An integrated model for improvement: Implications for study design Frank Davidoff, MD, MACP Editor Emeritus, Annals of Internal Medicine Executive Editor,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safety Net Medical Home Initiative Ed Wagner, MD, MPH, MACP MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation Group Health Research Institute Safety Net Medical.
Advertisements

How can we teach effectively?
Learning strategies How do we learn and how can we learn more effectively.
Integrating the gender aspects in research and promoting the participation of women in Life Sciences, Genomics and Biotechnology for Health.
Dr. Hamda Qotba, M.D,MFPH,FFPH
Research article structure: Where can reporting guidelines help? Iveta Simera The EQUATOR Network workshop.
Barbara M. Altman Emmanuelle Cambois Jean-Marie Robine Extended Questions Sets: Purpose, Characteristics and Topic Areas Fifth Washington group meeting.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
Doug Altman Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK
Interprofessional Healthcare Education, Research & Practice Community Faculty Conference May 10, 2014 Dixiana Room 10:30-11:20.
The Experience of Community Service. Experience of Community Service.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9.
Health Systems and the Cycle of Health System Reform
NANDA International Investigating the Diagnostic Language of Nursing Practice.
Why Publish? Public Health Translation Research Eric Tai, MD MS Comprehensive Cancer Control Branch Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Centers for.
Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines
5. Presentation of experimental results 5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can.
Why Simulation Offers patient care experiences to the novice that are rare and risky for them to participate in. High acuity patient levels Shortened patient.
Lifelong Learning at Salford EuLearn Meeting, Bucharest, September 2005 Renata Eyres Associate Dean Enterprise. Faculty of Health & Social Care.
The search for internal validity in improvement Frank Davidoff Learning Lab – 2013 IHI Forum.
Integrated Framework for Reducing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Quality of Health Care Marshall H. Chin, MD, MPH, and Don Goldmann, MD University.
Striving for Quality Using continuous improvement strategies to increase program quality, implementation fidelity and durability Steve Goodman Director.
Developing as a medical leader The leadership of small things.. Saleem Farook Associate Postgraduate Dean North Western Deanery.
University of Regensburg Institute for Educational Science Older workers´ workplace learning – Toward the construction of a theoretical framework on basis.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
Writing a “Quality” Manuscript Virginia A. Moyer, MD, MPH Deputy Editor.
KOLB: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING AND LEARNING STYLES PRESENTED BY ROBERT DRAGO, BRANDON MEYERS, AND TEDDY WALSH KOLB, D.A. (1984). EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING: EXPERIENCE.
Quality Improvement & Data Systems for Performance Excellence Board and Executive Learning Series June 2, 2012 Lucy A. Savitz, Ph.D., MBA Director of Research.
Adapt, Evolve or Become Extinct Making Educational Change Work FOR You Robert G. Carroll, Ph.D. Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University Greenville,
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Effectiveness in Review & Oversight of Human Subjects Research Steven Joffe, MD, MPH Assistant Professor of Pediatrics.
IDENTIFYING KEY AREAS FOR DELIVERY SYSTEM RESEARCH The Challenge and Promise of Delivery System Research: A Meeting of AHRQ Grantees, Experts and Stakeholders.
Socio-cultural and ethical aspects Anne G. Ekeland Berlin,
Linda A Headrick, MD, MS, FACP February 26, 2013.
Evidence-Based Medicine: What does it really mean? Sports Medicine Rounds November 7, 2007.
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH Presented by SANIA IQBAL M.Ed Course Instructor SIR RASOOL BUKSH RAISANI.
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can not be combined together at one time -
THE EVIDENCE SANDWICH MODEL Dr. Soumyadeep Bhaumik BioMedical Genomics Centre, Kolkata Research priority setting exercises:
CIHC is a 2-year initiative funded by Health Canada Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice Request for a Special CIHR Competition.
+ Evidence Based Practice University of Utah Evidence-Based Treatment and Practice: New Opportunities to Bridge Clinical Research and Practice, Enhance.
Comparative Effectiveness Research : Rethinking Therapeutic Evaluation in Chronic Diseases Ph Ravaud.
Constructing Knowledge “The single most important factor influencing learning is what the learner already knows.”
5 Initiating and Managing Change.
Linking the learning to the National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare Joan Heffernan Inspector Manager Regulation – Healthcare Health Information.
Research article structure: Where can reporting guidelines help? Iveta Simera The EQUATOR Network workshop 10 October 2012, Freiburg, Germany.
Standard 14. Professional Practice Evaluation The registered nurse evaluates her or his own nursing practice in relation to professional practice standards.
Spreading Improvements Heidi Johns, Quality Leader, BCPSQC July, 2013.
Reflecting on learning – learning to reflect
Ethics in Clinical Genetics and Genomics Key Knowledge Year 4 Medical Ethics and Law Thread Course, The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford.
Chapter 5 Population Health Quality and Safety Learning Objectives 1. Explain why it is difficult to monitor healthcare quality and safety at the population.
Methodological Issues in Implantable Medical Device(IMDs) Studies Abdallah ABOUIHIA Senior Statistician, Medtronic.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. © All Rights Reserved. This program generously funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Evidence-Based.
Mark A Wainberg Elly Katabira PUBLISH OR PERISH Strengthening the Skills of Developing World Investigators to Publish their Research/Project Findings Skills.
NDIA PMSC Baseline Stability Working Group February 2010 Neil Albert Pete Wynne.
Where is the Implementation in Implementation Science?
MUHC Innovation Model.
Kownayn University ARTICLE REVIEW May 23, 2017.
The Anatomy of a Scientific Article: IMRAD format
What barriers and facilitators influence the implementation of new high-risk medicine services in Scottish community pharmacies? Ms Natalie Weir1, Dr Rosemary.
Project Title Subtitle: make sure to specify that project is an improvement project (see SQUIRES elaboration article) Presenter(s) Date of presentation.
What the Editors want to see!
Project Title Subtitle: make sure to specify that project is an improvement project (see SQUIRES elaboration article Presenter(s) Date of presentation.
How do we learn and how can we learn more effectively
Author Department of general internal medicine Conference Date
Sustainability of Organizational Change
MANUSCRIPT WRITING TIPS, TRICKS, & INFORMATION Madison Hedrick, MA
Public health reform A Scotland where everybody thrives.
Publishing Your Quality Improvement Work Jennifer Elston Lafata, PhD
Presentation transcript:

An integrated model for improvement: Implications for study design Frank Davidoff, MD, MACP Editor Emeritus, Annals of Internal Medicine Executive Editor, Institute for Healthcare Improvement

Scientific discovery Experiential discovery New generalizable knowledge Patients, populations in particular settings Improved outcomes + Locating, acquiring, and evaluating new knowledge Adapting evidence and redesigning practices Executing changes Developing and using measurements Established generalizable scientific knowledge Patients, populations in particular settings Desirable outcomes +

The three kinds of learning that drive improvement Scientific discovery: learning about “what is” Experiential discovery: learning about “what works” (i.e., learning about learning) Experiential learning: learning “how to”

Scientific discovery Experiential discovery New generalizable knowledge Patients, populations in particular settings Improved outcomes + Locating, acquiring, and evaluating new knowledge Adapting evidence and redesigning practices Executing changes Developing and using measurements Established generalizable scientific knowledge Patients, populations in particular settings Desirable outcomes +

Experiential learning: what it looks like Setting: real-world, local, contextual variables not controlled Product: know-how, competence, “knowing-in-practice” Reflexiveness: learning changes the thing learned, i.e., performance – instability Originality: learning what’s already known

Scientific and experiential discovery: what they look like Setting: artificial, protocol-driven, contextual variables controlled Product: abstract, conceptual knowledge Reflexiveness: discovery doesn’t change the thing discovered – stability Originality: discovering what’s not yet known or understood

Experiential learning: the action cycle The generic cycle (informal): Experience  Question  Conceptualize  Retry (Dewey, Piaget, Lewin, Schon, Kolb, et al)

Experiential learning: the wholeness rule You need all the cycle’s elements No reflection (Q and C)  stagnation No experience (E and R)  pedantry

Experiential learning: extending the action cycle The generic cycle (informal learning): Experience  Question  Conceptualize  Retry The extended cycle (formal learning): Plan  Do (E)  Study (Q+C)  Act (R)

The experiential learning action cycle: what’s missing? Scientific and experiential discovery: Plan  Do  Study  Publish Experiential learning: Plan  Do  Study  Act Answer: No “Publish” step (Tom Nolan)

Quality improvement: the need for extended action cycles A new generic cycle: Plan  Do  Study  Act/Disseminate For experiential learning: Plan  Do  Study  Act/Teach/Coach For experiential discovery: Plan  Do  Study  Act/Publish/Discuss

Failure to publish: the consequences Trouble establishing repeatability Prevents public scrutiny, accountability Reduces opportunity to clarify thinking Slows spread of known improvements Inhibits discovery of innovations Ethical issue: fails to give back to public Limits influence of publication on QI

Publication shapes scientific discovery Peer review Requirement for authors’ control of data Requirement for authors’ control of decision to publish Publication guidelines –General: Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts (ICMJE) –By design and content (CONSORT)

Can publication shape improvement? BMJ/QSHC 1999 publication guidelines –For less formal “QI case reports” New proposed publication guidelines –For more organized, formal QI projects: experiential discovery –Adopts IMRaD format: generic flow of all thinking in discovery –Not suitable for story telling, reviews, etc. –Potential impact on planning QI, funding decisions, editorial process

Summary: An integrated model of QI Science-based care is complex Improvement must be layered on, built in Integrated model: 3 kinds of learning The key role of experiential learning Experiential discovery: link to generalizable knowledge Publication guidelines: help shape QI