Slide 1 NRC Perspectives on Reactor Safety Course Special Features of BWR Severe Accident Mitigation and Progression L. J. Ott Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Generic Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR): Safety Systems Overview
Advertisements

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory SCWR Preliminary Safety Considerations Cliff Davis, Jacopo Buongiorno, INEEL Luca Oriani, Westinghouse.
INRNE-BAS MELCOR Pre -Test Calculation of Boil-off test at Quench facility 11th International QUENCH Workshop Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK), October.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
INSPE internship 6 month internship proposal for a Ph.D. student at WUT within the framework of WUT-I2EN Transnational Agreement Location: CEA-Cadarache.
Assessing the Challenges Resulting from the Events at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station A Preliminary Discussion March 25, 2011 Walter L. Kirchner.
Vermont Yankee Presentation to VSNAP 7/17/13 VY/Entergy Fukushima Response Update Bernard Buteau.
Safety Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Sheldon L. Trubatch, Ph.D., J.D. Vice-Chairman Arizona Section American Nuclear Society.
PRACTICAL EXAMPLES OF THE ANALYSIS OF SEVERE ACCIDENTS Presented Dr. Chris Allison Regional Workshop on Evaluation of Specific Preventative and Mitigative.
Modeling boiling water reactor main steam isolation valve leakage using MELCOR Presented at the 21 st Annual Regulatory Information Conference March 10-12,
GENERATION III AND III+ NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DESIGNS ACR-1000 (Advanced CANDU Reactor) Dr. Şule Ergün Hacettepe University Department of Nuclear Engineering.
PERMITTING CHALLENGES FOR THE NEW GENERATION OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Ping Wan Bechtel Power Corporation Ninth Nuclear Utility Meteorological Data Users.
Issues Associated with the Development of Severe Accident Management Guidelines for CANDU Reactors Keith Dinnie Director, Risk Management Nuclear Safety.
The Harnessed Atom Lesson Six Atoms to Electricity.
LFR plant assessment against a Fukushima-like scenario Technical Workshop to Review Safety and Design Aspects of European LFR Demonstrator (ALFRED), European.
US NRC Protective Action Recommendation Study National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference April 10, 2008 Las Vegas, NV Randy Sullivan, CHP.
Debris Effects in Long-Term Post-LOCA PWR Cooling
An Approach to Evaluation of Uncertainties in Level 2 PSAs
1 ACPR Advanced, cost competitive, proven technology, and reliable The Third Generation Nuclear Reactor.
Accidents Happen But Nuclear Accidents Require Special Skill!
Presented at the USNRC 20 th Regulatory Information Conference Washington, DC March 11, 2008 Randall Gauntt, Sandia National Laboratories Charles Tinkler,
Nuclear Plant Systems ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords
Nuclear Power What is nuclear energy? Power plants use heat to produce electricity. Nuclear energy produces electricity from heat through a process called.
2012 Advisory Panel Oil and Gas Applications Ray Zowarka Center for Electromechanics The University of Texas at Austin 12/4/2012.
March “Experience Gained from the Mexican Nuclear Regulatory Authority in the Probabilistic Safety Assessment Level 2 Development for Laguna.
Fukushima Incident Preliminary Analysis, Consequences and Safety Status of Indian NPPs Part-1 Dr. S.K.Jain Chairman & Managing Director NPCIL & BHAVINI.
Overview of Conventional 2-loop PWR Simulator. PCTRAN Dr
State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA)
Westinghouse Perspective on New Reactor Sumps
RIC 2009 Thermal Hydraulics & Severe Accident Code Development & Application Ghani Zigh USNRC 3/12/2009.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Containment Isolation, actuation logic, Description Supporting Material
What about Japan?. Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6.
Nuclear Fuels Storage & Transportation Planning Project Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies Nuclear Energy Criticality Safety Assessment for As-loaded Spent.
1 BREI Conducted Comprehensive Independent Reviews of Passive Heat Removal Systems with Ejectors-Condensers Euratom DEEPSSI Project for the design and.
1 RIC 2009 MELCOR Analyses to Address Regulatory Issues: Evaluation of System Success Criteria Hossein Esmaili USNRC March 12, 2009.
Kevin Burgee Janiqua Melton Alexander Basterash
Nuclear Power Generation In The United States. 103 Nuclear Power Reactors.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
TACIS Project: R8.01/98 – TRANSLATION, EDITING AND DIFFUSION OF DOCUMENTS (Result Dissemination) Probabilistic Safety Analysis Technology (PSA) TACIS R3.1/91.
March 11, 2011 to Present. Presentation Overview Reactor Design and FeaturesChronology of EventsCurrent Status of Each ReactorRecovery Actions Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.
Repository Design Overview Presented to: NSNFP Meeting Presented by: Joe Price Office of Repository Development April 13, 2005 Bethesda, MD.
Nuclear Power Plant Orientation
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 ESTIMATION OF THERMAL-HYDRAULIC LOADING FOR VVER-1000 UNDER SEVERE ACCIDENT SCENARIO Barun Chatterjee 1, Deb Mukhopadhyay.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 Analysis of Corium Behavior in the Lower Plenum of the Reactor Vessel during a Severe Accident Rae-Joon Park,
Nuclear Power Plants. Salem/Hope Creek Oyster Creek.
Nuclear Energy Power Plants. Chernobyl Fuel  Uranium-235  an isotope of naturally occurring uranium- 238  Uranium is mined-common mineral is urananite.
E3 Teacher Summer Research Program. Willie L. Smith - IPC, Physics Tidehaven ISD Tidehaven High School.
Modeling a Steam Generator (SG)
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 ASTEC V2.0 rev 1 Reactor Applications French PWR 900 MWe Accident Sequences Comparison with MAAP4 V. Lombard,
Safety of At-Reactor High-Density Storage of Fuel in Pools Steve Jones Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission International.
THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT ON THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT OF NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 1.IRSHAD NURHAKIM BIN NORAHIM (ME088151) 2.LEE SZE TENG (ME087909)
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
LOW PRESSURE REACTORS. Muhammad Umair Bukhari
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities U.S. Industry’s Fukushima Response Joseph Pollock, Nuclear Energy Institute Christopher H. Mudrick,
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making “Overview of Level 2 PSA” Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, Country.
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities U.S. Industry’s Fukushima Response Joseph Pollock, Nuclear Energy Institute Christopher H. Mudrick,
Version 1.0, July 2015 BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module VII Probabilistic Safety Assessment Case Studies This material was prepared by the IAEA.
1039 GW Power Plant Equivalent
A.Borovoi, S.Bogatov, V.Chudanov, V.Strizhov
Containment System (CNS)
Pressurized Water Reactor
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module III Basic principles of nuclear safety Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared.
NRC Event Number – Event Date
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
VICTOR HUGO SANCHEZ ESPINOZA and I. GÓMEZ-GARCÍA-TORAÑO
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module VII Probabilistic Safety Assessment Case Studies Version 1.0, July 2015 This material was prepared.
Group 1 Best Group.
THE ROLE OF PASSIVE SYSTEMS IN ENHANCING SAFETY AND PREVENTING ACCIDENTS IN ADVANCED REACTORS Moustafa Aziz Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority.
New Regulatory Requirements in Japan
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 NRC Perspectives on Reactor Safety Course Special Features of BWR Severe Accident Mitigation and Progression L. J. Ott Oak Ridge National Laboratory Appendix 2B-7 Module 3 Section 7 Module 4 Section 7

Slide 2 BWR Severe Accident Studies Were Conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory  Follow-on to NRC Severe Accident Sequence Analysis (SASA) Programs initiated late 1980  Response to Three Mile Island  PWR studies  SNL  INL  LANL  BWR studies ORNL  Evaluations of Owners Group Emergency Procedure and Severe Accident Guidelines for NRR

Slide 3 BWR Severe Accident Technology Activities at ORNL  Accident progression  Event sequence  Timing  Code application and model development  Analytical support of experiments  Pretest planning  Posttest analyses  Diverse locations  ACRR (Sandia)  NRU (Chalk River)  CORA (Karlsruhe)  Accident management strategies  Preventive  Mitigative  Extension to advanced reactor designs

Slide 4 Predicted BWR Severe Accident Response Is Different from That Expected of a PWR in Several Aspects  Much more zirconium metal  Isolated reactor vessel  Reduction in power factor in the outer core region  Effects of safety relief valve actuations  Progressive relocation of core structures  Importance of core plate boundary  Steel structures in vessel  Large amount of water in vessel lower plenum

Slide 5 Boiling Water Reactor Contributors to Core Damage Frequency – NUREG-1150

Slide 6 Station Blackout Involves Failure of AC Electrical Power  Loss of offsite power  Emergency diesel-generators do not start and load Short-Term Station Blackout Immediate Loss of Water Makeup Long-Term Station Blackout Loss of Water Makeup Following Battery Exhaustion

Slide 7 The Most Probable BWR Accident Sequence Involving Loss of Injection Is Station Blackout Peach Bottom Short-term5% Long-Term42% Grand Gulf Short-term96% Long-Term1% Susquehanna* Short-term52% Long-Term10% Station Blackout Core Damage Frequencies *From Plant IPE (NPE )

Slide 8 If the Reactor Vessel Remains Pressurized, Relocating Core Debris Falls into Water above the Core Plate Grand Gulf Short Term Station Blackout without ADS Actuation

Slide 9 Release of Debris Liquids through Penetration Internals Has Been Extensively Analyzed  Control rod drive mechanism penetrations: secure  Vessel drain: very improbable  Instrument tube: most likely internal path

Slide 10 The BWR Control Rod Drive Mechanism Assemblies Are Held in Place by Upper Stub Tube Welds; the Incore Instrument Tubes Are Supported by Welds at the Vessel Wall

Slide 11 The Drywell Floor Area Is Small and the Drywell Shell Is Within Ten Feet of the Pedestal Doorway

Slide 12 Inside the Reactor Pedestal at Peach Bottom

Slide 13 Lower Drywell at Browns Ferry

Slide 14 BWR Evolution

Slide 15 Comparison of ESBWR and ABWR  Key parameters that increase core flow in ESBWR  Shorter fuel  Tall chimney  Unrestricted downcomer

Slide 16 Safety Systems Inside Containment Envelope

Slide 17

Slide 18 Breakdown by Initiating Event