Probing the Ionosphere with Radioscience Instruments on CASSIOPE-e-POP Athabasca University - University of Alberta - University of Calgary - University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reflections, Echo's, Doppler, Libration and Scintillation. The strange. The unusual. The down right weird. Some stuff you may have missed ? But all have.
Advertisements

ESWW 5 Some ionospheric effects on ground based radar Y. Béniguel, J.-P. Adam.
1 Two questions still of the day: the Gendrin angle, the R.Gendrin view on the positioning of URSI F. Lefeuvre LPCE / CNRS – Univ Orléans.
Fisica Generale - Alan Giambattista, Betty McCarty Richardson Copyright © 2008 – The McGraw-Hill Companies s.r.l. 1 Chapter 22: Electromagnetic Waves Production.
Using a DPS as a Coherent Scatter HF Radar Lindsay Magnus Lee-Anne McKinnell Hermanus Magnetic Observatory Hermanus, South Africa.
HEATING expands the mind
Observation of Equatorial Electrodynamics in Africa using AMBER Magnetometer Network Endawoke Yizengaw Institute for Scientific Research, Boston College,
Extended observations of decameter scatter associated with the mid-latitude ionospheric trough E. R. Talaat 1, E. S. Miller 1, R. J. Barnes 1, J. M. Ruohoniemi.
The EISCAT Radar Facilities Ian McCrea STFC RAL. What is EISCAT? International Scientific Association Established agreeement since 1975 First observations.
Faculty of Science Department of Physics Field Line Resonances in the Earth’s Magnetosphere and Astrophysical Plasmas 1 J. C. Samson
Auroral dynamics EISCAT Svalbard Radar: field-aligned beam  complicated spatial structure (
Chapter 22: Electromagnetic Waves
1 Duct Formation by HF heating Gennady Milikh, Aram Vartanyan, Dennis Papadopoulos, University of Maryland Evgenii Mishin, Air Force Research Lab, Hanscom.
Preliminary Results from the CASCADES 2 Sounding Rocket Paul Kintner, Eric Lundberg, Cornell U. Kristina Lynch, Meghan Mella, Dartmouth C. Nicolay Ivchencko,
31 May 2011SuperDARN Workshop, 29 May - 3June 2011, Hanover, US 1 Short-period Doppler shift variations in the polar cap: ULF waves or something else?
Multipoint observations of nightside auroral activity: the Cascades2 sounding rocket mission K A Lynch, Dartmouth College 2009 Fall AGU SM53D-05 Dartmouth.
Electromagnetic Wave Theory
SeaSonde Overview.
SuperDARN real time products for Space Weather Ermanno Amata INAF Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario Roma ESWW5, Bruxelles, 20 November 2008.
0 The FORMOSAT3/COSMIC Mission Space Weather Application AMS San Diego Jan. 11, 2005 Christian Rocken
V. M. Sorokin, V.M. Chmyrev, A. K. Yaschenko and M. Hayakawa Strong DC electric field formation in the ionosphere over typhoon and earthquake regions V.
1 UNCLASSIFIED – FOUO – Not for Public Release Operational Space Environment Network Display (OpSEND) & the Scintillation Network Decision Aid Dr. Keith.
Review Doppler Radar (Fig. 3.1) A simplified block diagram 10/29-11/11/2013METR
Andrew W. Yau University of Calgary, Canada CASSIOPE Enhanced Polar Outflow Probe (e-POP) University of Alberta, October 25, 2007.
RESONANCE Project for Studies of Wave-Particle Interactions in the Inner Magnetosphere Anatoly Petrukovich and Resonance team RESONANCEРЕЗОНАНС R.
Measuring ITM Variability:Missions Around Geospace-Part 2 Jan J Sojka Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University, Logan, Utah
Ionospheric-magnetospheric VLF Wave Propagation: RPI/IMAGE-HAARP Correlative Study RPI/IMAGE-HAARP Correlative Study V. Paznukhov, B. Reinisch, G. Sales,
Brief introduction of YINGHUO-1 Micro-satellite for Mars environment exploration J. Wu, G. Zhu, H. Zhao, C. Wang, L. Lei, Y. Sun, W. Guo and S. Huang Center.
Formation of Artificial Ionospheric Ducts Gennady Milikh, Dennis Papadopoulos University of Maryland, Joe Huba, Glenn Joyce Joe Huba, Glenn Joyce Naval.
Incoherent Scattering
RUSSIAN SPACE MISSIONS FOR SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL SCIENCE ILWS-2011 A.A. Petrukovich, L.M. Zelenyi Space Research Institute V.D. Kuznetsov IZMIRAN.
Physics and Measurements of Stimulated Electromagnetic Emissions Paul A. Bernhardt, Stan Briczinski Plasma Physics Division Naval Research Laboratory.
China National Report , Prague, Czech Republic.
Remote Radio Sounding Science For JIMO J. L. Green, B. W. Reinisch, P. Song, S. F. Fung, R. F. Benson, W. W. L. Taylor, J. F. Cooper, L. Garcia, D. Gallagher,
ARL Applied Research Laboratories The University of Texas at Austin ARL Applied Research Laboratories The University of Texas at Austin Ionospheric Tomography.
Fate of a Radio Wave SOLAR AND IONOSPHERIC EFFECTS ON RADIO-WAVE SYSTEMS (Communications, Tracking, Navigation, etc.) A. Wave penetrates the ionospheric.
29 August, 2011 Beijing, China Space science missions related to ILWS in China
An Efficient Propagation Simulator for High Frequency Signals And Results from HF radar experiment Kin Shing Bobby Yau Supervisors: Dr. Chris Coleman &
Linear and nonlinear representations of wave fields and their application to processing of radio occultations M. E. Gorbunov, A. V. Shmakov Obukhov Institute.
Joint International GRACE Science Team Meeting and DFG SPP 1257 Symposium, Oct. 2007, GFZ Potsdam Folie 1 Retrieval of electron density profiles.
UPenn NROTC Unit, dtd Fall 2004 Naval Weapons Systems Energy Fundamentals.
Distributed Radar Networks Ray Greenwald JHU/APL.
Synthetic Aperture Radar Specular or Bragg Scatter? OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001.
Electromagnetic Waves and Their Propagation Through the Atmosphere
A New Bound on the Radar Cross-section of the Sun Bill Coles, UCSD Mike Sulzer and John Harmon, NAIC Jorge Chau and Ron Woodman, JRO We have not observed.
Spatial Effects of Multiple Scattering of HF Signals in the Ionosphere: Theory and Experiment N. Zabotin 1,2, J.W. Wright 2, A. Gasiewski 1, G. Zhbankov.
ESOC/CSSDP I/F Meeting October 25-26, 2007 Greg Enno – UofC.
Whistler Waves and Related Magnetospheric Phenomena
1 Receiving Ground-based VLF Transmissions with RPI on IMAGE Bodo W. Reinisch Environmental, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences Department Center for Atmospheric.
Simulations of Radio Imaging in the Earth’s Magnetosphere J. L. Green, S. Boardsen, W. W. L. Taylor, S. F. Fung, R. F. Benson, B. Reinisch, and D. L. Gallagher.
ICS VIII Banff Canada March 27-31, 2006 To be convened by Eric Donovan & John Samson Shameless focus on THEMIS! To be held at the Banff Center Webpage.
All-sky camera of the ALFA project: common points and interests with the Wide Field Astronomical Observations E. Séran & M. Godefroy CETP, St-Maur June.
Ionospheric HF radars Pasha Ponomarenko. Outline Conventional radars vs ionospheric radars Collective scatter processes Aspect angle effects HF propagation.
HAARP-induced Ionospheric Ducts Gennady Milikh, University of Maryland in collaboration with: Dennis Papadopoulos, Chia-Lee Chang, BAE systems Evgeny Mishin,
Overview of Results from the Radio Plasma Imager (RPI) on IMAGE James L. Green Space Science Data Operations Office Goddard Space Flight Center LEP Seminar.
CRRES observations indicate an abrupt increase in radiation belt fluxes corresponding to the arrival of a solar wind shock. The processes(s) which accelerate.
0 Earth Observation with COSMIC. 1 COSMIC at a Glance l Constellation Observing System for Meteorology Ionosphere and Climate (ROCSAT-3) l 6 Satellites.
0 7th ESWW, Bruges, Ionospheric Scintillations Propagation Model Y. Béniguel, J-P Adam IEEA, Courbevoie, France.
Mike Ruohoniemi 2012VT SuperDARN Remote Sensing of the Ionosphere and Earth’s Surface with HF Radar J. Michael Ruohoniemi and Joseph Baker.
Practice Questions 2015 General License Course. How is a directional antenna pointed when making a “long-path” contact with another station? A. Toward.
near-Space Environment
CAP congress, Ottawa, June 13-17, 2016
Visit for more Learning Resources
RENISH THOMAS (GPM) Global-Precipitation- Mapper
CEDAR Frontiers: Daytime Optical Aeronomy Duggirala Pallamraju and Supriya Chakrabarti Center for Space Physics, Boston University &
CEDAR Frontiers – Understanding the Polar Cap Ionosphere-Magnetosphere System Canadian High-Arctic Ionospheric Network (CHAIN) Jayachandran P. T., University.
Center for Atmospheric & Space Sciences
Ionospheric fluctuations structure during strong geomagnetic storm by incoherent scatter radar and GPS data Yu.V. CHERNIAK(1), I.I. SHAGIMURATOV(1), A.
Ionosphere, Magnetosphere and Thermosphere Anthea Coster
May 2017 Arecibo HF Experiments
Presentation transcript:

Probing the Ionosphere with Radioscience Instruments on CASSIOPE-e-POP Athabasca University - University of Alberta - University of Calgary - University of Saskatchewan - University of Western Ontario - York University - University of New Brunswick H.G. James and A.W. Yau University of Calgary P.A. Bernhardt Naval Research Laboratory R.B. Langley, University of New Brunswick Thanks to T. Cameron, G. Enno, R. Gillies, D. Knudsen

Outline Athabasca University - University of Alberta - University of Calgary - University of Saskatchewan - University of Western Ontario - York University - University of New Brunswick 1.E-POP scientific goals and instruments 2.CASSIOPE and e-POP status 3.Radio-science experiments 4.Radio Receiver Instrument (RRI) results 5.Summary

The CASSIOPE/e-POP Mission Overview Paper immediately follows: Yau

CASSIOPE Mission at a Glance… Launched 2013/09/29, 16:00 UT Polar orbiter: 325×1500 km, 81 , 3-axis stabilized e-POP: science payload; hi-res plasma and field, 3D radio propagation, meso-scale auroral imaging Cascade: comm. payload; high-speed U/L and D/L Multi-purpose small satellite funded by Canadian Space Agency and Industrial Technology Office Carries e-POP and Cascade payloads

5 Enhanced Polar Outflow Probe (e-POP) Objectives The scientific objectives of e-POP are to quantify the micro-scale characteristics of plasma outflow and related micro- and meso-scale plasma processes in the polar ionosphere, explore the occurrence morphology of neutral escape in the upper atmosphere, and study the effects of auroral currents on plasma outflow and those of plasma microstructures on radio propagation.

RRI GAP CER InstrumentMeasurementsResolution RRI Radio receiver instrument E, k(  ) ULF/HF (0–18MHz) 16  s GAP GPS attitude and profiling L1, L2Radio occultation0.05 s<1 km TEC CER Coherent EM radio tomography TECIonospheric irregularity~1 km/TEC pixel e-POP Radio Measurements

GPS spaceborne-limb and vertical sounding (Illustration adapted from graphic provided by GFZ) e-POP/GAP Motion of both GPS and e-POP results in “tomographic” sweeping of ionosphere TEC from CHAIN and other ground receivers yields density variation in horizontal direction CHAIN A GPS satellite occulted by Earth’s atmosphere and refracting the L-band waves Plasma density distribution in dispersive medium affects wave phase and amplitude

8 Amplitude (dB) VHFUHF -30 dB -10 dB -1 dB Signal Dropouts L-Band Scintillation Measurements for HAARP Operation 250 to 350 km ~ 10 km ~ 100 km CASSIOPE Orbit Vel ~ 9 km/s; T o ~ s BoBo HF Transmitter Field-aligned Striations,  n/n CERTO Receivers Distance (km) ePOP

9 E-POP Radio Receiver Instrument Science Artificial Waves, 1 kHz - 18 MHz: Measure the electric fields of waves created by ground transmitters, such as ionosondes, HF radars and ionospheric heaters. These transionospheric propagation experiments will investigate: a) the dynamics of density structure and the metrology of coherent scatter from it, and b) the nonlinear plasma physics of the HF-modified ionosphere. Spontaneous waves, 10 Hz - 3 MHz: Measure the electric fields of spontaneous waves, for scientific objectives of understanding spontaneous radio emissions of the ionosphere and magnetosphere. These measurements will be made in concert with onboard particle detectors and other space and ground facilities.

Some radio-science targets see targets.doc

Artificial Waves in Transionospheric Propagation

ePOP/RRI imaging using transionospheric HF propagation History during pass of wave parameters shows variations in: Amplitude, DOA, Doppler shift and time delay

SPEAR transionospheric propagation Transionospheric propagation on 2013/11/17 from SPEAR, Svalbard f = 4.45 MHz foF2 = 3.90 MHz from dynasonde fxF2 ≈ 4.6 MHz 3D ray tracing shows that only O- mode arrives at satellite. Then cold plasma theoretical polarization allows incident wave normal direction to be determined. Hope to investigate imaging of density structure using direction, amplitude, delay and Doppler. 3D IDL ray equations (Haselgrove).

Direction of Arrival (DOA) Excluding the time dependence, the total E vector In B-k space can be written For a given propagation direction and cold plasma parameters, the wave electric field amplitudes are in the ratio: The open-circuit voltage V oc-i induced on a dipole “i " of effective-length L eff-i by E is V oc-i = E ∙ L eff-i. With RRI dipoles 1 and 2 along the y and z axes of CASSIOPE, the induced voltages are V oc-1 = 3E y exp(2πift) and V oc-2 = 3E z exp(2πift),

Wave vector direction E) Apply two metrics: relative amplitude and phase of V oc-1 and V oc-2 R ≡ |V oc-1 |/ |V oc-2 | ; R obs = (I1 2 + Q1 2 ) 1/2 / (I3 2 + Q3 2 ) 1/2, and Φ ≡ Arg(V oc-1 ) − Arg(V oc-2 ); Φ obs = arctan(Q1/I1) − arctan(Q3/I3). F) To determine the direction θ, ϕ of propagation, search the θ, ϕ plane for solutions of F d =[R obs − R( θ, ϕ )] [Φ obs − Φ(θ, ϕ )]= 0. G) With A), transform θ, ϕ to up, south, east coordinates.

Up South East k E d1 d2 k, E - field polarisation ill suited for direction determination

Backscattered Artificial Waves Paper on SuperDARN to follow: Hussey

SuperDARN – e-POP Propagation Experiments with Radio Receiver Instrument HF Radar e-POP receiver Ionospheric Irregularities ● Effects of E/F-region density irregularities on trans-ionospheric propagation ● Observation of coherent HF backscatter from small-scale structure ● Explore angular dependence of scatter mechanism

SuperDARN Azimuthal Resolution

SuperDARN Saskatoon Pulse Train 2013_11_07 23:32:58

Artificial Waves from Ionospheric Heaters

f 5.66 MHz 04:51:33 f LHR = 6 kHz f pe = 270 kHz (H +, e - ) MHz HAARP

Doppler frequency shift and amplitude, 04:51:33 v s = 7288 m s -1 f 0 = MHz angkvel = 60.48° f0f0 Volts (dBμV)

Up SouthEast k -B 0 36°

Spontaneous Waves in the Auroral Zone Results from the ePOP Suprathermal Electron Imager to follow: Knudsen

Auroral zone wave emissions

15 kHz 0

Concluding Remarks e-POP instruments produce interesting, novel data. Data are being deposited in the Canadian Space Science Data Portal, managed by U. Alberta. Cascade wide band telemetry not available. S band limitations require close coordination by eSOC, SIC and Science Team of operations. CSA funding available until May 2015; negotiations under way for beyond.