§30-2.10(a) and (b) Teacher or Principal Improvement Plans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
How Do We Know We Are Making Progress? Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Writing Effective Teacher Improvement Plans (TIPs), (PIPs) and Appeal Decisions Presented by: Kathy A. Ahearn, Esq., Partner, Guercio & Guercio, LLP Erin.
S/CDN Meeting March 2013 Laurie Hedges.  Essential Elements of Instruction (ITIP)  Differentiated Instruction  21 st Century Skills  Brain Friendly.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 August 2014.
State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness April 2011 CCSSO Ohio Principal Evaluation System.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
SMART Goals and Educator Plan Development
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
Lincoln School District. Agenda  Overview of packets Observations Other Types of Evidence Mid-Year Conferences Closing and Next Steps.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Student Learning targets
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Facilitated by Joanne Picone-Zocchia, lead MPPR author The MPPR in Action 1 © 2013 Communities for Learning: Leading lasting change® and Learner-Centered.
Science Academic Content Standards and Standards-Based Education.
Ongoing Training Day 4. Agenda Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and.
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
RESPRO Area 1C Area 1C RESPRO Meeting RESPRO Area 1C November 24, 2009.
Awareness Raising for Principals/ Senior Managers November 2010 New Statutory Assessment Arrangements from 2012/13.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
Results Driven Accountability PRT System Support Grant Targeted Improvement Plan Cole Johnson, NDE.
Let’s Chat About Data Based Decision Making Melissa and Brian.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Cheryl Simonson, CESA 6 Jacob Hollnagel, DPI. Guiding Successful Implementation of Educator Effectiveness Understand successful educator effectiveness.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Title II, Part A, Division Improvement Procedures for Compliance with Section 2141 of Title II, Part A Virginia Department of Education.
PRINCIPALS’ SUPPORT CLUSTER TARGET SETTING within the school improvement process January 2010.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Write on sticky note, how you implemented the exit slip strategy. What does this tell you about your students?
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Annual Professional Performance Review and YOU! Is the road to hell paved with good intentions?
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Patricia Williams & Anita Castro Special Education Team 1 Sample IEP Forms College and Career Ready.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Educator Effectiveness Liaison Network Informational Webinar October 17, 2014.
Aligning Teacher Effectiveness to the Common Core Standards March 7, 2013 Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Principal Evaluation Process
Results Based Professional Learning Communities
Strategic Planning Summary.
UIP Review: Understanding Feedback from the CDE Review
State Board of Education Progress Update
Strategic Planning Summary.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Assessment Day Strategy
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

§ (a) and (b) Teacher or Principal Improvement Plans

C17 from Guidance When/under what circumstances must a district or BOCES implement a teacher or principal improvement plan? Upon rating a teacher or principal as Developing or Ineffective through an annual professional performance review, a school district or BOCES must formulate and commence implementation of a teacher or principal improvement plan (TIP and PIP, respectively) for that teacher or principal.

C17 from Guidance When/under what circumstances must a district or BOCES implement a teacher or principal improvement plan? The TIP or PIP must be developed locally through negotiations and implementation must begin no later than 10 school days from the opening of classes in the school year following the school year for which such teacher or principal’s performance is being measured.

C18 from Guidance What are some potential elements of improvement plans? An improvement plan defines specific standards-based goals that a teacher or principal must make progress toward attaining within a specific period of time, such as a 12-month period, and shall include the identification of areas that need improvement, a timeline for achieving improvement, the manner in which improvement will be assessed, and, where appropriate, differentiated activities to support improvement in these areas.

C18 from Guidance What are some potential elements of improvement plans? The plan should clearly describe the professional learning activities that the educator must complete. These activities should be connected directly to the areas needing improvement. The artifacts that the teacher or principal must produce that can serve as benchmarks of improvement and as evidence for the final stage of the improvement plan should be described, and could include items such as lesson plans and supporting materials, including student work.

C18 from Guidance What are some potential elements of improvement plans? The supervisor should clearly state in the plan the additional support and assistance that the educator will receive. In the final stage of the improvement plan, the teacher or principal should meet with his or her supervisor to review the plan, alongside any artifacts and evidence from evaluations, in order to determine if adequate improvement has been made in the required areas outlined within the plan for the teacher or principal.

Evidence Based TIPs 1.Look at rubric (standard or element or indicator level?) 2.Prioritize based on district and building goals 3.Identify possible SUSTAINED actions that could be included 4.Go to your form; fill it out 5.What is YOUR plan?

Have a Go! On YOUR form, get started!

Tips for TIPs Think remediation Think positive intentions Think priorities Think focus Think coaching Think differentiated Think sustainability Think ongoing

Tips for TIPs Don’t think punishment Don’t think compliance Don’t think workshop alone Don’t think buffet Don’t think quick fix Don’t think one size fits all