Comparative Politics: Party systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Restructuring the National Political Space in Western Europe: The Supply Side of National Electoral Politics Hanspeter Kriesi Department of political science.
Advertisements

The territorial implications of demographic change in the North Sea Region – scope for a transnational planning approach? Stefanie Dühr, Radboud University.
Globalising justice within coffee supply chains
The EU as a global actor by 2030 Context –Multipolar world with China, India and U.S. as the most important players. –Globalization –More regionally organized.
Interest Aggregation & Political Parties
Politics in France Political parties and political elite.
Typologies of India’s democracy A comparison of two approaches in the “worlds largest democracy”: Is democracy working in India?
International Political Economy
Trading Spaces: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment Regulation Sonal S. Pandya Department of Government Harvard University.
UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND – DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY 1 Immigrants in Iceland – Realities and Political Discourses Guðmundur Hálfdanarson EURES Mobility.
Office and policy payoffs in coalition governments Marc Debus Presentation by: Jacopo Gandin.
Socio-economic development of a metropolis and its statistical service Policy-making advancing the metropolitan region and requested information support.
Parties, elections and the electoral systems Lubomir Kopecek CDK & Educational Initiatives, December 2011.
Introduction Advent of ICT Increased integration of market Mobility of people for job and vacation Reach of satellite channels Internet Global Village.
Palma de Mallorca 9-10 November 2006 Assemblée des Régions d’Europe DEMYSTIFYING MIGRATION: GLOBAL THREAT OR GLOBAL REALITY? Discussion table.
Chapter 15 Comparative International Relations. This (that is the LAST!) Week.
Globalisation and Inequality Overcoming the Progressive Challenge Olaf Cramme Policy Network Melbourne 12 April 2007.
How to combine Integration and Diversities ? The Challenge of a European Union Multicultural Citizenship. by Marco Martiniello FNRS and CEDEM-ULg.
Chapter 21: The welfare state by Kees van Kersbergen and Philip Manow
Security Sector Governance and European Integration Pál Dunay Geneva Centre for Security Policy.
Chapter 2: The Industrialized Democracies. Four Elections United States 2004 Great Britain 2005 France 2007 Germany 2005.
Social Groups and Voting: A Comparative View. Who typically votes in Democratic societies? According to recent research by Jeff Manza & Ruth Braunstein.
Political parties What is the Republican party? Who are the Republican party? What is the Democratic party? Who are the Democratic party? What issues.
Government and Politics in Europe October 30, 2014 By Hung-jen Wang 王宏仁.
Migration Policies of EU Member States George Gigauri International Organization for Migration Kyiv, Ukraine 23 September 2008.
Slide 4.1 Alan M Rugman and Simon Collinson, International Business, 5 th Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2009 International politics Chapter 4.
Part Four: Citizens, Society & the State
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 LESSONS FROM THE THEMATIC EVALUATION OF THE TERRITORIAL EMPLOYMENT PACTS Veronica Gaffey, DG Regional.
Swiss politics and political institutions: 5. Party system and parties Prof. Dr. Andreas Ladner iMPA 2013.
Are new political cleavages opening up between globalization’s (perceived) ‘winners’ and ‘losers’? Edgar Grande University of Munich Chair in Comparative.
The “-isms” and the Parties January 31 st. ws/Satisfaction+with+Canadian+ democracy+hits+rock+bottom+su rvey+finds/ /story.html.
Federal and Unitary Systems Territorial Representation in Democratic Systems February 9 th, 2006.
Representation of Europe Commonalities and national differences Paszkál Kiss EuroPhD on S.R. & C. Roma, 2005.
Chapter 13: Party Systems by Daniele Caramani
Strategies to Combat Right-Wing Extremism in Europe Guideline for Country Reports Berlin, 31st May 2007Britta Schellenberg Centre for Applied Policy Research.
What were the criteria that voters prioritized for redistricting when they approved the California Redistricting Commission (CRC) initiative? If the legislature.
Policy Strategies for Economic Development in the Knowledge Society: Contribution from the New Member States Carine Dartiguepeyrou Idate Conference on.
Lecture # 15 Politics in the Age of Progress ( ) Abul Kalam Azad Senior Lecturer in Sociology Centre for GED, NUB.
CULTPAT Cultural Patterns of the European Enlargement Process 5 th FP project (duration )
HSE MOSCOW The future of Labour Law in a Globalised or Regionalised World Dr Paul Smit 28 October 2015 Date.
American Political Culture Sanford-Green text chapter 4.
Injustice, Insecurity and Immigration Jörg Flecker (FORBA, Vienna) Friedrich Ebert Stiftung / Policy Network The other side of the challenge: Immigration,
The International Business Environment
Comparative Political Economics Paolo Graziano Lecture 6.
Similarities and attractions Small and ”peripheral” countries / economies (population: Finland 5,2 million + Estonia 1,4 million = 1,5% of the total EU.
The West and the Rest. 3 main themes: The world’s cultural diversity in the age of globalization – does it breed conflict and impede cooperation? The.
New Right Populist Parties: New kids on the block.
Regions for All Ages: Implications of Demographic Ageing for Regional Policy Martin Ferry Regions for economic change – Regional Policy responses to demographic.
21 st Century Europe Emerging Trends. Final Exam: Thursday, April 17 th 9-11:00 AM SN2000 Format: 2 Essays.
Government and Politics in Europe Sept. 25, 2014 Hung-jen Wang 王宏仁.
What is the Irish nation? Is it old? –How old? What is its nature? Celtic? Is it invented? –By whom, for what purpose? Why did it (re)emerge at the end.
Scenarios for territorial policy making The ESPON 2006 scenarios Moritz Lennert IGEAT - ULB.
Government and Politics in Europe November 13, 2014 By Hung-jen Wang 王宏仁.
What Are the Differences Between Socialism and Capitalism? versus.
Orientations towards the Scoping Paper H2020 Transport Programme Committee Brussels, 22 June 2016 SMART, GREEN and INTEGRATED TRANSPORT.
Comparative political economics
Hanspeter Kriesi, EUI ITANES-Università die Siena, November 13, 2017
Government and Politics in Europe November 6, 2014
Political Spectrum Moderates Liberals Conservatives Democrats
Nations and Society.
Comparing the Domestic Policies of Authoritarian States
Global Comparative Politics (7)
The Global State of Democracy and the crisis of representation
Comparing the Domestic Policies of Authoritarian States
Chapter 5 Political Parties.
Europe at the millennium:
Left-wing parties in European politics Current trends in European politics April 12th, 2018 Heikki Paloheimo
Priorities of the future Greek EU Presidency
Has the left-right divide become obsolete in EU politics? David Amiel
Slide Deck 9: The Federal Political Landscape
Presentation transcript:

Comparative Politics: Party systems Immobilisim and Change in the political space Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared Kriesi, Grande, Lachat, Dolezal, Bornschier, Frey (2006)

General dynamics Globalization/Denationalization New structural conflict: Winners Vs Losers Mobilization Transformation of the national political space + Strategic repositioning of parties

The analysis is based on four assumptions political reactions to economic and cultural globalization mainly manifest at the national level increasing economic, cultural, and political competition creates new winners & losers winners & loser of globalization constitute political potentials the political importance of national boundaries increases with their lowering and unbundling The new cleavage integration Vs demarcation

Expectations Losers support: - protectionists measures - maintenance of national boundaries - independence Winners support: - opening up of national boundaries - international integration

Transformation of the political space New structural conflicts 60’s Classic cleavages centre - periphery religion rural - urban owner - worker Mobilization for cultural liberalism and social justice Transformation of the cultural dimension Culture (religion) Socio-economic (class) No new dimension but change of meaning of the existing dimensions (cultural and socio-economic)

Transformation of the political space Embedding hypothesis Kriesi et al expect the new demarcation/integration conflict to be embedded into the two dimensional basic structure that emerged under the impact of the mobilization by new social movements SOCIO-ECONOMIC DIMENSION the new conflict should reinforce the opposition btwn a pro-state and a pro-market position, and change its meaning (pro-state more defensive and protectionist pro-market in favour enhancement of competitiveness) CULTURAL DIMENSION enhanced opposition to cultural liberalism, defence of tradition takes on an ethnic or nationalist character, new issues (EU, immigration)

Transformation of the political space Not necessary to add new dimensions ADAPTIVE CAPACITY of existing parties Repositioning and realigning Mainstream parties take up new preferences, identities, values and interests interpreting them in their own specific ways

Positioning of parties in the transformed space: expected positions of major parties

Positioning of parties in the transformed space: first hypothesis Mainstream parties will tend to formulate a winners programme (further economic and cultural integration), but: - parties on the left will try to combine economic integration with high level of welfare state; - parties on the right will tend to reduce the role of the state in every respect

Positioning of parties in the transformed space: variations on the general theme Leftist dilemma: market integration in EU threats national social achievements position will vary on the economic dimension Rightist dilemma: endorse liberalization, but nationalist and opposed to the opening up of borders position will vary on the cultural dimension Liberals: the opening up of borders doesn’t seem much problematic for them

Positioning of parties in the transformed space: two hypotheses based on empirical observations an intensification of political conflicts within mainstream parties as they attempt to redefine ideological preferences increasing political fragmentation with the strenghtening of peripheral political actors that adopt a losers programme

Positioning of parties in the transformed space The parties that most successfully appeal to the interests and fears of the losers of globalization are the driving force of party systems transformation Right-wing populist parties have been able to formulate a highly attractive ideological package for losers of economic transformations and cultural diversity The smaller common denominator for losers’ mobilization are the defence of their national identity/community [cultural side]

Positioning of parties in the transformed space The mobilization by the populist right challenges established parties both on the left and on the right The challenge of a successful right-wing populist party is likely to reinforce the relative importance of the cultural dimension, and it is likely to move the centre of gravity of partisan competition in the direction of cultural demarcation/protection

Research design Six European countries: Austria, Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland Focus on national elections: three between 90s and 2000s one from 70s (point of reference)

Research design - Assumptions the macro-historical structural change linked to globalization is articulated by the issue- specific positions taken by parties during electoral campaigns and by the salience they attribute to the different issues the most appriopriate way to analyse the positioning of parties and the way in which deal with the new issues linked to globalization is to focus on the political debate during electoral campaigns, as reflected by mass-media

Research design - Political actors Austria: Greens, Social Democrats (SPO), Liberals (Liberales Forum), Christian Democrats (OVP), Populist right (FPO) Britain: Social Democrats (Labour), Liberals (Liberal Democrats), Conservatives France: Radical Left (PCF, Trotskyist parties), Greens, Social Democrats (PSF), the MRG, Conservatives (RPR), Liberals (UDF), Populist right (FN) Germany: Radical Left (PDS), Greens, Social Democrats (SPD), Liberals (FDP), Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU) Netherlands: Greens, Social Democrats (PvdA), Christian Democrats (CDA), Liberals (D66, VVD), Populist Right (LPF) Switzerland: Greens, Social Democrats (SP), Christian Democrats (CVP and other minor centre parties), Liberals (FDP and LPS), Populist Right (SVP and small parties of the New Radical Right)

Research design - Political issues Welfare Budget Economic Liberalism Cultural Liberalism Europe Culture Immigration Army Security Environment Institutional Reform Infrastructure

Research design The data offer valuable information on two central aspects of the supply side of electoral competition: the positions of political parties on the issues; the salience of these issues for a given party They construct a graphical representation of parties’ and issues’ positions in a low-dimensional space using MDS

Results: general observations changes over time in the strenght of political parties do not necessarily result from a change in the cleavage structure the emergence of new players on the electoral scene or a radical transformation of some established parties constitute first symptoms of the expected transformation of the cleavage structure

Results: general observations

Results: general observations on the horizontal dimension, in all countries there is strong opposition between support for the welfare state and support for economic liberalism; the traditional economic conflict remains salient the vertical dimension shows a cultural opposition in each country; by the 90’s the cultural conflict is typically expressed by the strong opposition between support for cultural liberalism, and support for a more restrictive immigration policy

Results: Germany

Results: Austria

Results: Switzerland

Results: the Netherlands

Results: France

Results: Britain

Conclusions two dimensionality (economy & culture) transformation of the cultural dimension (EU integration & immigration) both dimensions are polarizing, the cultural gained importance common feature: tripolarism