Online Project Monitoring System (OPMS) ISE PI Meeting March 14, 2012 Sandra Toro Martell, NSF Gary Silverstein, Westat Hannah Putman, Westat Melissa Bryce,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
Advertisements

Some Findings from the AISL Program’s Online Project Monitoring System for Projects Funded Between FY 2006 and FY 2012 Gary Silverstein Westat August 21,
Campus Improvement Plans
 Reading School Committee January 23,
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Measuring and reporting outcomes for your BTOP grant 1Measuring and Reporting Outcomes.
Introduction to the Child & Adolescent Needs and Strengths Assessment (CANS) Our Community. Our Kids. Dr. Gary Buff, Ed.D. President and COO.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
How to Write Goals and Objectives
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: CNA Toolkit August 21, 2012.
Introduction to the MSP Management Information System Molly Hershey-Arista December 16, 2013.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
Evaluation 101 Everything You Need to Know to Get Started Evaluating Informal Science Education Media Everything You Need to Know to Get Started Evaluating.
SPF SIG State-Level Evaluation PARTICIPANT LEVEL INSTRUMENT (PLI)
Seven Hills Elementary Futures Under Construction
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
ENHANCE Update Research Underway on the Validity of the Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process ECO Center Advisory Board Meeting March 8, 2012 Arlington,
The Early Reading First Program CFDA # A and B Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
School Readiness: We’re Better Together
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
Presentation Topics School Improvement Plans Combing Title I Schoolwide with SIPs Submitting Plans & Required Documents Districtwide Initiatives Training.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Module 4 Evaluating Services to Binational Migrant Students Designing an Implementation and Outcome Evaluation of State and Local Binational Services 1.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 5 Pre-Evaluation Conference Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Seven Hills Elementary Futures Under Construction
Webinar on Reporting and Evaluation for Museums for America Grantees January 6-8, 2009.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Continuing the work of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Presented by: Jeff Stauffer WebJunction Service Manager Date: 3 February 2005.
Nuts and Bolts of the Title II, Part A Application Virginia Department of Education Coordinators’ Academy July 22 – July 24, Coordinators' Academy.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
SPP/APR - SSIP Stakeholders Meeting # 5. Agenda for Today Stakeholder involvement Review Draft SSIP –Baseline Data / Target setting –Introduction –Data.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
Documenting Completion of your PDP
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Findings from the AISL Program’s Online Project Monitoring System for projects funded between FY 2006 and FY 2014 Gary Silverstein and Ashley Simpkins,
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Dr. Greg Kniseley, Professor Rhode Island College Department of Elementary Education
Overview of the FY 2011 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. State Personnel Development Grants Program Lead 1.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Dr. Kathleen Haynie Haynie Research and Evaluation November 12, 2010.
Planning a Customer Survey Part 1 of 3 Elaine Carlson, Westat Anne D’Agostino, Compass Evaluation & Research.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
For the National Science Foundation’s Advancing Informal STEM Learning (AISL) Program.
How to Use the Online Project Monitoring System (OPMS) Navigating the Survey.
Orientation Thursday, October 20 Washington Elementary
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
SLP Training Day 3 30th September 2016
Iowa 21st CCLC Local Evaluation Form Training for Local evaluators
United Way of Tulare County
Family Engagement Coordinator Meeting July 25, 2018
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Overview of Updated Proposal and Reporting Guidelines
Presentation transcript:

Online Project Monitoring System (OPMS) ISE PI Meeting March 14, 2012 Sandra Toro Martell, NSF Gary Silverstein, Westat Hannah Putman, Westat Melissa Bryce, Westat

Overview of Presentation I.Introduction II.Overview of the ISE OPMS Baseline Survey III.Navigating the OPMS IV.Questions

Web-based monitoring system completed by project PIs Developed specifically for the ISE program Collects data throughout a project’s lifecycle Baseline Annual Closeout Currently includes data for projects funded since FY 2006 ISE Online Project Monitoring System

How do the OPMS and Fastlane differ? Fastlane GEOOPPEHROISEOCIBIOCISE

ISE characteristics PO information needs Searchable and sortable OPMS Is Designed for ISE Program ISE Program

Information collected by the ISE OPMS Lead organization, key personnel, and partners Information about each project deliverable Characteristics of anticipated audience Anticipated reach and impact Study designs and data collection methods Baseline data Update baseline data (e.g., add new key personnel) Actual number reached Extent to which anticipated impacts were attained Challenges encountered and lessons learned Upload products (e.g., surveys, logic models) Annual/closeout data

OPMS data serve many purposes Information about funded ISE projects

Lead Organization Type (n=120 ISE projects funded between FY )

Methods for Reaching Public Audiences in Private Settings (n=111) Percent of Projects

Methods for Reaching Public Audiences in Public Settings (n=111) Percent of Projects

Anticipated Target Audiences: age groups (n=111) Percent of Projects

OPMS data serve many purposes Information about funded ISE projects Information about what federal funding has accomplished

Impacts that Represent Significant Accomplishment: Public Audiences “Elementary school children will increase their understanding of the evolutionary concept: variation” “Participants will engage in dialogue about wolves and wolf conservation” “Participating 6-10 year olds will be more inclined to pursue a career in a STEM field.” “Adults with disabilities and older adults with age-related limitations will increase their interest/engagement in science.” “Viewers gained understanding of how tornadoes are formed.”

Study design: Qualitative and quantitative, no comparison group Data collection methods: Program attendance Questionnaire/survey at informal venue Direct observations of visitors’/participants’/educators’ conversations and/or behavior at informal venue Indicators Attendance by adults from partner organizations repeat over time. Participants from partner organizations will demonstrate verbally or through active involvement that their participation in MarshAccess activities has engaged their interest in returning to the MEC to learn more about science. Evidence Attendance by the adults in our partner and visitor groups were voluntary. As the organizations repeated their visits the same individuals would attend as the organizations were always able to bring the maximum number of attendees who were almost always the same people. This is a significant accomplishment according to the group leaders because many times the participants were unable to participate or felt unwelcomed when attending programs at other facilities. This was not the case at our facility due to our understanding of the unique needs people with disabilities have with regard to program development and delivery therefore attendance was repeated over time. The significant accomplishment met by the project was how participants with cognitive developmental psychiatric and communicative disabilities demonstrated their understanding and interest in learning about science. Through the use of body language communication boards and flip cards online journals and paper journals and through the successful completion of activities these participants were able to demonstrate their interest in MarshAccess programming and continued to voluntarily return for programs. “Adults with disabilities and older adults with age- related limitations will increase their interest/engagement in science.”

OPMS data serve many purposes Information about funded ISE projects Information about what federal funding has accomplished Information about promising practices

More specific questions that can be addressed using OPMS data How many people participate in ISE-funded science cafés? Which ISE projects are reaching an international audience? How many ISE-funded museum projects are targeting youth—and what strategies are these projects using to engage this population? What are the most significant accomplishments of ISE projects focusing on biological sciences? What are the anticipated and actual impacts of ISE projects employing games and other information and communication strategies? What data collection activities are ISE projects using to assess the impact of their video products?

Baseline Completed when NSF award is made Anticipated project accomplishments Annual Completed at beginning of calendar year Progress toward implementing deliverables and achieving impacts Closeout Completed at end of grant award Extent of implementing deliverables and achieving impacts OPMS Modules

OPMS Baseline Sections Baseline Sections Section A: Project and the Lead Organization Section B: Key Personnel for the Project Team Section C: Organizational Partners Section D: Products, Programs, or Experiences for Public Audiences Section E: Products, Programs, or Experiences for Professional Audiences Section F: Formative and Summative Evaluation Questions

Find this helpful overview of the items in the OPMS with your handouts

Before You Begin the OPMS, Westat… Identifies all ISE projects Reviews project proposals Pre-fills information about PI, partners, deliverables Conducts series of webinars for projects completing a baseline survey

Help Materials Can Save Time OPMS Help page Downloads Page Westat Login Contact Melissa or Hannah CAISE website Newsletters Other Resources

For the National Science Foundation’s Informal Science Education Program Developing and Entering Impacts and Indicators

 Intended target population ◦ High school students who visit the exhibit will…  Type of change that will be observed ◦ …increase their interest in…  STEM content area that is the focus of the impact ◦ …the Earth’s moon. Developing and Entering Impacts and Indicators

ImpactIndicator Visitors will increase their awareness of the people who shaped our evolving perception of the Earth’s moon Visitors will be more likely than non-visitors to name the contribution of at least one individual (e.g., Copernicus, Galileo) who shaped our perception of the moon. Visitors will be more likely than non-visitors to describe how an individual’s contribution shaped our perception of the moon. Visitors will increase their interest in the Earth’s moon During their visit to the museum, high school students will engage their parents in conversations about specific phenomena that are featured in the exhibit. Visitors will indicate that the exhibit increased their interest in learning more about the moon and/or a related topic. Visitors will seek out additional information about the Earth’s moon. Visitors will share information about the exhibit and/ or the moon with family, friends, or colleagues. High school students will go to the museum’s Internet site about the moon after attending the exhibit. Adult visitors will join an astronomy club or attend a star party after attending the exhibit. Developing and Entering Impacts and Indicators

 Indicators should be aligned with their impacts ◦ If an impact is about knowledge, the indicator should also be about knowledge (and not behavior) ◦ If an impact is about learning the phases of the moon, the indicator should also be about the phases of the moon (and not identifying other planets)  The best indicators are detailed, specific, and measureable Developing and Entering Impacts and Indicators

Tips for Using the OPMS Multiple people can log into the same OPMS report at the same time We recommend that no more than one person work in a section at a time The OPMS will log you out after 10 minutes of inactivity

More Helpful Tips Work with your evaluator during the OPMS process Review and follow help materials on impacts and indicators so you won’t have to revise them later Print a copy for your records

After you submit the OPMS Westat reviews your report Westat sends you suggested revisions You revise report Westat reviews revisions

Accessing the sample OPMS Website: ID: 105 Password: Sample10 Caveats Do not edit or alter any information This is a basic example, not a sample of “excellent work”

Visit Our Table Ask questions about the OPMS Get help completing your OPMS report If we’re not at the table, look for Gary, Hannah, and Melissa at the PI meeting through Friday