New York Public Welfare Association July 25, 2011 NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New York Welfare Fraud Investigators Association June , 2011 NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York.
Advertisements

Making Every Dollar Count Office of Children & Family Services Roundtable on Preventing Child Care Subsidy Fraud Gladys Carrión, Esq. Commissioner David.
1 Child Care Regulation Legislative Audit Bureau January 2010.
Management Information Systems 2007 Understanding a Systems Approach to Sound Fiscal Management.
RIte Share Premium Assistance Program Then and Now Kate Brewster, Manager Employer Contact Unit Center for Child and Family Health RI Department of Human.
Monitoring Local GSRPs Linda Stachowiak Preschool Services Supervisor.
The importance of a Compliance program is to ensure that our agency meets the highest possible standards for all relevant federal, state and local regulations,
NYS Office of Children and Family Services CHILD CARE SUBSIDY PROGRAM INTEGRITY INITIATIVE Janice M. Molnar, Deputy Commissioner Jim Hart, Director of.
Meal Counting and Site Operations Virginia Department of Health Special Nutrition Programs 2014.
Michael Seereiter Director of Planning, NYS Office of Mental Health and EO #38 Implementation Lead 1.
Justice Center Update NYSACRA 12 th Annual Leadership Conference December 4,
Time to Wave the White Flag – Compliance with the FTC’s Identity Theft Red Flags Rule William P. Dillon, Esq. Messer, Caparello & Self, P.A Centennial.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Administrative Review Requirements September 17, 2014.
Educational Access Project for DCFS An Overview of a Partnership Between Northern Illinois University and the Illinois Department of Children and Family.
2010 Region II Conference Corporate Compliance Panel June 3, 2010
SEPARATION OF DUTIES CONFLICT OF INTEREST POTENTIAL FRAUD 1.
Elimination of Improper Payments U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PAYMENT RECAPTURE RECOVERY AUDITING (PRRA) INITIATIVE RENTAL ASSISTANCE.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Tom Corbett, Governor | Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Education | Gary D. Alexander, Secretary of Public Welfare.
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
COMBATTING CHILD CARE SUBSIDY FRAUD TO MAKE EVERY DOLLAR COUNT The New York Public Welfare Association 144 th Annual Summer Conference Monday, July 22,
1 Wisconsin Shares Child Care Subsidy Program Legislative Audit Bureau August 2009.
1 Wisconsin Department of Children and Families Henry Wilde, Deputy Secretary 1.Wisconsin Shares background 2.Nature of Wisconsin Shares fraud 3.What we.
1 Public Hearings: May , 2013 Child Care Development Fund Massachusetts State Plan Federal Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
Fraud Prevention and Investigation Branch. Fraud Prevention- Everyone’s Responsibility.
NYS Office of Children and Family Services Technical Solution Initiative Child Care Program Integrity (CCPI) Jim Hart, Director of Regional Operations,
Certification of Market Values STEB PROGRAM Briefing Points 2011 Pennsylvania Department of the Auditor General Thomas E. Marks, CPA Deputy Auditor General.
Legal Strategies for Fraud Prevention- Recent Wisconsin Administrative Hearing Decisions Sandra Lee Esrael, Wisconsin Attorney Annual NARA Conference.
UI Integrity/ Improper Payments Joint Federal/ State Task Force October 14, 2011.
Improper Authorizations for Payment October 21, 2008.
A Brief Overview of Child Care in Wisconsin Wisconsin Child Care Summit October 22, 2013 Dave Edie Policy Analyst Wisconsin Council on Children and Families.
Monitoring Requirements for Sponsors of Multiple Sites Pages
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
1 Long-term Care Vermont’s Approach Individual Supports Unit Division of Disability and Aging Services Department of Disabilities, Aging & Independent.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
DSDS Quality Assurance Unit State of Alaska, Dept. of Health and Social Services Division of Senior and Disabilities Services (DSDS) Quality Assurance.
1 Informed Consent and Monitoring of Psychotropic Medications in Texas Kathy Teutsch, RN, LMSW-MSSW: CPS Division Administrator for Medical Services SHARED.
GOVerify Business Center. Improper Payment Initiative 2 The purpose of this order was to reduce improper payments by intensifying efforts to eliminate.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Louisiana UI Integrity Task Force October 24, 2011.
NYS HCBS Waiver. Services Process: NYS OMH solicited input from both children’s mental health services providers and families across NYS Sample of providers.
Child & Adult Care Food Program Serious Deficiency Process & Provider Appeals.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Voucher Reassessment Management Project Fiscal Committee October 3, 2011.
NYS Office of Children and Family Services Child Care Program Integrity (CCPI) Technical Solution Initiative Jim Hart, Director of Regional Operations,
“AmeriCorps service allowed me to see the benefits of volunteering and the difference I made to not only my community, but the organization where I was.
Fiscal Monitoring and Oversight Tecumseh Local School District January 8, 2013 Roger Hardin, Assistant Director Finance Program Services (614)
Department of Human Services
Medicaid Program Integrity A View from the States National Medicaid Audioconference Combating Medicaid Fraud and Abuse October 24, 2006 Kathryn Kuhmerker,
New York State Office of Children and Family Services COMBATING CHILD CARE SUBSIDY FRAUD USING THE CHILD CARE TIME AND ATTENDANCE SYSTEM Renee Rider, Assistant.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
Child Care Subsidy: What Providers Should Know Presenter: Francie Ray Area Manager Audubon Child Care Assistance.
ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FCM TRAINING
RECORDKEEPING & MONITORING. Required Daily Records ◦ Daily attendance rosters or sign-in sheets ◦ Number of at-risk afterschool snacks and/or meals prepared.
Coordinated Review Effort (CRE) School Year Karen Franklin, SNS Distance Learning October 1, 2015.
THE 31 DAYS OF FEBRUARY February February February Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES Office of Inspector General Budget Presentation – February 20, 2013.
Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Administrative Review Requirements.
Consumer Education: Online Inspection Reports Regional Webinar.
Data Coordinators Conference – 2014 Laura Marroquin CASEWORKER/JCMS Specialist Everything New Data Coordinators Should Know.
NYS Office of Children and Family Services Did We “Hit the Mark” Let’s discuss the Child Care Subsidy Fraud Regulations Rhonda Duffney, Director, Child.
CROW WING COUNTY PROBATION SERVICES TASK FORCE Presented by Central Minnesota Community Corrections.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
CCDF Reauthorization Child Care Regulation Updates Broward County Provider Meeting June 15 th, 2016.
Summer Food Service Program 101.  Child Nutrition Program- administered by CDE OSN  Ensures children receive nutritious meals during the summer  Free.
Office of Inspector General Budget Presentation – February 20, 2013
Legislative Hearing December 17, 2018 OIG FFAID OVERVIEW
Administrative Review Requirements
Presentation transcript:

New York Public Welfare Association July 25, 2011 NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count

* DID YOU KNOW THAT: Nationally, the rate of improper child care subsidy payments is 13.3%. The US Department of Health and Human Services has estimated that somewhere between 15% and 20% of payments are either in fraudulent status, lack program integrity or are in error. In each of the past three State Fiscal Years, New York State allocated $736 M to local social services districts for child care subsidies. If we take 10% of NYS’s allocations ($73.6 M) and divide it by $6,200 (cost to provide child care to one child per year), that’s 11,870 add’l child care slots that could be available in NYS.

NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count WE NEED TO MAKE EVERY DOLLAR COUNT IN NEW YORK STATE!!!!

NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count Real Life Examples of Child Care Subsidy Fraud Multiple providers who claimed full second and third shifts despite surveillance indicating zero attendance for weeks One sister was licensed as a group family day care provider, hired her sister as an assistant, and watched only her sister’s children who were eligible for child care subsidies Providers who split child care payments with parents who agreed not to send their children to the program. Parents watched their own kids and received a kick-back from the provider Providers who offered to sell authorizations for payments to other providers for $1500 every two weeks Social services staff authorized care for children who didn’t exist (including stealing identities of deceased children)

Child Care Subsidy Fraud: A View From the States In WI, 1000 out of 9000 regulated providers were under investigation for possible subsidy fraud. In CT, in 2007, an assessment of 1200 cases resulted in: 141 arrests; 50 convictions, recoupment of $202,000; and a cost avoidance of $1.5M In CA, LA county reviewed 6 years of historical data from 5 data sources; used predictive analytics to identify fraudsters; resulted in 85% correct hit rate on provider fraud and 40% correct hit rate on participant fraud; expected return on investment is between $7M and $30M annually NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count

NEW YORK STATE CHILD CARE SYSTEM Over 216,000 children received subsidies in FFY 2010 Over 21,260 regulated child care providers with a capacity to serve approximately 670,000 children Approximately 52,000 legally-exempt providers caring for 83,000 children NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count 6

Can you tell who the fraudulent provider is? ABCD 7

Steps NYS Has Taken to Prevent Waste, Fraud, and Abuse Conducted a Roundtable Discussion in October 2010 for 100 participants (invitation only) including social services commissioners, caseworkers, fraud investigators, local county prosecutors, child care advocates, among others Built partnership with NYWFIA and established scholarships for local district staff to attend the NYWFIA annual seminar Increased training of state staff to improve oversight and monitoring, including training sponsored by NYWFIA and OSC Drafted new child care subsidy regulations to address fraud NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count

Child Care Subsidy Fraud Regulations Principle: Provide LDSS’ more authority to stop child care payments LDSS may disqualify a provider from receiving payment for child care services if a provider: Is found to be criminally convicted of fraud; Is found to be civilly liable for fraud; Has voluntarily admitted to filing a false claim; Has been disqualified from the NYSDOH CACFP; Has a conviction of any activities in the past 7 years that indicated a lack of business integrity; Has been found to have submitted false claims after an Administrative Review;

Fraud Regulations continued All providers must: Comply with all OCFS regulations or face enforcement actions; Maintain current and accurate enforcement records; Certify that all documents and information provided to districts is accurate and true; The submission of any false, inaccurate or fraudulent claims may be the basis for the deferral or disallowance of payment for such claims. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count 10

…..More Steps Began integrating the OCFS regulated care and subsidy units on issues related to fraud Established a formal referral process between local social services districts and OCFS regional office regulatory staff to address child care subsidy fraud Worked with local districts to establish indicators for the referral of child care applications to their investigative units NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count

….Even More Steps Analyzed existing databases for the purpose of identifying child care subsidy cases that may warrant further investigation Developed a “SWAT Team” to investigate and conduct on-site inspections Coordinated efforts with the NYS CACFP program around data sharing and fraud detection Secured funding for, and are currently implementing, an automated child care time and attendance system NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count

NYS Identifies Red Flags to Detect Fraud Beginning in March 2011, data are run quarterly from a “data warehouse” using the following two indicators: Overcapacity: Any group family child care program that receives payment for 22 or more children in a pay period Highest Revenue Producers in a pay period by modality: list of top 10 providers for 4 modalities (child care centers, family child care, group family child care, and legally exempt) are given to each OCFS regional office to review and conduct inspections and/or investigations, where appropriate Began discussions on using technology solutions (data mining) to identify fraudulent individuals (child care providers and subsidy recipients) NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count

Increased reviews of applicants who “work off the books” Increased the number of cases verified for the recipients ongoing need for child care assistance Identified red flags such as provider billing for perfect attendance, billing for meals for an absent child, billing full-time for a school-age child Improved communication between eligibility workers and fraud investigators Increased the number of fraud referrals to law enforcement Strengthened contracts with providers to allow for greater oversight in ensuring compliance with LDSS rules and regulations Leveraged CCTA reporting functions to identify fraud Steps Nassau County Has Taken to Address Fraud

NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count Nassau County continued: Since April 1st: completed 221 investigations resulting from 313 referrals from the Day Care Unit (the remaining 92 referrals are still being reviewed) Found that 43% of the referrals resulted in a finding of ineligibility, worth $527,250 in cost avoidance. (The cost avoidance figures are based on a NYS OTDA prescribed savings of $5,550 per case closure for a 6-month period). FEDS investigations are averaging a 31-day completion window

Next Steps to Address Child Care Subsidy Fraud 1.Implement the new, child care subsidy fraud regulations once they are adopted 2.Explore ways to assist local districts with resources for fraud efforts 3.Release a Request For Information (RFI) focused on technical solutions such as data mining, predictive analytics, among others NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count

NYS Identifies Red Flags to Detect Fraud The new, automated Child Care Time and Attendance System (CCTA) includes the following Red Flags: – Parents/caretakers use a password to check the child in and out of the system automatically. – Attendance data is captured in the system in real time; inspectors check CCTA for attendance prior to an inspection. – If a change is made, the system records all transactions in history establishing an audit trail. – The system captures “exceptions” which the district can review when a child has perfect attendance and when a provider changes the check in and out times recorded by the parent. – CCTA interfaces with NY’s regulatory database to confirm that the provider is licensed/registered and is in a payable status both at time of authorization and when making the payment.

Albany County’s Experience with CCTA Pilot County CCTA Implementation Lessons Learned NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count

Child Care Time & Attendance (CCTA) Updates Deployments to be completed on 8/1 63 Public/Private organizations collaborated to deploy CCTA NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count

Next Steps Refine and Enhance CCTA Progress towards 100% utilization/Parent sign-in/out Leverage CCTA to identify ‘low hanging fruit’ fraud NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES Child Care Subsidy in New York State: Making Every Dollar Count

Questions and Answers