The HEARTH Act Changes to HUD’s Homeless Assistance Programs Norm Suchar October 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Advertisements

Housing First: Where it Works
Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) Department of Community Development May 13, 2009.
2014 HUD COC HOMELESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Applicant Workshop June 19 th, 2014.
US DOL-VETS 2007 Competitive Grantees Training Conference` August 7-9, 2007 Cynthia W. High, MSW US Department of Housing and Urban Development Office.
Impact of the HEARTH Act on Metro Denver Homeless Planning John Parvensky President Colorado Coalition for the Homeless.
Update on Continuum of Care and HMIS Presented by: Ann Oliva Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs U.S. Department of Housing and Urban.
HEARTH Act: Planning for Impact Julie Dixon The Planning Council.
1 Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) Overview April 2009.
Department of Housing & Urban Development Notice of Funding Availability (NoFA) for the Fiscal Year 2014 Funds in the FY2013- FY2014 Continuum of Care.
HEARTH Act Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing Act of 2009 Homelessness Awareness Day 2010 Governor’s Committee to End Homelessness.
Austin/Travis County CoC PSH Bonus SEPTEMBER 22,2014.
A SYSTEM IN TRANSITION: Shifting our priorities and programs to end homelessness Denise Neunaber North Carolina Coalition to End Homelessness securing.
Jack Peters, Director Office of Community Planning and Development Seattle Regional Office U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development WSCH Annual.
A Place to Call Home 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness November 2006.
Homeless Assistance in Ohio Changes in the 2012 Consolidated Plan.
Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) How to Apply – Technical Assistance Sessions March 18 & 19, 2010.
1 Help! I Don’t Speak Housing! Mattie Lord, UMOM New Day Centers Jeremy Rosen, National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty.
VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WORKGROUP Reallocate $ for more community based housing Need rapid rehousing dollars Adjust current grant to allow for more.
Continuum of Care (CoC)  Promotes community-wide commitment to the goal of ending homelessness.  Provides funding for efforts by nonprofit providers.
Shelters in the HEARTH era The Lyceum, Hartford, CT April 7, 2014 Katharine Gale
MaineHousing ~ Homeless Initiatives Department NCSHA Conference ~ October 2014.
WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS Indiana HPRP Training 1. TRAINERS: ANDREA WHITE & HOWARD BURCHMAN IHCDA STAFF: RODNEY STOCKMENT, KIRK WHEELER, KELLI BARKER &
OCTOBER 24, 2012 PRESENTED BY RENEE LAMBERJACK, RESEARCH & EVALUATION ASSISTANT Annual Homeless Assessment Report Presentation to Safe Harbors Partners.
HUD PERSPECTIVES FOR WASHINGTON STATE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS Jack Peters, Director Office of Community Planning and Development US Department of Housing.
Michael Roanhouse January 23, 2014 HUD Homeless Assistance Grants: Overview.
The Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Program: An Introductory Overview
Setting a Path to Ending Family Homelessness Presentation to the Early Childhood Cabinet July 30, 2015 Lisa Tepper Bates, CCEH Executive Director Think.
COSCDA Conference 2012 Washington, DC Susan Ziff, HUD March 12, 2012 Substantial Amendment Process for Second Allocation of FY 2011 ESG Funds.
The HEARTH Act Changes to HUD’s Homeless Assistance Programs Norm Suchar March 2010 COSCDA Conference.
Virginia Learning Collaboratives Reducing Family Homelessness in Virginia: A Rapid Re-Housing Approach.
HOUSING FIRST Broward County, FL Broward FL-601 Continuum of Care Board October 2014.
1 1 Preventing and Re-Defining Homelessness How New HUD Policies Will Help More Children, Youth, and Families Phillip Lovell First Focus Jeremy Rosen National.
HUD’s Homeless Assistance Ann Marie Oliva. Overview of Presentation Update on Status of Regulations FY 2013 and FY 2014 Budgets and Implications Policy.
Laura Skotnicki, Director of Administrative Services January 20, 2012 Housing First: Where it Works Institute for Children, Poverty & Homelessness.
Orientation to the Continuum of Care (CoC) July 29, 2014.
Continuum of Care Funding 2011 A Preview for Applicants July 28, 2011.
Establishing Partnerships with HUD & Housing Groups The HOW.
Emergency Solutions Grants Program February 2012.
HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION RAPID RE- HOUSING PROGRAM Sept 2010.
+ The New Emergency Solutions Grants Program Jenny Helbraun Abramson, Coordinator Sonoma County Continuum of Care Planning Group January 19, 2012.
Changes to the Federal Approach to Homelessness Kentucky Balance of State Frankfort, KY June 21, 2011 ( Slides adapted from presentations at the September.
The National Alliance to End Homelessness presents The HEARTH Academy Training and tools to help your community achieve the goals of the HEARTH Act.
Game-Change: Overview of the HEARTH Act Jason Satterfield Bridget Kurtt DeJong Piper Ehlen.
SNAPS Update for NCDA Michael Roanhouse Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
NCDA January 2009 Mark Johnston, DAS for Special Needs Programs Ann Marie Oliva, SNAPS Director Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs Community Planning.
COSCDA Conference 2012 Washington, DC Michael Roanhouse, HUD March 12, 2012 The Emergency Solutions Grants Program (ESG): An Overview.
The National Alliance to End Homelessness presents The HEARTH Academy Training and tools to help your community achieve the goals of the HEARTH Act.
Consolidated Homeless Fund Application Workshop Consolidated Homeless Fund Partnership January 2012.
Housing Department CITY COUNCIL HUD Continuum of Care 2015 Funding Application Anne Lansing, Project Planner November 2, 2015.
2015 HUD Continuum of Care NOFA Bidder’s Conference 1.Review of Community Input Session 2.Local Process and Strategic Changes 3.Application Highlights.
2015 NOFA Committee Orientation. A Continuum of Care (CoC) is a regional or local planning body that coordinates housing and services funding for homeless.
Austin/Travis County FY2015 CoC Renewal & PSH Bonus SEPTEMBER 28, 2015.
FY 2015 Continuum of Care Application Priorities and Process Presentation to the Lake County Coalition for the Homeless April 7, 2015.
 Award of $923,339  Substantial Amendment › $300,000Homelessness Prevention › $480,000 Rapid Re-housing › $80,000 Housing Relocation and Stabilization.
2015 NOFA Committee Orientation. A Continuum of Care (CoC) is a regional or local planning body that coordinates housing and services funding for homeless.
The HEARTH Academy System Assessment and Design October 2010.
COSCDA, Des Moines September 21, 2011 CPD Program Updates.
Ann Oliva, Director Brett Gagnon, Program Specialist Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs HEARTH Act: Continuum of Care Program.
Austin/Travis County FY2016 CoC New & PH Bonus Funds MAY 6, 2016.
Minneapolis/Hennepin County Continuum of Care for the Homeless 2016 Request for Proposals Pre-applications for potential new projects are being solicited.
POTENTIAL FUNDING RESOURCES CHRONIC HOMELESS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING & SERVICES.
Presenter: Darrick Mallad.  In the beginning………..
April 21 at 10:00 a.m. Presented by the John Burton Foundation & California Coalition for Youth Follow the Money: What’s In Store for Federal HUD Funds.
2017 Continuum of Care: New Project Informational session
Mountainland Continuum of Care
Appalachian Regional Coalition on Homelessness August 1, 2017
Overview of HUD’s Competitive Programs
The National Alliance to End Homelessness presents The HEARTH Academy Training and tools to help your community achieve the goals of the HEARTH Act.
CITY COUNCIL HUD Continuum of Care 2018 Funding Application
Presentation transcript:

The HEARTH Act Changes to HUD’s Homeless Assistance Programs Norm Suchar October 2009

Overview HEARTH Act Enacted May 20, 2009 Changes HUD’s McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance programs First significant reauthorization since 1992

Overview Major Changes More Administrative Funding Emphasizes –Prevention –Rapid Re-Housing –Chronic homelessness Focus on Outcomes Rural Flexibility

Overview Timeline Most changes take effect in the NOFA to be released in Spring/Summer 2011 Regulations recently released Public comment period

Formula and Competitive Funding Old (2008)New Formula (ESG) 10% Competitive (CoC) 90% Competitive (CoC) 80% Formula (ESG) 20%

Changes to the ESG (Formula) Program Old Name: Emergency Shelter Grants Distribution: Formula to Cities, Counties, and States Admin: Up to 5% for administrative expenses Eligible Activities: –Shelter renovating, rehab, conversion –Operating Emergency Shelter (limit of 10% for staffing) –Services in Shelter or for outreach (max. 30%) –Prevention (limited, targets people with sudden loss of income, max 30%) New Name: Emergency Solutions Grants Distribution: Same Admin: Up to 7.5% for administrative expenses Eligible Activities: –Same as now plus HPRP activities (except that prevention has to target below 30% of AMI) –No cap on prevention, services, or staffing –Minimum of 40% must be for prevention and Rapid Re-Housing (with a hold- harmless provision)

Another way to look at ESG changes New ESG = Old ESG + HPRP Roughly the same amount of funding for emergency shelters New funding for homelessness prevention and Rapid Re-Housing similar to HUD’s HPRP

Continuum of Care (competitive) Program Old 3 programs Supportive Housing Program (SHP)—including permanent supportive housing, transitional housing, safe havens, and supportive services only projects Shelter Plus Care (SPC)—rental subsidies for permanent supportive housing Mod. Rehab./SRO—seldom used, provides long-term rental subsidies for moderate rehabilitation of single room occupancy buildings New Single Continuum of Care program Includes all of the eligible activities of the 3 former programs More flexibility for mixing and matching eligible activities Explicitly specifies re-housing services as an eligible activity Up to 10 percent for admin. Costs (previous amount was 5% for SHP and 8% for SPC Reasonable costs for staff training

Continuum of Care (competitive) Application Old Providers in community jointly apply for funding Stakeholders in community review and rank applications Application has two parts –Exhibit 1 is the community wide part, which includes information about the number of homeless people, community resources and gaps, and capacity to administer homeless assistance –Exhibit 2 includes individual project applications New Similar to existing process. Application will be submitted by Collaborative Applicant, which will be eligible for 3% of the communities award for admin. Application will be more focused on performance, including: –Reducing lengths of homeless episodes –Reducing recidivism back into homelessness –Reducing the number of people who become homeless

Continuum of Care (matching funds) Old Match requirement varies depending on activity –25% for services, must be cash –100% for rental assistance, must be in-kind services –100% for construction/rehab –33% for operating expenses –No match for leasing New Uniform 25% match except for leasing projects –Match can be community-wide, meaning some projects can have higher matches to offset projects with lower matches –Match can be cash or in-kind when documented by Memorandum of Understanding

Additional Requirements Projects that serve families cannot refuse to serve families because of the age of the children (i.e. must serve families with adolescent children) Projects must identify person who will be responsible for coordinating child’s education

HMIS HMIS = Homeless Management Information System Collaborative Applicant is responsible for ensuring that everyone participates in HMIS

Incentives Old Communities that score well on their application are eligible for a bonus permanent supportive housing project. In some years, the bonus project had to serve individuals without children experiencing chronic homelessness. New Communities that score well will be eligible for a bonus for proven strategies, including— –Permanent supportive housing for individuals or families with children experiencing chronic homelessness –Rapid Re-Housing that serves homeless families –Other activities that HUD determines are effective at reducing homelessness –Communities that fully implement a proven strategy can receive a bonus to do whatever they determine is necessary

Unified Funding Agencies Old Each project submits to HUD an application for funding, and HUD enters into a contract with each project sponsor New Communities may designate a Unified Funding Agency to receive a direct grant from HUD and then subgrant to project sponsors Project Sponsor HUD Project Sponsor HUD Unified Funding Agency

Unified Funding Agencies A Collaborative Applicant could apply to become a Unified Funding Agency (UFA) or HUD could designate a Collaborative Applicant as a UFA UFAs would be responsible for ensuring audits and appropriate fiscal controls UFAs would be eligible for up to 3% of a communities award for administrative expenses (on top of the 3% that a collaborative applicant could receive)

Rural Areas Old Rural homelessness program was never funded. Rural Applicants were treated the same as other applicants New Rural Continuums of Care may apply for funding under a different more flexible set of conditions –Allowed to serve people who are homeless or at risk of homelessness with their competitive funding –May use up to 20% of funding for capacity building –Compete with other rural programs for funding

Rural Areas Rural area defined as— Being located in a rural state (Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, or Wyoming); Being a CoC with no Metropolitan Statistical Areas; or Being in a CoC with only a rural part of an MSA included in the boundary (HUD will provide more specific definitions later)

Definition of Homelessness/Eligibility Old Except for a small amount for prevention, homeless assistance could only serve homeless people which includes people living in the following places –On the streets or in a place not meant for human habitation –In an emergency shelter –In a transitional housing program –In housing, but being evicted within 7 days and not having resources or support networks to obtain housing –Fleeing domestic violence New ESG funding can be used to serve people at risk of homelessness. All programs can serve homeless people, including those previously considered homeless and –People who are losing their housing in 14 days and lack support networks or resources to obtain housing –People who have moved from place to place and are likely to continue to do so because of disability or other barriers Communities may use up to 10% (more in some cases) of CoC funds to serve people who are living doubled up, or in motels.

Additional Changes Bigger capital grants Non-competitive renewals for PSH 15-year contracts subject to funding for project-based PSH All Permanent Housing Activities are adjusted for inflation at renewal

Implications 1.More focus on preventing homelessness and reducing lengths of stay in homelessness. 2.Funding will focus on homelessness prevention, permanent supportive housing, and Rapid Re-Housing. 3.Bigger role for Collaborative Applicants

Contact Norm Suchar Senior Policy Analyst National Alliance to End Homelessness