Judge Lynn M. Egan November 29, 2012. “The parties shall proceed at all stages of trial, including the selection of prospective jurors…in the order in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JURY SELECTION Davis v. Fisk Electric Co., 268 S.W.3d 508 (Tex. 2008). Hyundai Motor Corp. v. Vasquez, 189 S.W.3d 743 (Tex. 2006). Cortez v. HCCI-San Antonio,
Advertisements

ELECTRONIC PRELODGEMENT NOTICES IN THE CIVIL JURISDICTION OF THE MAGISTRATES COURT before.
 JURY- is a panel of everyday citizens that are summonsed by a court to determine the verdict of a case in which one of their peers from society is on.
Grand Jury Practice and Indictments
JURY DUTY. “Trial of all crimes… shall be by jury.” Article III, Section 2 “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy.
Chapter Fourteen: Trials and Juries
The Court System.
ENG 3C1.  The Rule of Law is the “fundamental principle that society is governed by law that applies equally to all persons and that neither an individual.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Trial Preparation and Trial Litigation and Procedure Trial.
Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Common Trial Procedures United States. Opening Statements.
Jury Duty. “A person is innocent until proven guilty” “A person is innocent until proven guilty” As a juror, you have the responsibility of determining.
Society & Environment.  Most people between may be summoned for jury service  They go to court and are held in a Jury assembly area.  15 people.
 Trial Courts : listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts in disputed situations.
THE JURY & 3 RD PARTY INTERVENERS BLAW WAS HERE Law 12.
Unit 4 Legal Studies Overview of the Jury System.
New Expedited Jury Trials Administrative Office of the Courts Office of the General Counsel Anne M. Ronan December 6, 2010.
Preparing for our Mock Trial 1. Introduction to jury duty- why do YOU think it’s important? 2. Quick Power Point on the purpose of a jury 3. Read: Michigan.
By: Abby Pinkston & Kirsten Carbaugh Russian Federation.
It’s our last one YAY!.  Remember FAT ElementMeaningWays it is achieved (F) Entitlement to a fair and unbiased hearing Based on natural justice, a fair.
Trial on Indictment in the Crown Court
Law and the Legal Process. Jurisdiction What is Jurisdiction? What is Jurisdiction? The authority of a court to hold a trial and decide a case The authority.
 The US court system is an adversarial system.  This means that the trial is a contest between two sides.  The judge makes rulings on the law and manages.
TRIAL SYSTEM USED IN THE UNITED STATES ADVERSARY SYSTEM.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 27 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 24, 2005.
The Federal Court System …and Justice For All. The Adversarial System Courts settle civil disputes between private parties, a private party and the government,
Equal Justice Under the Law Chapter 7 section 1 Pages
Supreme Court civil pre-trial procedures: an overview
Trial Courts (pages 46 to 50). Trial Courts Courts that listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts.
JURIES – CROSS SECTION OF THE COMMUNITY. STRENGTHS OF THE JURY SYSTEM RANDOMLY SELECTED People from the community are randomly selected from the electoral.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 1 LAW 12 MUNDY
Jurors Criminal Justice 1010 Abigail Hogan. Where did we get the idea for trial by jury?  The jury system started in England.  In the Declaration of.
American Judicial Procedure Judge Tom C. Rawlings Judge, Juvenile Courts Middle Judicial Circuit Sandersville, GA USA
Section B, Part I. The Trial The Anticipation –Makes old men and women out of young trial lawyers. –There is an exhilaration when the judge takes the.
The selection of a jury may take many days – it is called empanelling.
American Court System Applied to Twelve Angry Men.
1. True 1. True 2. True 2. True 3. True 3. True 4. False 4. False 5. True 5. True 6. True 6. True 7. False 7. False 8. True 8. True 9. True 9. True 10.
Jury Selection Process. Role of the Jury Juries are fundamental to the Canadian justice system. In a criminal trial, 12 people are chosen at random to.
Judge Lynn M. Egan Judge Thomas M. Donnelly Judge Diane M. Shelley November 20, 2015.
The Legal System Chp. 30. Structure of the Legal System Trial Court – the first court to hear a case Appellate Court – has the authority to review the.
Section 1.2 The Court System and Trial Procedures.
A Legal Action brought by the government against a person charged with committing a crime.
Unit 2: The Court System Trial Courts Law Education Mr. Chad Fetscher Randall T. Shepard Academy for Law and Social Justice.
1 Chapter 5: The Court System. 2 Trial Courts Trial courts listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts in disputes. There are 2 parties.
THE LAW OF JURY SELECTION Presented by Ted A. Donner (With Thanks to Hon. Ron Sutter and Hon. Lynn M. Egan)
Voir Dire: The Jury Selection Process Mr. Calella Introduction to Law.
The Court System Chapter 5. Courts  Trial Courts- two parties Plaintiff- in civil trial is the person bringing the legal action Prosecutor- in criminal.
Trial by Ordeal: a physical test overseen by the church. “Trial by Boiling Water” “Trial by Cold Water” Was abolished after it lost support of the Catholic.
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH COURTS, JUDGES, AND THE LAW. MAIN ROLE Conflict Resolution! With every law, comes potential conflict Role of judicial system is to.
What is it like to serve on a Jury?
THE LAW OF JURY SELECTION
Chapter 5: The Court System
Jury System.
Also known as the ‘accusatorial’ system.
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
JURY SELECTION: Possibly the most important part of a trial!
The Jury System.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards
JURY DUTY.
The Role of the Jury.
JURY DUTY.
CHALLENGES TO VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
Introduction to the Criminal Trial
Chapter 5: The Court System
Chapter 5: The Court System
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 1
Introduction to the Criminal Trial
Chapter 5: The Court System
THE LAW OF JURY SELECTION
Seminar for Illinois Attorney General’s Office
Presentation transcript:

Judge Lynn M. Egan November 29, 2012

“The parties shall proceed at all stages of trial, including the selection of prospective jurors…in the order in which they appear in the pleadings unless otherwise agreed by the parties or ordered by the court.”

CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES INHABITANT OF THE COUNTRY AGE 18 YEARS OR OLDER ABLE TO UNDERSTAND ENGLISH “FREE FROM ALL LEGAL EXCEPTION, OF FAIR CHARACTER, OR APPROVED INTEGRITY, OF SOUND JUDGMENT, WELL INFORMED”

LACKS ANY QUALIFICATION SET FORTH IN SECTION 2 JURY SERVICE IN THE COUNTY WITHIN ONE YEAR PRIOR PARTY TO A PENDING SUIT IN THAT COURT

EACH PARTY MAY CHALLENGE JURORS FOR CAUSE. “IF A PROSPECTIVE JUROR HAS A PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT, THE COURT SHALL CONSIDER [THE] JUROR’S ABILITY TO PERCEIVE & APPRECIATE THE EVIDENCE WHEN CONSIDERING A CHALLENGE FOR CAUSE.”

EACH SIDE IS ENTITLED TO 5 PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES ADDITIONAL PEREMPTORIES (NOT TO EXCEED 3) MAY BE ALLOWED IF MORE THAN 1 PARTY PER SIDE EACH SIDE GETS EQUAL NUMBER COURT SHALL ALLOCATE AMONG PARTIES ON A SIDE IF THEY CANNOT AGREE

EACH SIDE IS ALLOWED 1 ADDITIONAL PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE, REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF ALTERNATE JURORS. THE ADDITIONAL PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE MAY ONLY BE USED AGAINST AN ALTERNATE, BUT “ANY UNEXERCISED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE MAY BE USED AGAINST AN ALTERNATE JUROR.”

ALTERNATE JURORS ARE UTILIZED “IN THE SEQUENCE IN WHICH THEY ARE ORDERED INTO THE JURY BOX.” ANY ALTERNATE WHO DOES NOT REPLACE A PRINCIPAL JUROR “SHALL BE DISCHARGED AT THE TIME THE JURY RETIRES TO CONSIDER ITS VERDICT.”

BATSON APPLIES TO RACE & GENDER. People v. Rivera, 221 Ill.2d 481 (2006). DOES NOT APPLY TO AGE, BUT RELIGION MAY BE ENTITLED TO “SOME FORM OF HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY.” Lawler v. MacDuff, 335 Ill.App.3d 144 (2d Dist., 2002). TRIAL JUDGE MAY RAISE A BATSON CHALLENGE SUA SPONTE. People v. Glasper, 234 Ill.App.3d 173 (2009).

“…IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE COURT TO…” ORDER THE FULL NUMBER OF JURORS INTO THE JURY BOX BEFORE EITHER PARTY QUESTIONS COMMENCE WITH THE PLAINTIFF PASS UPON & ACCEPT JURORS IN PANELS OF FOUR PASS UPON ALTERNATE JURORS SEPARATELY

“…A RULE OF ANCIENT ORIGIN WHEREBY A PANEL HAS NOT BEEN ACCEPTED BY BOTH SIDES, & WHEN A PANEL HAS BEEN ‘BROKEN,’ THE PARTY TENDERING THE PANEL HAS A RIGHT TO MAKE FURTHER PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES.” Koester v. Johnson, 158 Ill.App.3d 747 (4 th Dist., 1987).

KNOW THY JUDGE!