Act 101 of 2010 Creating Enforceable Post-Adoption Contact Agreements: County Approaches ABA Permanency Barriers Project Webinar June 22, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
Advertisements

Effective Casework Practice (Foster Care) Ongoing assessment of childs needs and interventions Ongoing assessment and implementation of services/supports.
Reinstatement of Parental Rights: The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Judge Doris Fransein Richard, Ro’derick, and Richard Jr. Hampton Kimberly Lynn.
On Behalf of the Parent’s – The ICWA - Transferring Proceedings to Tribal Court and Petitioning to Invalidate ICWA Proceedings.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Understanding Confidentiality and Education Decision Making for Youth in Foster Care Child Welfare, Education and the Courts: A Collaboration to Strengthen.
Education Outcome Measures for Courts Child Welfare Agency’s Perspective on the Need for Education Outcome Measures Kathleen McNaught ABA Center on Children.
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
YOUTH ATTORNEY. GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 1:  The primary change in the general provisions article is the establishment of an attorney for children.
Dependency Court – A Team Approach Presen Presented by: Judge Brantley S. Clark and Carol A. Dunaway, M.S. 1.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
2005 CHILDREN’S CODE REVISIONS ARTICLE 5 ADOPTION ACT.
A court dedicated to protecting children and promoting families
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
To provide justice through a system that assures equal access for the fair and timely resolution of cases and controversies. MJB Mission Statement Amendments.
Allianceforchildwelfare.org Adoptions.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
Termination of Parental Rights and Adoption: Where does the GAL fit in? The most important steps to know in the TPR process and how the GAL plays a role.
1 JUVENILE COURT PROTECTION CASES: THE PLAYERS POVERTY LAW Irene M. Opsahl.
The Heart of the Matter: supporting family contact for fostered children.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 53: Family Law Chapter 53: Family Law Business Law Legal, E-Commerce,
Handling a CHIPS Case in FCPC Tribal Court Law Day April 30, 2015.
Wisconsin Indian Child Welfare Act November 5, 2009.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Karen Stoutamyer Law Law Offices of Karen S. Law, PLC
ADOPTIONS CM 124_ADP_PPT_October 2012 PPT 1. Objectives Professional standards & values Adoption program’s legal base. Florida adoption guidelines. Legal.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
Mentor Training Update 1 April 2014 Guardian Ad Litem Program “I am for the child”
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 FAMILY LAW © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall CHAPTER 53.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
New Options for Pennsylvania Adoptions Overview of Act 101 of 2010.
Permanency Planning in Juvenile Court The options GALs have in finding a safe, permanent home for our kids.
Parent-Child Visitation: Could Practice Make a Difference? Washington State CASA Conference October 2015Washington State CASA Conference October 2015.
Caseworker Contacts Changes to Case Notes in eWiSACWIS.
Amy Groh, MA Director of Crisis Intervention Services 19 N. 6 th Street. Reading, PA (610) Crisis Intervention & Emergency Services.
Privacy Panel: Information Sharing Between Education and Child Welfare Agencies and Access to Records CIP Conference July 2010.
STANDARDS FOR GUARDIANS AD LITEM Supreme Court Rule 110A.
A.J. (Tony) Brandenburg August 21, 2015 TCAP Tribal Court Conference Protecting Indian Children (760)
When Can You Redact Information Without Requesting an Attorney General Decision? Karen Hattaway Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views.
Intersection of Fostering Connections and McKinney-Vento What is the connection? How do we connect? Susie Greenfelder, Education Planner MI Department.
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
DISPOSITION. Dispositional Hearing  What is it?  A dispositional hearing is required whenever a petition for dependency or neglect has been sustained.
Adoption Webinar: Openness in Adoption #3 - Bringing the Child's Voice to Openness Planning - Working with the Office of the Children's Lawyer Welcome.
SURROGATE PARENT Information for Local District Administration.
11/28/12 1 CALIFORNIA FOSTERING CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ACT Version 2.0 Assembly Bill 12.
Sharing Information (FERPA) FY07 REMS Initial Grantee Meeting December 5, 2007, San Diego, CA U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug-Free.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Acknowledging the Past and Securing the Future. Working with birth families when Barnardos case plan is adoption Presenters Elizabeth Cox – Senior Manager.
Being a GAL in Tribal Court NAILS Pre-NLADA Indian Law Training Paul Stenzel – Stenzel Law Office LLC November 6, 2007.
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
The Current State of Foster Care in Virginia
ADOPTIONS.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS?
Open Adoption Agreements
? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart
Background checks are required by state and federal law prior to CA/DCYF staff authorizing an individual (other than a parent) to have unsupervised access.
Adoption.
Obtaining Proof of Decision-Making Authority
Adoption.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS?
Defending the Family in the Fight Against Criminal and Civil Protection Orders – Collaborating to Keep Families Together Jill Gookin, Esq.
NEXT.
Child Abuse and Neglect Institute
Presentation transcript:

Act 101 of 2010 Creating Enforceable Post-Adoption Contact Agreements: County Approaches ABA Permanency Barriers Project Webinar June 22, 2012

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 2 Webinar Presenters Cristina Ritchie Cooper, Esq. (moderator) Staff Attorney, ABA Center on Children and the Law Washington, DC Joshua Lewis, Esq. Director Adoption Legal Services Project Allegheny County Paul Beebe Family Group Specialist Crawford County Human Services Sarah Katz, Esq. Supervising Attorney Community Legal Services, Family Advocacy Unit Philadelphia, PA

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 3 Overview of Act 101 of 2010 Amended Adoption Act – new Subchapter on Voluntary Agreement for Continuing Contact added to Pa.C.S., Title 23, Chapter 27 Effective Date: April 25, 2011 Covers three post-adoption issues:  post-adoption contact (PAC) agreements  state information registry  access to adoption records, including those in state registry

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 4 Open Adoption - Background Allows for some form of continued contact or communication between adoptive parents and birth relatives and/or children and their birth relatives About 30 states have some type of statute concerning open adoption Noncompliance does not invalidate adoption Benefits:  Helps maintain relationship between child and birth relatives  Minimizes child’s lost relationships  Older children in particular may have great attachment to birth relatives and want ongoing contact  May result in increased voluntary relinquishment, when appropriate and not coerced  Access to information about medical or cultural history of the child and the birth family Open adoption may not be appropriate in all cases

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 5 When is Open Adoption Appropriate? Certain types of cases may be more amenable to agreements (e.g., older children). Factors the court must consider under Act 101 (23 Pa.C.S. § 2735 ) to determine whether a PAC agreement is in the child’s best interest include:  Length of time child removed from parents' care and circumstances relating to removal;  Interaction and interrelationships of child with birth relatives;  Adjustment to child’s home, school and community;  Willingness and ability of birth relative (including birth parents) to respect and appreciate the bond between the child and prospective adoptive parent; and  Willingness and ability of the prospective adoptive parent to respect and appreciate the bond between the child and the birth relative.

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 6 Who May Enter a Post Adoption Contact (PAC) Agreement Birth relatives (by blood, marriage or adoption):  parent;  grandparent;  stepparent;  sibling; or  uncle/aunt of child’s birth family Prospective adoptive parents Child 12 or older must consent 23 Pa.C.S. §§ 2732, 2733(a), 2734

Approval of PAC Agreements A PAC agreement is not legally enforceable until court approval. 23 Pa.C.S. § 2735(c) To be legally enforceable, an agreement must be approved on or before the date the adoption is finalized. 23 Pa.C.S. § 2738(c)(2) Approval is based on court determinations that the agreement:  Was entered into knowingly and voluntarily (23 Pa.C.S. § 2735(b)(1)); and  Is in the child’s best interest (23 Pa.C.S. § 2735(b)(2)) Factors the court should consider when making the best interest determination are enumerated in the statute. See 23 Pa.C.S. § 2735(b)(2). 7 Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law

8 What terms can PAC include? Act 101 states that the agreement must be in writing, but does not specify type, duration or frequency of contact From OCYF Bulletin :  Entered knowingly, voluntarily by all parties with signed and notarized affidavit  Appendix B - Sample Voluntary Post -Adoption Contact Agreement  Appendix C - Instructions for Completion of Agreement  Agreements should address: Purpose of agreement Participants Types of contact, including:  mail/letters  exchange of photographs or videos

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 9 What terms can PAC include?  gifts  telephone contact  electronic communication/use of social media ( s, texts, Facebook, etc.)  supervised and/or unsupervised visits  other contact Frequency of contact Duration of contact Location of contact Conditions of contact Person who has some responsibility for facilitating the contact Process for modification, enforcement or discontinuance of agreement

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 10 Post-Approval Actions An agreement may be modified if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that it would serve the needs, welfare and best interest of the child.  Only the adoptive parent or child age 12 or over may seek modification. 23 Pa.C.S. § 2737 Any party to the agreement, a sibling or a child who is the subject of an agreement may seek its enforcement. 23 Pa.C.S. § 2738(b)  Failure to comply with the agreement is not grounds for setting aside the adoption decree. 23 Pa.C.S. § 2736 To end an agreement, the court must find by clear and convincing evidence that its discontinuance serves the needs, welfare and best interest of the child. 23 Pa.C.S. §2739(b)  A party or child 12 or over may seek discontinuance of an agreement. 23 Pa.C.S. §2739(a)

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 11 Who will Facilitate or Negotiate PAC? DPW is to develop procedures, in consultation with AOPC and the Juvenile Courts Judges Commission, to facilitate the development of an agreement, when appropriate, before it is presented to the court. 23 Pa.C.S. § 2740 Parties are not prohibited from agreeing to mediation of an agreement at their own cost. 23 Pa.C.S. § 2733(d) Consider when PAC agreements should be created. Who should facilitate or negotiate the agreement?  Who should write it?  Who should file it?

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 12 Who will Facilitate or Negotiate PAC? Practices used or considered in PA counties:  Family Group Decision-Making model  SWAN unit of service - mediators  Parent Attorneys  Guardian Ad Litem  Prospective adoptive parent’s adoption attorney  Discussed at pre-TPR trial conferences conducted by court personnel

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 13 Potential Issues Foster parents often don’t have attorneys until after TPR Parents’ attorney contracts end when TPR concluded Can PAC be drafted after a birth parent’s rights have been terminated? What conditions can be part of the agreement?  Can the child’s best interests or safety prevail? Who would make that determination? Must agreements between all interested birth relatives be identical? Can an agreement be voided before being approved? Can an agreement be approved at the same time as a TPR? Before the TPR?

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 14 Family Group Decision-Making Model Crawford County Children and Youth Services Goals: provide neutral setting for parties to express type of contact they want and determine if consensus can be reached  Creating a written, signed agreement not the meeting goal Stage 1: Individual “pre-conference” meeting Stage 2: Family Group PAC meeting

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 15 Family Group Decision-Making Model, cont. Written materials provided:  Initial letter – meeting details, disclaimers  Minutes form – notes from meeting, any consensus reached, disclaimers Copies sent to attorneys and CYS caseworker Youth involvement Interest from multiple birth relatives Strengths/Challenges

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 16 Role of Attorneys Encourage clients to identify relatives as placement options and maintain relative relationships. Counsel clients about PAC option. E.g., remind them:  That the option exists;  What the options for continued contact are;  That this is a way to maintain some kind of relationship with the child, even if contact is limited to updates from adoptive parents;  That there is no guarantee that they will be able to enter into an agreement, or that the court will approve it even if all parties agree;  Noncompliance does not invalidate the adoption. Counsel clients on drafted agreements. Facilitate/negotiate/draft PAC agreements?

Role of Attorneys, cont. If siblings have been freed for adoption through a dependency case but the pre-adoptive parents are not adopting all the siblings:  each sibling under 18 shall be represented by a Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) in the development of a PAC agreement. 23 Pa.C.S. § 2733(b) Parties are not entitled to appointed counsel in modification, enforcement or discontinuance proceedings. 23 Pa. C.S. § 2741(a)  But a GAL may be appointed to “represent the interests of a child” in those proceedings. 23 Pa.C.S. § 2741(b)(1)  A GAL may also be appointed to a sibling under 18 who seeks to enforce or discontinue an agreement. 23 Pa.C.S. § 2741(b)(1) Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 17

Copyright 2012 ABA Center on Children and the Law 18 Role of Court Collaboration with county agency and attorneys on development of Act 101 policies Confirm in involuntary termination cases that birth parents received notice of the enforceable post adoption contact option? Approval of agreement  On or before date adoption is finalized  Which judge?  Timing of hearing?  Need for hearing at all?  Best interest determination Post-approval actions: modification, enforcement, discontinuance