PEER Relating Structural Response to Damage Eduardo Miranda Hesaam Aslani Shahram Taghavi Stanford University PEER 2002 Annual Meeting.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Recent Experience in Turkey for Building Vulnerability and Estimating Damage Losses P. Gülkan and A. Yakut Middle East Technical University.

Advertisements

Imperial College London Assessment of Building Structures under Extreme Loading Bassam A. Izzuddin Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering.

PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting PEER 2002 Annual Meeting Ian Robertson University of Hawaii.

Seismic Performance Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Bridges

Experimental Testing of Drift- Sensitive Nonstructural Systems – Year 4 The Pathways Project San Jose State University Equip Site:

1 Analysis of Test Results 2 What we’ll have to do: Load-Deflection curve. Load Vs Strain curve for steel and concrete Find yield load (  s = 0.002)

An-Najah National University

Gravity Force Resisting Systems

Project #4 Energy Dissipation Capacity of a Wood-frame Shear Wall CEE Numerical Analysis.

Lecture Goals Slab design reinforcement.

Earthquakes in San Francisco, California - Structural Engineering Solutions -

MUSE 11B Buildings in Earthquakes Why do buildings do the things they do?

ATHENS 12 th of April, M. Eng. Velyan Petkov The European Center for Risk Prevention, Sofia, Bulgaria Bulgarian seismic design codes and civil construction.

Nirmal Jayaram Nilesh Shome Helmut Krawinkler 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting A statistical analysis of the responses of tall buildings to recorded and simulated.

PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting PEER 2002 Annual Meeting uPractical Application of the PEER Limit State Checking Methodolgy uAllin Cornell uwith F. Jalayer,

Record Processing Considerations for Analysis of Buildings Moh Huang California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program California Geological Survey Department.

Building Systems (Seismic)

by: Jon Heintz, S.E. & Robert Pekelnicky

Express Team University of New Mexico February 24, 2006.

PEER Van Nuys Testbed Simulation Laura N. Lowes - University of Washington #setAnalysisParameters.tcl #

Instrumented Moment Frame Steel Buildings Models Erol Kalkan, PhD California Geological Survey PEER-GMSM First Work Shop, Berkeley Oct

PEER Undergraduate Seismic Competition 2006 PEER SLC Summer Retreat Dongdong Chang.

Quantifying risk by performance- based earthquake engineering, Cont’d Greg Deierlein Stanford University …with contributions by many 2006 IRCC Workshop.

What Will a Large Earthquake be Like? Tom Heaton Caltech.

Framework for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Helmut Krawinkler, Stanford U. PEER Summative Meeting – June 13, 2007.

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF A CONCRETE BUILDING California State University at Los Angeles Belen Valencia Art Chianello Marlon Calderon Faculty Advisor: Rupa Purasinghe.

Assessing Effectiveness of Building Code Provisions Greg Deierlein & Abbie Liel Stanford University Curt Haselton Chico State University … other contributors.

Seismic Performance Assessment of Flat Plate Floor Systems John W. Wallace, Ph.D., P.E. Thomas Hyun-Koo Kang, Ph.D. Student Department of Civil and Environmental.

Colorado State University

1 Yahya C. Kurama, Professor Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences University of Notre Dame Introduction to Engineering Program University.

1 Yahya Gino Kurama, Associate Professor Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences University of Notre Dame Introduction to Engineering Program University.

Bob Nigbor In 1973, EERI formally initiated the Learning from Earthquakes (LFE) Program. This program, funded by the U.S. National Science.

Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering

Villanova University Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE 8414 – Structural Dynamics Northridge Earthquake 1 Northridge Earthquake - Concrete.

Preliminary Investigations on Post-earthquake Assessment of Damaged RC Structures Based on Residual Drift Jianze Wang Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Kaoshan.

Elastic and inelastic relations..... mx+cx+Q(x)= -ma x Q x Q Q=kx elasticinelastic.

PEER EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE-ENGINEERING INTERFACE: STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE Allin Cornell Stanford University SCEC WORKSHOP Oakland, CA.

Project Collaborators and Contributors: Derek Skolnik (Sr. Project Engineer, Kinemetrics) Aziz Akhtary (Grad Student Researcher, CSU Fullerton) Leonardo.

World Trade Center 7 Building Performance Assessment.

Federal Emergency Management Agency Unit U nit 3- Mitigation Measures by Type of Disaster.

AE SENIOR THESIS APRIL 14 th, 2014 CHRIS DUARTE – STRUCTURAL Dr. THOMAS BOOTHBY ORCHARD PLAZA.

Villanova University Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE Capstone II Structural Engineering 1 CEE Capstone II Structural Engineering.

Static Pushover Analysis

Jennifer Soderstrom University of Washington

NEWBuildS Tall Wood Building Design Project – Structural Design and Analysis Zhiyong Chen & Minghao Li University of New Brunswick, University of British.

Senior Thesis Structural Option Ryan Friis Spring Morgan St. Chicago, IL 111 Morgan St. Chicago, IL Ryan Friis Structural Option.

SUPPORTING SLIDES. Rigid and Flexible Assumption.

Opportunities for NEES Research Utilization Robert D Hanson Professor Emeritus University of Michigan.

Civil and Environmental Engineering Departments

E E R I TECHNICAL BRIEFING ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 PADANG, INDONESIA EARTHQUAKE Outline Building Types and Occupancies Acceleration Response vs Design Base.

University of Palestine

Modes of Building Failure Connections between failure modes observed in shake table testing of models in building contest and earthquake damage to actual.

NEEDS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING

Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.

Villanova University Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering CEE 3704 Statistical and Numerical Analysis 1 Group Project #2 Energy Dissipation Capacity.

Experiment-Based Deployment With the Four Seasons Building Steve Kang Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of California, Los Angeles.

CAP in Earthquake Damage Messaging. Presentation Outline Automated Post-earthquake Building Damage Assessment The GSense system at a glance Architecture.

Student Health Center Jacob Brambley - AE (structural option)

Progress towards Structural Design for Unforeseen Catastrophic Events ASME Congress Puneet Bajpai and Ben Schafer The Johns Hopkins University.

CESL Hotel Unique – Toronto Chris O’Brien Eric Fraser Scotia Mabury

Biobehavioral Health Building The Pennsylvania State University Daniel Bodde Structural Option Advisor – Heather Sustersic.

U-shaped plan of commercial- residential building in Bhuj.

Lecture 2 Structural System Overview CVEN Structural Concrete Design January 15, 2003.

2005 PS3 Summer Institute Buildings in Earthquakes Why do buildings do the things they do?

INTRODUCTION Due to Industrial revolution metro cities are getting very thickly populated and availability of land goes on decreasing. Due to which multistory.

Review of Indian Seismic Codes

QuakeCore Alpine Fault case study

ANDRÉS ALONSO-RODRIGUEZ Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile

An-Najah National University

Earthquake resistant buildings

Presentation transcript:

PEER Relating Structural Response to Damage Eduardo Miranda Hesaam Aslani Shahram Taghavi Stanford University PEER 2002 Annual Meeting

Damage Estimation EDPDM How to relate structural response parameters to structural and nonstructural damage ? E. Miranda, PEER 2002 Annual Meeting

Damage Estimation EDPDM We need information of damage sustained by structural and nonstructural components when subjected to different levels of structural response. We need MOTION–DAMAGE PAIRS. E. Miranda, PEER 2002 Annual Meeting

Damage Estimation 1.Experimental research (e.g. in a lab). Where can we get MOTION–DAMAGE PAIRS for structural nonstructural components ? E. Miranda, PEER 2002 Annual Meeting 2.Damage surveys from instrumented structures that have experienced earthquakes. 3.Damage surveys from structures that have experienced earthquakes and where records are available near by. EXAMPLE 1 – STRUCTURAL COMPONENT EXAMPLE 2 – NONSTRUCTURAL COMPONENT

Minor Cracks Appear IDR [%] Minor Cracks Appear Damage State IDR [%] Lateral Load (Kips) Lateral Displacement (in) Punching Shear Failure Punching Shear Failure Significant Cracking Significant Cracking Collapse DS 4 : Collapse Damage States For Slab- Column Connections

Damage States Based On Experimental Results

IDR [%] Punching Shear Failure Damage State Influence of Gravity Shear Ratio on Punching Failure

IDR [%] Gravity Shear Ratio 0 V V g Trend ? Dispersion ? Influence of Gravity Shear Ratio on Punching Failure For a Single Specimen

Influence of Gravity Shear Ratio on Punching Failure General trend based on 67 punching failure reports.

Influence of shear gravity shear ratio on the dispersion of punching failure drift ratio General trend based on 67 punching failure reports Gravity Shear Ratio Residuals 0 V V g

%1%2%3%4%5%6% EDP (IDR) P (DM | EDP) Minor Cracks Appear Fragility curves P( DM | EDP ) Punching Shear Failure Significant Cracking

Olive View Medical Center 1994 Northridge Earthquake Lateral resisting system: Concrete and steel shear walls Fundamental period of vibration: 0.33 sec Damages: Minor structural but major nonstructural damages

N-S Direction E-W Direction Recorded Floor Accelerations in Northridge EQ.

N-S Direction E-W Direction Max. FA (cm/s 2 ) Floor Recorded Max. FA (cm/s 2 ) Floor Recorded PFA profile of the building Computed

Damage surveys of nonstructural components

Damage-motion pairs for HVAC systems of Olive View Hospital No Damage Heavy damage Moderate damage Insignificant damage PFA (g) Damage state E-W direction N-S direction

No Damage Heavy damage Moderate damage PFA (g) Damage state Insignificant damage Damage-motion pairs for HVAC systems of 19 buildings Burbank, 10-story residential building Burbank, 6-story commercial building Los Angeles, 17-story residential bldg Los Angeles, 19-story office building Los Angeles, 2-story fire command Los Angeles, 3-story commercial bldg Los Angeles, 5-story warehouse Los Angeles, 52-story office bldg Los Angeles, 54-story office bldg Los Angeles, 6-story office bldg Los Angeles, 54-story parking structure Los Angeles, 7-story UCLA math/science bldg Los Angeles, 7-story university hospital Los Angeles, 9-story office building Los Angeles, Hollywood storage building North Hollywood, 20-story hotel Sherman oaks, 13-story commercial building Sylmar, 6-story hospital Van Nuys, 7-story hotel

Fragility curves of HVAC systems