Courtney Mills. ESEA (Formerly AYP)  Federal Accountability  August  0 – 100, A – F  One per school (includes a breakdown by grade band)  Two Components:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Advertisements

Palmetto Assessment of State Standards (PASS) and State and Federal Accountability Elementary and Middle School Principals November 5, 2009.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Accountability data overview August Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.
1 Union County School District Instructional Update 10 December 2007 Dr. David Eubanks Superintendent.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data The New York State Education Department November 12, 2014.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Carolyn M. Wood - Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems October 31,
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.
Accountability State and Federal Ratings August 11, 2009 Board Presentation 1.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
School Performance Index School Performance Index (SPI): A Comprehensive Measurement System for All Schools Student Achievement (e.g. PSSA) Student Progress.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results
Charter Goals BECKIE DAVIS & COURTNEY MILLS. Is the goal S.M.A.R.T.? S pecific M easurable A mbitious & A ttainable R elevant & R esults-oriented T ime-bound.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
1 School Grades Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Accreditation and AMO I.ACCREDITATION (Virginia’s Accountability System) – ACCREDITATION is Virginia’s Accountability System – No membership groups, no.
State and Federal Accountability Old English Consortium Assistant Principals’ Conference October 2009.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Accountability Update School Grade Changes Dr. Karen Schafer Office of Accountability and Testing March 14, 2012.
Accountability Scorecards Okemos Board of Education September 2013.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
Understanding our 2012 High School Grade 1Spruce Creek High.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Accountability and School Grades FY 16 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting March 17, 2016 Everglades Preparatory Academy.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Accountability and School Grades FY 17 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting August 24, 2016 Pew Center.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
FCAT? FCAT? FSA EOC? FAA? AYP? AMO?.
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
2012 Accountability Determinations
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
ABCs/AYP Background Briefing
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
Texas State Accountability
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
AYP and Report Card.
School Profile Andy Dekaney High School
MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.
Presentation transcript:

Courtney Mills

ESEA (Formerly AYP)  Federal Accountability  August  0 – 100, A – F  One per school (includes a breakdown by grade band)  Two Components: ◦ Test Participation (95%) ◦ Test Performance  Third Component for High Schools: ◦ On-time Graduation Rate Report Cards  State Accountability  November  Excellent, Good, etc.  One per grade band  ESEA data & more: ◦ Absolute Rating ◦ Growth Rating ◦ Comparison to other schools ◦ Teacher data ◦ Principal data ◦ Narrative ◦ Satisfaction Survey

 New schools DO receive a report card after the first year of operation.  Schools earn an ABSOLUTE rating and a GROWTH rating for each grade band (elementary, middle, and high): ◦ Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, At-Risk  Basis for Ratings: ◦ High schools – HSAP & EOC performance, on-time and 5- year graduation rates ◦ Elementary and Middle schools: PASS & EOC performance ◦ Primary schools: other criteria such as prime instructional time, student-teacher ratio, etc.

Under AYP:  Percent Proficient  Yes or No  Equal weighting  ELA & Math  Attendance rate used  Met or Not Met Under Waiver:  Mean of all scores  Partial credit  Adjusted weights  Four core subjects  Attendance not used  A, B, C, D, F

AMO = Annual Measurable Objective  1 = Met AMO  = Did not meet AMO but improved over previous year  0 = Did not meet AMO & did not improve 2014 AMOsElemMidHigh ELA Math Science Soc Stud Grad RateN/A ~75.1

Weightings  ELA Performance: 35% (Elem/MS), 22.5% (HS)  Math Performance: 35% (Elem/MS), 22.5% (HS)  *Science Performance: 5%  *Social Studies Performance: 5%  ELA Participation: 10% (Elem/MS), 7.5% (HS)  Math Participation: 10% (Elem/MS), 7.5% (HS)  *Graduation Rate: 30% (HS) *High school calculations use the previous year’s results for EOC performance and graduation rate.

Grade Conversions  A =  B =  C =  D =  F = Below 60 Potential changes to the Charter School Law may automatically close schools that earn an F for three consecutive years.

Test Participation o If a student is enrolled on the first day of testing, he or she MUST take the test o The goal is 95% participation overall and in every subgroup (gender, ethnicity, etc.) o Applies to PASS and HSAP Test Performance o PASS & HSAP: Students’ scores only count if they are enrolled continuously from the 45 th day through the first day of testing o HSAP: Only students in the 2 nd year cohort count o EOC: Every score counts

 All students  Male  Female  White  African American  Asian/Pacific Islander  Hispanic  American Indian/Alaskan  Disabled  Limited English Proficiency  Subsidized meals

 Report Cards ◦ All students & any subgroup >= 10  ESEA ◦ Performance & Participation >= 30* ◦ Graduation rate subgroups >= 10 ◦ Grad rate “all students” >= 1 * Subgroup size is determined by school, not by grade span or by test subject area. In some instances data will be reported for subgroups between 10 and 30 students.

o 9GR is the code which identifies the year a student FIRST entered the 9 th grade ◦ , 9GR = 12 ◦ , 9GR = 13 ◦ , 9GR = 14 o You must have evidence to show when the student was in 8 th grade ◦ Report Card, Letter from MS Principal, or SUNS History o Implications for HSAP participation and graduation rates

PowerSchool School Leaders Testing Coordinators Special Education Coordinators Other Staff

 Report Cards Accountability Manual: 13%20Accountability%20Manual/Accountability%20Manual% %20Final.pdf  ESEA Technical Manual:

 Courtney Mills  