COOPERATIVE AND EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING – AQIP ACTION PROJECT Recommendation to the President and Executive Cabinet of Mott Community College November 21,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Advertisements

Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
AQIP ACTION PROJECTS AQIP Action Project Community Forum Mott Community College.
Envision SFA developing the next strategic plan….
Strategic Planning and the NCA Special Emphasis A Focus on Community Engagement and Experiential Learning.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Transforming Education in Kentucky EPSB and TEK 1.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
1 FDIC Corporate University Aligning Learning With Corporate Objectives March 2006.
Pilot – Professional Mentoring Program The American Association of Blacks in Energy.
Competency Models Impact on Talent Management
Welcome to LC W University Parkway. Our Staff Director Summer Valente Academic Service- Learning Director Jonathan Westover Program Coordinator.
South Seattle Community College BUDGET HEARING Fiscal Year June 7, 2005.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
Fall 2007 AQIP Update MCC Board of Trustees Meeting Monday, August 27, 2007.
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
1. 2 Professional Development at Mott Community College An AQIP Project Higher Learning Commission Recommendation to the MCC Executive Cabinet by MCC.
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Eastern Washington University EWU ODP Maps EWU ODP Maps
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
Board of Trustees Orientation September 23, 2014 Dr. George Railey Vice Chancellor of Educational Services and Institutional Effectiveness 1.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SUSTAINABLE CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees have developed a new system that integrates these two.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Institutional Initiatives Action Plans Town Hall Meeting April 16, 2007.
Externship Program September 12, 2014 Career Services.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
1 25 STRONG WORKFORCE RECOMMENDATIONS IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW #strongworkforce DoingWhatMATTERS.cccco.edu.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE DIVISION OF THE PRESIDENT Approved by the President in Spring  Provide students with a quality educational.
HLC Criterion One Primer Criterion One. Mission August 27, 2015.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
NCHSE Board Presentation Roadmap for Creating a Health Care Work-Based Learning Program January 27, 2016 Cathy Martin Vice President, Workforce Policy.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
University Career Services Committee
Reporting on Applied Learning to SUNY
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
kctcs action plan.
Internship Bill of Rights
Strategic Boards Toolkit
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

COOPERATIVE AND EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING – AQIP ACTION PROJECT Recommendation to the President and Executive Cabinet of Mott Community College November 21, :00 p.m. / RTC 1107

Action Project Background Prioritization process that included Conversation Day Surveys of internal and external community Executive Cabinet, Trustee Member, and representatives from faculty and staff agreed on the final three at Strategy Forum May 17-20, 2006 Action project team members were identified by President after the strategy forum

Team Membership Team Sponsor Scott Jenkins Vice President for Student and Administrative Services Amy FugateVice President for Academic Affairs Team Members Carlos CisnerosStudent & Administrative Services Community Outreach & Engagement Coordinator [team leader] Tom Crampton Executive Dean for the Regional Technology Center M-TEC Becky GarskeSocial Sciences Division Faculty Paul JordanSocial Sciences Division Faculty Laurette Wright Academic Affairs secretary Robert Matthews Director of Workforce Development – WEC [team leader] Lillie McCain Social Sciences Division Faculty and Advisor Cindy McDanielEmployment Services Coordinator [team leader] Carol NielsenBusiness Division Cosmetology Program Faculty, coordinator and advisor, [team leader] Paul RozyckiSocial Sciences Faculty AQIP “Pit Crew” Mike CieslinskiStudent and Administrative Services Resources Coordinator Gail IvesExecutive Director of Institutional Research Steve RobinsonAQIP Coordinator / Humanities Division Faculty

History In 1995 an Ad Hoc CPSC committee recommended the expansion of experiential learning; no action was taken due to new efforts to study School-to-Work Initiatives. In November 2005 expansion of experiential education was one of the recommendations to emerge from Conversation Day; its priority was confirmed through the various stages of internal and external prioritization. Experiential Education team leaders drafted a final goal statement in August, 2006 with a target completion date of May Training and continuous improvement was conducted by Carol Tyler late August, early September Between September 2006 and March 2008 the team held regular meetings, conducted surveys and gathered relevant information pertaining to experiential education. In April 2008 the team completes recommendations to be submitted to the president and executive cabinet.

Vision Raise the expectations that all students have relevant Experiential Ed experiences Explore the possibilities of documenting Experiential Ed experiences on transcripts Create an institutional culture that values Experiential Ed/Applied Learning Experiences aid faculty in currency of the curriculum and engagement of the community

Project Goal “The goal of this project is that cooperative education and other experiential learning opportunities be expanded in all areas of the college curriculum.” The team defined “all areas of the college curriculum” as: Credit Non-credit – Continuing Education/Corporate Services – Workforce Development

Accomplishments Surveyed all faculty (both part-time and full-time) to describe current experiential activities in all college courses Engaged both the credit and non-credit areas of the college in investigating and researching the topic Developed a rich body of web-based resources on the team’s work processes, including meeting minutes, agendas, resources from other institutions, etc. on the central AQIP web site; demonstrations of these web- based resources to internal college groups including supervisors, managers, etc.

Accomplishments Defined terms related to experiential education, curriculum, co-op, etc. Produced an inventory of credit courses with co-op, internship, externship, and practicum experiences Began to inventory non-credit experiential opportunities and external relationships and sources for experiential education Discussed the need for a “clearinghouse” to match students (credit, non-credit, Workforce Development, and Continuing Ed) with opportunities Reviewed the recommendations submitted to CPSC in 1995 by the ad-hoc Experiential Learning Committee and found many similarities between our analysis and the 1995 recommendations. Positive AQIP Reviewer comments in 2007 & 2008.

Definitions Need was identified for a common lexicon of terms related to experiential education, cooperative learning, etc. Broad review was conducted to identify the various terms that define the concept of experiential education Initial collection of working definitions was compiled

Definitions Apprenticeships: Combined work and education experience with an employer. Clinicals: Course(s) which provide a supervised clinical experience in an approved medical setting. Co-op: A course that allows a student to work in a job related to the student’s program of study. Experiential Learning: Learning through experience, either in a real situation, such as a workplace, or in a role play or simulated environment. Externship: May or may not be compensated, not an employee of the company, purely educational but do not receive college credit. Field Work: Course(s) which provide the student with the opportunity to demonstrate competency in the classroom. Practical work experience in an agency or organization. Field experiences intended to provide students with real world work experiences and contact with working professionals. Internship: May or may not be compensated, students work for an employer for a specified period of time to learn about a particular industry, occupation or skill set.

Definitions Job Shadowing: A student follows an employee at a company location to learn about a particular occupation or industry. Used most often to gain information about an occupation. Mentoring: An employee who possesses the skills and knowledge to be mastered by a student, and who instructs the student. Practicum: A course of study designed especially for the preparation of teachers and clinicians that involves the supervised practical application of previously studied theory Project-Based Co-op: Learning experience that provides students the opportunity to work on specific, short-term projects from an employer in conjunction with their academic program. Service Learning: A method of teaching, learning and reflecting that combines academic classroom curriculum with meaningful community service. Work Study: A federal or state-funded program that allows students to work on campus to gain valuable work experience and earn money for expenses, preferably in program of study.

Survey Results 61 faculty participated in this survey 93 Course/sections were identified as having an experiential component The following shows the distribution of how each faculty member classifies their course *Each course could have more than one selection

Survey Results

Recommendations 1.President and/or his designee should be responsible for administration and oversight of the recommended position and the Experiential Learning Office. 2.Create and maintain a clearinghouse for standardized management of information related to faculty, staff, student, and employer/community stakeholder needs. 3.Create and fund a position to develop, manage, and coordinate existing resources and facilitate new opportunities for cooperative education and experiential learning. 4.Allocate the appropriate physical space and equipment to support the effective functioning of the Experiential Learning Office. 5.Transition the AP Team into a “resource council” who will be empowered to provide ongoing guidance, advice and support to the Experiential Learning Office.

1. Presidential Level There needs to be a clear administrative responsibility at the executive level. This will acknowledge an institutional responsibility to involve all areas of the institution, including Academic Affairs and Student & Administrative Services

2. Clearinghouse Function

3. Provide Human Resources/Position Experiential education for our students requires a champion to promote, maintain and expand opportunities. Our proposed solution requires a resource person dedicated to this purpose who will: Build and manage relationships throughout the college and community Provide technical support to faculty, staff and students Initiate new applied learning initiatives Apply expertise and marketing skills

4. Space Allocation Readily accessible to staff and students Access to adequate and appropriate administrative and staff support Provide appropriate furnishings and equipment

5. Experiential Education “Resource Council” Transition the Cooperative and Experiential Education Team into a “resource council” who will be empowered to provide ongoing guidance, advice and support to the Experiential Learning Office.

What We Are Asking For Identify area for improvement Define current situation Analyze current situation Develop improvement theory Implement best strategies Monitor results Adjust, standardize, or plan further Approve the creation of a position and office charged with the development, management, coordination, and evaluation of existing and future applied learning arrangements in all areas of the curriculum.

23 Links to MCC Strategic Plan & HLC Accreditation This project impacts all three student oriented strategic goals Student Learning & Success 1.1 Utilize research and development to proactively enhance curriculum to meet demands of students and employers. 1.2 Focus, align and integrate organizational efforts across academic, student service, continuing education and workforce development, to support student learning. 1.3 Coordinate curriculum and services across all sites to create learning-centered environments that offer all students an opportunity to succeed.

24 Links to MCC Strategic Plan & HLC Accreditation Other strategic objectives Systems Improvement 3.1 Develop comprehensive cross-functional improvement processes that enable us to respond quickly to changes in the external environment while simultaneously making existing operations faster, smarter, cheaper, and of the same or higher quality. 3.2Using AQIP principles and practices ensure that improvement processes and communication between all sectors of the college start with community and student needs and end with student success. Economic Development 4.1 MCC programs and services will be directly related to the labor market needs of our region and we will continuously analyze and prepare for emerging economic challenges and opportunities. 4.2 Expand our capacity to be involved and responsive to local, regional and state plans for economic growth and align our resources and assets to enhance the viability of the community. Institutional Image & Community Relations 6.1 Continue to have a positive presence in the community by engaging community partners to better meet area educational needs.

25 Links to MCC Strategic Plan & HLC Accreditation Higher Learning Commission Criteria for Accreditation Criterion Five: Engagement and Service As called for by its mission, the organization identifies its constituencies and serves them in ways both vale The organization learns from the constituencies it serves and analyzes its capacity to serve their needs and expectations The organization has the capacity and the commitment to engage with its identified constituencies and communities The organization demonstrates its responsiveness to those constituencies that depend on it for service Internal and external constituencies value the service the organization provides

In Summary AQIP Priority Aligned with Strategic Plan Aligned with HLC Criterion Creates system to support student experiential learning Requires Executive Cabinet action Thank You Questions?