Michael Deru, PhD – NREL Dru Crawley – DOE Kristin Field, Brent Griffith, Kyle Benne, and Danny Studer – NREL Bing Liu, Mark Halverson, Dave Winiarski,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SSC-NM0053 Determination of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions Based on Whole- Building Simulation of Building Mitigation Efforts Using eQUEST/DOE-2.2.
Advertisements

Roof Savings Calculator Overview Joshua New, Ph.D. Whole Building and Community Integration Group Building Technologies Research and Integration Center.
Energy Savings Impacts of the Advanced Energy Design Guide: Small Office Buildings Bing Liu, P.E. Research Engineer Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
DOE-2 Overview and Basic Concepts. Background  US public domain programs from 1970s Post Office program; NECAP (NASA energy- cost analysis program);
Efficient Low-Lift Cooling with Radiant Distribution, Thermal Storage and Variable-Speed Chiller Controls Srinivas Katipamula, Ph.D. Peter Armstrong, Ph.D.,
University of Liège Faculty of Applied Sciences Thermodynamics Laboratory Workshop “Commissioning and Auditing of Buildings and HVAC Systems” Use of a.
Pathway to Net-Zero Energy Commercial Buildings Gregory B. Stark, P.E. National Renewable Energy Laboratory UNL Net-Zero Energy Workshop.
April 8 th 2013 California’s Commercial Building Energy Asset Rating System (BEARS)
Michael Deru ASHRAE Albuquerque, NM June 30, 2010 Better Green House Gas Calculations for Buildings NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department.
Energy Saving Analysis for ASHRAE Standard Bi ng Liu, P.E., C.E.M. LEED AP Senior Research Engineer Pacific Northwest National Laboratory ASHRAE.
Action-Oriented Benchmarking Paul A. Mathew, Ph.D. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley California Using CEUS Data to Identify and Prioritize.
Whole-Building Energy Modeling: Reducing Modeling Time With the OpenStudio 0.8 User Interface and the Building Component Library Presented by the Building.
Engineered Systems Webinar Thursday, July 12, 2012 at 2 pm EST/11 am PST Tom Brooke PE, CEM, MBA, ASHRAE Member TODAY’S PARADIGM FOR.
ASHRAE 2010 Winter Conference
Evaluation of Building Energy Performance Rating Methods ASHRAE TRP-1286 Initial Results Jason Glazer, P.E. GARD Analytics January 2006.
1 Neva Kaye National Academy for State Health Policy SIM Annual Meeting Augusta, ME March 4, 2015 Sustaining Momentum in Multi-Payer Payment Reform.
Development of the Envelope Criteria Merle McBride, Ph.D., P.E Senior Research Associate Owens Corning ASHRAE Representative At Large Orlando, FL February.
High Performance Buildings and the Advanced Buildings Benchmark Design Guide Lee DeBaillie, P.E. - Energy Center of Wisconsin.
Briefing Book Slides on SAMHSA/CSAT 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic File: All Grantees GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems.
Exhibit 1. Premiums for Family Coverage, by State, 2011 Source: 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey–Insurance Component. Dollars U.S. average = $15,022.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Commercial Windows and Insulation RTF November 2, 2010.
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Benchmark Buildings & Models: Concept & Structure Dru Crawley, Ph.D. U.S. Department.
Developing Building Energy Use Intensity Benchmarks for Standard 100 Energy Targets Terry Sharp, PE, CEM Building Technologies Research & Integration Center.
1 Modeling Needs and Considerations for Energy Efficiency Ex Ante and Ex Post Savings Estimates Workshop: Energy Modeling Tools and their Applications.
Bill Harrison Cleveland - Akron Chapters Joint Meeting March 16, 2009.
GSA Early Concept Design Project – Energy Analysis
PAGE 1 Sustainable Buildings 2030 © 2008 THE WEIDT GROUP Building Energy Benchmarks THE WEIDT GROUP.
Figure 1 K A I S E R C O M M I S S I O N O N Medicaid and the Uninsured Dual Eligibles: The Basics Barbara Lyons, Ph.D. Director, Kaiser Commission on.
2 Why Care About Building Energy Performance?  Aside from building energy increasing?  Ignoring performance ratings is choosing to fly fairly blind.
Selective Overview of R&D to Improve Energy Simulation Philip Haves LBNL CPUC Workshop: Energy Modeling Tools and their Applications in Energy Efficiency.
Multifamily Energy Calculator Rapid modeling of mid-rise residential projects Greg Arcangeli | Graduate Engineer | LEED AP BD+C Cristina Woodings | Graduate.
Standard Information Workbook: Update Proposal Christian Douglass Regional Technical Forum March 15, 2016.
WDMA Technical Conference Chicago, IL 28 June 2016
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
Uninsured Non-Elderly Adult Rate Increased from 17. 8% to 20
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Match the climograph with the correct location.
Compliance Software Tool Approval Technical Assistance Manual
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Comprehensive Medicaid Managed Care Models in the States, 2014
LRFD Scoreboard LRFD Scoreboard LRFD Scoreboard
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Uninsured Rate Among Adults Ages 19–64, 2008–09 and 2019
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Post-Reform: Projected Percent of Adults Ages 19–64 Uninsured by State
Premiums for Family Coverage, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Uninsured Nonelderly Adult Rate Has Increased from Percent to 20
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
United States & Puerto Rico
Presentation transcript:

Michael Deru, PhD – NREL Dru Crawley – DOE Kristin Field, Brent Griffith, Kyle Benne, and Danny Studer – NREL Bing Liu, Mark Halverson, Dave Winiarski, and Michael Rosenberg – PNNL Joe Huang and Mehry Yazdanian – LBNL ASHRAE Winter Meeting Orlando FL January 24, 2010 DOE Commercial Building Benchmark Model Development NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

Motivation Developing good energy models is a lot of work! – 1,000’s of inputs Often depend on default values and inputs from other simulations What is the answer?  Standard benchmark models provide a common set of inputs that people can “trust”

Project Starting Objectives “Benchmark Model” Defined –Standard building energy model that represents a “typical” building Project Goal: –Represent ~ 70% of the commercial building stock –Manageable number of models –Realistic building models Look, construction, systems, operation

Benchmark Models 16 building types (+1 in the next release) 16 locations Three sets of benchmark models –New construction –Post-1980 construction –Pre-1980 construction 16 x 16 x 3 = 768 models! For simplicity and to ease comparisons: –Same geometry and schedules across locations and vintages

Benchmark Models Three sets of benchmark models –New construction –Post-1980 construction –Pre-1980 construction

Benchmark Models Three sets of benchmark models –New construction Standard Typical construction (not Appendix G) –Post-1980 construction Same as New Construction except –Meets Standard –Some changes in envelope and HVAC types –Pre-1980 construction Same as New Construction except –Match pre-1980 U-values and HVAC efficiencies –Some changes in envelope and HVAC types

Benchmark Models Three sets of benchmark models –New construction Standard Typical construction (not Appendix G) –Post-1980 construction Same as New Construction except –Meets Standard –Some changes in envelope and HVAC types –Pre-1980 construction Same as New Construction except –Match pre-1980 U-values and HVAC efficiencies –Some changes in envelope and HVAC types New versions with 90.1 updates

Benchmark Building Models (16) Building ActivityArea ft 2 FloorsSource Office Small Office5,5001Small Office AEDG Medium Office53, CBECS Large Office498, CBECS School Primary School73,9601K-12 AEDG Secondary School210,8902K-12 AEDG Retail Stand-alone Retail24, CBECS Strip Mall22, CBECS Supermarket45, CBECS Food service Quick Service Restaurant2, CBECS Full Service Restaurant5, CBECS Lodging Small Hotel43,2004Highway Lodging AEDG Large Hotel122, CBECS Health care Hospital241, CBECS Outpatient health care40,9463Health Care AEDG Storage Warehouse52,0451Warehouse AEDG Resi- dential Midrise Apartment33,7404PNNL

Benchmark Locations NoClimate ZoneBenchmark CityDOE City 11AMiami FL 22AHouston TX 32BPhoenix AZ 43AAtlanta GAMemphis TN 53B-CALos Angeles CA 63B-otherLas Vegas NVEl Paso TX 73CSan Francisco CA 84ABaltimore MD 94BAlbuquerque NM 104CSeattle WASalem OR 115AChicago IL 125BDenver COBoise ID 136AMinneapolis MNBurlington VT 146BHelena MT 157Duluth MN 168Fairbanks AK

Approach Balance of accuracy and practicality –Best estimations when there is limited data Review and buy in by the modeling community –DOE and other researchers –ASHRAE review Data sources –CBECS and construction start data –ASHRAE standards –AEDG committees –Existing research

Envelope Construction types –Analysis of CBECS and NC 3 –AEDG committees Thermal properties –New Construction  Standard –Post-1980 Construction  Standard Represents average of buildings from –Pre-1980 Construction  1987 Briggs paper 1970 construction for office buildings Analysis And Categorization Of The Office Building Stock, Topical Report. GRI-87/0244

Internal Loads Interior lighting –Standard for new construction –Standard for all others – assumed that most buildings have had a lighting retrofit People and plug loads –Standard ( User’s Guide) and judgment Exterior lighting (façade only) – and PNNL analysis Schedules –AEDG committees and Standard ( User’s Guide) with adjustments

HVAC System types –CBECS analysis System efficiencies –Standard for new construction –Standard for post-1980 construction –Review of standards for pre-1980 construction and a weighted replacement schedule

Weighting Factors Weighting factors show how each benchmark building represents a part of the national building stock Data sources –CBECS – limited data –Construction start data – only new construction Solution: –New construction benchmarks from construction start data

Office Buildings Small Office 1 floor, 5,500 ft 2 Large Office 12 floors, 498,588 ft 2 Medium Office 3 floor, 53,630 ft 2

Schools Primary School 1 floor, 73,960 ft 2 Secondary School 2 floors, 210,890 ft 2

Sales Bakery Deli Produce Office DryStorage Retail Supermarket 1 floor, 45,000 ft 2 Stand alone retail 1 floor, 25,000 ft 2 Strip mall 1 floor, 22,500 ft 2

Food Service Quick service restaurant 2 zone, 2,500 ft 2 Full service restaurant 2 zone, 5,500 ft 2

Lodging Small hotel 4 floors, 43,200 ft 2 Large hotel 6 floors, 122,120 ft 2

Healthcare Outpatient Healthcare 3 floors, 40,946 ft 2 Hospital 5 floors, 241,351 ft 2

Other models Warehouse 1 floor, 40,946 ft 2 Midrise apartment 4 floors, 241,351 ft 2

What’s Available? EnergyPlus input and html output files Scorecards – spreadsheets with input parameters and output results Project report (coming ~ February)

Benchmark Scorecard

Where Can You Get Them?

Thank you