July 2004 doc.: IEEE 15-04-0376-00-004a Submission Slide 1 Philippe Rouzet, STM Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE Submission September 2008 A. Batra, S. Hosur, TI; O. Omeni, ToumazSlide 1 NOTE: Update all red fields replacing with.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE a Submission 21 July, 2005 Kyung-Kuk Lee, John Lampe Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
IEEE g Submission Cheolho Shin & Sangsung Choi, ETRI Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /0136r0 Submission March 2006 Abbie Mathew, NewLANS Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Submission.
Doc.: IEEE s Submission July 2015 Hidetoshi Yokora, Landis&GyrSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: g September, 2011 Daniel Popa, Ruben Salazar Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
IEEE r q Submission Sept 2014 B. Rolfe (BCA)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE a TG4a September 20, 2005 L. Reggiani, G.M. Maggio and P. RouzetSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
March 2004 doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 1 Philippe Rouzet, STM Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission March 2015 Byung-Jae Kwak et al., ETRISlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Drafting of IEEE e.
July 2004 Jay Bain, Fearn Consulting doc.: IEEE /0379r0 Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /241r0 Submission May 2004 Reed Fisher Oki Electric IndustrySlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2004 Larry Taylor (Staccato)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission doc. : IEEE March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /214r1 Submission July 2000 Grant B. Carlson, Eastman Kodak Co. Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE q Submission ETRI September 2012 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /229r0 Submission 07/2000 Jim Lansford, MobilianSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE r3 Submission November 2004 Michael Mc Laughlin, decaWaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /317r0 Submission September, 2000 Allen Heberling, Eastman Kodak, CompanySlide 1 NOTE: Update all red fields replacing with your information;
a Slide 1 Michael Mc Laughlin, decaWave Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Doc.: IEEE /327 Submission July 2002 Intel Research and Development Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE a TG4a May 15, 2005 Philippe Rouzet (STMicroelectronics)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /0160r0 Submission March 2004 Dr. John R. Barr, MotorolaSlide 1 Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE COEX-02/004r0 Submission 23 January, 2001 James P. K. Gilb, Appairent Technologies Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission June 2005 Dani Raphaeli, SandLinks Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
May 18, 2006 Slide 1 doc.: IEEE c Submission Ali Sadri (Intel Corporation) Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE Submission, Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Communicating.
Doc.: IEEE g TG4g Presentation Jan 2010 C.S. Sum1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)‏
Doc.: IEEE g Submission March 2011 Xing Tao (SIMIT/WSNIRI), Khanh Tuan Le (TI) Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission September 2004 Michael Mc Laughlin, decaWaveSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /0518 Submission November 2003 Dr. John R. Barr, MotorolaSlide 1 Project: IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0339r0 Jul 2004 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:
Doc.: IEEE e Submission July 2009 Andy Summers, Skip Ashton, EmberSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
May 15, 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4a UWB PHY Pulse Peak to Peak voltage.
Submission Title: [Comment resolution for i-31]
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> March 2004
May 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group report]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<May,2009> doc.: IEEE <doc .....> <July 2009>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
January 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group report]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
July 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Uncoordinated Deletion of Sub-Carriers in.
January 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group report]
Date Submitted: [March 13, 2011] Source:[Ben Rolfe] Company [BCA, SSN]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
May 203 doc.: IEEE r1 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
January 2003 doc.: IEEE /056r0 May 2004
September 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group.
doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Sep 19, 2007 June 2009
Submission Title: [Frame and packet structure in ]
November 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group report]
May 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group report]
September 2005 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group.
平成31年4月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 July 2008 doc.: IEEE c
March 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3c Technical Requirement sub-group report]
May 2018 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: z Comments on ax Coexistence Assurance.
Jul 12, /12/10 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4n Chinese Medical Band Closing.
<month year> doc.: IEEE s March 2019
Submission Title: Opening Report for the TG6 Session in September 2008
5 May mai 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TG4a UWB PHY preamble/modulation.
Tero Kivinen, INSIDE Secure
Submission Title: Opening Report for the TG6 Session in November 2008
Submission Title: [TG4a-TRD&Selection-Criteria-doc-status-Anaheim ]
July 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Flexible DSSS Merging Effort] Date Submitted:
Submission Title: TG9ma Agenda for September Meeting
May 203 doc.: IEEE r2 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
Presentation transcript:

July 2004 doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 1 Philippe Rouzet, STM Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:[TG4a-Selection-Criteria-doc-status-Portland ] Date Submitted:[13 July 2004] Source:[Philippe Rouzet, TG4a Technical Editor], Company [STMicroelectronics] Address:[STMicroelectronics, 39 Chemin du Champ des Filles 1228 Geneve Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland] Voice:[ ], FAX: [ ], Re:[IEEE P SG4a CFA] Abstract:[TG4a is in the process of drafting the Selection Criteria Document for the requirements to be used in the selection process for a PHY Draft Standard for P a and has nearly completed the Technical Requirement Doc ] Purpose:[Status of the current Selection Criteria Draft (July 2004 –Portland IEEE session) and plan for the next steps] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

July 2004 doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 2 Philippe Rouzet, STM TG4a PORTLAND Selection Criteria Doc (SCD) Status available on the reflector (draft form) –SCD rev 4 (of TG4a) : a- tg4a-alt-phy-selection-criteria.doc

July 2004 doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 3 Philippe Rouzet, STM TG4a PORTLAND Selection criteria doc (SCD) 1/5 First session dealing with SCD started March 17 th. 8 conf.calls so far +Anaheim and Portland meeting See exchanges through the reflector and conf. calls or meeting minutes The group agreed to start using the structure of 15.3a SCD (03031r9P802-15_TG3a-PHY-Selection-Criteria.doc) Note: in the next slides ref. to the SCD doc. are as follow : [5.6.2]

July 2004 doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 4 Philippe Rouzet, STM TG4a PORTLAND Selection criteria doc 2/5 Status Draft agreed up to [5.1.2] inclusive 2 minor additions or modifications to be discussed : –[3.5.2] ranging –[ ] interference model

July 2004 doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 5 Philippe Rouzet, STM TG4a PORTLAND Selection criteria doc 3/5 Actions –One more item proposed: aggregated throughput Definition Figures Q. to answer: Impact on the modeling (e.g. SOP) see [5.3] ?

July 2004 doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 6 Philippe Rouzet, STM TG4a PORTLAND Selection criteria doc 4/5 Sections to complete now: [5.2] PHY-SAP payload bit rate and Data throughput (S) (editor comment: mainly references to MAC structure) [5.3] Simultaneously operating piconets (C) (editor comments: this section is critical in that sense that it has a major impact : –On the performance results as expressed in the proposals –On the amount of simulations proposers will have to perform also see annex to this doc) [5.4] Signal Acquisition (S) (editor comment: please express view on the target acquisition time) [5.5] System Performance (S) Note: (S) : mainly editing work (C) more complex : discussion must be conducted on principles and methods

July 2004 doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 7 Philippe Rouzet, STM TG4a PORTLAND Selection criteria doc 5/5 Sections to complete now: [5.7] Link Budget (S) (editor comment: please check the table structure and equations definition) [5.8] Power management modes (S) (editor comments: please check the consistency with ) [5.9] Power Consumption (S) (editor comment: please express view on the target acquisition time) [5.5] Antenna Practibility (S) (editor comment: please provide appropriate information on the form factor)

July 2004 doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 8 Philippe Rouzet, STM TG4a PORTLAND Selection criteria doc Annex: simulations for range estimation and S.O.P. performance ( excerpt from a mail sent to 15.4a group on 9 July 2004 in preparation of this session) * The first discussion is about the rationales. Do we need this section? […general opinion is that] we need to compare proposals on this criteria since a number of applications suggest that many uncoordinated 15.4a piconets will coexist in relatively small areas. * The second point (if yes for the first one)is how to assess. - we need to unambiguousy provide a method, a describes one possible method (see note 1)in section 5.3), […], - we need to take care of minimizing the simulation time a could provide some specificities (larger range, moving nodes,...)

July 2004 doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 9 Philippe Rouzet, STM TG4a PORTLAND Selection criteria doc Annex: simulations for range estimation and S.O.P. performance Summary of the method (simplified, other interpretations exist) 2 stages: * Stage1 : for a couple (TX, RX), without interferer Determine the max. distance dref function of given PER (8%)and given packet length. For each CM (CM1, CM3, CM4), 100 channel drawings are provided (fixed for all proposers), CM1 to CM100 Proposers simulate TX (e.g 200 random packets per CMi --> average d(CMi)). Then the 10 worst results are eliminated and the next worst is selected, giving the max distance. (we have, after sorting: CMs1 to CMs10 eliminated, CMs11 --> dref, CMs12 to CMs100 It's an iterative process: When you reach 8% PER you are done (if not iterate your simulation) (Note […]introduce a shadowing effect and [see] how it affects the channels drawings and the simulation results)

July 2004 doc.: IEEE a Submission Slide 10 Philippe Rouzet, STM TG4a PORTLAND Selection criteria doc Annex: simulations for range estimation and S.O.P. performance * stage 2 : with one interferer [then same method for 2 and 3 interferers] First add 6dBs of received energy to the receiver (renormalize) (which is: new dref =dref* 0.707) Second select a subset of the channels for the ref. link (TX, RX) and another (no autocorrelation) for the interference link (Txinterf, RX) […] : CMs11 to CMs15 for (TX,RX), CMs16 to CMs20 for (Txinterf, RX) And perform the same kind of operations to determine min distance dinterf. where you still get 8% (in fact it's dint/dref ratio). [in] chapter […] many variations were asked (Cmi versus CMj,several interferers, different bit rates, as many different modulations types as defined in the proposals). Also some side effects : e.g. Code rate affects the length of the frame (in-air).