ODP’s Waiver Quality Strategy Where does IM4Q fit in? Dolores Frantz, ODP Diana Ramirez, ODP Jennifer Fraker, ODP William Posavec, ODP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Advertisements

March 25, Quality Assurance Overview. March 25, Quality Assurance System Overview FY 04/05- new Quality Assurance tools implemented, taking.
The Regulatory Perspective
Targeted Case Management
Medicaid Division of Medicaid and Long-Term Care Department of Health and Human Services Managed Long-Term Services and Supports.
Dr. Hamda Qotba, M.D,MFPH,FFPH
Managing Risk: A Framework and Reporting Cycle 2014.
HCBS Mental Health Waiver Focused Discussion Forum Illinois Department Healthcare & Family Services Illinois Department of Human Services ~Division of.
What It Means for HCS Participants & Their Families Hill Country Community MHMR Center March 23, 2010 Changing from HCS Case Management to Service Coordination.
Accident Incident Policy Changes to Policy September 2007.
OVERVIEW OF DDS ACS HCBS MEDICAID WAIVER. Medicaid Regular state plan Medicaid pays for doctor appointments, hospital expenses, medicine, therapy and.
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
PALLIATIVE CARE WAIVER STAKEHOLDER MEETING California Department of Health Services Medi-Cal Policy Division 11/29/06.
Introduction Waiver Basics HCBS Roles and Responsibilities Assurances in Action Level of Care Service Plan Qualified Providers Health and Welfare Financial.
4/30/20151 Quality Assurance Overview. 4/30/20152 Quality Assurance System Overview FY 04/05- new Quality Assurance tools implemented, taking into consideration.
ODP ACADEMY For Administrative Entities …Changing Practices, Unchanged Values Administrative Entity Oversight Monitoring Process Pennsylvania Department.
Office of Long Term Living Quality Management, Metrics & Analytics
INFORMATION SOLUTIONS The National Quality Contractor Technical Assistance to State HCBS Waivers Beth Jackson, Ph.D
Evolution of Federal Quality Assurance and Improvement Principles for HCBS Waivers: Movement to More Specific Expectations Valerie J. Bradley, President.
Assurance: The State demonstrates that it implements the process and instrument(s) specified in the approved waiver for evaluating/reevaluating an applicant’s.
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
Understanding & Managing Risk
Ministry of Health and Long Term Care Performance Improvement and Compliance Branch Compliance Management Program Presentation to the North East Family.
7/16/20151 Quality Assurance Overview. 7/16/20152 Quality Assurance System Overview FY 04/05- new Quality Assurance tools implemented  included CMS Quality.
Responsible CarE® Employee health and Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
Home Care Monitoring Guy Pettengell, Head of Operational Contracts.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Illinois’ Money Follows The Person Demonstration “Pathways to Community Living Illinois’ Money Follows The Person Demonstration “Pathways to Community.
Division of Aging Provider Meeting “Waiver 101” June 23, 2015 Amy Rapp Steve Bordenkecher.
Case Management Maintenance Galynn Thomas, RN, MSN Children’s Medical Services.
How the Administrative Entities Are Using IM4Q Data and Information 1.
Xavier Castorena, MSW Social Work Consultant III Children’s Medical Services OVERVIEW OF PARTNERS FOR CHILDREN WAIVER HEALTH AND WELFARE STANDARDS.
HCBS Final Rule and Settings. Goals of the Presentation Review of the Final Rule Medicaid HCBS Requirements Intent of the Final Rule Requirements of the.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
The Policy Company Limited © Control of Infection.
CMS HCBS Quality Initiative Nancy Thaler CMS/DEHPG Quality Team May 5, 2004.
1 CT DDS Quality Service Review Connecticut Community Providers Association Presented by Fred Balicki, DDS Quality Management Services May 27, 2008.
Risk Management, Assessment and Planning Committee III-4.
Overview of Quality Assurance and Enhancement A Framework for Moving from Quality Assurance to Quality Management Ohio Association of County Boards of.
Procedures and Forms 2008 FRCC Compliance Workshop April 8-9, 2008.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
ASSURANCES, FRAMEWORKS, DOMAINS… OH MY! Everything You Always Wanted to Know About QM Strategies But Were Afraid to Ask.
Analysis of State’s Licensing/Certification Outcomes Processes Person-Centered Outcomes Respect and dignity  Respectful interactions with staff  Age.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
1 Standardized Needs Assessment Update PA Office of Developmental Programs July 12, 2007.
College Reviews An Overview Presented by Howard Lutwak, CIA Director of Internal Audit January 2004.
Partners for Children Quality Improvement Health & Welfare Jill Abramson, MD MPH February15, Training.
Guidance Training CFR §483.75(i) F501 Medical Director.
1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.
Guidance Training (F520) §483.75(o) Quality Assessment and Assurance.
SUPPORTED LIVING ARRANGEMENTS (SLA) For Developmental Services Presented by: Kate McCloskey, M.A., C.P.M. Manager of Quality Assurance Sierra Regional.
Quality Improvement Strategy
Shaping Solihull – Everything We Do, Everyone’s Business Meeting Core Objectives for Information, Advice, Advocacy and Support Services in Solihull Partners'
Quality Assurance. Define Quality (product & service) Exceeds the requirements of the customer. General excellence of standard or level. A product which.
New Zealand Standard Health and Disability Services (Restraint Minimisation and Safe Practice) Standards Foreward –Least restrictive environment Legal.
August 16, 2011 MRT Managed Long Term Care Implementation and Waiver Redesign Work Group.
Home and Community-Based Medicaid Waiver Services Aged and Disabled Medicaid Waiver Update March 2016.
Why Are Outcomes Important? Outcomes must be established to move our participants towards greater independence in the community in which they live.
SAFEGUARDING – MENTAL CAPAPCITY ACT.
MFP Quality Requirements
Training Appendix for Adult Protective Services and Employment Supports June 2018.
Waiver Assurances and Performance Measures
Welcome Training for Case Managers: Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Waiver Assurances to Improve Quality.
Importance of Law and Policies in the Environmental Management System
Division of Long-Term Services and Supports
Gem Complete Health Services
Safeguarding Adults local procedures
Module 3 Part 2 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Planning and Execution Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Quality.
Risk Management NDS Forum June 23rd 2010.
Presentation transcript:

ODP’s Waiver Quality Strategy Where does IM4Q fit in? Dolores Frantz, ODP Diana Ramirez, ODP Jennifer Fraker, ODP William Posavec, ODP

HCBS Quality Framework Program design sets the stage for achieving desired outcomes. Program design addresses fundamental program requirements including: service standards, provider qualifications, assessment, service planning, monitoring participant health and welfare, and critical safeguards (e.g., incident reporting and management systems). 2

3 Waiver Assurances Level of Care Determinations Service Plans Qualified Providers Health and Welfare Administrative Authority Financial Accountability

CMS Vision of CQI: DDRI Model DESIGN Plan for and set stage for achieving positive outcomes DESIGN Plan for and set stage for achieving positive outcomes DISCOVERY Find positive and negative outcomes in a systematic, timely manner DISCOVERY Find positive and negative outcomes in a systematic, timely manner REMEDIATION Address negative outcomes in a timely manner REMEDIATION Address negative outcomes in a timely manner IMPROVEMENT Improve quality via systemic changes IMPROVEMENT Improve quality via systemic changes CONTINUOUS CYCLE This is where data analysis comes in 4 4

CMS Vision of CQI: DDRI Model The National HCBS Quality Enterprise, a Grant Funded by CMS 5

Appendix H: Quality Improvement Strategy Sums up how, where, and by whom statewide performance results will be compiled and trended over time each year for review and any systemic improvement activities needed Brings together data for analysis from a variety of sources that support the QIS, including IM4Q/NCI data, HCSIS, PROMISe, AE, Provider, and SCO Monitoring data, and data from ad hoc databases Improvement 6

7 CMS Expectations for QIS Performance measures required for all assurances and sub-assurances Should be continually reaching 100% compliance Should be able to aggregate remediation and show how quickly issues are resolved Should be able to describe and document methods of remediation Should be able to describe relevant quality improvement initiatives (training, policy change, etc.) Can use consumer surveys in conjunction with all other data

Remediation The National HCBS Quality Enterprise, a Grant Funded by CMS 8

9 Service Plans Assurances The State demonstrates it has designed and implemented an effective system for reviewing the adequacy of service plans for waiver participants. Sub-Assurance A: Service Plans address all participants assessed needs (including health and welfare risk factors) and personal goals, either by the provision of waiver services or through other means. Sub-Assurance B: The State monitors service plan development in accordance with its policies and procedures.

Sub-Assurance C: Service plans are updated/ revised at least annually or when warranted by changes in the waiver participant’s needs. Sub-Assurance D: Services are delivered in accordance with the service plan, including the type, scope, amount, duration and frequency specified in the service plan. Sub-Assurance E: Participants are afforded choice between waiver services and institutional care, and between/among waiver services and providers. 10

11 Service Plans Subassurance A Consolidated Waiver Data Source: AEOMPCycle 1 (CY 07-08) Cycle 2 (CY 09-10) Cycle 3 YTD (FY 11-12) n% Compliant n% Compliant n Q2.A. All assessed needs are addressed in the ISP %22195% Q4.A. The outcomes listed on the ISP relate to an identified preference %43597%22198%

12 Service Plans Subassurance A Consolidated Waiver Health and Welfare risk factors are assessed; Risk factors are mitigated where appropriate Data Source: AEOMP Cycle 1 (CY 07-08) Cycle 2 (CY 09-10) Cycle 3 YTD (FY 11-12) n% Compliant n% Compliant n Q1.0H. Risk assessment is completed % Q1.0I.01. If yes, services and supports to mitigate identified are incorporated into the ISP %

13 Service Plans Subassurance B Consolidated Waiver Service Plan Development is Monitored Data Source: AEOMP Cycle 2 (CY 09-10)Cycle 3 YTD (FY 11-12) n% Compliant n% Compliant Cycle 2: Q7.B. Do you attend your ISP meeting? % Cycle 3: Q6.A. There is documentation that the waiver participant attended the ISP meeting % Cycle 2: Q7.A. There is documentation that the required members of the team were invited to the ISP meeting % Cycle 3: Q6.B. There is documentation that the required members of the team attended the ISP meeting %

14 Service Plans Subassurance B Consolidated Waiver Service Plan Development is Monitored Data Source: AEOMP Cycle 2 (CY 09-10)Cycle 3 YTD (FY 11-12) n% Compliant n% Compliant Cycle 2: Q3.B. Service frequency is indicated in the ISP % Cycle 3: Q3.A. Service frequency is indicated in the ISP % Cycle 2: Q1.C. Were all services and supports in the approved ISP? 43595% Cycle 3: Q1.C. Were all services and supports in the approved ISP? 22198%

15 Service Plans Subassurance B Consolidated Waiver Service Plan Development is Monitored Data Source: AEOMP Cycle 2 (CY 09-10)Cycle 3 YTD (FY 11-12) n% Compliant n% Compliant Cycle 2: Q8.B.1. The AE authorizes services consistent with the service definitions % Cycle 3: Q7.0A. The AE authorizes services consistent with the service definitions % Cycle 2: Q8.B.2. The AE authorized qualified providers to deliver all services authorized in the ISP % Cycle 3: Q7.0C. The AE authorized qualified providers to deliver all services authorized in the ISP %

16 Service Plans Subassurance E Consolidated Waiver Choice of Services is offered Data Source: AEOMP Cycle 1 (CY 07-08) Cycle 2 (CY 09-10) Cycle 3 YTD (FY 11-12) n% Compliant n% Compliant n Q50.A Documentation indicates choice between and among services was offered to the individual/family %31847% Q24.0A. There is documentation that indicates choice between and among services was offered to the individual/family %

17 Service Plans Subassurance E Consolidated Waiver Choice of Providers is offered Data Source: AEOMP Cycle 1 (CY 07-08) Cycle 2 (CY 09-10) Cycle 3 YTD (FY 11-12) n% Compliant n% Compliant n Q51.A Documentation indicates choice of willing and qualified service providers was offered to the individual/family %42167% Q25.0A. There is documentation that indicates choice of willing and qualified service providers was offered to the individual/family %

18 Service Plans Subassurance D Consolidated Waiver Services and Supports are delivered Data Source: AEOMP Cycle 2 (CY 09-10)Cycle 3 YTD (FY 11-12) n% Compliant n% Compliant Cycle 2: Q1.C.2. Based on AEO Review of records, all services and supports in the approved ISP were received % Cycle 3: Q1.0D.01. Based on HCSIS monitoring reports, all services and supports in the approved ISP were received %

19 Data Source: IM4Q Individuals receive services they need Services Delivered in Accordance with the Plan FY 06-07FY Percent of waiver participants who indicated they received the services they need n% Compliantn Consolidated Waiver 88878%110779%

Individuals receive services they need 20

Individuals receive services they need 21

Individuals receive services they need 22

Individuals receive services they need 23

24 Health and Welfare The State demonstrates, on an ongoing basis that it identifies, addresses and seeks to prevent instances of abuse, neglect and exploitation.

25 Health and Welfare Consolidated Waiver Data Source: HCSIS Data Extraction Date: 06/20/12 (100% Review) FY FY FY FY FY Number of Confirmed Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Abuse Individual to Individual Abuse Other investigated injuries determined to be abuse

26 Consolidated Waiver Data Source: HCSIS Data Extraction Date: 06/20/12 (100% Review) FY FY FY FY FY Number of Confirmed Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Neglect Rights Violation Misuse of funds Health and Welfare

27 Health and Welfare Critical Incident Review # and % of critical incidents in which prompt action (demonstrated within 24 hours) is taken to protect the participant’s health, safety and rights # and % of AEs that review incidents within 24 hours of the report # and % of critical incidents finalized within the required timeframe (30 days)

28 Health and Welfare Investigation of Critical Incidents # and % of AEs that completed investigations in accordance with ODP standards # and % of confirmed critical incidents where corrective actions were carried out or planned by the appropriate entity within the required timeframe # and % of AEs that maintain documentation of incident management training

29 Consolidated Waiver Data Source: HCSIS Data Extraction Date: 06/20/12 (100% Review) FY FY FY FY FY Number of Incidents of Restraints 2,8642,8792,5363,2593,053 Unduplicated Count of Individuals with Restraints Number of Medication Errors 7,9848,3888,1728,4058,458 Health and Welfare

30 Health and Welfare Training in Reporting Abuse # and % of waiver participants who received information about reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation.

31 Individuals Feel Safe Consolidated Waiver Data Source: IM4QFY 06-07FY n%n% Percent of individuals who feel safe in their homes %193080% Percent of individuals who feel safe during day activity %166290% Percent of individuals who feel safe in their neighborhood %225472%

Individuals Feel Safe at Day Activity 32

Individuals Feel Safe at Day Activity 33

Individuals Feel Safe at Day Activity 34

Individuals Feel Safe at Day Activity 35

36