Offtaker of Last Resort Consultation Event 3 March 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPACT ESTIMATION PROJECT h o r i z o n s c a n n i n g Anti-trust issues in on-line retailing Ed Smith Director Office of Fair Trading The views expressed.
Advertisements

REGULATORY AND INVESTMENT CHALLENGES IN HYBRID POWER MARKETS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES REGULATORY AND INVESTMENT CHALLENGES IN HYBRID POWER MARKETS IN DEVELOPING.
RIIO-T1 impact on allowed revenues and network charges 6 September 2012.
Copyright 2013 by Baringa Partners LLP. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary. Route to market for independents Overview of the evidence to.
The information in this presentation has been collated by ELEXON and while all due care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this information, ELEXON.
Trust Policy The Trust aims to maintain a workforce that is highly skilled, competent and flexible and one that puts the patient at the centre of maintaining.
Hedging Foreign Exchange Exposures. Hedging Strategies Recall that most firms (except for those involved in currency-trading) would prefer to hedge their.
Project Discovery Transmission Workstream, 4 March 2010 Ben Woodside.
Chapter 15.
Copyright 2013 by Baringa Partners LLP. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary. PPA Route to Market Imbalance Risk Analysis An Update Oliver.
A regulatory framework for gas quality treatment facilities: recap and update.
1 NBS-M017 – 2013 CLIMATE CHANGE: GOVERNANCE AND COMPLIANCE Electricity Market Reform Aims to integrate both the Wholesale and Low Carbon Electricity Markets.
FINANCING LNG PROJECTS. Contracting for and financing LNG assets April 2006.
Introduction to Derivatives and Risk Management Corporate Finance Dr. A. DeMaskey.
Distribution Charging Methodologies Forum DCC Charging Methodology 4 th April 2013.
International Finance Chapters 12, 13, and 14 Foreign Exchange Exposure.
Contracts for Difference Harrison Clark Rickerbys.
CHAPTER FOUR – SOURCES OF FINANCE. SOURCES OF FINANCE  Internal Sources  Refers to funds that are generated from within the firm itself – from owner’s.
Sources of Finance How to get your business started...
Ch 9: General Principles of Bank Management
What How When DELISTING. IN. SEBI(DELISTING OF EQUITY SHARES) REGULATIONS, 2009 SCRA[ SECURITIES CONTRACT( REGULATION ACT) 1956] LISTING AGREEMENT COMPANIES.
The economic regulation of gas processing services Key issues and initial thoughts Ofgem presentation 18 June 2007.
EFRAG’s preliminary position on the IASB Supplementary Document Financial Instruments: Impairment Draft comment letter 28 February 2011.
Chapter 6 Sourcing. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Explain the difference between.
Derivatives and Risk Management Chapter 18  Motives for Risk Management  Derivative Securities  Using Derivatives  Fundamentals of Risk Management.
SO Incentives from April 2010 John Perkins. 2 Gas System Operator (SO) Incentives National Grid operates the high pressure Gas Transmission System in.
MANAGING INTEREST RATE RISK. THEORIES OF INTEREST RATE DETERMINATION Expectation theory : –Forward interest rate are representative of expected future.
8 Halswell St PO Box Thorndon WELLINGTON New Zealand While Strata Energy.
The changing policy environment - what about the market? Nigel Cornwall UKELA CCEWP Round up 10 October 2012.
Credit Risk Dr Said Abu Jalala. Introduction Financial institutions have faced difficulties over the years for a multitude of reasons The major cause.
Discussion of ERCOT Market Default Alternative to Credit Insurance CWG/MCWG September 17,
Nursery Management Understanding and Managing Finance Session 9.
Credit Arrangements During a Prolonged Emergency Mark Cockayne and Jayne McGlone 11 December 2006 Whilst all reasonable efforts have been made to verify.
Flow Margin Assumptions for NTS Planning and Development Transmission Planning Code Workshop 3 5 th June 2008.
Mod 0333: Update of default System Marginal Prices Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Modification Proposal 0246: Quarterly NTS Entry Capacity User Commitment Chris Shanley.
UNC (Urgent) Modification Proposal 0044: “Revised Emergency Cash-out & Curtailment Arrangements” UNC Transmission Workstream 11 th August 2005.
Medium-term TEC Trading ARODG Seminars Glasgow & London February 2007.
Review Group Modification Proposal Introduction of Enduring NTS Exit Capacity Arrangements.
Gas Emergency Arrangements Proposal Transmission Workstream 5 th April 2007.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Receivables Management For Management Related Notes and Assignments, Visit
Project Procurement Management
1 Transmission Work Group 1 st November 2012 Gas Security of Supply SCR Proposals Credit Implications for GB Gas Market EBCC Response Summary Mark Cockayne.
Extended Reserve Selection Methodology Workshop 2 Default values and proposed payment mechanism 1.
Third-Party Solar Financing Options in New Hampshire 1.
Pamela Taylor, Head of European Strategy, Ofgem Madrid Forum, March 2011 ERGEG’s draft framework guideline for gas balancing.
Transmission workstream 6 April Overview of TPCR Third Consultation UNC transmission workstream – 6 April Mark Feather.
Mitigation of Credit Tail Risk Exposure Donald Meek Credit Working Group January 20, 2015.
Facilitating Release of Non-obligated Entry Capacity Draft – for discussion purposes only 22 November 2007.
Proposed framework for charges for generators connected to the Distribution network Please note that the contents of this presentation are proposals at.
Resource Analysis. Objectives of Resource Assessment Discussion The subject of the second part of the analysis is to dig more deeply into some of the.
Modification Proposal 0435: Arrangements to better secure firm gas supplies for GB customers Initial Workgroup discussion 1 November 2012.
Selling your renewable electricity Stuart Stephens, Commercial Director e-POWER the best price for your power.
Derivatives in ALM. Financial Derivatives Swaps Hedge Contracts Forward Rate Agreements Futures Options Caps, Floors and Collars.
RFPEG Belize 2013 Public Utilities Commission. Objectives of RFPEG Belize 2013 PUC Act: Section 22 (1)It shall be the duty of the Commission to ensure.
Session 22 (R) Utility Scale Solar Development Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) April 04, 2016.
Ratio Analysis…. Types of ratios…  Performance Ratios: Return on capital employed. (Income Statement and Balance Sheet) Gross profit margin (Income Statement)
Distribution Commercial Group Billing & Collection Management and Remedies Richard Smith Chair- EA Distribution Commercial Group.
ROMANIA NATIONAL NATURAL GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY Public Service Obligations in Romanian Gas Sector Ligia Medrea General Manager – Authorizing, Licensing,
1 ST Market Engagement Session 3 rd October 2014 RE-PROCUREMENT OF CUSTODIAL TENANT DEPOSIT PROTECTION SCHEME Presentation by Ruth Hayes.
Renewables IPP frameworks for successful PPAs Dr Muriel Watt Head, Energy Policy & PV.
BUNKERING RISK MANAGEMENT METHODS & COMPARISON
Chapter 8: Selecting an appropriate price level
SO Incentives from April 2010
Back-up flexibility for this winter Slow R3 non-reserved power
Mod_38_18 Limitation of Capacity Market Difference Payments to Loss Adjusted Metered Quantity. 12th December 2018.
Transmission Workstream 2nd December 2010
Interconnector trading in SEM 7th June 2007
Presentation transcript:

Offtaker of Last Resort Consultation Event 3 March 2014

Session One: Offtaker of Last Resort Rationale, aims and objectives

The current market situation 3OLR Overview Lenders usually require generators to have a PPA with a credit-worthy counterparty before they will provide debt finance, as it provides them with a secure price for power. If independent generators cannot secure PPAs, they struggle to finance and develop projects, reducing competition and increasing costs to consumers. Independent renewable developers currently face difficulties in securing bankable long- term PPAs because:  Offtakers are reluctant to offer price floors within long-term PPAs;  The closure of the Renewables Obligation to new entrants from 2017 appears to me making large utilities more cautious when contracting for ROCs  Views of the future costs and risks of managing a PPA (such as balancing costs), are making offtakers relatively reluctant to offer PPAs, and are resulting in higher PPA discounts where they are offered.

Contracts for Difference will help… 4OLR Overview Many of the issues that have been identified in the market at present will be addressed through the Contract for Difference (CfD):  CfD pays a variable ‘top-up’ to developers, which combined with the variable power price provides a stable price  It therefore removes long-term price risk from the generator and thus the requirement for price floors or fixed prices in PPAs in order to satisfy financiers that there will be a minimum wholesale price received for electricity generated.  PPA providers also no longer need to value and market ROCs through PPAs

…but some risks remain 5OLR Overview There were three issues raised in responses to our Call for Evidence last year, which may present challenges for independent generators under the CfD:  Lack of competition within the Long-term PPA market. If lenders continue to require generators to have long term PPAs with well-capitalised creditworthy offtakers, who have a strategic interest and long term presence in the GB electricity market.  Long-term route-to-market risks (including imbalance costs) which are difficult to price accurately. The combination of increasing intermittency, higher likelihood of system imbalance and regulatory uncertainty means that lenders are pricing a higher risk premium in the PPAs being offered.  The switch to the CfD creates transitional uncertainty and caution for lenders and offtakers. We have been working with generators and offtakers as part of a Market Readiness Group to address this, developing a sample PPA structure compatible with the CfD, as well as best practise guidelines for securing a PPA.

The Aims of the Offtaker of Last Resort 6OLR Overview In order to address the long-term route to market risks and the lack of competition within the long-term PPA market, we are proposing to introduce the Offtaker of Last Resort. The Offtaker of Last Resort will provide renewable CfD generators with a guaranteed, 'backstop' route-to-market for their power: a Backstop PPA. The Offtaker of Last Resort aims to:  Open up route to market opportunities for independent generators;  Reduce the cost of investment in renewable electricity generation; and  Boost competition and thereby lower costs to consumers.

The Aims of Today  Present our proposed design for the Offtaker of Last Resort  Provide an opportunity for you to ask questions  Gather your initial views on our design proposals Please note that this event is no substitute for submitting your views in written form through our consultation. 7OLR Overview

A Word on Competition Law This event should be conducted in full accordance with competition regulations. Participants should not share commercially sensitive information, such as: The value to a company of any particular OLR design detail; Any specific financial or other data, inputs or assumptions used in any model, investment appraisal, forecast or analysis; Individual output, capacity and production plans; Prices, pricing strategy, profits, profit margins, cost information, and market trends, market shares and marketing policy; Supplier details, contracting strategies, contract terms or contract tenders; Credit terms and credit limits; Individual investment or technical development; or Individual business plans or strategies. If you feel at any point that discussions might be in danger of restraining or distorting competition, please alert the chair and seek to terminate the discussion. 8OLR Overview

Session Two: Generator Eligibility, Offtaker Identity, Access and Allocation OLR Overview

Offtaker of last resort – outline design 10OLR Overview ►Offtakers are competitively allocated backstop generators, by bidding a management fee ►Certain suppliers mandated to bid; other suppliers can do so voluntarily ►Credit-worthiness: ensured by credit rating or letter of credit requirements? ►Offtakers are competitively allocated backstop generators, by bidding a management fee ►Certain suppliers mandated to bid; other suppliers can do so voluntarily ►Credit-worthiness: ensured by credit rating or letter of credit requirements? Generators have a right to a ‘Backstop PPA’ Obligation on suppliers to bid for backstop PPAs ►Management fees bid by backstop offtaker are levelised across all suppliers through a levelisation process Management fees levelised across suppliers ►Eligible generators have a right to a ‘backstop PPA’ enshrined in regulations and supply licence conditions. Terms grandfathered from the point of CfD signature ►Provides a guaranteed route to market at a fixed discount to the market price; when combined with CfD top up, it creates a fixed price per MWh ►Fixed discount set to be larger than discounts expected to be available in the market, to ensure it is a genuine ‘last resort’ – so fixed price, but significantly below the strike price ►Effectively ‘caps’ generators’ long term route to market costs (eg imbalance/basis risk) ►Gives greater flexibility to developers to choose the contracting structure and counterparty which best suits their appetite for risk ►Backstop PPAs are 1yr in length, with a minimum tenor of 6 months ►Eligible generators have a right to a ‘backstop PPA’ enshrined in regulations and supply licence conditions. Terms grandfathered from the point of CfD signature ►Provides a guaranteed route to market at a fixed discount to the market price; when combined with CfD top up, it creates a fixed price per MWh ►Fixed discount set to be larger than discounts expected to be available in the market, to ensure it is a genuine ‘last resort’ – so fixed price, but significantly below the strike price ►Effectively ‘caps’ generators’ long term route to market costs (eg imbalance/basis risk) ►Gives greater flexibility to developers to choose the contracting structure and counterparty which best suits their appetite for risk ►Backstop PPAs are 1yr in length, with a minimum tenor of 6 months

Eligibility and Offtaker Identity 11 OLR Design ►Largest suppliers (those that supply more than [X]% of GB electricity) are mandated to submit bids to manage each Backstop PPA. ►Duty on SoS to review the threshold if it appears that no supplier would exceed it. ►Other licenced suppliers are able to voluntarily submit bids, subject to any credit requirements ►Largest suppliers (those that supply more than [X]% of GB electricity) are mandated to submit bids to manage each Backstop PPA. ►Duty on SoS to review the threshold if it appears that no supplier would exceed it. ►Other licenced suppliers are able to voluntarily submit bids, subject to any credit requirements Offtaker Identity ►All Renewable CfD holders including IC holders ►Considering splitting output from generators with capacity above 100MW across multiple offtakers ►All Renewable CfD holders including IC holders ►Considering splitting output from generators with capacity above 100MW across multiple offtakers Eligibility

Access 12 OLR Design ►Few fetters on access. Generators’ eligibility for further Backstop PPAs is lost if: ►a Backstop PPA is terminated by offtaker for ‘material breach’, or ►if they terminate a Backstop PPA early without the required notice ►Generators are able to enter into a Backstop PPA at any point during their CfD (once payments have started) ►However, initial delay to enable Ofgem to get their systems in place: earliest access to a Backstop PPA is in early 2016 ►Considering requirement for information provision ►Few fetters on access. Generators’ eligibility for further Backstop PPAs is lost if: ►a Backstop PPA is terminated by offtaker for ‘material breach’, or ►if they terminate a Backstop PPA early without the required notice ►Generators are able to enter into a Backstop PPA at any point during their CfD (once payments have started) ►However, initial delay to enable Ofgem to get their systems in place: earliest access to a Backstop PPA is in early 2016 ►Considering requirement for information provision Access

Allocation 13OLR Design ►Backstop PPA is allocated to an offtaker competitively – they bid a management fee £/MWh. Contract allocated to the lowest bidder. ►Mandatory offtakers are required to submit bids for each Backstop PPA. ►Ofgem to allocate within five weeks of generator expressing an interest in a Backstop PPA. Contract comes into force a week later: six weeks after notifying Ofgem. ►Allocation initially via sealed bid, could move to monthly auction if Ofgem judged this would be in consumers’ interest. ►Potential to use mutualisation provisions to compensate generator in the event that Ofgem fails to allocate within five weeks. ►Backstop PPA is allocated to an offtaker competitively – they bid a management fee £/MWh. Contract allocated to the lowest bidder. ►Mandatory offtakers are required to submit bids for each Backstop PPA. ►Ofgem to allocate within five weeks of generator expressing an interest in a Backstop PPA. Contract comes into force a week later: six weeks after notifying Ofgem. ►Allocation initially via sealed bid, could move to monthly auction if Ofgem judged this would be in consumers’ interest. ►Potential to use mutualisation provisions to compensate generator in the event that Ofgem fails to allocate within five weeks. Allocation

14OLR Design Allocation

Table Discussion Questions 15OLR Design ►Does the high-level allocation timeline for Backstop PPAs look appropriate for generators and suppliers? ►What information should Generators be asked to provide when applying to access the OLR, to help inform Offtakers’ bids? ►Does the high-level allocation timeline for Backstop PPAs look appropriate for generators and suppliers? ►What information should Generators be asked to provide when applying to access the OLR, to help inform Offtakers’ bids? Allocation ►How do generators and lenders get comfort over OLR payment flows? ►Minimum offtaker credit rating of, or letter of credit from, a BBB- entity? ►No need for credit support as the right to swift (6-week) re- allocation should be sufficient? ►Compensate generators in the event of offtaker insolvency via the mutualisation provisions? ►How do generators and lenders get comfort over OLR payment flows? ►Minimum offtaker credit rating of, or letter of credit from, a BBB- entity? ►No need for credit support as the right to swift (6-week) re- allocation should be sufficient? ►Compensate generators in the event of offtaker insolvency via the mutualisation provisions? Offtaker Identity

Session Three: Levelisation and Pricing OLR Overview

►The sum of the management fees bid by offtakers will be levelised across all licensed suppliers. ►Costs split by market share (domestic and non-domestic) ►Quarterly levelisation ►Mutualisation provisions ►Subject to review: manner and frequency of levelisation may change under large volume of BPPAs ►The sum of the management fees bid by offtakers will be levelised across all licensed suppliers. ►Costs split by market share (domestic and non-domestic) ►Quarterly levelisation ►Mutualisation provisions ►Subject to review: manner and frequency of levelisation may change under large volume of BPPAs Levelisation 17OLR Design

Pricing 18OLR Design ►Absolute (£/MWh) discount ►Fixed over time ►Indexed to CPI ►Modelled £20-£30/MWh discount, £25/MWh favoured option ►Single discount for all technologies ►Absolute (£/MWh) discount ►Fixed over time ►Indexed to CPI ►Modelled £20-£30/MWh discount, £25/MWh favoured option ►Single discount for all technologies Pricing

19OLR Design Pricing

20OLR Design Pricing

21OLR Design Pricing

22OLR Design Pricing

23OLR Design Pricing

24OLR Design Higher gearing  Bigger discounts Smaller discounts  Less gearing What OLR discount gives a similar project returns across both scenarios? Pricing

25OLR Design Reference case (15-year PPA) Short term contracting strategy, with debt sized on the following OLR discounts: £20/MWh£25/MWh£30/MWh TechnologyGearing Equity IRR Gearing Equity IRR Gearing Equity IRR Gearing Equity IRR Onshore wind 70.6%13.1%67.6%13.3%65.1%13.0%62.7%12.7% Offshore wind 75.5%15.2%73.8%15.5%71.9%15.2%69.8%15.0% Solar PV63.9%10.3%60.3%10.3%58.7%10.2%57.1%10.1% Pricing

Questions? 26OLR Design

Session Four: Backstop PPA – contract terms

Principles of the bPPA Help ensure bankability Facilitate easy comparison for competitive allocation Provide an appropriate balance of risks for the Parties Ensure normal operational incentives are maintained. Should be as close as possible to a ‘typical’ commercial PPA Have based the initial shape heavily on the emerging output of the CfD Market Readiness Working Group. Contract terms should be standard without areas of negotiation between the Parties. As far as possible, contract terms should be universal across technology types. If variation is necessary to the contract over time, should (to the extent possible) leave the generator in an equivalent position. 28Backstop PPA – Contract terms

Structure Strong preference for single set of terms and conditions that would apply to all projects and technology types. Intention (subject to drafting) is that any differences required would be reflected in the schedule to the contract which would provide project specific details and make clear the overall shape of the contract. The information in the schedule would need to be available to offtakers prior to the allocation process to allow them to factor in to their bidding strategies. The index price will be the relevant CfD Market Reference Price for that particular project. This will be detailed in the schedule. Contract will include an operational period (during which the offtaker will take power and provide payment to the generator) of up to 12 months. Likely to be preceded by a short ‘start-up’ period to get systems connected and make appropriate metering arrangements. 29Backstop PPA – Contract terms

Metering and meter registration Backstop PPA will need to come into force very quickly therefore will need to get meters registered very quickly. We are working with Elexon to ensure that new offtaker can either be registered within 5 working days, or at least has access to the metering data. 30Backstop PPA – Contract terms Transmission connected Relatively easy to transfer BMU to new offtaker Distribution connected Not possible to transfer A.BMU, and setting up a new one takes time We are working with Elexon on new approach whereby A.BMUs are kept open for all potential new offtakers

Forecasts & Data Provision Generator will need to provide SCADA access Forecasts of availability. Baseload/despatchable generators will also need to provide regular estimated output profile Generator would need to provide notice to the offtaker if availability is significantly different from forecast (unplanned outage). There may be a need to include additional incentives to ensure that information is provided in a timely manner: Failure to provide notice of outages within the specified timeframes will result in the generator paying the offtaker the system sell price for the forecast generation during the unnotified period of the outage. 31Backstop PPA – Contract terms Is SCADA appropriate for all types of generators? Can minimum requirements be specified? What timescale is appropriate for notification of unplanned outages? Are the penalties appropriate?

Negative price protection 32Backstop PPA – Contract terms Do these provide the appropriate protection for generators? Does the automatic curtailment option introduce new risks for the offtaker? Will generators have the capability to be curtailed remotely? Not proposing to provide protection for reduced revenue as a result of negative prices, just providing protection for negative revenue at times of extreme negative prices. Negative prices are passed through to generator (i.e. generator pays offtaker) Generator would specify a point below which it would not want to generate. Below this point offtaker would not sell their output on the exchanges. Offtaker would notify generator who would be obliged to curtail for the relevant period (OR offtaker automatically curtails generator, if connection allows)

Intra-day Curtailment As generator is paid on the basis of the Day-Ahead price or the Baseload reference price, they would not respond if intra-day prices fall. To facilitate efficient generation at times of over supply it would be useful to retain the incentive to curtail output if prices fall between day-ahead and gate closure. Would also allow offtaker to bid the facility in to the Balancing Mechanism. Considering that where functionality allows, offtaker has ability to curtail generator at any time, and provide full compensation for lost revenue 33Backstop PPA – Contract terms Would offtakers find this a useful provision? Would generators have concerns? How could the curtailed output of the facility be estimated?

Termination & consequences of termination Contract will need to include clear definition of ‘event of default’. This will include either party being declared insolvent, liquidated or under administration, as well as either Party providing false information or failing to perform an obligation (including payment) and not remedying this. Termination following default would lead to compensation for losses incurred by the non-defaulting party. If caused by generator default the generator would lose eligibility for the OLR in the future. If caused by offtaker default then Ofgem could pursue for breach of licence obligations. Non-Default termination. In addition, after the first 6 months of the contract, the generator will be able to terminate the contract without liability by providing 6 weeks' notice to the offtaker. 34Backstop PPA – Contract terms

Scheme Review Terms of the OLR will be grandfathered from the point of CfD signature. Any changes to the terms or discount would be subject to consultation and only apply to new generators. But OLR intended to be a transitional measure and available until a competitive market for bankable PPAs develops and lenders, offtakers and generators are more comfortable with the scheme. Therefore may be appropriate to amend or withdraw for new entrants as the market develops. Propose a combination of annual reporting & evaluation, with a comprehensive review after a few years. 35Backstop PPA – Contract terms

Annual reporting and evaluation Evaluate the scheme against a number of market parameters to ascertain whether there have been any significant shifts in the market: Volume of CfD generation coming forward (and proportion from independents) Number of offtakers and terms available in the market Number of generators accessing OLR (and their capacity) Will require data from PPA market to inform review. Considering requiring that generators provide information on their initial route-to-market at the point at which their CfD payments commence. The information would likely cover: i.The PPA tenor; ii.The discount to the reference price (or other price metric); and iii.Any substantive clauses that might need reflecting in future Backstop PPAs. 36Backstop PPA – Contract terms Is it appropriate to require generators to provide information about their initial PPA arrangements at point of CfD signature?

Comprehensive review Most likely to take place in 2018/19, to consider whether the scheme should remain open to new CfD signatories after the end of the first EMR delivery plan. The review would also consider whether any aspects of the design need to be changed. In addition to the sources of data identified for the annual updates, the comprehensive review would likely include a Call for Evidence. 37Backstop PPA – Contract terms

Table Discussion Questions Is SCADA an appropriate requirement for all Generators? Can minimum requirements be set? Are the timings for Meter Registration appropriate? Is it necessary to include these steps in the contract or rely on ‘as soon as reasonably practicable’? Are tolerance limits appropriate for unplanned outages? If so, at what level? Is the risk of exposure to cash-out the best incentive to ensure the generator provides good information on outages? What do you see as the best way to protect generators from very negative prices? Do offtakers see value in being able to curtail the generator (and provide compensation)? Would Offtakers find intra-day curtailment useful? Would Generations have concerns? Is it appropriate for Government to ask generators for details of their initial PPA? 38Backstop PPA – Contract terms