Best Practices Standards Vol. I: An Overview. OBJECTIVES  Define Best Practices Standards  Identify the need for Best Practices Standards  Briefly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Virginia Juvenile Justice Association EFFECTIVE PAROLE TRANSITION & RE-ENTRY: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN & HOW November 2, 2006 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D.
Advertisements

JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
The New (Proposed) Texas Rules for ESRD Facilities What They Mean for the Renal Dietitian.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Yamhill County: Evidence-Based Decision Making (EBDM)
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Strategies for Drug-Abusing.
Role of Drug Court Defense Attorneys and Prosecutors Presented by Mike Loeffler and Liesl Nelson.
HONORABLE PEGGY DAVIS ROLES AND BOUNDARIES OF SPECIALTY COURT SUPERVISION.
Core Competencies. OBJECTIVES Recognize key core competencies Identify the relationship between core competencies and best practices.
Tribal Juvenile Wellness Courts
Community-Oriented Defense Performance Indicators A Conceptual Overview Michael Rempel Center for Court Innovation Presented at the Community-Oriented.
Drug Courts: Some Answers to Our Burning Questions NADCP May 2008 How Drug Court Practices Impact Recidivism and Costs Shannon Carey, Ph.D. August 2014.
North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training Module Thirteen: Care Management.
A MERICAN P SYCHOLOGICAL A SSOCIATION 11. Forensic Issues II.
Misdemeanor Sanctions
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
The Honorable John R. Roach, Jr. 296 th Judicial District Court Alyse Ferguson, Esq. Attorney Director, MHMC Program.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
a judgment of what constitutes good or bad Audit a systematic and critical examination to examine or verify.
REALIGNING RESOURCES TO FUND YOUR DTC CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROFESSIONALS – NATIONAL CONFERENCE BANFF, ALBERTA OCTOBER 24 – 27,
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
The PD and the Prosecutor An unlikely couple Jack Zanerhaft, Chief Public Defender Tammy Westcott, Assistant DA, Director of Alternative Courts.
THE COALITION OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROVIDERS OF NEW JERSEY The Role of Community Resource Centers in Offender Re-entry.
Tammy Westcott, Assistant District Attorney Director of Alternative Courts Tulsa County, Oklahoma.
The 10 Key Components of Veteran’s Treatment Court Presented by: The Honorable Robert Russell.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
PREVENTION CERTIFICATION: WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL? Pam Rush, CSPP Axis I Center of Barnwell, SC IC&RC Products Chair.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment (Section 5 continued…) UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Continuum of Care 1.
North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training Module One: Understanding TASC.
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
EXTENDING THE THERAPEUTIC JUSTICE MODEL TO PROBLEM GAMBLERS Mark G. Farrell, JD; Jessica Aungst Weitzel, MPH; Thomas H. Nochajski, PhD, Buffalo Center.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: What do the Data Tell Us? Recovery Community Services Program Grantee Meeting December 14, 2007.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.
Sanctions and Incentives Length of time is important: The longer a patient stays in treatment, the better they do. Coerced patients tended to stay longer.
Assessment of Alcohol-Involved Offenders Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals Treatment Research Institute.
PRINCIPLES OF DRUG ADDICTION TREATMENT Dr. K. S. NJUGUNA.
8/21/2015 Scott Ronan Idaho Supreme Court Senior Manager, Problem-Solving Courts and Sentencing Alternatives.
Vermont Treatment Court Dockets Compassion & Accountability ~~~~~ Innovative Practices Conference Vermont Law School November 15, 2013.
Aboriginal Financial Officers Association of BC September 24, 2015 Developing a Substance Abuse Management Program in your Workplace Presentation by Peter.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Effective Drug Court Treatment: Methods, Modalities and More Terrence D Walton, MSW, ICADC.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
OREGON CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FOR ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT FIDELITY SCORING DECISION RULES.
ACCELERATED COMMUNITY ENTRY United States District Court Western District of Michigan Robert Holmes Bell Chief Judge.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
Evidenced Based Protocols for Adult Drug Courts Jacqueline van Wormer, PhD Washington State University NADCP/NDCI.
Key Moments in NADCP History A DULT D RUG C OURT A DULT D RUG C OURT B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS V OLUME II B EST P RACTICE S TANDARDS V OLUME II “D OING.
Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.
Key Moments in NADCP History J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES “A P REVIEW ” T ERRENCE D. W ALTON, MSW, CSAC C HIEF.
Truth or Consequences Standard 4: Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Medicated Assisted Treatment (MAT) Terry R. Jones Director of Behavioral Health.
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
All Things CACJ Ms. Taylor Jones
Judicial Best Practices in Drug & DUI Court
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D., FCPP
Evidence-Based Criminal Justice Reform
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
Role of Drug Court Defense Attorneys and Prosecutors
Annals of Research and Knowledge (ARK)
Key Moments in NADCP History
Mental Health Counseling and Behavioral Medicine Program
Presentation transcript:

Best Practices Standards Vol. I: An Overview

OBJECTIVES  Define Best Practices Standards  Identify the need for Best Practices Standards  Briefly examine each of the Best Practices Standards in Volume One  Discuss the impact of Best Practices Standards on Drug/DWI Court’s operation

Best Practice Standards  Set benchmarks for new and existing programs  Focus on practices supported by reliable and convincing evidence  Are both aspirational and directive

Best Practices Standards I. Target Population II. Historically Disadvantaged Groups III. Roles and Responsibilities of the Judge IV. Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments V. Substance Abuse Treatment

Objective Eligibility & Exclusion Criteria  Specified in writing  Communicated to team I. Target Population

High-Risk and High Need Participants 1) Substantial risk for reoffending, community supervision failure, and/or treatment failure. 2) Addicted I. Target Population

1) Validated risk- assessment tool 2) Valid Clinical- assessment tool Validated Eligibility Assessments

I. Target Population Offenders charged with drug dealing or those with violence histories are not excluded automatically Criminal History Disqualifications

Clinical Disqualifications  Co-occurring mental health diagnosis  Medical Condition  Legally prescribed psychotropic or addiction medication Candidates are not disqualified automatically due to: I. Target Population

II. Historically Disadvantaged Groups

 Nondiscriminatory in intent and impact  Valid assessment tools for members of group Equivalent Access

II. Historically Disadvantaged Groups Monitors completion rates for group, if lower  Investigate reasons for disparity  Develop remedial action plan  Reevaluate Equivalent retention

Equivalent Treatment Evidence- based treatment for cultural group Equivalent incentives & Sanctions -Monitor -Remedial action if needed Equivalent Dispositions -Disparate Dispositions? -More frequent terminations? -Harsher sentences? II. Historically Disadvantaged Groups

Team Training  Develop culturally sensitive attitudes  Develop concrete strategies to correct and remediate disparities in services and outcomes

III. Roles & Responsibilities of the Judge

Professional Training  Constitutional  Ethics  Evidence-based substance abuse  Mental Health treatment  Behavior modification  Community Supervision III. Roles & Responsibilities of the Judge

 Length of Term  No less than two consecutive years  Consistent Dockets  Participate in Pre-court Staff Meetings III. Roles & Responsibilities of the Judge

 Frequency of Status Hearings  At least every two weeks during first phase  No less than once per month in later phases  Length of Interaction with participant  At least three minutes III. Roles & Responsibilities of the Judge

Judicial Demeanor Respectful Fair Attentive Enthusiastic Consistent Caring III. Roles & Responsibilities of the Judge

Judicial Decision Making  Seek and value team input  Responsible for weighing facts  Don’t decide by majority vote III. Roles & Responsibilities of the Judge

IV. Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments

 Advance Notice  Written policies and procedures  Opportunity to Be Heard Explanation – by participant, by judge  Equivalent Consequences III. Roles & Responsibilities of the Judge

 Progressive sanctions  Intermediate range  Proximal Behaviors  Distal Behaviors IV. Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments

Licit addictive or intoxicating substances  Continued use is contrary to evidence- based practices except when medically necessary  Authorized use only:  Competent medical evidence indicates medically indicated, and effective alternative treatments are not reasonably available IV. Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments

Therapeutic Adjustments  Early phase: Maintaining abstinence may be extremely difficult  Adjust treatment based on expertise of trained clinicians  Later phase: After treatment and stabilization sanctions can escalate for illicit drug or alcohol use. IV. Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments

 Incentivizing Productivity  Improved outcomes when court uses higher levels of praise and positive incentives  Phase Promotion Clearly defined phase structure Clearly defined behavior requirements Rewards participant and sets expectations IV. Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments

Use jail sanctions sparingly  Increased recidivism after six day on average IV. Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments

 Those who automatically Terminate participants for new drug or alcohol use or drug possession offenses have:  50% higher recidivism  48% loser cost savings IV. Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments

 Consequences of graduation and termination  Favorable criminal justice outcomes should result from graduation  More restrictive or more stringent criminal justice outcomes should result from unsuccessful termination or withdrawal IV. Incentives, Sanctions, and Therapeutic Adjustments

V. Substance Abuse Treatment

 Continuum of Care  Standardized patient placement criteria governs level of care provided.  Incarceration  Is not used to achieve clinical or social service objectives (e.g., for detox)  Treatment  Is not used to accomplish non-clinical goals (e.g., for housing or for those who need jail) V. Substance Abuse Treatment

Clinically trained representative from one or two treatment agencies are core members of team and attend staffing and hearings V. Substance Abuse Treatment

 Treatment Dosage and Duration  9 to 12 months; 200 hours of counseling  Treatment Modalities  One individual per week in Phase 1  Group membership is guided by evidence-based selection criteria  Evidence-Based Treatments  Medications V. Substance Abuse Treatment

Medication Assisted Treatment  Effective with and necessary for some participants when combined with psychosocial treatment  Programs avoid blanket prohibitions  Best when prescribed by a physician specializing in addiction medicine  Judge exercises discretion to prohibit MAT only when determined to not be medically necessary by a physician advising the court V. Substance Abuse Treatment

Provider Training and Credentials  Licensed or certified  Experience working with criminal justice populations  Clinically supervised V. Substance Abuse Treatment

 Peer Support Groups  Structured model or curriculum  12-Step and secular alternatives  Continuing Care Continue with pro-social activities and remain connected with a peer support group after Drug Court V. Substance Abuse Treatment

Best Practices Standards Vol. I: An Overview