Introduction to Game theory Presented by: George Fortetsanakis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction to Game Theory Part V: Extensive Games with Perfect Information Bernhard Nebel.
Advertisements

Mixed Strategies.
Introduction to Game Theory
Module 4 Game Theory To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, Tenth Edition, by Render, Stair, and Hanna Power Point slides created by Jeff Heyl.
Game Theory Assignment For all of these games, P1 chooses between the columns, and P2 chooses between the rows.
ECON 100 Tutorial: Week 9 office: LUMS C85.
This Segment: Computational game theory Lecture 1: Game representations, solution concepts and complexity Tuomas Sandholm Computer Science Department Carnegie.
Mixed Strategies CMPT 882 Computational Game Theory Simon Fraser University Spring 2010 Instructor: Oliver Schulte.
Game Theory S-1.
Operations Research Assistant Professor Dr. Sana’a Wafa Al-Sayegh 2 nd Semester ITGD4207 University of Palestine.
1 Chapter 4: Minimax Equilibrium in Zero Sum Game SCIT1003 Chapter 4: Minimax Equilibrium in Zero Sum Game Prof. Tsang.
Chapter 6 Game Theory © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Eponine Lupo.  Questions from last time  3 player games  Games larger than 2x2—rock, paper, scissors  Review/explain Nash Equilibrium  Nash Equilibrium.
MIT and James Orlin © Game Theory 2-person 0-sum (or constant sum) game theory 2-person game theory (e.g., prisoner’s dilemma)
EC3224 Autumn Lecture #04 Mixed-Strategy Equilibrium
Study Group Randomized Algorithms 21 st June 03. Topics Covered Game Tree Evaluation –its expected run time is better than the worst- case complexity.
Game theory.
What is a game?. Game: a contest between players with rules to determine a winner. Strategy: a long term plan of action designed to achieve a particular.
Short introduction to game theory 1. 2  Decision Theory = Probability theory + Utility Theory (deals with chance) (deals with outcomes)  Fundamental.
An Introduction to Game Theory Part I: Strategic Games
GAME THEORY.
by Vincent Conitzer of Duke
Eponine Lupo.  Game Theory is a mathematical theory that deals with models of conflict and cooperation.  It is a precise and logical description of.
A camper awakens to the growl of a hungry bear and sees his friend putting on a pair of running shoes, “You can’t outrun a bear,” scoffs the camper. His.
An Introduction to Game Theory Part II: Mixed and Correlated Strategies Bernhard Nebel.
1 Introduction APEC 8205: Applied Game Theory. 2 Objectives Distinguishing Characteristics of a Game Common Elements of a Game Distinction Between Cooperative.
Selfish Caching in Distributed Systems: A Game-Theoretic Analysis By Byung-Gon Chun et al. UC Berkeley PODC’04.
Artificial Intelligence for Games and Puzzles1 Games in the real world Many real-world situations and problems.
Job Market Signaling (Spence model)
An Introduction to Game Theory Part III: Strictly Competitive Games Bernhard Nebel.
Finite Mathematics & Its Applications, 10/e by Goldstein/Schneider/SiegelCopyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 of 68 Chapter 9 The Theory of Games.
Artificial Intelligence for Games and Puzzles1 Games in the real world Many real-world situations and.
Minimax strategies, Nash equilibria, correlated equilibria Vincent Conitzer
EC941 - Game Theory Prof. Francesco Squintani Lecture 2 1.
Game Theory.
Chapter 9 Games with Imperfect Information Bayesian Games.
9/14/20151 Game Theory and Game Balance CIS 487/587 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn.
Game Theory, Strategic Decision Making, and Behavioral Economics 11 Game Theory, Strategic Decision Making, and Behavioral Economics All men can see the.
Chapter 12 Choices Involving Strategy Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
A Game-Theoretic Approach to Strategic Behavior. Chapter Outline ©2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 2 The Prisoner’s Dilemma: An Introduction.
Games of Strategy (Game Theory) Topic 1 – Part IV.
Nash equilibrium Nash equilibrium is defined in terms of strategies, not payoffs Every player is best responding simultaneously (everyone optimizes) This.
Dynamic Games of complete information: Backward Induction and Subgame perfection - Repeated Games -
9  Markov Chains  Regular Markov Chains  Absorbing Markov Chains  Game Theory and Strictly Determined Games  Games with Mixed Strategies Markov Chains.
EC941 - Game Theory Prof. Francesco Squintani Lecture 5 1.
Standard and Extended Form Games A Lesson in Multiagent System Based on Jose Vidal’s book Fundamentals of Multiagent Systems Henry Hexmoor, SIUC.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright  2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. GAME THEORY, STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING, AND BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS.
The Science of Networks 6.1 Today’s topics Game Theory Normal-form games Dominating strategies Nash equilibria Acknowledgements Vincent Conitzer, Michael.
Lecture 5A Mixed Strategies and Multiplicity Not every game has a pure strategy Nash equilibrium, and some games have more than one. This lecture shows.
Part 3 Linear Programming
Mixed Strategies and Repeated Games
1 What is Game Theory About? r Analysis of situations where conflict of interests is present r Goal is to prescribe how conflicts can be resolved 2 2 r.
Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Static Games of complete information: Dominant Strategies and Nash Equilibrium in pure and mixed strategies.
1 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE, GAME THEORY AND POLITICS 2, POL SCI 130B, Lecture 2.5: AGGRESSION, VIOLENCE, AND UNCERTAINTY Recall various interpretations.
5.1.Static Games of Incomplete Information
Games of pure conflict two-person constant sum games.
Extensive Form (Dynamic) Games With Perfect Information (Theory)
Lec 23 Chapter 28 Game Theory.
9.2 Mixed Strategy Games In this section, we look at non-strictly determined games. For these type of games the payoff matrix has no saddle points.
Oligopoly and Game Theory Topic Students should be able to: Use simple game theory to illustrate the interdependence that exists in oligopolistic.
By: Donté Howell Game Theory in Sports. What is Game Theory? It is a tool used to analyze strategic behavior and trying to maximize his/her payoff of.
Advanced Subjects in GT Outline of the tutorials Static Games of Complete Information Introduction to games Normal-form (strategic-form) representation.
Mixed Strategies Keep ‘em guessing.
Chapter 15: Game Theory: The Mathematics Lesson Plan of Competition
Managerial Economics Kyle Anderson
LECTURE 2 MIXED STRATEGY GAME
Game Theory in Wireless and Communication Networks: Theory, Models, and Applications Lecture 2 Bayesian Games Zhu Han, Dusit Niyato, Walid Saad, Tamer.
GAMES AND STRATEGIES.
GAMES AND STRATEGIES.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Game theory Presented by: George Fortetsanakis

Game theory Game theory attempts to mathematically capture behavior in strategic situations, or games, in which an individual's success in making choices depends on the choices of others (Myerson, 1991). A game consists of the following elements – Players: Who participates in the game? – Strategies: What can each player do? – Payoff: What is the outcome of the game?

Normal form game Consider a simple game between two players α and β. – Player α has n strategies s 1, s 2,..., s n. – Player β has m strategies t 1, t 2, …, t m. Each player receives a payoff when he chooses a certain strategy. – π α (i,j) is the payoff of player α if α chooses the strategy s i and β chooses the strategy t j. – π β (i,j) is the payoff of player β if α chooses the strategy s i and β chooses the strategy t j.

Bi-matrix representation Let π α and π β be nxm matrices with entries π α (i,j) and π β (i,j). The game in now conveniently represented using the bi-matrix notation.

Example 1: Oil producing countries 1/2 Two oil producing countries SA and IR can each produce either 2 millions or 4 millions barrels per day. – The total production level will be either 4,6, or 8 millions barrels per day. – Due to market demand the corresponding price per barrel will be $25, S17, or $12. The cost of producing one barrel is $5.

Example 1: Oil producing countries 2/2 If a player does not know the action of the other player it is preferable to produce 4 million barrels. – Each player will end up earning 28 million dollars. If the two players cooperate they will choose to produce 2 millions barrels each. – Each player will end up earning 40 million dollars.

Example 2: Rock-Paper-Scissors 1/2 Each player chooses among the strategies s 1 = Rock, s 2 = Paper, or s 3 = Scissors. – Paper wins over Rock, Rock wins over Scissors and Scissors wins over Paper. The winner gets $1 from the loser and no money is exchanged in the case of a tie.

Example 2: Rock-Paper-Scissors 2/2 Example of Zero sum game: The payoff of one player is negative of the payoff of the other player. Best way to play: Choose any of the three strategies with probability 1/3.

Mixed strategies The best way to play the Rock, Paper, Scissors game is stochastic and it can be represented with the probability vector: – P = (p R p P p S ) = (1/3, 1/3, 1/3). – This is an example of a mixed strategy. Generalization: We consider a player that can choose among the strategies s 1, s 2, …, s n. We define a mixed strategy as a probability vector upon s 1, s 2, …, s n : – P = (p s1, p s2, …, p sn ), p si ≥ 0,

Example 3: Hawk and Dove game 1/3 A species of territorial animals engage in fights over territories. Their behavior comes in two variants. – Hawk behavior: Animals fight until either victory or injury ensues. – Dove behavior: Display hostility at first but retreat at the first sign of attack from the opponent. We define: – υ: territory won after a fight. – w: cost of injury.

Example 3: Hawk and Dove game 2/3 We distinguish the following cases: – Two Hawks meet: If the probability to win is 1/2 the expected payoff of a Hack is υ*1/2 – w*1/2 = (υ-w)/2. – Two Doves meet: Each Dove could win with probability 1/2 thus the expected payoff of a Dove is υ/2. – A Hawk and a Dove meet: The Hawk always wins achieving a payoff υ while the Dove gains nothing.

Example 3: Hawk and Dove game 3/3 Consider a large population of N animals consisting of N 1 Hawks and N 2 Doves. – When an animal engages in a fight, it meets a Hawk with probability p 1 = N 1 /N and a Dove with probability p 2 = N 2 /N. Expected payoff of a Hawk = Expected payoff of a Dove = The population reaches an equilibrium when p 1 =

Strategies and payoffs Consider a game in which a player can choose a strategy from the set S = {s 1, s 2, …, s n }. – All members of the set S are called pure strategies. – A mixed strategy is a probability vector on the elements of S. The set of all strategies (pure and mixed) is denoted by Δ(S). – Δ(S) is convex: given two mixed strategies p and q, the convex combination ap + (1-a)q, is also a mixed strategy, ∀ a ∈ [0, 1]

Example on R 3 If S = {s 1, s 2, s 3 } then Δ(S) is depicted in the following diagram.

Payoff function A payoff function π : S → R assigns a value π i to each pure strategy s i. We identify the function with the vector: If p is a mixed strategy, the payoff is a random variable whose expected value is the following:

Best response A strategy s i ∈ S is a pure best response of the payoff π if: A mixed strategy that is a convex combination of pure best response strategies, is also best response for π. Formally a strategy p * is best response for the payoff π if p * maximizes or equivalently:

Example on R 3 If the pure best response strategies are s 2 and s 3 then the set of all best responses (pure and mixed) are the following:

Normal form games A finite game in normal form can be described by the following data: A finite set of players Γ = {γ 1, γ 2, … γ n }. A set of pure strategies S γ for each player γ ∈ Γ. – The set S = x γ ∈ Γ S γ is the set of strategy profiles and an element s = (s γ ) γ ∈ Γ assigns a pure strategy to each player. A payoff function π γ : S → R for each player γ ∈ Γ that assigns a payoff to player γ given a strategy profile s.

Mixed strategy profiles We denote by p γ a (possibly mixed) strategy for the player γ i.e. p γ ∈ Δ(S γ ). The set of mixed strategy profiles is: An element p ∈ Δ contains the mixed strategies that are chosen by all players and is written as p = (p γ1 p γ2, …, p γn ). If p is a mixed strategy profile then the payoff of player γ is a random variable whose expected value is:

New notation We introduce the notation s -α to denote the pure strategy profile for all players except α, i.e. Similarly we denote by p -α the profile of mixed strategies for all players except player α, i.e.

Nash equilibrium A Nash equilibrium is a strategy profile p in which no player can improve his payoff by changing his strategy given that the other players leave their own strategy unchanged. Formally, a Nash equilibrium for the game (Γ, S, {π γ } γ ∈ Γ ) is a strategy profile p * ∈ Δ, such that for every γ, p * γ is a best response for the player γ given the strategy profile p -γ of the other players, i.e.

Example: Matching pennies game 1/4 Two children, holding a penny, independently choose which side of their coin to show. – Child 1 wins if both coins show the same side and child 2 wins otherwise. – The winner pays $1 to the loser.

Example: Matching pennies game 2/4 Child 1 chooses the mixed strategy p 1 =(p 1,H,p 1,T )= (p, 1-p) Child 2 chooses the mixed strategy p 2 =(p 2,H,p 2,T )= (q, 1-q) Expected payoff for Child 1: Expected payoff for Child 2:

Example: Matching pennies game 3/4 BR of child 1 to the mixed strategy p 2 of child 2. Solve the above problem using Linear programming BR of child 2 to the mixed strategy p 1 of child 1.

Example: Matching pennies game 4/4 The NE of the game is the crossing point of BR 1 (p 2 ) and BR 2 (p 1 ). – p 1 =(p 1,H, p 1,T ) = (p, 1-p) and p 2 = (p 2,H, p 2,T ) = (q, 1-q)