SOOSAN JACOB, MS, FCRS,DNB AMAR AGARWAL, MS, FRCS, FRCOpth; ATHIYA AGARWAL, MD, DO; AMAR AGARWAL, MS, FRCS, FRCOpth; ATHIYA AGARWAL, MD, DO; GAURAV PRAKASH,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of a Novel Y- Suture Technique to Reduce Detachments in Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) Habeeb Ahmad, MD Martin Heur,
Advertisements

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم IN THE NAME OF GOD. Implantation of an Artisan phakic intraocular lens for the correction of high myopia, high hyperopia, aphakia.
Intraocular lens (IOL) Dislocation M.R. Akhlaghi MD.
Katsuya Yamazoe, MD, Takefumi Yamaguchi, MD, Kazuki Hotta, MD, Yoshiyuki Satake, MD, Kenji Konomi, MD, Seika Den, MD, Jun Shimazaki, MD Presented by: Abdulrahman.
V. S. Liarakos, K. van Dijk, L. Ham, L. Baydoun and G.R.J. Melles Anterior Chamber vs Posterior Chamber IOL in DMEK for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy.
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ayr, Scotland
Yüksel Totan, Ramazan Yaĝcı, Zeynel Arslanyılmaz, Uĝurcan Keskin The authors have no financial interest.
PIGGYBACK LENS AFTER MULTIFOCAL IOL IMPLANTATION Eric C. Amesbury MD Kevin M. Miller MD The authors have no financial interest.
Anupama Kotha 1, Simar J. Singh 1, William B. Trattler 1,2, Carlos Buznego 1,2 The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.
Clinical evaluation of foldable acrylic phakic IOL (fP) implantation ASCRS, San Diego, 2011 A.John Kanellopoulos, MD Professor NYU Medical School, NY Director,
Phaco-drainage Phacosection Amporn technique
Intraocular lens dislocation secondary to haptic torsion Lawrence E. Lohman, MD FACS Matthew C. Willett, MD.
Title slide Surgical Peculiarities in Cases of Irido- fundal Coloboma Having Cataract Extraction Prof Sudarshan K. Khokhar, MD Dr Sanjay K. Mishra, MS.
Somasheila I. Murthy, Prashant Garg, Pravin K. Vaddavalli
Dept. of Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Outcome after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry PATIENTS’ CHARACTERISTICS Table 1.1: Age Distributions.
Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,
Purpose: Introduction:  At initial evaluation: For post-op day # 0 patients: Pre-op VA was 20/50.6 (0.395 ± 0.198); Post-op VA was 20/102.0 (0.196 ± 0.162);
Implantable Collamer Lens Complications
Glaucoma and Penetrating Keratoplasty : Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes Sonika Gupta Consultant Ophthalmology Max Eye Care New Delhi, India Author.
DSAEK Outcomes in Normal and Abnormal, High-Risk Eyes at an University Practice Hugo Y. Hsu and Sean L. Edelstein The authors have no financial interest.
EVALUATION OF ANTERIOR CHAMBER SULCUS SUPPORTED INTRAOCULAR LENS BY PROF. HAMED NASER EL- DIN TAHA HAED OF OPHTHALMOLOGY DEPT. SAUDI GERMAN HOSPITAL JEDDAH.
Astigmatism management with toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients Adriano Guarnieri 1-2, Luis W. Lu 3-4, Alfonso Arias- Puente INCIVI, Madrid,
“OUR EXPERIENCE OF SECONDARY IOLS - SCLERAL FIXATION v/sAC IOL DR. RUPAM DESAI ROTARY EYE INSTITUTE NAVSARI INDIA (Author has no financial interest)
Case Report of Severe Haze After DSAEK
Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with Toxic anterior segment syndrome induced endothelial failure First and Presenting.
AlphaCor TM : A Novel Approach to Minimize Late Post-operative Complications V. Ngakeng MD, M. Price PhD. MBA, F. Price MD.
Financial Disclosure: None
Results of Collagen Crosslinking followed by posterior chamber toric implantable collamer lens implantation in patients with Keratoconus & High Myopia.
Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With an Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens: A Montreal Experience Georges M. Durr, MD 1,2 Johanna Choremis, MD, FRCSC.
Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Nepafenac 0.1% (Nevanac™) and Bromfenac Sodium 0.09% (Xibrom™) in Post-Op Cataract Patients Hon-Vu.
Internal Repositioning of Posteriorly Dislocated IOL: User’s Friendly Technique The author have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.
Comparison of LASIK and Mitomycin-C Assisted LASEK for Correction of Refractive Errors After Cataract Surgery Dr. Nitin Balakrishnan, Crystal Vision Laser.
Adriana S. Forseto1, MD Walton Nosé1,2, MD
Outcomes of Transscleral Sulcus Fixation of Intraocular Lenses through a 2.4-mm Incision with an Injector System: 1-Year Follow-Up Akiko Masai, MD, Tomoichiro.
Outcomes of Transscleral Sulcus Fixation of Intraocular Lenses through a 2.4-mm Incision with an Injector System: 1-Year Follow-Up Akiko Masai, MD, Tomoichiro.
Visual and IOP Outcomes after PRK in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome [Poster Number: P190] Kraig S. Bower, Denise A. Sediq, Charles D. Coe, Keith Wroblewski,
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Jodhbir S Mehta, Donald Tan The Authors have a financial Interest in the Endoglide patent/royalty.
Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.
An Epidemic of Dislocated IOLs? Garth Stevens Jr. MD Eye Care Center of Virginia Mary Washington Eye Care Center.
DSEK for the treatment of endothelial disease in India -Initial Experience in 80 eyes- Authors have no financial interest Dr Ashish Nagpal MD, FRCS Dr.
O.I.I. EC-3 Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens: The European Experience Thierry Amzallag, M.D. Institut Ophtalmique Somain, France.
P324: Femtosecond-Assisted DSAEK with Fibrin Glue-Assisted Sutureless Posterior Chamber Lens Implantation Gaurav Prakash, MD Amar Agarwal, MS, FRCS, FRCOphth;
Hongseok Yang, M.D. Dae Hee Kim, M.D. Department of Ophthalmology, Ajou University School of medicine, Suwon, Korea The authors have no financial interest.
Jae Woo Kim M.D. ; Sung Kun Chung M.D. Nam Ho Baek M.D. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The Catholic University of Korea Clinical Result.
Minimizing Risk in Visian ICL Implantation.
Liquifaction Method and Extent of Posterior Capsule Opacification: Two-Year Follow-up Marie Kalfertova, Mariya Burova, Pavel Rozsival, Nada Jiraskova Nada.
Long-term results of Phakic Refractive Lens (PRL™) implantation in high myopic eyes. Ioannis G. Pallikaris 1, 2, MD, PhD, Maria I. Kalyvianaki 1, MD, PhD,
D.r Nishant Nawani, MS Dr. Surinder Singh Pandav, MD Dr. Amit Gupta, MD Dr. Sushmita Kaushik, MD Advanced Eye Centre PGIMER, Chandigarh The authors have.
Challenging Situations: Multiple Possible Solutions.. But Ultimately – Wow !! Dr. Ashok P. Shroff, MD, Dr. Hardik A. Shroff, MD Dr. Dishita H. Shroff,
FreeVis LASIK Zentrum Universitätsklinikum Mannheim
Pseudoexfoliation syndrom and cataract: results and complication frequency in immature and mature cataract surgery Marijana Bilen Babić Department of.
Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
Late In-the-bag Intraocular Lens Dislocation:
Corneal Pachymetry in Prediction of Refraction After Cataract Surgery
Evaluation of Akreos AO micro-incision IOL, implantation in 350 eyes :
Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.
Clinical results of the aphakia correction using iris-fixated anterior chamber intraocular lens (Artisan) Authors have no financial interest Luis Izquierdo.
Effects of the “Pop & Prechop” Supracapsular Phacoemulsification Technique on Endothelial Cell Counts and Corneal Clarity Brandon Rodriguez, MD Michael.
Barry A Schechter, MD Florida Eye Microsurgical Institute
Technique for Scleral Fixation of Traumatic Subluxation of IOL
Nathalie M. Guibord,MD Geisinger Medical Center
Results of corrective surgery: secondary lens implantation at a cataract surgery training centre Mehul Shah,shreya shah, adway appalware,pramod upadhyay,
Intraocular lens (IOL) Dislocation
Innovation Glued IOL 1st Time in Cambodia
Anand K Shah MD1 Neda Shamie MD1 Paul Phillips MD1 Mark A Terry MD1,2*
Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital
SUBLUXATION LENS, A NO-RING APPROACH
Presentation transcript:

SOOSAN JACOB, MS, FCRS,DNB AMAR AGARWAL, MS, FRCS, FRCOpth; ATHIYA AGARWAL, MD, DO; AMAR AGARWAL, MS, FRCS, FRCOpth; ATHIYA AGARWAL, MD, DO; GAURAV PRAKASH, MD; DHIVYA A KUMAR, MD; GAURAV PRAKASH, MD; DHIVYA A KUMAR, MD; ARCHANA NAIR, MS; AKBAR SALEEM, MS DR. AGARWAL’S GROUP OF EYE HOSPITALS & EYE RESEARCH CENTRE, CHENNAI, INDIA CHENNAI, INDIA PROF. AMAR AGARWAL IS A PAID CONSULTANT TO ABOTT MEDICAL OPTICS AND BAUSCH & LOMB. NONE OF THE OTHER AUTHORS HAVE ANY FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES.

BACKGROUND : OPTIONS FOR CORRECTION OF APHAKIA IN THE ABSENCE OF ADEQUATE CAPSULAR SUPPORT ARE – ANTERIOR CHAMBER IOL, IRIS FIXATED IOL, SUTURED SCLERAL FIXATED IOL AND GLUED IOL BACKGROUND : OPTIONS FOR CORRECTION OF APHAKIA IN THE ABSENCE OF ADEQUATE CAPSULAR SUPPORT ARE – ANTERIOR CHAMBER IOL, IRIS FIXATED IOL, SUTURED SCLERAL FIXATED IOL AND GLUED IOL PURPOSE : TO EVALUATE THE VISUAL OUTCOME AND COMPLICATIONS OF EYES OPERATED WITH FIBRIN GLUE ASSISTED POSTERIOR CHAMBER IOL IMPLANTATION IN EYES WITH DEFICIENT POSTERIOR CAPSULE AT ONE YEAR FOLLOW UP PURPOSE : TO EVALUATE THE VISUAL OUTCOME AND COMPLICATIONS OF EYES OPERATED WITH FIBRIN GLUE ASSISTED POSTERIOR CHAMBER IOL IMPLANTATION IN EYES WITH DEFICIENT POSTERIOR CAPSULE AT ONE YEAR FOLLOW UP

FIBRIN GLUE ASSISTED SUTURELESS TRANS-SCLERAL HAPTIC FIXATED POSTERIOR CHAMBER IOL IMPLANTATION FIBRIN GLUE ASSISTED SUTURELESS TRANS-SCLERAL HAPTIC FIXATED POSTERIOR CHAMBER IOL IMPLANTATION RIGID PMMA IOL OR 3 PIECE FOLDABLE IOL RIGID PMMA IOL OR 3 PIECE FOLDABLE IOL EXPERIENCE OF >300 EYES (FIRST CASE: 2007), 11 PEER REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS EXPERIENCE OF >300 EYES (FIRST CASE: 2007), 11 PEER REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS INDICATIONS: INDICATIONS: IN THE BAG IOL/ SULCUS SUPPORT NOT POSSIBLE IN THE BAG IOL/ SULCUS SUPPORT NOT POSSIBLE >180º SUBLUXATION >180º SUBLUXATION APHAKIA APHAKIA GLUED IOL IS AN OFF LABEL USE OF IOLs AND FIBRIN GLUE AGARWAL A, KUMAR DA, JACOB S, ET AL. FIBRIN GLUE–ASSISTED SUTURELESS POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION IN EYES WITH DEFICIENT POSTERIOR CAPSULES. J CATARACT REFRACT SURG 2008; 34: 1433–1438 PRAKASH G, KUMAR DA, JACOB S ET AL. ANTERIOR SEGMENT OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY–AIDED DIAGNOSIS AND PRIMARY POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION WITH FIBRIN GLUE IN TRAUMATIC PHACOCELE WITH SCLERAL PERFORATION. J CATARACT REFRACT SURG 2009; 35: 782–784 JACOB S, PRAKASH G, ASHOK KUMAR D, NAIR V, AGARWAL A, AGARWAL A. ANTERIOR SEGMENT TRANSPLANTATION WITH A NOVEL BIOSYNTHETIC GRAFT. EYE CONTACT LENS MAR;36(2):130-6.

RETROSPECTIVE CASE SERIES, IRB APPROVED, INFORMED CONSENT TAKEN RETROSPECTIVE CASE SERIES, IRB APPROVED, INFORMED CONSENT TAKEN DECEMBER 2007 TO MAY 2008: 59 EYES (OF 56 PATIENTS ) DECEMBER 2007 TO MAY 2008: 59 EYES (OF 56 PATIENTS ) ALL UNDERWENT FIBRIN GLUE ASSISTED POSTERIOR CHAMBER IOL IMPLANTATION WITH TRANS-SCLERAL HAPTIC FIXATION ALL UNDERWENT FIBRIN GLUE ASSISTED POSTERIOR CHAMBER IOL IMPLANTATION WITH TRANS-SCLERAL HAPTIC FIXATION FOLLOW UP: 1, 3, 6, 12 MONTHS FOLLOW UP: 1, 3, 6, 12 MONTHS STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: SPSS VERSION 16.1(SPSS INC, USA). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: SPSS VERSION 16.1(SPSS INC, USA). DIFFERENCES CONSIDERED STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT AT P<0.05. WILCOXON SIGNED RANK TEST USED DIFFERENCES CONSIDERED STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT AT P<0.05. WILCOXON SIGNED RANK TEST USED ANALYSIS AT ONE YEAR OF: ANALYSIS AT ONE YEAR OF: POSTOPERATIVE BEST CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY (BCVA) POSTOPERATIVE BEST CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY (BCVA) UNCORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY (UCVA) UNCORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY (UCVA) SPECULAR COUNT SPECULAR COUNT INTRA OCULAR PRESSURE (IOP) INTRA OCULAR PRESSURE (IOP) CELLULAR REACTION (SUN CLASSIFICATION) CELLULAR REACTION (SUN CLASSIFICATION) CENTRAL MACULAR THICKNESS (CMT) CENTRAL MACULAR THICKNESS (CMT) INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IOL TILT IOL TILT IOL CENTERATION IOL CENTERATION

INFUSION CANNULA INSERTED INFUSION CANNULA INSERTED TWO LAMELLAR SCLERAL FLAPS 180 DEGREES APART WERE MADE TWO LAMELLAR SCLERAL FLAPS 180 DEGREES APART WERE MADE SCLEROTOMY WAS MADE UNDER EACH FLAP 1 MM FROM THE LIMBUS SCLEROTOMY WAS MADE UNDER EACH FLAP 1 MM FROM THE LIMBUS THE IOL HAPTIC WAS GRASPED WITH 23 G MST FORCEPS AND EXTERIORIZED UNDER THE FLAP THE IOL HAPTIC WAS GRASPED WITH 23 G MST FORCEPS AND EXTERIORIZED UNDER THE FLAP BOTH HAPTIC TIPS WERE TUCKED INTO SCLERAL TUNNELS AT THE EDGE OF THE FLAPS BOTH HAPTIC TIPS WERE TUCKED INTO SCLERAL TUNNELS AT THE EDGE OF THE FLAPS FIBRIN GLUE WAS USED TO SEAL THE FLAP FIBRIN GLUE WAS USED TO SEAL THE FLAP SCLERAL FLAPSIOL INTRODUCEDHAPTIC GRASPED WITH 23 G MST FORCEPS OPPOSITE HAPTIC SIMILARLY EXTERIORIZED HAPTIC EXTERIORIZEDTUNNEL AT EDGE OF FLAP MADE WITH 26 G NEEDLE HAPTIC TUCKED INTO SCLERAL TUNNEL FIBRIN GLUE APPLIEDFLAPS SEALED ABC DEF GHI

Scleral flaps 180 º apartLeading haptic graspedHaptic exteriorizedTrailing haptic grasped Both haptics exteriorizedScleral tunnel at flap edgeHaptic tucked into tunnelBoth haptics tucked Fibrin glue appliedFlap sealedOpposite flap sealedPost-op day 1: 20/30 A B CD EFGH IJKL

23 FEMALE/ 33 MALE 23 FEMALE/ 33 MALE MEAN AGE = 50.63±18.75 YRS MEAN AGE = 50.63±18.75 YRS PRIMARY PROCEDURE = 69.4% PRIMARY PROCEDURE = 69.4% SECONDARY PROCEDURE = 30.5% SECONDARY PROCEDURE = 30.5% INDICATIONS: INDICATIONS: INTRAOPERATIVE POSTERIOR CAPSULAR RUPTURE WITH ABSENT SULCUS SUPPORT (37.2%) INTRAOPERATIVE POSTERIOR CAPSULAR RUPTURE WITH ABSENT SULCUS SUPPORT (37.2%) APHAKIA (33.8%) APHAKIA (33.8%) SUBLUXATED CATARACT (28.8%) SUBLUXATED CATARACT (28.8%)

MEAN IOP (1 YR POST-OP) = 14.17±3.5mmHg MEAN IOP (1 YR POST-OP) = 14.17±3.5mmHg GRADE II AC CELLULAR REACTION ON DAY 1 GRADE II AC CELLULAR REACTION ON DAY 1 POST-OP PERIOD (RESOLVING WITHIN 48 HRS OF MEDICAL MANAGEMENT) = 3/59 EYES MEAN CMT (1 YEAR POST OP ON STRATUS OCT) = MEAN CMT (1 YEAR POST OP ON STRATUS OCT) = 190.8±5.9MICRONS 190.8±5.9MICRONS IRIDODONESIS = 16.9% IRIDODONESIS = 16.9% CLINICAL PSEUDOPHACODONESIS = 0 CLINICAL PSEUDOPHACODONESIS = 0 ENDOPHTHALMITIS = 0 ENDOPHTHALMITIS = 0 MEAN POST OP SPECULAR COUNT = MEAN POST OP SPECULAR COUNT = 2197 ± 318.7CELLS /MM2. PERCENTAGE LOSS OF ENDOTHELIAL CELLS PERCENTAGE LOSS OF ENDOTHELIAL CELLS (PREOP TO ONE YEAR POST OP) = 5.33±3.5% SCATTER PLOTSCATTER PLOTSCATTER PLOTSCATTER PLOT

ULTRASOUND BIOMICROSCOPY USED ULTRASOUND BIOMICROSCOPY USED LINE WAS DRAWN ALONG LIMBUS AS PLANE OF REFERENCE LINE WAS DRAWN ALONG LIMBUS AS PLANE OF REFERENCE SECOND LINEWAS DRAWN ALONG LONG AXIS OF IOL OPTIC SECOND LINEWAS DRAWN ALONG LONG AXIS OF IOL OPTIC OPTIC WAS CONSIDERED NOT TILTED WHEN REFERENCE LINE ALONG LIMBUS AND IOL OPTIC WERE PARALLEL OPTIC WAS CONSIDERED NOT TILTED WHEN REFERENCE LINE ALONG LIMBUS AND IOL OPTIC WERE PARALLEL ACCORDING TO EQUATION OF STRAIGHT LINE, Y = MX + C, SLOPE OF LINE THROUGH LIMBUS AND IOL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO EQUATION OF STRAIGHT LINE, Y = MX + C, SLOPE OF LINE THROUGH LIMBUS AND IOL WAS DETERMINED SLOPES WERE CALCULATED AS M = (Y2-Y1)/(X2-X1) WHERE (X1, Y1) & (X2, Y2) ARE ANY TWO POINTS ON THE 2 LINES. IF TWO STRAIGHT LINES ARE PARALLEL, THERE SLOPES WILL BE EQUAL; OR THE RATIO WILL BE 1. RATIO BETWEEN SLOPE OF LINE 1 & LINE 2 WAS CALCULATED ABSOLUTE MEAN SLOPE OF LINE (L1) THROUGH LIMBUS = ± 0.09 ABSOLUTE MEAN SLOPE OF LINE (L1) THROUGH LIMBUS = ± 0.09 ABSOLUTE MEAN SLOPE OF LINE (L2) THROUGH IOL OPTIC = ± 0.1 ABSOLUTE MEAN SLOPE OF LINE (L2) THROUGH IOL OPTIC = ± 0.1 MEAN RATIO OF SLOPE = 1.04 ± 0.28 MEAN RATIO OF SLOPE = 1.04 ± 0.28 MEAN DISTANCE B/W IRIS AND IOL = 0.92 ± 0.27MM IN OCT MEAN DISTANCE B/W IRIS AND IOL = 0.92 ± 0.27MM IN OCT

DECENTRATION OF THE GEOMETRIC CENTER OF THE IOL OPTIC (a1) WITH RESPECT TO LIMBUS (a) WAS DETERMINED AS r (MM) MILD DECENTERATION DETECTED IN AN EYE IN EARLY POST OPERATIVE PERIOD SERIAL DIGITAL SLIT LAMP IMAGES OF THE EYE WITH FULL PUPILLARY DILATATION WERE TAKEN TO ASSESS IOLCENTERATION SERIAL DIGITAL SLIT LAMP IMAGES OF THE EYE WITH FULL PUPILLARY DILATATION WERE TAKEN TO ASSESS IOLCENTERATION IMAGE PROCESSING WITH MATLAB VERSION 7.1 (MATHWORKS, INC) WAS DONE TO QUANTIFY DECENTERATION IMAGE PROCESSING WITH MATLAB VERSION 7.1 (MATHWORKS, INC) WAS DONE TO QUANTIFY DECENTERATION GEOMETRIC CENTRE OF THE LIMBUS (a) AND THE IOL OPTIC (a1) WAS DEDUCTED AFTER COMPLETE PUPILLARY DILATATION GEOMETRIC CENTRE OF THE LIMBUS (a) AND THE IOL OPTIC (a1) WAS DEDUCTED AFTER COMPLETE PUPILLARY DILATATION DISTANCE (r) BETWEEN THE TWO GEOMETRIC POINTS WERE CALCULATED IN MM ON EACH VISIT DISTANCE (r) BETWEEN THE TWO GEOMETRIC POINTS WERE CALCULATED IN MM ON EACH VISIT AMOUNT OF DECENTRATION OF THE GEOMETRIC CENTER OF THE IOL OPTIC WITH RESPECT TO THE X-AXIS AND Y-AXIS OF A 2-DIMENSIONAL CARTESIAN SYSTEM (THE CORONAL PLANE) WAS DETERMINED AMOUNT OF DECENTRATION OF THE GEOMETRIC CENTER OF THE IOL OPTIC WITH RESPECT TO THE X-AXIS AND Y-AXIS OF A 2-DIMENSIONAL CARTESIAN SYSTEM (THE CORONAL PLANE) WAS DETERMINED AT LAST FOLLOW UP : MEAN r = 0.08±0.19MM MEAN r = 0.08±0.19MM MEAN X AND Y SHIFT = 0.08±0.19MM AND 0.01±0.05MM MEAN X AND Y SHIFT = 0.08±0.19MM AND 0.01±0.05MMRESPECTIVELY.

ONE YEAR RESULTS OF FIBRIN GLUE ASSISTED POSTERIOR CHAMBER IOL IMPLANTATION SUGGEST GOOD VISUAL OUTCOME WITH MINIMAL COMPLICATIONS IN EYES WITH DEFICIENT CAPSULAR SUPPORT