10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I Managing Fatigue 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I Managing Fatigue Kamishan O. Martin, Human Factors Engineer Office of Nuclear Reactor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flight Time Limitations for Business Aviation A Snapshot of EBAA Activity Andrea Němec Manager Safety and Rulemaking BBGA Annual Conference 12 March 2013.
Advertisements

SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
Surry 2010 Fall Outage Gravel Neck Processing Wayne Croshaw Processing Coordinator.
The 2002 Davis Besse Event and Safety Culture Policy at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Stephanie Morrow, Ph.D. Safety Culture Program Manager Office.
SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHIC OPERATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES.
Cyber Security Plan Implementation Presentation to CMBG Glen Frix, Duke Energy June 20,
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
1 10 CFR Part 26 Subpart I Managing Fatigue Kamishan Martin Human Factors Engineering June 23, 2010 HPRCT conference.
1 NOTES This presentation is an outline of some of the most important aspects of DOE O 440.1B For completeness, copies of the Order should accompany this.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
Implementing Human Service Worker Safety Regulations
Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation Module 7 EMAR Part 147 –Aircraft Maintenance Training Organisations May 2015.
Safety and Health Programs
1 NRC Plans for NESCC Concrete Specifications, Codes & Standards (SCS) Endorsement NESCC Meeting March 28, 2013 Richard Jervey USNRC Office of Regulatory.
WHS Management Plans.
MTO Enforcement Program April, 2006 Hours of Service.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
EHS Management System Elements
Process Safety Management
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
Regulatory Affairs Personnel Training and Qualification (RA T&Q) Overview.
10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program Overview.
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,
Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, National Energy and Environmental Conference.
Fatigue Management Rule Russell Smith Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
NRC Leadership Expectations and Practices for Sustaining a High Performing Organization NRC Commissioner William C. Ostendorff FR/SSO/FS Workshop U.S.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
Presented by: Meg Boyd The Blue Mountains Drinking Water System: DWQMS Overview.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
1 A Dialogue to Raise Awareness of Operating Nuclear Power Plant Issues RIC 2009 Regional Breakout Session A Dialogue to Raise Awareness of Operating Nuclear.
Health and Safety Policy
Gravel Neck Fall Outage Processing, 2009 Johnny Rogers Processing Coordinator.
1 American Society of Quality September 20, 2005 Presented by Linda Smith USNRC Region IV.
RIC 2009 Rulemaking Process: “NRC and Industry Perspectives on Improving Quality, Timeliness, and Consistency in 10 CFR 50.55a “A New Approach” Jacob Zimmerman.
RIC 2008 Power Reactor Security Requirements Rule Bonnie Schnetzler Team Leader, Security Rulemaking Team Division of Security Policy Office of Nuclear.
Circuit Rider Training Program (CRTP) Circuit Rider Professional Association Annual General Meeting and Conference August 30, 2012.
Division of Risk Management State of Florida Loss Prevention Program.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
1 Control Room Habitability Program James A. Carlson, Omaha Public Power District, Author Deep Ghosh, Southern Nuclear Operating Greg Holbrooks, PE, Duke.
NRC Region I Lessons Learned Steve Barr Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector Region I US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2010 NRC Region I Joint Exercise.
LEGAL and REGULATORY FRAMEWORK for NUCLEAR and RADIATION SAFETY in BULGARIA General overview Dr. M. Mateeva – Chief Inspector R. Markova-Mihaylova – Chief.
10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program Overview David Weitzman, CIH Office of Worker Safety and Health Policy (HS-11)
Civil Contingencies Act Enhancement Programme (CCAEP) Civil Contingencies Secretariat March 2010.
10 CFR 851 Worker Safety and Health Program Bill McArthur, PhD, CIH Director, Office of Worker Safety and Health Policy Office of Health and Safety.
ISTOG – NRC Update Winter Meeting 2010 – Clearwater, FL Tony McMurtray Chief, Component Performance & Testing Branch Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Maintenance Rule Program Workshop Information IAEA Workshop.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Arusha, Tanzania (NIGERIA) Dr Yau IDRIS 2 – 5 December 2013 RAF9038 Final Coordination Meeting.
Meet your Regulator Workshop with FANR licensees October 2011 Dr. John Loy Director, Radiation Safety Federal Authority for Nuclear Regulation.
Flight and Duty Time Limitations and Rest Requirements Fatigue Risk Management Virgilijus Valentukevicius, EASA.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
Pipeline Safety Management Systems
NRC’s 10 CFR Part 37 Program Review of Radioactive Source Security
Randall (Randy) Snyder, PT, MBA Division Director January 27, 2016
NIEP Evaluation PO&A “How-to” Guide and Issue Classification
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Abdulla Al Yammahi Specialist, Radiation Safety Inspection
LLW Forum Meeting October 16, 2017 Alexandria, Virginia
Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events (MBDBE) Rule Implementation
DOE Approach to Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) in Safety Standards Office of Worker Safety and Health Policy (AU-11)
NRC’s LLW Regulatory Program: Update of Emerging Issues
NRC Cyber Security Regulatory Overview
Research and Test Reactor Safety: The Regulatory Perspective
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
TRTR Briefing September 2013
County Wide Safety Program
System Safety Regulation
Presentation transcript:

10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I Managing Fatigue 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I Managing Fatigue Kamishan O. Martin, Human Factors Engineer Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Kamishan O. Martin, Human Factors Engineer Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO Power for America Conference April 23, 2009 Las Vegas, Nevada

Overview Policy/Rulemaking History and Background Fatigue Effects and Contributing Factors Managing Fatigue in Rule Provisions Implementation Dates and Guidance Questions Policy/Rulemaking History and Background Fatigue Effects and Contributing Factors Managing Fatigue in Rule Provisions Implementation Dates and Guidance Questions

History - Background 1982 NRC published GL 82-12, Policy on Worker Fatigue 1991 NRC issued IN 91-36, Nuclear Plant Staff Working Hours 1999 NRC received concerns from Congress and UCS 2001 NRC staff reviewed adequacy of policy implementation 2002 Commission approved rulemaking public meetings held on draft requirements and implementation development 2008 Final Rule Published 1982 NRC published GL 82-12, Policy on Worker Fatigue 1991 NRC issued IN 91-36, Nuclear Plant Staff Working Hours 1999 NRC received concerns from Congress and UCS 2001 NRC staff reviewed adequacy of policy implementation 2002 Commission approved rulemaking public meetings held on draft requirements and implementation development 2008 Final Rule Published

History - Background Guidance not clear and not prescriptive Use of waivers not clearly limited Cumulative fatigue not effectively addressed Only addresses fatigue from work hours Guidance not clear and not prescriptive Use of waivers not clearly limited Cumulative fatigue not effectively addressed Only addresses fatigue from work hours

Fatigue Effects and Contributing Factors Fatigue is defined as a degradation in a person’s cognitive and motor functioning resulting from inadequate rest. Acute Fatigue means fatigue from causes occurring in the past 24 hours, such as restricted sleep, sustained wakefulness and task demands. Cumulative Fatigue means the increase in fatigue over consecutive sleep-wake periods resulting from inadequate rest.

Fatigue Effects and Contributing Factors Occurs Before sleep onset Effects comparable to blood alcohol concentrations that are prohibited in Part 26 Impairs attention, communication skills, decision making, teamwork Occurs Before sleep onset Effects comparable to blood alcohol concentrations that are prohibited in Part 26 Impairs attention, communication skills, decision making, teamwork

7 Fatigue Effects and Contributing Factors Conditions that contribute to fatigue are prevalent in the nuclear industry

What is the answer? Sleep The requirements accommodate napping.

Rule Provisions Major Rule Provisions: Work hour controls Periodic performance based assessments Training Self-declarations Waivers Behavioral observation Fatigue assessments Annual reporting Major Rule Provisions: Work hour controls Periodic performance based assessments Training Self-declarations Waivers Behavioral observation Fatigue assessments Annual reporting Addresses Contributors to Fatigue including: Tasks – work hour limits based on duties performed Rest – Requires days off and permits napping

Rule Provisions Objectives : Establishing clear and enforceable requirements for the management of worker fatigue to strengthen the effectiveness of FFD programs Strengthen the effectiveness of FFD programs at nuclear power plants Incorporate existing security work hours limits Provide the rights and responsibilities of licensees and workers

Rule Provisions Performance Based Licensees shall schedule the work hours of individuals who are subject to this section consistent with the objective of preventing impairment from fatigue due to the duration, frequency, or sequencing of successive shifts.

Applicability Rule Provisions Applicability Only to operating plants (not construction sites) Fatigue management program elements apply to anyone with unescorted access Work hour limits, MDO requirements and rest break requirements in § apply subset of individuals referred to as “covered workers”

Work Hour Controls Required for : Rule Provisions Work Hour Controls Required for : Maintenance (Risk-significant only) Operations (Risk-significant only) Chemistry (Emergency Response only) Health Physics (Emergency Response only) Fire Brigade (the individual responsible for knowing effects of fire and suppressants on safe shutdown capability) Security Force (armed) Individuals who direct risk significant maintenance or operations. Maintenance (Risk-significant only) Operations (Risk-significant only) Chemistry (Emergency Response only) Health Physics (Emergency Response only) Fire Brigade (the individual responsible for knowing effects of fire and suppressants on safe shutdown capability) Security Force (armed) Individuals who direct risk significant maintenance or operations.

Work Hour Controls Rule Provisions Work Hour Controls Retain maximum work hour limits of: 16 hours in any 24-hour period 72 hours in any 7-day period Increase maximum work hour limits from 24 to 26 hours in any 48-hour period Increase min. break period between work periods from 8 hours to 10 hours Limit waivers to conditions necessary to prevent or mitigate conditions adverse to safety or security Added Minimum Days Off (MDO) requirements

Minimum Day Off Requirements (MDOs) Rule Provisions Minimum Day Off Requirements (MDOs) Vary according to: Plant state (operating or outage) Shift duration (8, 10, or 12 hours) Job duties maintenance operations, health physics, chemistry, fire brigade security Vary according to: Plant state (operating or outage) Shift duration (8, 10, or 12 hours) Job duties maintenance operations, health physics, chemistry, fire brigade security

MDOs During Non-Outages Rule Provisions MDOs During Non-Outages In each shift cycle (d)(3) *Averaged over the shift cycle, from one to six weeks long. Days off must be distributed to provide at least 34 hours off in any 9-day period

MDOs During Outages Rule Provisions MDOs During Outages Periods are successive, not rolling Applies to every shift: 8, 10 or 12-hr Days off still must be distributed to provide at least 34 hours off in any 9-day period

MDO Outage Rule Provisions MDO Outage Individuals will be limited to 60 consecutive days of outage scheduling 7 day extensions will be allowed for each 7- day period during outage individual works not more than 48 hours Individuals are subject to outage controls, “while working on outage activities” Individuals will be limited to 60 consecutive days of outage scheduling 7 day extensions will be allowed for each 7- day period during outage individual works not more than 48 hours Individuals are subject to outage controls, “while working on outage activities”

Waivers Rule Provisions Waivers Waivers only allowed: To mitigate or prevent a condition adverse to safety To maintain the security of the facility Face-to-Face Fatigue assessment required to approve waiver Review of work hours + time of day work would be performed also considered in assessment Waivers only allowed: To mitigate or prevent a condition adverse to safety To maintain the security of the facility Face-to-Face Fatigue assessment required to approve waiver Review of work hours + time of day work would be performed also considered in assessment

Waivers Rule Provisions Waivers Who Determines? Waiver Needed to: Operations Shift Manager Mitigate or prevent a condition adverse to safety Security Shift ManagerMaintain site security Site Senior-level Manager with requisite authority Mitigate or prevent a condition adverse to safety and/or to maintain site security

For-cause Post-event Follow-up Self-declaration Applicable to all personnel subject to the fitness-for-duty program For-cause Post-event Follow-up Self-declaration Applicable to all personnel subject to the fitness-for-duty program Fatigue Assessments Rule Provisions Fatigue Assessments

A statement that you are not able to safely or competently perform your duties because of fatigue Self Declaration Rule Provisions Self Declaration

Requires that licensee procedures describe: Rights and responsibilities Controls and conditions for permitting or requiring individuals to perform work following a self-declaration Process to be followed if an individual disagrees with the results of a fatigue assessment Requires that licensee procedures describe: Rights and responsibilities Controls and conditions for permitting or requiring individuals to perform work following a self-declaration Process to be followed if an individual disagrees with the results of a fatigue assessment Self Declaration Rule Provisions Self Declaration

Implementation Full compliance required within 18 months of (March 31, 2008) rule publication date Training Completed Full compliance required within 18 months of (March 31, 2008) rule publication date Training Completed

25 Implementation Guidance Reg. Guide 5.73, “Fatigue Management for Nuclear Power Plant Personnel” endorses: NEI 06-11, Rev 1 – “Managing Personnel Fatigue at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites”

FAQ Process is sent to FFD Working Group Consensus reached on issue ( not official regulatory position ) Respond via at earliest convenience is sent to FFD Working Group Consensus reached on issue ( not official regulatory position ) Respond via at earliest convenience

Thank You Questions ? Questions ?