Can you answer these questions? Can you describe in 100 words or less your vision of the ideal academic experience? What do you think needs to be done.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Responding to Extreme Changes between Self-Study and the Evaluation Visit Dr. Andrew Thompson, Provost Dr. Richard Resch, Provost (Retired) The American.
Advertisements

Academic Master Plan College Senate October 29, 2012.
Strategic Plan Briefing Session Progress and Challenges Spring
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
Basic Skills Workgroup October 12, 2010 Basic Skills Workgroup Basic Skills/College Skills Definition: “Basic skills are those foundation skills in reading,
Envision SFA developing the next strategic plan….
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
1 General Education Senate discussion scheduled for April 11 and 25 1.Proposal to base General Education on outcomes that can be assessed 2.Proposal for.
Developing an Institutional Assessment Plan: Product and Process Bruce P. Szelest Winter Workshop - January 20-21, 2005 Saratoga Springs, NY Association.
SUNY Oneonta College Advancement Presentation to College Senate oMarch 1, 2010 Who We Are What We Do Our Partners The Importance of Your Participation.
1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?
UST Exempt Staff Council A series of forums for exempt staff to discuss a proposed new university committee Richelle Wesley, Associate University Registrar.
The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.
F LORIDA A TLANTIC U NIVERSITY B OARD OF T RUSTEES.
Strategic Planning Update. durhamtech.edu 2 Work to Date Spring 2013 Summer 2013 Fall 2013 Summer 2014 Survey Listening Tour: Faculty and Students Listening.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Maria Thompson Provost & Vice President for Academic Affairs Academic Affairs Restructuring Proposal 23 April 2012.
A member of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system, Bemidji State University is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer and educator.
Strategic Planning: Theme 1 – Develop and Inspire Creative Thinkers and Leaders and Life-long Success Lever 1.1 : Require all undergraduate students to.
Can you answer these questions? Can you describe in 100 words or less your vision of the ideal academic experience? What do you think needs to be done.
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
Academic Master Plan Update November 4, It is not too late to join a working group! Thanks to the members of Academic Affairs who have already stepped.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
12 November 2012 Provost's Report to College Senate.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
Preparing for SACS: Focusing our Quality Enhancement Plan.
Academic Master Plan Academic Master Plan Update To the College Senate
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Promotion in the Clinical Track Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
SMSU University Mission Southwest Minnesota State University prepares students to meet the complex challenges of this century as engaged citizens in their.
03 December 2012 Provost's Report to College Senate.
1 Shared Governance and Transparent Decision Making American Democracy Project National Meeting Orlando, Florida June 4, 2011 Patrick Dolenc, Professor.
02 April 2012 Provost's Report to College Senate.
Middle States Self-Study Process : 2013 College Senate SUNY Oneonta October 15, 2012.
CCC: Where Teaching and Learning Transform Lives, Putting Together the Self- Study Puzzle Corning Community College August 24, 2012.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Think Academics: Academic Visioning David Marker Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
2012 Middle States Accreditation Report Review Chapter 1: Institutional Excellence Standards 1 and 6.
Assessment Presentation Day For Faculty Cindy J. Speaker, Ph.D. Wells College August 21, 2006.
Academic Master Plan
Strategic Planning Linked to Long Range Planning Presentation to Faculty and Staff February 13-14, 2008
05 December 2011 Provost's Report to College Senate.
University Senate January 19, 2016 ACADEMIC UPDATE.
10/12/20091 Agenda Introduction Meeting Purpose Sustainability History at NCSU CEST Mission & Organization Schedule Next Meetings Welcome to the Buildings.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
University Town Hall May 18, 2016 Co-Chairs: Dr. Claire M. Fraser & Dr. Roger J. Ward.
Strategic Planning Summary of Events Open Space Technology (OST) Retreat– Oct Review of Inputs from OST by Strategic Planning Operations Committee.
IUP Middle States Accreditation and Self Study Process
David J. Lanoue Dean August 11, 2010 (Does not include budget information that is now obsolete.)
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
Forward Together: UW Madison’s Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee Shared Governance (Faculty, staff,
Cosumnes River College Vision, Mission and Values Review.
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update College Senate April 18, 2016 STRATEGIC PLAN 2015: SCHOLARSHIP, SERVICE, STRENGTH.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
Strategic Planning Committee Review of New Strategic Goals and formative community and committee input.
Recommendations of the Renewal, Tenure and Promotion Task Force 2
Phase One: Re-inventing the Flagship University, Fall 2006-Fall 2007
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
The Council for Diversity and Interculturalism
University Community Briefing
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Share.Shape.Unite. Building our SSU Sonoma State University Academic Senate May 17, 2018 University Budget Office.
Presentation transcript:

Can you answer these questions? Can you describe in 100 words or less your vision of the ideal academic experience? What do you think needs to be done here at SUNY Oneonta to create the ideal academic environment you describe above? If you could strengthen just one aspect of the Oneonta academic experience what would it be and what would you do?

Academic Master Plan, Phase II A discussion of where we have been and where we are going

The Academic Master Plan Timeline…so far August 2011, Provost Thompson introduced the idea of a three phase process to develop an Academic Master Plan Phase I – assess the values and academic culture of the college, define core values Phase II – define specific action items and plans to help foster and develop these core values Phase III – evaluate the impact and value of these initiatives The Provost and administration were not direct participants in Phase I, this was envisioned as a “faculty- owned” process

2012 The 13 member elected and appointed task force designed an open-response survey to assess campus beliefs about academic values. Members visited with offices and departments within Academic Affairs and began a dialogue about the potential value of an Academic Master Plan, and current concerns and aspirations of faculty, staff and students. Documents, including survey responses and goal statements gathered from academic departments, were evaluated using qualitative data analysis software to isolate keywords and ideas that were used consistently.

…in December 2012… After a year of meetings, discussions, surveys, forums and data analysis, the task force chairs, John Schaumloffel and Bill Proulx, presented a final report to the Provost recapping the broad content of the data and describing the Phase I process. They also presented a statement to the College Senate which was endorsed as a potential Mission Statement for the Division of Academic Affairs: The Division of Academic Affairs advances rigorous teaching, learning and scholarship in a student-focused environment by embracing experiential learning, engagement and collegiality within a diverse liberal arts tradition.

Process remains a magnet for healthy debate Why do we need it? What is this Academic Master Plan intended to demonstrate? How can it be misused or misrepresented? Why didn’t this happen before re-structuring? How open and democratic will decision-making ultimately be? Who is going to lose resources and gain resources? Who is behind this nefarious plot? Is this just about selling the college or raising money? How does any of this promote teaching, learning or scholarship? WHY SHOULD I CARE ABOUT ANY OF THIS?

Input between Phases I & II The recommended Mission Statement from phase I defined five areas of development for the improvement and sustenance of the division of Academic Affairs. As a starting point for Phase II these areas will be the focus of working groups charged with recommending initiatives in each area and presenting action plans for pursuing those initiatives. To ensure that these working groups have enough influence and information to complete these tasks, each group will be co-chaired by a dean. Direct dialogue and administrative investment in the efforts of each working group will be critical to the success of this process. During preliminary meetings with the newly arrived deans, some recommendations were put forward to modify the Mission Statement endorsed by the Senate. These recommendations will certainly influence discussion within the working groups during the coming months.

Themes Emphasis Proposed by Phase I Task Force Report Recommended by Deans Liberal ArtsLiberal Education EngagingEngagement CollegialShared Stewardship ExperientialExperiential Learning DiverseDiversity

Mission Statement Phase I Task Force Report Recommendation The Division of Academic Affairs advances rigorous teaching, learning, and scholarship in a student-focused environment by embracing experiential learning, engagement, and collegiality within a diverse liberal arts tradition. Deans’ Recommended Version The division of Academic Affairs empowers students to contribute responsibly and creatively to a diverse society. It provides students with access to quality teaching, learning and scholarship in a student focused environment through the pursuit of high impact practices such as experiential learning, community engagement, and global connectedness within the traditions of a liberal education.

Time to make choices The Academic Master Plan task force can not travel back in time to meet the May 2013 deadline originally proposed for completing Phase II. We can, realistically, present actionable recommendations to the college community and leadership by the close of this academic year. Since Phase III is intended as a period of evaluation, it would be ideal if the college was prepared to enact initiatives developed for the Academic Master Plan by the summer of Initiatives undertaken as part of the AMP would already be under way when work on the new Strategic Plan begins and could potentially be reinforced and developed

Planned working groups for Phase II Working groupDean Liberal Arts/Liberal EducationDr. Susan Turell, School of Social Science Engaging/EngagementDr. David Yen, School of Economics and Business Collegial/Shared StewardshipDr. Wade Thomas, School of Arts and Humanities Experiential/Experiential LearningDr. Venkat Sharma, School of Natural and Mathematical Sciences Diverse/DiversityDr. Richard Lee, School of Education and Human Ecology

Task Force Central Committee Andrew Kahl, Associate Professor of Theatre, Co-chair Patricia Francis, Associate Provost for Institutional Assessment and Effectiveness, Co-Chair Dr. Maria Thompson, Provost ( ex officio ) Five appointed/elected Senate representatives (each assigned to one working group) Deans (each dean will also appoint a co-chair within each working group who will also be invited to participate in meetings of the Central Committee)

Proposed structure for Phase II Academic Master Plan Phase II Central committee Co-chairs (2) Senate representatives (5) Deans (5) Working Group Co-Chairs(5) Student reps (2) Working group on Liberal Arts/Liberal Education Dean Turell Appointed Co- Chair Senate representative (1) Working group on Engaging/Engage ment Dean Yen Appointed Co- Chair Senate representative (1) Working group on Collegial/Shared Stewardship Dean Thomas Appointed Co- Chair Senate Representative (1) Working group on Experiential/Expe riential Learning Dean Sharma Appointed Co- Chair Senate Representative (1) Working group on Diverse/Diversity Dean Lee Appointed Co- Chair Senate Representative (1)

Working group membership Self-nomination to participate in working groups will be open to all member of the division of Academic Affairs. Preferences to work with particular groups will be observed with some concessions to balancing membership across all five groups. (Self nomination survey was ed this afternoon) vey.aspx?SurveyID=n4K3no51 vey.aspx?SurveyID=n4K3no51

Goals for the coming year Get ahead of the strategic plan Rapidly undertake discussion and planning within the five focus areas Directly involve administrators in the discussion who are capable of dedicating resources to new initiatives Advance concrete and prioritized action plans for public discussion from all five working groups, during spring 2014 Complete final draft of Academic Master Plan, Phase II document and present to Provost and college community during the summer of 2014.

Task force membership Central committee structure 2 Co-chairs 5 deans 5 Working group co-chairs 5 Senate-selected representatives 2 Student representatives Voluntary membership in task force workgroups – volunteer/self-nominate for particular groups with priority choices for principal areas of interest

Get involved While central committee and working group members are being selected, preliminary schedules and work group deadlines are being developed. Tentatively, the central committee is expecting to meet by the end of October with working groups meeting by early November. Now is the time to make your voice heard. The Academic Master Plan should be in place before a new Strategic Plan is drafted for the college. Action plans from each work group will take shape over the coming year. If you want to influence the direction of this division and this college please be ready to join one of the groups and bring your ideas to the table.