A Next Generation Registration Directory Service (RDS) EWG Briefing for the IETF by Chris Disspain Monday Nov 4, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2003 Public Interest Registry Whois Workshop Registrant/User Classification & Current Practices Panel Presented by Bruce W. Beckwith VP, Operations October.
Advertisements

Whois Task Force GNSO Public Forum Wellington March 28, 2006.
Internationalizing WHOIS Preliminary Approaches for Discussion Internationalized Registration Data Working Group ICANN Meeting, Brussels, Belgium Jeremy.
Update on Whois TF March 25, Objectives of the Task Force 1)Define the purpose of the Whois service. [complete] 2)Define the purpose of the Registered.
STAFF Implement Proposed action STAFF – Assess (initial AND revisions based on feedback) Implementation change? Policy guidance needed? Admin/error update?
ICANN Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency.
GNSO Working Session on the Vertical Integration PDP 4 December 2010.
Update to NCPH on WHOIS GNSO NCPH Inter-Sessional Meeting 29 Jan 2013.
Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report al%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton.
Draft Roadmap to Implement SAC 051 Steve Sheng, ICANN 1.
Internationalized Domain Names Status Report Prepared for: ICANN Meeting, Lisbon 29 March, 2007 Tina Dam IDN Program Director ICANN
© 2003 Public Interest Registry Whois Workshop Introduction to Registry/Registrar Issues Presented by Bruce W. Beckwith VP, Operations June 23, 2003 Serving.
WHOIS Policy Review Team Draft Report Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) 14 February 2012.
CORDRA Philip V.W. Dodds March The “Problem Space” The SCORM framework specifies how to develop and deploy content objects that can be shared and.
Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT) Proposal Comments Sue Todd, Director, Product Management Monday 11 May 2009, San Francisco.
Policy & Implementation WG Initial Recommendations Report.
#ICANN51 1 Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Activities Update ICANN Los Angeles Meeting October 2014 Chris Dillon.
Text #ICANN51. Text #ICANN51 15 October 2014 At-large policy round table Holly Raiche Panel 1: Privacy and Proxy 1000 – 1045 Hrs.
RAA Update and WHOIS Validation Workshop Moderated by: Volker Greimann, Gray Chynoweth, Kurt Pritz 12 March 2012.
Registrars SG Briefing- Vertical Integration Special Trademark Issues Margie Milam Senior Policy Counselor ICANN 8 March 2010.
1 Updated as of 1 July 2014 Issues of the day at ICANN WHOIS KISA-ICANN Language Localisation Project Module 2.3.
Update report on GNSO- requested Whois studies Liz Gasster Senior Policy Counselor 7–12 March 2010.
Text #ICANN51 15 October :30 - 5:30 pm Board/GNSO Collaboration Group to suggest next steps on EWG Report/registration data services PDP.
Final Report on Improvements to the RAA Steve Metalitz 5 December 2010.
What is WHOIS?. 2  Internet Protocol you can use to search registry and registrar databases and discover who registered a domain name or IP address 
Text #ICANN49 Whois Studies Update. Text #ICANN49 Recent Developments Final two GNSO-commissioned Whois Studies just completed – on Whois Privacy & Proxy.
Michael Yakushev, cctld.ru Board Member.  WHOIS existed before ICANN (1982-)  Review of WHOIS Policy is prescribed by AoC (2009)  Review Team was formed.
ICANN Update: What Next for Trademark Owners? 22 nd Annual Fordham Int’l IP Law & Policy Conference 25 April 2014.
ICANN COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PLANNING DISCUSSION Brussels, June
Update from ICANN staff on SSR Activities Greg Rattray Tuesday 21 st 2010.
JIG (Joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN Group) Update APTLD | New Delhi Feb 23, 2012.
Text. #ICANN49 Data & Metrics for Policy Making Working Group Thursday 27 March 2014 – 08:00.
Global Name Registry Proposal to Modify Appendix O: WHOIS Data Access.
IRTP Part D PDP WG Items for Review. Items for Review Policy Development Process WG Charter GNSO WG Guidelines.
WHOIS Next Steps Bruce Tonkin Acting Chair GNSO WHOIS Steering Committee.
Policy Update. Agenda Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings PDP Thick Whois PDP IRTP Part D PDP Policy & Implementation Other efforts?
SSAC Report on Domain Name Registration Data Model Jim Galvin.
What is WHOIS?. 2  Internet Protocol you can use to search registry and registrar databases and discover who registered a domain name or IP address 
Proposals for Improvements to the RAA June 22, 2010.
1 1 The GNSO Role in Internet Governance Presented by: Chuck Gomes Date: 13 May 2010.
#ICANN51 1 Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues (PPSAI) PDP Working Group Status Report & Activity Update ICANN51 11 October 2014 Don Blumenthal,
IDN UPDATE Tina Dam ICANN Chief gTLD Registry Liaison Public Forum, Wellington 30 March 2006.
#ICANN50 Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP Working Group Activities Update ICANN London Meeting June 2014 Chris Dillon and Rudi.
PDP on Next-Generation ‭gTLD‬ Registration Directory Services to Replace ‭WHOIS‬ - Update Marika Konings – ICANN-54 – 17 October, 2015.
Governmental Advisory Committee Public Safety Working Group 1.
Update on WHOIS- related policy activities in the GNSO Liz Gasster Senior Policy Counselor ICANN ICANN 5 March
RDAP Andy Newton, Chief Engineer. Background WHOIS (Port 43) – Old, very old – Lot’s of problems Under specified, no I18N, insecure, no authentication,
GNSO Public Council Meeting Wednesday, 17 July 2013.
Law Enforcement Recommendations for RAA ammendment ICANN Brussels 2010 Protective Marking : Protect.
Update on Consumer Choice, Competition and Innovation (CCI) WG Rosemary Sinclair.
Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP WG Graeme Bunton, Vice Chair | ICANN-52 | February 2015.
Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part C Presentation of Initial Report.
Update to ALAC on the RAA Negotiations Margie Milam 26 June 2012.
GNSO IDN work Dr Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council IDN Workshop Marrakech, June 25, 2006.
Text #ICANN49 Privacy & Proxy Accreditation Services Issues (PPSAI) Working Group Update.
1 Internationalized Domain Names Paul Twomey 7 April 2008.
‘Thick’ Whois PDP Items for Review. Items for Review GNSO Policy Development Process ‘thick’ Whois Issue Report DT’s Mission WG Charter Template.
Implementation Review Team Meeting
8th Capacity Building Webinar
Introduction to the PSWG
Implementation Review Team Meeting
Community Session - Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace WHOIS
Community Session - Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Service (RDS) Policy Requirements RDP PDP WG | ICANN59 | 26 June 2017.
Abuse Mitigation + NG RDS PDP
ICANN’s Policy Development Activities
Review Implementation
Introduction to the PSWG
IDN Variant TLDs Program Update
Draft Framework Elements for Unified Access Model
EE DNS FORUM / UADOM Domain name dispute resolution: challenges and alternatives Kateryna Oliinyk Head of Arzinger IP practice, Patent and Trademark Attorney.
Presentation transcript:

A Next Generation Registration Directory Service (RDS) EWG Briefing for the IETF by Chris Disspain Monday Nov 4, 2013

2 Mandate and Purpose  ICANN Board directives  Implement the WHOIS Review Team recommended improvements  Redefine the purpose and provision of gTLD registration data  Expert Working Group (EWG) formed to assess the need for Next Generation Registration Directory Service (RDS) and recommend a new approach

Why Update WHOIS? Pr otocol Challenges Lack of standardized command, output, and error structures No consistent data model Support for internationalization and localization Lack of security features Other Challenges Consistency Accuracy Privacy (or lack thereof) Limited standards for privacy/proxy services One size fits all approach Limited validation & verification of data elements Purpose for access not tied to data elements displayed 3

4  Initial Report published on 24 June  Based on detailed analysis of users and purposes  Recommends paradigm shift  Abandon one-size-fits-all WHOIS system  Replace by purpose-driven system to improve privacy, accuracy & accountability  Buenos Aires Status Report to be published 8 Nov EWG Key Findings gtld-directory-services/initial-report-24jun13-en.pdf gtld-directory-services/initial-report-24jun13-en.pdf

5 EWG recommendations to facilitate & focus future policy discussions on an issue that has been contentious for 10+ years GNSO to develop new policy recommendations based on EWG Work EWG is developing design principles for evaluation in the GNSO policy process Policy Requirements for the Next Generation WHOIS

6  All parties in the domain name ecosystem have responsibilities  Current, accurate, timely data  Reachable for timely resolution of domain name problems  Responsible for registration and use  Repercussions for misusing data or providing inaccurate data EWG Recommended Principles – Accountability

7  Collected by registrars  Stored by registries  Purpose-based collection  Allow for extensibility EWG Recommended Principles – Data Elements

8 EWG Recommended Principles – Validation and Accuracy  Registration data should be validated syntactically when collected  Name/contact should also be validated operationally  Optional feature for registrants to pre-validate a reusable registrant name/organization/contact  Periodic time-stamped re-validation  Standard validation service

9  Copied from registries  Stored in the Aggregated RDS or queried real-time from registries (Federated RDS)  Purpose-based disclosure  Public access to minimum data set, with restrictions to deter harvesting  Gated access to other data, based on requestor identity and purpose EWG Recommended Principles – Data Disclosure

Registrar Aggregated RDS Aggregated RDS Registrants Requestors Stores copies of Data Validates Collected Data Handles All Queries (public & authenticated) Licenses Requestors Applies Gating Policy Returns Allowed Data Audits Data Access Additional Services Stores copies of Data Validates Collected Data Handles All Queries (public & authenticated) Licenses Requestors Applies Gating Policy Returns Allowed Data Audits Data Access Additional Services Data Collection Data Storage Data Access Enabled via Periodic Data Copies for all gTLDs Registrar Registrars gTLD Registries gTLD Registries Purpose-Driven Data Disclosure via Public & Authenticated Access Methods gTLD Registries gTLD Registries gTLD Registries gTLD Registries Aggregated RDS Model

Registrar Federated RDS Federated RDS Registrants Requestors Obtains Data in Real-Time Validates Collected Data Handles All Queries (public & authenticated) Licenses Requestors Applies Gating Policy Returns Allowed Data Audits Data Access Additional Services Obtains Data in Real-Time Validates Collected Data Handles All Queries (public & authenticated) Licenses Requestors Applies Gating Policy Returns Allowed Data Audits Data Access Additional Services Data Collection Data Storage Data Access Enabled via Queries relayed in Real-Time for all gTLDs Registrar Registrars gTLD Registries gTLD Registries Purpose-Driven Data Disclosure via Public & Authenticated Access Methods gTLD Registries gTLD Registries gTLD Registries gTLD Registries Federated RDS Model

12 Recommended Principles – Access Methods RDS Any Requestor Returns only requested data available and accessible to authenticated requestor for declared purpose. RDS Query (Anonymous) RDS Query (Requester,Purpose,Data) methods portal RDS Response (Gated Data Elements) RDS Response (Public Data Elements) Authenticated Requestor or Issue RDS Credentials (Requester ID, Purposes) Returns only public data available to anyone, for any purpose.

Implications for Protocols

Informed by/Connected to IETF Efforts Referral Whois (RWhois) –RFC 1714 (1994), RFC 2167 (1997) Whois++ –RFC 1834 et al. (1995) Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS) –RFC 3981 et al. (2005) Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) –WEIRDS working group (2012+) EWG is informed of IETF work and has explored compatibility with its recommendations 14

Implications for Protocols Intent is to work with applicable protocols wherever possible EWG is evaluating applicable protocols (EPP & RDAP) – EPP: Standard 69, RFCs Initial analysis suggests both EPP & RDAP can be used – May require a few extensions, additions, or use of RDAP “remarks” 15

Implementation & Deployment Issues Registries & Registrars roles a focal point What about TLD registries? –ccTLDS may or may not –Unclear who will implement or deploy the new ARDS Depends upon model ultimately selected by Board (Centralized, Federated, or something else) –EWG evaluating models to see which one can satisfactorily address all recommended design principles 16

17 What is the status of other WHOIS-related work being done by ICANN? Other policy work on improving WHOIS continues to be conducted:  Thick WHOIS Policy Development Process (PDP) GNSO approved thick WHOIS requirements for all gTLDs in the standard format required under the 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement  PDP on Privacy and Proxy Services- GNSO drafting charter to commence work  PDP on Translation and Transliteration of Internationalized Registration Data- GNSO finalizing charter to commence work

18 Next Steps for the EWG  EWG to publish Status Report by ICANN’s Nov. Meeting  Research to Commence on Topics- ccTLD validation practices, commercial validation services, risk/impact analysis, proxy provider practices & detailed costs analysis  EWG expects to wrap up after ICANN’s March Singapore meeting w/ delivery of Final Report  Community debate and discussion  ICANN Board to evaluate & send to the GNSO for follow-up policy work if appropriate

19 How to Learn More Buenos Aires Public Sessions: Wed Nov : and workshop: wrap-up Calls, briefings, meetings upon request Initial Report: services/initial-report-24jun13-en.pdf Announcement: ement-3-24jun13-en.htm

Questions? 20

Thank You