Civil Administrative Enforcement of Environmental Laws.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural Safeguards
Advertisements

Dispute Resolution Under the Congressional Accountability Act
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Understanding Dispute Resolution Options in the Construction Industry © Copyright 2014 NASBP.
Facility Lead Corrective Action Approaches Voluntary Agreements RCRA National Meeting August 13, 2003 Jennifer Shoemaker EPA Region 3.
David Abbott EPA Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia
Japan Audit & Supervisory Board Members Association (JASBA) Explanatory Memorandum on the Audit & Supervisory Board Members (The companies with Audit &
ADEQ Regulatory Process
NARUC/NIGERIA REGULATORY PARTNERSHIP Peer Review Presented by Elijah Abinah Assistant Director Public Utilities Division Arizona Corporation Commission.
Deborah M. Smith United States Magistrate Judge District of Alaska LAWS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED TO FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Second Asian Judges Symposium.
Regional conference on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, February, Belgrad,Serbia Albania’s Challenges.
FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND THEIR EFFCT ON CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY Gary A. Jones, Senior Environmental Counsel Siemens Corporation Franco.
Module 7 Slide 1 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 7 Enforcement.
PA/FOIA INTERFACE OSD/JS Privacy Office (703)
Developing and Implementing Solid Waste Codes ITEP - TSWEAP Wyndham San Diego Bayside, San Diego, CA February 24-26, 2015 Gussie A. Lord Jill Grant & Associates,
Environmental Audits New Jersey Hospital Association - May 2, 2005 Patrick T. Mottola, Esq. This presentation and materials do not constitute and are not.
Introduction: The Role of Agencies
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 43 Administrative Law Chapter 43 Administrative Law.
Module 8: Settlement of collective labour disputes Module 8: Settlement of collective labour disputes ©2005/ILO/DIALOGUE/VE 1 The purpose of labour dispute.
P A R T P A R T Regulation of Business Administrative Agencies The Federal Trade Commission Act and Consumer Protection Laws Antitrust: The Sherman Act.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
Environmental Compliance Assistance Workshop for Colleges and Universities September 13-14, 2005 Chapel Hill, NC.
Enforcement Overview Melissa Cordell, P.G. Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 2 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 2 The Resolution of Disputes.
Administrative Penalty Program SB Regulatory Item California Air Resources Board Enforcement Division Public Hearing December 12, 2002 Sacramento,
Foundations of Effective Board Operation Nicole L. Mace Vermont School Boards Association.
Strategies Available in Puerto Rico to Reduce Potential Environmental Liabilities and Self Disclosure Incentives for Current Owners and Operators Gretchen.
EPA’s ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION SYSTEM Environmental Appeals Board U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Kathie A. Stein, Judge.
Neutral Confidentiality DON ADR Program Office NOTE: These slides are just an overview and not intended as legal advice. People seeking legal advice on.
CONSIDERATION OF STREAMLINED PROCESS FOR STIPULATED WASTE TIRE HAULER AND WASTE TIRE FACILTY ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY CASES CIWMB Board Meeting Agenda Item.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
Chapter 3 Part II. ALJs versus Article III Judges Article III Judges Protections Lifetime tenure Cannot reduce salary Cannot fire, only impeach Cannot.
Overview of Civil Judicial Enforcement. Civil Judicial Enforcement  Who may file civil judicial environmental enforcement actions in U.S.? Federal Government.
COMPLIANCE ACTIONS FDA Regulation & Licensure of Whole Blood & Blood Components, Including Source Plasma September 15-16, 2009 Helen Cowley Office of Compliance.
Public Review Committee Linda Sullivan-Colglazier Assistant Attorney General July 28, 2011.
The right item, right place, right time. DLA Privacy Act Code of Fair Information Principles.
THE FUTURE OF THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW PROCESS July 2005 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
1 UST Stakeholders Meeting Compliance & Enforcement “C/E 101” MassDEP January 2012.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Part 190 NPRM: Administrative Procedures - 1 -
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND REGULATORY AGENCIES © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as.
Avoiding and Resolving Government Contract Disputes with the Federal Government Richard W. Oehler Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue Suite 4800 Seattle,
VCE Legal Studies: Evaluating the role of the court as a law-maker
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
Enforcement What to Expect From the Water Boards, and What to Look for Locally ENTS Workshop August Mark Bradley Office of Enforcement CA State.
© 2005 Powell Goldstein LLP. All rights reserved. Practical Pointers for Using EPA’s Audit Policy Matthew Mattila
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF A SEP Projects must improve, protect or reduce risks to public health or environment. Projects.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
Office of Monitoring, Audit and Enforcement Office of Monitoring, Audit and Enforcement Web – Feb 2016.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Getting Started: Basic Administrative Requirements Unit 1.
Enforcement Overview Melissa Cordell, P.G. Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental.
 Legal requirement to file returns and pay taxes. ◦ I.R.C. Sections 6001, 6011 ◦ Regulations under § 6011  Self-assessment system. ◦ Proper form, required.
Creative Use of Administrative Order Authority Expedited Settlement Agreements.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
Chapter 5 Administrative Law © 2012 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning.
Choosing the Appropriate Enforcement Mechanism Enforcement Response Policies.
WHAT TO DO WHEN YOU HAVE AN “ALLEGED” VIOLATION Keith W. Turner Watkins & Eager.
Administrative Agencies
Mason County School District
Tomball Independent School District Annual Confidentiality Training
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
ENFORCEMENT ISSUES IN STORMWATER REGULATION
Enforcement Overview James Gradney Enforcement Division
Session: Enforcement Actions
Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications
Liability Under CERCLA
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
Chapter 6 Powers and Functions of Administrative Agencies.
Chairman Christi Craddick
Presentation transcript:

Civil Administrative Enforcement of Environmental Laws

Direct Authority This is authority granted by the legislature to the Administrator of EPA. May order compliance and/or a penalty for noncompliance. May be delegated by the Administrator. May take many forms, often creative. No need to go to Federal Court.

EPA Civil Administrative Enforcement Process Informal – Action taken by Agency based on its own authority to inform facility of violation and potential enforcement (e.g., Warning Letters, Notice of Violation) – Used as first response with escalation to formal enforcement if action fails to achieve desired response

Administrative Process con’t. Formal – Established process whereby legal action can be taken via an EPA administrative system that allows EPA to enforce environmental statutes through either unilateral or consent orders Administrative Compliance Orders (ACOs) used to compel facility to comply with environmental requirements on an established schedule Administrative Penalty Orders (APOs) used to assess penalties Orders not self-enforcing. If facility does not comply, EPA must take action judicially – Does not require coordination with separate prosecutorial agency (DOJ)

Administrative Process con’t. Formal con’t. - Parties receiving ACOs/APOs may request hearing before specialized Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) with environmental expertise Certified by Office of Personnel Management and appointed in accordance with 5 U.S.C. § They have decisional independence pursuant to Section 557 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 557 which ensures fair and impartial resolution of proceedings. ALJs conduct hearings, render decisions, and issue final orders - ALJs offer all litigants opportunity to resolve enforcement cases through Alternative Dispute Resolution with ALJ serving as a neutral If litigant declines, case assigned for litigation before another ALJ

Administrative Process con’t. Formal con’t. - ALJ decisions subject to review by Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) ALJ initial decision becomes final EPA order within 45 days after service upon parties unless a party appeals to EAB or EAB elects to review initial decision. - EAB is impartial body independent of all Agency components outside the immediate Office of Administrator - Parties can appeal EAB decision judicially - Regional Judicial Officers (RJOs) perform adjudicatory functions and act as Agency neutrals in administrative cases. Generally, senior EPA attorneys

Advantages of Administrative Process Appropriate for routine, relatively simple violations requiring limited injunctive relief and/or short compliance schedules – Some statutes limit time allowed for injunctive relief (e.g., CAA allows administrative order if relief sought can be completed within 1 year) Appropriate with smaller penalties – Some statutes establish penalty cap (e.g., CAA cap is $200,000, but can be revised with DOJ consent) – By comparison, single largest civil judicial penalty >$30M; whereas, total administrative penalties assessed in FY 2009 were ~$32M Enables Agency to address broader range of violations and maintain greater field presence with limited resources Less costly and time-consuming than judicial approach with violations resolved more quickly

Roles/Responsibilities Headquarters and Regions: Same as for Civil Judicial Enforcement – Staff are same – Enforcement Response Policies, Penalty Policies and calculations are same States/Locals/Tribes: Not involved in administrative enforcement – EPA communicates and coordinates with agencies – Some have independent administrative authority Citizens: – Can not bring cases administratively, but may comment on settlement proposals

Incentive Programs Programs available for both civil and administrative enforcement Self Disclosure Policy – Must meet specified criteria: systematic, voluntary, independent discovery; independent, prompt disclosure; prompt correction; cooperation; prevent recurrence – Reduced gravity component of penalties – Agreement to not prosecute criminally Small Business Policy – Applies Self Disclosure Policy to businesses with 100 or fewer employees

Incentive Programs con’t. Expedited Enforcement Settlement Offers – Offer very small penalty to first time violators if they come into compliance quickly (usually within 30 days) – Facility required to submit documentation to demonstrate that in compliance Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPS) – Facility voluntarily agrees to undertake environmentally beneficial project related to the violation in exchange for mitigation of penalty – Does not include activities that violator must take to return to compliance