoly Practices.
Chapter Ten Monopolies. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company, Inc. All rights reserved A Model of Monopoly Monopoly: One firm in an industry.
Price Discrimination Monopoly Wrap-Up Chapter 15 Completion.
Profit Maximization Chapter 8
© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 25 Monopoly Behavior.
Chapter 14 Equilibrium and Efficiency. What Makes a Market Competitive? Buyers and sellers have absolutely no effect on price Three characteristics: Absence.
PPA 723: Managerial Economics Lecture 15: Monopoly The Maxwell School, Syracuse University Professor John Yinger.
Chapter 14 Equilibrium and Efficiency McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Managerial Decisions for Firms with Market Power BEC Managerial Economics.
MONOPOLIES.  Single seller (pure monopoly) – industry with only one dominant company  Cartel agreement – group of producers who enter a collusive agreement.
Chapter 11 Monopoly.
1.  exists when a single firm is the sole producer of a product for which there are no close substitutes. 2.
Long Run A planning stage of Production Everything is variable and nothing fixed— therefore only 1 LRATC curve and no AVC.
Chapter 25 Monopoly Behavior Price Discrimination Price discrimination: selling different units of output at different prices. First-degree price.
Chapter 25 Monopoly Behavior. How Should a Monopoly Price? So far a monopoly has been thought of as a firm which has to sell its product at the same price.
As we wait for class to start, please sign in for today’s attendance tracking: Text to 37607: Lenovo44 netID Go online to: PollEv.com/dyson netID or.
Announcements Midterm results posted next week In recitation this week: Helpful Monopoly worksheet Homework due next week! 1.
Chapter 14 notes.
14-1 Learning Objectives  Explain why uniform pricing does not generate maximum possible total revenue and how price discrimination can generate more.
Five Sources Of Monopoly
Price Discrimination.
Second degree price discrimination
Managerial Decisions for Firms with Market Power
Ch. 13: Monopoly Causes of monopoly
Presentation transcript:

Notes

 Because Ramsey is difficult to implement must find alternative way to price for multiproduct firm  Each output’s revenue covers its costs  Must be able to separate out costs

 NARUC – ◦ Joint costs “occur when the provision of one service is an automatic by-product of the production of another service  Example, ◦ Gas well produces natural gas, propane, butane, and other gases. ◦ The only possible manner of production creates a fixed ratio of the different product ◦ There is no unique way of allocating costs to separate the products

 Products that cannot be produced simultaneously can incur common costs.  Example, ◦ Petroleum refinery produces gasoline, diesel, heating oil from each barrel of crude oil. ◦ The cost of the refinery depends on the amount produced of each of the products. ◦ Yet, the proportion of each of the products may not be fixed. (i.e. more gasoline means less diesel produced) ◦ Allocating common costs can be difficult

 1)relative output  2)attributable output  3)gross revenue  We can define these mathematically.  FDC requires each output to generate enough revenue to cover its attributed cost

 Pizza Store ◦ Breadsticks vs. pizza ◦ Common costs = dough ◦ Attributable costs = toppings  Railroad Company ◦ Passenger vs. freight train ◦ Common costs = track ◦ Attributable costs = fuel  Electricity Utility ◦ Residential vs. Industrial Consumers ◦ Common costs = power-plant ◦ Attributable costs = transmission and distribution

 How we split up the common costs depends on the method used.  Limitations ◦ MC is not included => very likely inefficient ◦ Cross-subsidization impossible to detect  P 1 MC 2  Encourages entry ◦ Circular reasoning  Pricing depends on revenue, gross revenue determines pricings ◦ Under-produce elastic goods

 An attempt to promote efficiency and equity  Move to nonlinear prices  Uniform 2-part tariff ◦ pq+t ◦ p is price per unit consumed ◦ t is an access fee charged or license/entry fee, which allows a consumer to consume any positive amount ◦ t=0 is linear pricing

 Electricity or natural gas ◦ Flat monthly fee (access fee) ◦ Pay per kilowatt hr (usage fee) ◦ Pay per cubic foot of gas (usage fee)  Cell phones ◦ Purchase cell phone (access fee) ◦ Pay per minute used (usage fee)

 Marginal price paid decreases in steps as the quantity purchased increases  If the consumer purchases q  He pays ◦ p 1 * q +t, if 0<q≤q 1 ◦ p 2 *(q- q 1 ) + p 1 * q 1 +t, if q 1 < q ≤q 2 ◦ p 3 *(q- q 2 ) + p 2 *(q 2 - q 1 ) + p 1 * q 1 +t, if q 2 < q ≤q 3 ◦ If p 1 >p 2 >p 3 => declining block tariff

 t varies across consumers  For example, ◦ industrial customers face a lower t b/c they use a constant q level of electricity ◦ Ladies night, where girls get in free  Discriminatory, challenge in court  Often used to meet some social objective rather than increase efficiency.  Initially used to distinguish between fixed costs and variable costs ◦ View demand (Mwh) and peak demand separately (MW) ◦ The two are connected and that must be accounted for

 MC = P creates deficit, particularly if you don’t want to subsidize  Ramsey is difficult, especially if it creates entry

 Lewis (1941) – decreases distortions caused by taxes  Coase (1946) – P=MC and t*s=deficit  Gabor(1955) – any pricing structure can be restructured to a 2-part tariff without loss of consumer surplus

 MC = P and fee= portion of tariff  Fee acts as a lump-sum tax  Non-linear because consumer pays more than marginal cost for inframarginal units.  Perfectly discriminating monopolist okay with first best because the firm extracts all C.S. ◦ Charges lower price for each unit ◦ The last unit P=MC  Similarly, welfare max regulator uses access fee to extract C.S.

P Q MC D Q P c AC b f a e

 Not levied on everyone  Output level changes, if demand is sensitive to income change  Previous figure shows zero income effect  Demand probably changes when the fee changes

 Marginal customer forced out because can’t afford access fee (fee > remaining C.S.)  Trade-off between access fee and price ◦ Depend on  Price elasticity  Sensitivity of market participation  Access fee  price

 Example of fixed costs ◦ Wiring, transformers, meters ◦ Pipes, meters ◦ Access to phone lines, and switching units  Per consumer charge = access fee to cover deficit  We examine single-product ◦ Identical to next model if MC of access =0  Schmalensee (1981) modeled two different output, but one requires the other. ◦ Some consumers can be priced out of the market ◦ Results are the same for single-product model

 Θ = consumer index  Example ◦ Θ A = describes type A ◦ Θ B = describes type B  f(Θ)=density function of consumers ◦ The firm knows the distribution of consumers but not a particular consumer ◦ s* is the number of Θ* type of consumer ◦ š is the number of consumers

 Demand  q(p,t,y(Θ*), Θ*)  Income  y(Θ*)  Indirect Utility Function ◦ v(p,t,y(Θ*), Θ*) ◦ ∂v/ ∂ Θ ≤0  => Θ near 1 =consumer has small demand  => Θ near 0 =consumer has large demand  Assume Demand curves do not cross ◦ => increase p or decrease t that do not cause marginal consumers to leave, then inframarginal consumers do not leave

 Let be a cutoff where some individuals exit the market at a given p, t  If, no one exits ◦ Number of consumer under cutoff,  Total Output  Profit

◦ w(θ) weight by marginal social value ◦ Maximizing this equation ensures Pareto Optimality

 max L=V+λπ  by choosing p, t, λ  FOCs

 Where is the change # of consumers caused by a change in p  and the marginal consumer receives zero surplus

 Simplifies to  From the individual’s utility max  Where v y (θ) MU income for type θ.

 Let v y =-v t because the access fee is equivalent to a reduction in income  Ignore income distribution and let ◦ w(θ)=1/v y (θ) ◦ Each consumer’s utility is weighted by the reciprocal of his MU of income  Substituting into V p reveals

 And let  From the FOC  Where  s=Q p +Q/s Q y  D= deficit

 where

 Let  Marginal consumer’s demand (Roy’s Identity)  To keep utility unchanged, the dt/dp=-qˆ  Differentiate to get  Combining get

 If the marginal consumers are insensitive to changes in the access fee or price, that is,  then the welfare maximization is ◦ P=MC ◦ t=D/s  Applies when no consumers are driven away ◦ i.e electricity ◦ Not telephone, cable

 Suppose the marginal consumers are sensitive to price and access-fee changes  Then, the sign of p-MC is the same sign as Q/s-qˆ  And ◦ p-MC≤0, then t=D/s>0 ◦ if p>MC, then t≥0

 Increase in price or fee will cause individuals to leave  Optimality may require raising p above MC in order to lower the fee, so more people stay  p>MC when Q/s>qˆ, because only then will there be enough revenue by the higher price to cover lowering the access fee.

 p 0 ◦ Very few consumers enticed to market by lowering t ◦ Consumers who do enter have flat demand with large quantities ◦ A slightly lower price means more C.S. ◦ Revenues lost to inframarginal consumers is not too great because Q/s<qˆ, ◦ Lost revenues are recovered by increasing t without driving out too many consumers ◦ Q/s-qˆ is a sufficient statistic for policy making

 Set low to get more customers  Positive externalities  Example, ◦ Telephone company offers more people to call when there are more customers accessing their lines