Three Types of Questions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QAA Research Teaching Linkages: Enhancing Graduate Attributes Theme Linda Juleff, QAA Steering Group Representative.
Advertisements

By Anthony Campanaro & Dennis Hernandez
 To explain the NATURAL WORLD and how it got to be the way it is.  NOT merely to collect “facts” or describe.  Natural here means empirically sensible—that.
General Studies Areas Core Areas –Literacy & Critical Inquiry (L) –Mathematical Studies (MA/CS) –Humanities & Fine Arts (HU) –Social & Behavioral Sciences.
Note: Lists provided by the Conference Board of Canada
Ethics in HealthCare. Treating Patients With Dignity Sometimes health professionals get so wrapped up in the scientific principles of healthcare that.
Critical Thinking. Definition: Evaluating whether we should be convinced that a claim is true or that an argument is good. It’s also about formulating.
HOW TO EXCEL ON ESSAY EXAMS San José State University Writing Center Dr. Jim Lobdell.
Introducing Social Psychology
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Using Situational awareness and decision making
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Effective Questioning in the classroom
Learning Objectives LO1 Describe the role of professional judgment in achieving the overall objectives of the independent auditor in conducting an audit.
Principles of Assessment
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Learning to Think Critically
Learning to Think Critically pages Objectives Define thinking & reflection Identify 3 functions of the brain Describe how thinking impacts decision.
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
9/12/2015 Kevin G. Tucker/University of Belize1 Meaningful Social Studies.
Answering Questions Writing essays that fulfill the objectives.
CHAPTER 2 PARADIGMS, THEORY, AND RESEARCH
Appalachian Teacher Partners Appalachian Math Science Partnership September 23, 2009 We will begin at 9:01.
Socratic Seminars The Power of Questions. What is Socratic Seminar A teaching strategy to encourage students to engage in critical thinking, listening,
The Areas of Interaction are…
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Case Study Assignment MTT Certification Exam. Graded on four-point scale Purpose – extent to which response addresses the components of the assignment.
ETHICS ON BROADCASTING. BROADCASTING A medium that disseminates via telecommunications. It is the act of transmitting speech, music, visual images, etc.,
Opposing Viewpoints Teaching American History In Miami-Dade County December 14, 2012 Fran Macko, Ph.D.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Towards Independence: Major Purchases Mobile Phones – Part 1.
WRITING A BETTER PURPOSE AND NEED A COMMON SENSE APPROACH Kevin E. Davis Environmental Supervisor ODOT-OES.
Philosophy 2803 – Health Ethics Andrew Latus. Introduction Ethics Study of right and wrong/good and bad A Branch of Philosophy Central Question = “How.
Evolving Approaches to Documentation and the Student Interview Melanie Thornton Adam Meyer.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Expectations What Do YOU Expect To Learn What Do YOU Expect To Learn  How to Compute  How to Solve Equations  How to Solve (textbook) Problems  More.
IB-ITGSIB-ITGS Mr. Ketner Assigned Seats. IB-ITGS Syllabus please get signed and return!
What is Science?. The Goal of Science to investigate and understand the natural world To explain events in the natural world To use those explanations.
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
Essay Questions. Two Main Purposes for essay questions 1. to assess students' understanding of and ability to think with subject matter content. 2. to.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
A medium that disseminates via telecommunications. It is the act of transmitting speech, music, visual images, etc., as by radio or television. Broadcasting.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Assessment without levels. Why remove levels?  levels were used as thresholds and teaching became focused on getting pupils across the next threshold.
Coaching: The Art and Science “Try not to become a person of success but rather try to become a person of value.” Albert Einstein.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Critical thinking in the context of biology CETL Workshop February 25, 2015 Ben Montgomery NSE (Biology)
© 2006 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Longman Publishers Chapter 10: Reading Across the Disciplines Reading Across the Disciplines: College Reading.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
Planning Effective 1. 2 The elements of an effective lesson design is a rich learning experience for to begin with understanding where they need to go.
C RITICAL T HINKING I N E DUCATION. T HINK A BOUT Y OUR T HINKING “Critical thinking is the art of thinking about thinking while thinking in order to.
Chapter 1. Medical Law and Ethics, Second Edition Bonnie F. Fremgen ©2006 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Sara.
A Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools
Ethics on Broadcasting
Ethics on Broadcasting
Research & Writing in CJ
Ethics on Broadcasting
Learning to Think Critically
Chapter 4 Planning in the Problem-Based Classroom
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
Jez Echevarría 6th September 2013
The curriculum The curricullum tells «What and how the learners should learn» at specific levels of the education system. It includes the objectives and.
Moral Reasoning 1.
Learning to Think Critically
Zimbabwe 2008 Critical Thinking.
Exploring Bioethics.
Coaching: The Art and Science
Presentation transcript:

Three Types of Questions

Three Types of Questions 3 Conflicting Systems 1 One System 2 No System Require evidence and reasoning within a system Require evidence and reasoning within multiple systems call for stating a subjective preference a subjective opinion better and worse answers a correct answer cannot be assessed judgment knowledge

Questions of Procedure (established- or one-system)- These include questions with an established procedure or method for finding the answer. These questions are settled by facts, by definition, or both. They are prominent in mathematics, as well as the physical and biological sciences

Examples of One-system Questions What is the boiling point of lead? What is the size of this room? What is the differential of this equation? How does the hard drive on a computer operate? What is the sum of 659 and 979? How is potato soup prepared, according to established Polish tradition?

Questions of Preference (no system)- Questions with as many answers as there are different human preferences (a category in which subjective taste rules).

Questions of Preference Would you rather have short hair or long hair? Or would you prefer that your head be shaved, either completely or in some segments Do you like to go to the opera? Do you like to watch football on TV? Do you prefer a flat pillow or a fluffy pillow? Do you want a ring or a necklace? Do you want to go outside now?

Questions of Judgment (conflicting-systems) - Questions requiring reasoning, but with more than one arguable answer. These are questions that make sense to debate, questions with better-or-worse answers (well-supported and reasoned or poorly-supported and/or poorly-reasoned answers).

With Questions of Judgment (conflicting-systems), we are seeking the best answer within a range of possibilities. We evaluate answers to such questions using universal intellectual standards such as breadth, depth, logicalness, and so forth. These questions are predominant in the human disciplines (history, philosophy, economics, sociology, art…)

Questions Calling for Reasoned Judgment   Should assisted suicide be legalized? To what extent is welfare justifiable? How can we ensure long-term “health” of the environment while also considering the economic impact of the environmental decisions? What philosophy of parenting makes best sense in the light of our knowledge of child development? To what extent is it morally justified to subject animals to pain and suffering in experiments? What can we do about the problem of education today? What can we do about the problem of hunger in a world of plenty? What can we do about the problem of big money in politics? How can we create a world in which critical thinking is a fundamental social value?

To Determine Which of These Three Types of Questions We Are Dealing With (in Any Given Case) We Can Ask the Following Questions: Are there relevant facts we need to consider? If yes, then either the facts alone settle the question (and we are dealing with a question of procedure), or the facts can be interpreted in different ways (and the question is debatable). If there are no facts to consider, then it is a matter of personal preference. If the facts settle the question, then it is a “one-system” procedural question.

Teaching Students to Reason Through Category Three Questions 1) Write out a category 3 question within your content (question requiring reasoned judgment) that is important for students to learn to reason through. 2) List the category 1 questions (one-system questions) students would need to answer before addressing the category 3 question. 3) Design a classroom activity or unit which focuses on a category 3 question. For example, you could take a chapter in the textbook, think of the umbrella category 3 question (or any important category 3 question within the chapter) which that chapter answers. Have students figure out the category 1 questions they must answer prior to answering the category 3 question. Then they could figure out the logic of the question by reasoning through the elements of thought.

In general, what is the best way to treat depression? What are some ways to treat depression that have been proven effective with some people? Are there different types of depression? If so, what are the most common types, based on current research in the field? What ways of treating depression have been proven largely ineffective? Given the established ways of treating depression (that have been proven to have some degree of effectiveness), which ones have proven to be the most effective? Are some types of depression treated better with one method than other methods? If so, explain.

What is the best solution for reducing the number of people who take illegal drugs for fun?  What are some of the variables that have been shown to lead people to take drugs? At what age do most people begin taking drugs? Of those proven strategies, what are the costs involved in using each one of them on a broad scale? What are some of the obvious social, political, and economic barriers to using these strategies?

What are the best methods for reducing the amount of waste currently being transported to landfills? What types of wastes are currently being transported to landfills? How much of each type is being transported to landfills? How long does it take for each of these to disintegrate? What are some proven alternative methods for effectively handling wastes besides transporting it to landfills? What are some clearly identifiable political and ethical barriers to finding alternative ways of getting rid of waste?