Wave-current Interaction (WEC) in the COAWST Modeling System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INWAVE: THE INFRAGRAVITY WAVE DRIVER OF THE COAWST SYSTEM
Advertisements

Development and Implementation of Depth Dependent Wave Forcing and Stokes Drift into Coupled 3D PADCIRC/PUNSWAN Joshua Todd Coastal Engineering Department.
Operational Forecasting Wave Models. WaveWatch III (Tolman 1997, 1999a) Model description: – Third generation wave model developed at NOAA/NCEP. – Solves.
Dynamics V: response of the ocean to wind (Langmuir circulation, mixed layer, Ekman layer) L. Talley Fall, 2014 Surface mixed layer - Langmuir circulation.
To Couple or Not To Couple John Warner, USGS. Overview of some recent advancements to ROMS –sediment transport components –wave/current interactions –model.
James PM Syvitski & Eric WH Hutton, CSDMS, CU-Boulder With special thanks to Pat Wiberg, Carl Friedrichs, Courtney Harris, Chris Reed, Rocky Geyer, Alan.
SWAN User's manual
WAIS 2005; Slide number 1. Numerical modelling of ocean- ice interactions under Pine Island Bay’s ice shelf Tony Payne 1 Paul Holland 2,3 Adrian Jenkins.
Wave-current interactions in three dimensions Fabrice Ardhuin 1 and Nicolas Rascle 1,2, 1 Service Hydrographique et Océanographique.
Wave-current Interaction (WEC) in the COAWST Modeling System Nirnimesh Kumar, SIO with J.C. Warner, G. Voulgaris, M. Olabarrieta *see Kumar et al., 2012.
Stephen M. Henderson R.T. Guza Steve Elgar Britt Raubenheimer W.C. O’Rielly T.H.C. Herbers Comparison of observed and modeled alongshore-variable surfzone.
D A C B z = 20m z=4m Homework Problem A cylindrical vessel of height H = 20 m is filled with water of density to a height of 4m. What is the pressure at:
STORM SURGE. Composed of several attributes: A)Barometric – Coastal water response to low pressure at center of storm B) Wind stress – frictional drag.
Wind Driven Circulation - wind energy to the ocean is a “wind stress” - wind directly drives currents at ~2 - 3% of wind speed - wind directly drives currents.
HWRF Model Sensitivity to Non-hydrostatic Effects Hurricane Diagnostics and Verification Workshop May 4, 2009 Katherine S. Maclay Colorado State University.
Institute of Oceanogphy Gdańsk University Jan Jędrasik The Hydrodynamic Model of the Southern Baltic Sea.
Estuarine Variability  Tidal  Subtidal Wind and Atmospheric Pressure  Fortnightly M 2 and S 2  Monthly M 2 and N 2  Seasonal (River Discharge)
The Air-Sea Momentum Exchange R.W. Stewart; 1973 Dahai Jeong - AMP.
SELFE: Semi-implicit Eularian- Lagrangian finite element model for cross scale ocean circulation Paper by Yinglong Zhang and Antonio Baptista Presentation.
An Assimilating Tidal Model for the Bering Sea Mike Foreman, Josef Cherniawsky, Patrick Cummins Institute of Ocean Sciences, Sidney BC, Canada Outline:
US IOOS Modeling Testbed Leadership Teleconference May 3, 2011 FVCOM Development Team Robert C. Beardsley and Changsheng Chen
Nearshore circulation system
MODEL RESPONSE SENSITIVITY TO WAVES, NONLINEAR ADVECTION, AND BOTTOM FRICTION Patrick C. Kerr 17 th ADCIRC WORKSHOP April 29-30, Patrick Corbitt.
CEE 262A H YDRODYNAMICS Lecture 18 Surface Ekman layer.
Background Research Applications Philip Hayes The Florida State University.
Oceanic and Atmospheric Modeling of the Big Bend Region Steven L. Morey, Dmitry S. Dukhovksoy, Donald Van Dyke, and Eric P. Chassignet Center for Ocean.
Progress on the Modification of Offshore Boundary Conditions for Full-Bay ROMS Simulations Have shown previously that ROMS simulations capture tides well,
Alternative derivation of Sverdrup Relation Construct vorticity equation from geostrophic balance (1) (2)  Integrating over the whole ocean depth, we.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar Abhilash Vijayan Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj University of Toledo.
Modelling 1: Basic Introduction. What constitutes a “model”? Why do we use models? Calibration and validation. The basic concept of numerical integration.
Sensitivity of Tropical Cyclone Inner-Core Size and Intensity to the Radial Distribution of Surface Entropy Flux Wang, Y., and Xu, 2010: Sensitivity of.
SWAN cx, cy = propagation velocities (x- and y- directions)  = relative frequency  = wave direction S = source/sink term for: - wind-wave generation.
MS 698: 2014 Implementing a Hydrodynamic Model - Part 2 Julia Moriarty 14 February 2014.
Modeling the upper ocean response to Hurricane Igor Zhimin Ma 1, Guoqi Han 2, Brad deYoung 1 1 Memorial University 2 Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
A High Resolution Coupled Sea-Ice/Ocean Model for the Antarctic Peninsula Region Michael S. Dinniman John M. Klinck Andrea Piñones Center for Coastal Physical.
Turbulent properties: - vary chaotically in time around a mean value - exhibit a wide, continuous range of scale variations - cascade energy from large.
WRF Volcano modelling studies, NCAS Leeds Ralph Burton, Stephen Mobbs, Alan Gadian, Barbara Brooks.
CLOSED ENERGY BUDGETS FOR REGIONAL NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS Parker MacCready University of Washington.
The Governing Equations The hydrodynamic model adopted here is the one based on the hydrostatic pressure approximation and the boussinesq approximation,
Mixing From Stresses Wind stresses Bottom stresses Internal stresses Non-stress Instabilities Cooling Double Diffusion Tidal Straining Shear ProductionBuoyancy.
Infragravity Waves Forced by Surface Wind Waves in the Central North Pacific Ocean Yusuke Uchiyama and James C. McWilliams (CESR, IGPP, UCLA) Ocean bottom.
Ocean surface waves - nearshore littoral currents (e.g., rip current)‏ - upper ocean mixing (e.g., Langmuir cells)‏ Wave-Current Interaction in ROMS: A.
Typical Mean Dynamic Balances in Estuaries Along-Estuary Component 1. Barotropic pressure gradient vs. friction Steady state, linear motion, no rotation,
Current Weather Introduction to Air-Sea interactions Ekman Transport Sub-tropical and sub-polar gyres Upwelling and downwelling Return Exam I For Next.
CEE 262A H YDRODYNAMICS Lecture 13 Wind-driven flow in a lake.
Some GOTM Physics SOPRAN GOTM School Warnemünde: Hans Burchard Baltic Sea Research Institute Warnemünde, Germany.
Modeling wave-ocean processes, dense water dynamics, sediment transport and continental margin reshaping in the Adriatic Sea Woods Hole, Aug , COAWST.
Modeling transport and deposition of the Mekong River sediment Z. George Xue 1 * Ruoying He 1, J.Paul Liu 1, John C Warner 2 1.Dept. of Marine, Earth and.
Effect of the Gulf Stream on Winter Extratropical Cyclones Jill Nelson* and Ruoying He Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University,
CHANGSHENG CHEN, HEDONG LIU, And ROBERT C. BEARDSLEY
NUMERICAL STUDY OF THE MEDITERRANEAN OUTFLOW WITH A SIMPLIFIED TOPOGRAPHY Sergio Ramírez-Garrido, Jordi Solé, Antonio García-Olivares, Josep L. Pelegrí.
Forces and accelerations in a fluid: (a) acceleration, (b) advection, (c) pressure gradient force, (d) gravity, and (e) acceleration associated with viscosity.
Polar Research Thesis Topics Associate Research Professor Tim Stanton X3144 Spanegal 329 Comparisons of ocean heat fluxes.
The effect of tides on the hydrophysical fields in the NEMO-shelf Arctic Ocean model. Maria Luneva National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool 2011 AOMIP meeting.
Typical Mean Dynamic Balances in Estuaries Along-Estuary Component 1. Barotropic pressure gradient vs. friction Steady state, linear motion, no rotation,
Estuarine Hydrodynamics
Posted by Irina Overeem, May 2016
Interfacing Model Components CRTI RD Project Review Meeting Canadian Meteorological Centre August 22-23, 2006.
Coupling ROMS and CSIM in the Okhotsk Sea Rebecca Zanzig University of Washington November 7, 2006.
Estuarine Variability
The Boussinesq and the Quasi-geostrophic approximations
Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation
ROMS Framework: Kernel
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast
SWAN model applications
Community Model for Wave and Current Prediction at Tidal Inlets
Mark A. Bourassa and Qi Shi
LCDR John Hendrickson 17SEP2008
Lecture 1: Introduction
SWAN model applications
Presentation transcript:

Wave-current Interaction (WEC) in the COAWST Modeling System Nirnimesh Kumar with John Warner, George Voulgaris, Maitane Olabarrieta *see Kumar et al., 2012 (third paper in your booklet) : Implementation of the vortex force formalism in the coupled ocean-atmosphere-wave-sediment transport (COAWST) modeling system for inner shelf and surf zone applications, Ocean Modelling, Volume 47, 2012, Pages 65-95, 10.1016/j.ocemod.2012.01.003. *also see Olabarrieta et al., 2012 (fourth paper for applications)

Wave-averaged Equations Wave-Current Interaction Description StCOR Stokes-Coriolis Force/Hasselmann Stress PG Pressure Gradient (Includes Bernoulli head, quasi-static pressure and vertical vortex force, Eqn. 5, 7, 9 and 13) HVF Horizontal Vortex Force BA+RA Breaking & Roller Acceleration (Wave dissipation and roller induced flows) BtSt+SuSt Bottom & Surface Streaming (Can act as stress in bottom and surface layer)

Exchange of Data Field http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/operations/modeling/COAWST/index.html

Wave-current Interaction (WEC) WEC_MELLOR (Mellor, 2011) WEC_VF (Uchiyama et al., 10) Implemented in Kumar et al., 2011 + Dissipation (depth) + Roller Model + Wave mixing + Streaming + Roller Model + Streaming Implemented in Kumar et al., 2012 *Processes in italics are optional cppdefs.h (COAWST/ROMS/Include) WEC_MELLOR+ Activates the Mellor (2011) method for WEC WEC_VF (preferred method for 3D) Activate WEC using the Vortex Force formalism (Uchiyama et al., 2010)

Dissipation (Depth-limited wave breaking) WDISS_THORGUZA Use depth-limited wave dissipation based on Thornton and Guza (1983). See Eqn. (31), pg-71 WDISS_CHURTHOR Activate depth-limited wave dissipation based on Church and Thornton (1993). See Eqn. (32), pg-71 WDISS_WAVEMOD Activate wave-dissipation from a wave model. If using SWAN wave model, use INRHOG=1 for correct units of wave dissipation Note: Use WDISS_THORGUZA/CHURTHOR if no information about wave dissipation is present, and you can’t run the wave model to obtain depth-limited dissipation If you do not define any of these options, and still define WEC_VF, the model expects a forcing file with information about dissipation

ROLLER MODEL (for Wave Rollers) ROLLER_SVENDSEN Activate wave roller based on Svendsen (1984). See Warner et al. (2008), Eqn. 7 and Eqn. 10. ROLLLER_MONO Activate wave roller for monochromatic waves from REF-DIF. See Haas and Warner, 2009. ROLLER_RENIERS Activate wave roller based on Reniers et al. (2004). See Eqn. 34-37 (Advection-Diffusion) Note: If defining ROLLER_RENIERS, you must specify the parameter wec_alpha (αr in Eqn. 34, varying from 0-1) in the INPUT file. Here 0 means no percentage of wave dissipation goes into creating wave rollers, while 1 means all the wave dissipation creates wave rollers.

Wave breaking induced mixing TKE_WAVEDISS ZOS_HSIG Activate enhance vertical viscosity mixing from waves within framework of GLS. See Eq. 44, 46 and 47. The parameter αw in Eq. 46 can be specified in the INPUT file as ZOS_HSIG_ALPHA (roughness from wave amplitude) Parameter Cew in Eqn. 47 is specified in the INPUT file as SZ_ALPHA (roughness from wave dissipation) Note: Sensitivity tests for wave-mixing were done in Kumar et al. (2012). The enhanced mixing is sensitive to Cew

Bottom and Surface Streaming BOTTOM_STREAMING Bottom streaming due to waves using Uchiyama et al. (2010) methodology. See Eqn. 22-26. This method requires dissipation due to bottom friction. If not using a wave model, then uses empirical Eq. 22. _XU_BOWEN Bottom streaming due to waves based on methodology of Xu and Bowen, 1994. See Eq. 27. SURFACE_STREAMING Surface streaming using Xu and Bowen, 1994. See Eq. 28. Note: BOTTOM_STREAMING_XU_BOWEN was tested in Kumar et al. (2012). It requires very high resolution close to bottom layer. Suggested Vtransform=2 and Vstretching=3

Shoreface Test Case (Obliquely incident waves on a planar beach) [0,0] [1000,-12] z x y Hsig= 2m Tp = 10s θ = 10o Wave field computed using SWAN One way coupling (only WEC) Application Name: SHOREFACE Header file: COAWST/ROMS/Include/shoreface.h Input file: COAWST/ROMS/External/ocean_shoreface.in

Header File (COAWST/ROMS/Include)

Input File (COAWST/ROMS/External)

Input File (COAWST/ROMS/External) Requires a wave forcing file as one way coupling only

WEC Related Output Dissip_roller / Eqn. 37 rollA / Eqn. 35 Zetaw / Eqn. 7 qsp / Eqn. 9 bh / Eqn. 5

Should contain the following variables Forcing file for one way coupling Data/ROMS/Forcing/swan_shoreface_angle_forc.nc Should contain the following variables Wave Height Hwave Wave Direction Dwave Wave Length Lwave Bottom Orbital Vel. Ub_Swan Depth-limited breaking Dissip_break Whitecapping induced breaking Dissip_wcap Bottom friction induced dissip. Dissip_fric Time Period Pwave_top/Pwave_bot

Code Compilation:coawst.bash Application Name Number of Nested Grids ROOT and Project Directory Define Message Passage Interface (MPI), Fortran Compiler, NETCDF4 Header (*.h) & Analytical (ana_*.h) Files ./coawst.bash –j N

Running the Shoreface Test Case np = number of processors coawstM = Executable created after compilation Input file = ROMS/External/ocean_shoreface.in Serial ./coawstS.exe ROMS/External/ocean_shoreface.in Parallel mpiexec/run -np 4 ./coawstM.exe ROMS/External/ocean_shoreface.in

Results (I of III) Significant Wave Height Sea surface elevation

Results (II of III) Depth-averaged Velocities Cross-shore Vel. Longshore Vel.

Results (III of III) Eulerian Stokes Cross-shore Longshore Vertical

WEC related Diagnostics Terms (i.e., contribution to momentum balance) Terms in momentum balance Definition Output Variable 𝜕 𝜕𝑡 𝐻 𝑧 ⋅𝑢 Local Acc. u_accel/ ubar_accel 𝜕 𝜕𝑥 𝐻 𝑧 𝑢𝑢 + 𝜕 𝜕𝑦 𝐻 𝑧 𝑣𝑢 +𝑢 𝜕 𝜕𝑥 𝐻 𝑧 𝑢 𝑆𝑡 +𝑢 𝜕 𝜕𝑦 𝐻 𝑧 𝑣 𝑆𝑡 Horizontal Advection u_hadv/ubar_hadv 𝜕 𝜕𝑠 𝜔 𝑠 𝑢 +𝑢 𝜕 𝜕𝑠 𝜔 𝑠 𝑆𝑡 Vertical Advection u_vadv 𝐻 𝑧 ⋅𝑓⋅𝑣 Coriolis Force u_cor/ubar_cor 𝐻 𝑧 ⋅𝑓⋅ 𝑣 𝑠𝑡 Stokes-Coriolis u_stcor/ubar_stcor − 𝐻 𝑧 ⋅ 𝜕 𝜑 𝑐 𝜕𝑥 | 𝑧 Pressure Gradient u_prsgrd/ubar_prsgrd 𝐻 𝑧 𝑣 𝑠𝑡 𝜕𝑣 𝜕𝑥 − 𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑦 Vortex Force u_hjvf/ubar_hjvf 𝜔 𝑠 𝑆𝑡 𝜕𝑢 𝜕𝑠 u_vjvf

Terms in momentum balance Definition Output Var. 𝐻 𝑧 ℱ 𝑤𝜉 (see Eqn. 21) Breaking + Roller Acceleration + Streaming u_wbrk/ubar_wbrk u_wrol/ubar_wrol u_bstm/ubar_bstm u_sstm/ubar_sstm BREAKING THE PRESSURE GRADIENT TERM 𝜑 𝑐 =𝑔 𝜁 𝑐 − 𝜁 − 𝑔−𝒦 | 𝜁 𝑐 + 0 𝑠 𝑔𝜌 𝜌 0 −𝐾 𝐻 𝑧 𝑑𝑠 (𝐄𝐪𝐧. 𝟏𝟑, 𝟒𝟗, 𝐓𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝟐) − 𝐻 𝑧 ⋅ 𝜕 𝜑 𝑐 𝜕𝑥 | 𝑧 Pressure Gradient u_prsgrd/ubar_prsgrd − 𝛻 ⊥ 𝑔 𝜁 𝑐 + −ℎ 𝜍 𝑐 𝑔𝜌 𝜌 0 𝑑𝑧 Eulerian Contribution ubar_zeta 𝑔 𝛻 ⊥ 𝜁 Quasi-static response, Eqn. 7 ubar_zetw 𝛻 ⊥ 𝒦| 𝜁 𝑐 Bernoulli-head contribution, Eqn. 5 ubar_zbeh 𝑔 𝛻 ⊥ 𝒫| 𝜁 𝑐 Surface pressure boundary, Eqn. 9 ubar_zqsp

Inlet Test Case (WEC in a tidal inlet) Wave field computed using SWAN Two way coupling (WEC and CEW) Application Name: INLET_TEST Header file: COAWST/Projects/Inlet_test/Coupled/inlet_test.h Input file: COAWST/Projects/Inlet_test/Coupled/ocean_inlet_test.in COAWST/Projects/Inlet_test/Coupled/swan_inlet_test.in COAWST/Projects/Inlet_test/Coupled/coupling_inlet_test.h NORTH SOUTH

Header File (COAWST/Projects/Inlet_test/Coupled)

Input File (COAWST/Projects/Coupled/ocean_inlet_test.in ROMS/Functionals/ana_fsobc.h

Input File (COAWST/Projects/Coupled/swan_inlet_test.in INRHOG should be 1 for correct units of wave dissipation Example of TEST Command TEST 120 {} TEST 0

Input File (COAWST/Projects/Coupled/swan_inlet_test.in

Input File (COAWST/Projects/Coupled/coupling_inlet_test.in

Code Compilation:coawst.bash ./coawst.bash –j N

Running the Inlet_Test Case np = number of processors coawstM = Executable created after compilation Input file = Projects/Inlet_Test/Coupled/coupling_inlet_test.in Serial ./coawstS.exe Projects/Inlet_test/Coupled/coupling_inlet_test.in Parallel mpiexec/run -np 4 ./coawstM.exe Projects/Inlet_test/Coupled/coupling_inlet_test.in

Results Hsig

References Kumar et al., 2012: Implementation of the vortex force formalism in the coupled ocean-atmosphere-wave-sediment transport (COAWST) modeling system for inner shelf and surf zone applications, Ocean Modelling, Volume 47, 2012, Pages 65-95, 10.1016/j.ocemod.2012.01.003. Kumar et al., 2011: Implementation and modification of a three-dimensional radiation stress formulation for surf zone and rip-current applications, Coastal Engineering, Volume 58, Issue 12, December 2011, Pages 1097-1117, 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2011.06.009. Olabarrieta, M., J. C. Warner, and N. Kumar (2011), Wave-current interaction in Willapa Bay, J. Geophys. Res., 116, C12014, doi:10.1029/2011JC007387. Warner et al., 2008: Development of a three-dimensional, regional, coupled wave, current, and sediment-transport model, Computers & Geosciences, Volume 34, Issue 10, October 2008, Pages 1284-1306, ISSN 0098-3004, 10.1016/j.cageo.2008.02.012. Haas and Warner, 2009: Comparing a quasi-3D to a full 3D nearshore circulation model: SHORECIRC and ROMS, Ocean Modelling, Volume 26, Issues 1–2, 2009, Pages 91-103, ISSN 1463-5003, 10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.09.003.