ESEA Waiver: Implications for the Providence School District Providence School Board Presentation June 18, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
Advertisements

STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION UPDATE DECEMBER 7, 2011 AYP DETERMINATIONS ESEA WAIVER.
Restructuring Plans Glenbrook Middle School Bel Air Elementary School Rio Vista Elementary School Shore Acres Elementary School Mt. Diablo Unified School.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
State and Federal Accountability Directors of Special Education October 10, 2013 Region One Education Service Center Office of School Improvement, Accountability,
CT’S NEW ACCOUNTABILITY METRICS SPI/DPI. The NCLB waiver Approved May 29, 2012 Allows more flexible use of Title I funding Replaces AYP under NCLB with.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Request Frequently Asked Questions April 30, 2012 April 27,
Rhode Island Accountability Process Revisions for School Years 2015 and 2016 A Presentation to the Accountability 3.0 Statewide Webinar March 27, 2015.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
Title 1 at J. Evans Middle School. Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was created to ensure that all children have a fair,
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
School Performance Index School Performance Index (SPI): A Comprehensive Measurement System for All Schools Student Achievement (e.g. PSSA) Student Progress.
NECAP Ramp-Up Programs Math Grade 4  4 /5 Students Improved 2/5 Improved 2 levels 2/5 Improved 1 level 1/5 No Change Reading Grade 4  8/9 Students Improved.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
Measuring Charter Quality Eric Paisner, NAPCS Anna Nicotera, NAPCS Lyria Boast, Public Impact.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
Mississippi Department of Education Office of School Recovery November 18, :30-4:30 Committee of Practitioners Meeting School Improvement Grant 1003(g)
Accelerating All Schools Toward Greatness The New Rhode Island Accountability System.
Composite Index Scores (CIS) Understanding Accountability for Strategic Goal Setting August 24, 2015 Andrew Milligan | RIDE Office of Transformation.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Highlights of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Waiver Renewal Application.
Early College High School Initiative June 16, 2009.
September 13, Title I is a federal program which provides financial assistance to Local Education Agencies (LEAs) and schools with high numbers.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
1.Welcome (10 minutes) 2.Federal Focus School Update (20 minutes) 3.Upcoming Sessions (30 Minutes) 4.Break (15 minutes) 5.Accountability Update (75 minutes)
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
To support the personal and intellectual success of every student, every day. Fresno-Long Beach Learning Partnership Board Workshop August 19, 2008.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
ESEA Flexibility NCLB Waiver Discussion October 24, 2011.
 SYSTEM - an assemblage or combination of things or parts forming a complex or unitary whole  KPREP testing is one measure of our school system.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
PA School Performance Profile 1 Tamaqua Area Middle School.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Hawaii’s Public Schools Update USPACOM Pacific Theater Education Conference Deputy Superintendent Ronn Nozoe Asst Supt Stephen Schatz 12/4/ :15-11:15.
Office of Improvement and Innovation Jo Hannah Ward, Director Office of Improvement and Innovation.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
Apollo 20 Initiative Houston Independent School District Paula Harris Board of Education President Alicia Thomas, Ph.D. Deputy Chief Academic Officer.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
Legislative Requirement 2013
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Accountability
Strategic Performance Management
TTIPS Model Overview.
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
Sustaining and building on the excellence of LCPS
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
Presentation transcript:

ESEA Waiver: Implications for the Providence School District Providence School Board Presentation June 18, 2012

What Does the ESEA Waiver Offer? Relief from identifying an ever-increasing number of schools as “in need of improvement” Increased flexibility in use of Title I funding A more accurate and diagnostic accountability and intervention system

Rhode Island’s Approved ESEA Waiver A New Approach to School Measurement MeasureComponents Elementary / Middle Schools High Schools Absolute Percent Proficient All Students Minority + FRL IEP +LEP 30 Progress To 2017 TargetAll Students10 Achievement Gaps Minority+FRL 30 IEP+LEP Percent of Tested students in Distinction Level All Students55 Growth All Students 25n/a Minority+FRL IEP+LEP HS Graduation RatesAll Students n/a 20 High School Scaled ScoreAll Students n/a 5 TOTAL 100

A New Approach to School Classification ClassificationDescription Commended Commended Schools are the highest performing schools. They represent the strongest patterns of performance across metrics, test at least 95% of their students, and serve all students well. Leading Leading schools demonstrate success by having strong achievement in reading and mathematics, small or no gaps in student performance, or are improving student achievement, or increasing graduation rates. Typical Typical Schools perform near or at the state average and may out-perform the state average on one or more metrics but also may demonstrate significant challenges on one or more metrics. Warning Warning schools have a combination of substandard achievement in reading and math, unacceptable achievement gaps, and demonstrate little or no progress in improving achievement or graduation rates. Focus Focus schools have substandard achievement in reading and math, unacceptable achievement gaps, and demonstrate little or no academic progress in improving student achievement or increasing graduation rates Priority Priority schools have the lowest achievement in reading and mathematics, intolerable gaps in student performance and demonstrate little or no academic progress in improving student achievement or increasing graduation rates. Rhode Island’s Approved ESEA Waiver

A New Approach to Intervention ModelDescription Closure LEA closes the identified school and enrolls the students who attended that school in other public schools within the state that are higher achieving. These other schools should be within a reasonable proximity to the closed school and may include, but are not limited to, charter schools or new schools for which achievement data are not yet available. Restart LEA converts a school or closes it and reopens a new school under one of the following mechanisms: (1) a regional collaborative organized pursuant to RIGL Chapter ; (2) a charter school operator or a charter management organization or similarly independent entity that materially changes school operations; (3) an education management organization that has been selected through a rigorous review process; or (4) the creation of a joint Labor/Management Compact Flex Model The Flex Model requires districts to select a comprehensive package of intervention strategies from a RIDE-developed and managed list of 28 empirically proven intervention strategies. The LEA selection of the strategies must be: (1) coherent, (2) comprehensive, (3) responsive to the results of the diagnostic screen, and (4) ambitious but achievable.

So What Happens In Identified Schools?