TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

(your state) Master Farmer Program
Developing Water Quality Solutions for SF Bay
Regulatory State of the Bay Status and Trends Tom Mumley San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Urban Runoff Management: So Far, So Good. So What? Geoff Brosseau The RMP 2007 Annual Meeting Perspectives on the Impact of the Clean Water Act on San.
Paying for TMDL Compliance: The Calleguas Creek Example Don Kendall, CMWD Ashli Desai, Larry Walker Associates February 28 th, 2007.
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Public Workshop Implementation and Enforcement of Nutrient TMDLs for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake CA Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water.
East San Gabriel valley watershed Group Watershed Management Program (WMP) Development Cities of claremont, La Verne, pomona, and san dimas.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
RIPDES Storm Water Program: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
Upper Providence Township Stormwater Management MS4 Program.
Environmental Harm Urban stormwater frequently contains litter, oil, chemicals, toxic metals, bacteria, and excess nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous.
ENTITY and DATE HERE Tampa Bay Nitrogen Management Consortium TMDL and Reasonable Assurance Overview.
Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
1 Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program (ILRP) Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program (ILRP) Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June 11-13, 2013 Kings Beach, CA Presented.
Irrigated Lands Program Update – Sacramento River Conservation Forum Bruce Houdesheldt Director Regulatory Affairs Northern California Water Association.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
Section 319 Grant Program Nonpoint Source Pollution Control
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Item #17: Board Workshop Alamitos Bay and Los Cerritos Channel Watershed Management Area Watershed Management Program Approach October 9, 2014.
Oxon Run and C&O Canal TMDLs
Module 1: Stormwater Permit Program Robert Pitt Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Santa Margarita Region MS4 Permit – Pyrethroids Evaluation Jason E. Uhley, P.E. Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District.
Amy Walkenbach Illinois EPA 217/
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
SFEP/EPA Proposal Background- prior NBWA grant EPA Funds and Process SFEP Process EPA Approval and Schedule NBWA Proposal-$1.5 Million Other Funds.
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program Lake Jesup Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP) Environmental Protection Division September 1, 2009.
Stormwater Management William Taylor New Hampshire Wastewater Control Association June 13, 2013.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
Prepared By: Amaliyar Kamleshkumar ( ) Rathod Nikunj ( ) Parmar mukesh ( ) Patel Raj ( ) Ode Kiran ( )
CLEAN WATER ACT AND MUNICIPAL STORMWATER CALIFORNIA STORMWATER WORKSHOP David W. Smith, Manager NPDES Permits Section EPA/Region 9.
1 How the Water Board Protects California’s Water Quality Kate Hart, Board Member Chair Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Water Pollution: Pollutant Transport Mechanisms
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Regulatory Requirements Background
Water Pollution.
Water Pollution.
Drww general membership meeting
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Water Pollution.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Agricultural Order 4.0 Discussion
Presentation transcript:

TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates

Presentation Outline What is a TMDL? Calleguas TMDLs TMDL Sources Required reductions from agricultural sources TMDL Implementation and Costs

303(d) List and TMDLs Foundation for Protecting Water Quality -Water Quality Objectives Waterbodies Exceeding Water Quality Objectives (Impaired) -Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List Mechanism for Removing Impairment -Development of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Calleguas Creek Watershed 8 TMDLs for 28 constituents by 2012

What is a TMDL? Calculation of maximum amount of pollutant discharge from each source that allows waterbody to meet water quality objective Considers all sources to waterbody Ag+Urban+Wastewater+Background=TMDL Background covers groundwater, soils, atmospheric deposition, etc.

TMDLs in Calleguas Effective Nitrogen and Algae Historic Pesticides (DDT, Chlordane) Metals (Copper, Nickel, Zinc, Mercury) Toxicity Sediment Trash Awaiting EPA Approval Salts (Chloride, TDS, Boron, Sulfate) Bacteria to be developed in next year

TMDL Development Calleguas Creek Watershed Management Plan developed TMDLs Public review process for about a year each Implementation coordinated with existing programs to extent possible Agricultural Stakeholders RWQCB/EPA TMDL Development Urban Stakeholders

Agricultural Source Analysis TMDL analysis determines amount from each source Agricultural contribution varies depending on constituent Can also vary between wet and dry conditions Source analysis part of analysis of how much can be discharged

Nitrogen Sources

Sources of Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon

Metals and Selenium Sources

Sources of DDE (DDT)

Estimated DDT Usage Map

Summary Agriculture is a source for all of the constituents in TMDLs Magnitude of the source varies by constituent Historic practices may need to be addressed Some of the constituents discharged are not due to agricultural use, but could be impacted by agricultural practices

Required Reductions ConstituentCalleguas Nitrogen and algae70% Historic Pesticides50-99% Toxicity (Diazinon & Chlorpyrifos) 68-99% Metals38-83% Sediment~25% Salts10-73%

Load Allocations Load allocations are interim and final limits to be met by agriculture Interim limits Go into effect when TMDL effective Set at 95 th /99 th percentile of existing discharge data Designed to ensure discharges don’t increase Final limits Go into effect at end of implementation period Set based on water quality objective Designed to achieve water quality objectives Used to allocate costs for TMDL implementation

TMDL Implementation vs. Ag Waiver TMDLConditional Waiver Similar Requirements Grower Education Implement BMPs Similar Requirements with Additional TMDL Actions Develop AWQMPs for all TMDL waterbodies Develop AWQMPs for waterbodies exceeding benchmarks Conduct receiving water and land use monitoring Conduct land use monitoring No Similar Conditional Waiver Requirements Special Studies

Implementation Schedule ConstituentCalleguas Nitrogen and algae2010 Historic Pesticides2026 Toxicity (Diazinon & Chlorpyrifos) 2016 Metals2022 Sediment2015 Salts2023 Trash2011

TMDL Implementation Receiving Water- water, sediment, fish tissue Agricultural land use sites. Coordinated with conditional waiver sites where possible Required studies to answer outstanding questions Optional studies allow for site- specific objective development Identify and install BMPs Education TMDL Monitoring Special Studies Implementation Actions

Completed Implementation Actions TMDL Monitoring Program Submitted plan in September 2006 Monitoring begins August 2008 Special Study Workplans Sediment Transport and Habitat Impacts Study High Concentration Areas for DDT and Metals and Flood Control Practices Urban Source Identification for DDT and Metals Agricultural Source Identification for DDT and Metals Selenium in Groundwater

Completed Implementation Actions Special Studies Completed Algae, Greenhouses, and Groundwater Studies Alternatives to Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos Study Completed work so far has been funded by POTWs only Work conducted from 2007 to date to be reimbursed

Upcoming Implementation Items- Covered by Conditional Waiver Develop Agricultural Water Quality Management Plans Identify and install BMPs Implement Agricultural Educational Program on BMPs Evaluate effectiveness of BMPs

Upcoming Implementation Items Not Covered by Conditional Waiver Conduct work for submitted special study workplans Develop workplans and conduct work for optional studies Copper WER for Revolon SSO for Mercury and Selenium Implement historic pesticide collection program

Cost of Implementing TMDLs Implementation ActionApproximate Cost TMDL Monitoring$1,200,000/year TMDL Administration$150,000/year Required Special Study Workplans$75,000 Optional Special Study Workplans$160,000 Special Study Implementation>$850,000 Implementation ActionsTo Be Determined

Approach for Cost Sharing Based on amount each source allowed to discharge to stream More allowable discharge, more cost Different percentage of costs for each TMDL Memorandum of Agreement developed for funding Budget developed every year for approval Agriculture Discharge Urban Runoff Wastewater Storm Flows

Cost Allocations by TMDL Responsible Party NutrientDDT and Sediment ToxicityMetalsOverall POTWs68%1%29%15%28% Urban0%27%37%33%24% Agriculture32%72%34%52%48%

Agricultural Share of Costs Implementation ActionApproximate Cost TMDL Monitoring $696,000 ($527,000 future years) TMDL Administration $72,000 (annual cost) Required Special Study Workplans$21,000 Optional Special Study Workplans$15,000 Special Study Implementation$126,000

Summary Agricultural costs based on amount allowed to discharge in TMDL Costs of studies will be spread over several years Costs shown are just first year budget Monitoring will be ongoing every year Amount billed is for first year, but will be ongoing costs throughout TMDL implementation Most of costs for special studies during first five years

Regulatory Issues and Enforcement VCAILG being used as a mechanism for implementing TMDLs as a group RWQCB will require individuals not participating in group to conduct actions on own Recent Writ of Mandate Specific to urban discharges Doesn’t protect against lawsuits from others Calleguas group continuing TMDL implementation

Future Calleguas is first for TMDLs, but won’t be last Salts and Bacteria implementation will be added later Trash will be addressed separately Santa Clara River has effective nutrient TMDL and is listed for: Salts Bacteria Toxicity (Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos) Historic Pesticides Ventura River has effective trash TMDL and is listed for: Nutrients Bacteria Historic Pesticides