Fault Location EE 526 Venkat Mynam Senior Research Engineer Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories
Accurate Fault Location is Critical Expedite Service Restoration Reduce outage times Identify insulator problems Prevent potential recurring faults Verify Protective Relay Performance
Permanent Fault Need Immediate Attention We need accurate fault location
Temporary Faults Needs Attention Too Identify & Fix Damaged Insulators-Minimize Fault Recurrence
Hard to Find a Flashed Insulator Fault location investigations
Finding Faults
Visual Methods
Estimate Location From Current “JM Drop” circa 1936 Approximate fault location was calculated based on system and line parameters
Methods in Use Line impedance Based Traveling Wave Based Measure impedance to fault Compare it to the actual line impedance Traveling Wave Based Measure wave arrival time
System One-Line and Circuit Representation of System Fault
Modified Takagi Method-Single Ended (Negative Sequence) Multiply by I2 and save Imaginary part Zero For: Rf=0 or system is homogeneous
IEEE Guide Defines Homogeneous System “A transmission system where the local and remote source impedances have the same angle as the line impedance”
Single End Impedance Method Accuracy of zero-sequence line impedance Effect of zero-sequence mutual coupling from parallel lines Time synchronization Communication Radial topology Fault resistance System nonhomogeneity Accuracy of measurements Accuracy of positive-sequence line impedance
SE Impedance Fault Location Phase-Ground Faults 𝑚𝐴𝐺= 𝐼𝑚 𝑉𝐴𝐺∙ 𝐼 2 𝑎 ∗ 𝐼𝑚 𝑍1𝐿∙ 𝐼𝐴𝐺+𝑘0∙𝐼𝐺 ∙ 𝐼 2 𝑎 ∗ 𝑚𝐵𝐺= 𝐼𝑚(𝑉𝐵𝐺∙ 𝐼 2 𝑏 ∗ ) 𝐼𝑚(𝑍1𝐿∙(𝐼𝐵𝐺+𝑘0∙𝐼𝐺)∙ 𝐼 2 𝑏 ∗ ) 𝑚𝐶𝐺= 𝐼𝑚 𝑉𝐶𝐺∙ 𝐼 2 𝑐 ∗ 𝐼𝑚 𝑍1𝐿∙ 𝐼𝐶𝐺+𝑘0∙𝐼𝐺 ∙ 𝐼 2 𝑐 ∗ 𝐼 2 𝑏 =𝑎∙𝐼 2 𝑎 𝐼 2 𝑐 = 𝑎 2 ∙𝐼 2 𝑎
SE Impedance Fault Location Multi-Phase Faults 𝑚𝐴𝐵= 𝐼𝑚 𝑉𝐴𝐵∙ 𝑗∙𝐼 2 𝑐 ∗ 𝐼𝑚 𝑍1𝐿∙𝐼𝐵𝐶∙ 𝑗∙𝐼 2 𝑐 ∗ 𝑚𝐵𝐶= 𝐼𝑚 𝑉𝐵𝐶∙ (𝑗∙𝐼 2 𝑎 ) ∗ 𝐼𝑚 𝑍1𝐿∙𝐼𝐵𝐶∙ (𝑗∙𝐼 2 𝑎 ) ∗ 𝑚𝐶𝐴= 𝐼𝑚 𝑉𝐶𝐴∙ (𝑗∙𝐼 2 𝑏 ) ∗ 𝐼𝑚 𝑍1𝐿∙𝐼𝐶𝐴∙ (𝑗∙𝐼 2 𝑏 ) ∗ 𝑚3𝑃= 𝐼𝑚 𝑉∅∅∙ 𝐼∅∅ ∗ 𝐼𝑚 𝑍1𝐿∙𝐼∅∅∙ 𝐼∅∅ ∗ 𝐼 2 𝑏 =𝑎∙𝐼 2 𝑎 𝐼 2 𝑐 = 𝑎 2 ∙𝐼 2 𝑎
Fault Loop Selection and Reporting Select appropriate Fault Loop Report a single fault location value Select a window of data from the fault data Provide the average value of fault location computed from the selected window
Modified Takagi Method-Multi Ended (Using Remote terminal current) Multiply by I2 and save Imaginary part THIS IS ZERO
Multi-End I2 Total Current Fault resistance System nonhomogeneity Accuracy of measurements Accuracy of positive-sequence line impedance Accuracy of zero-sequence line impedance Effect of zero-sequence mutual coupling from parallel lines Time synchronization Communication
ME_I Impedance Fault Location Phase-Ground Faults 𝑚𝐴𝐺= 𝐼𝑚 𝑉𝐴𝐺∙ 𝐼 2𝑇 𝑎 ∗ 𝐼𝑚 𝑍1𝐿∙ 𝐼𝐴𝐺+𝑘0∙𝐼𝐺 ∙ 𝐼 2𝑇 𝑎 ∗ 𝑚𝐵𝐺= 𝐼𝑚(𝑉𝐵𝐺∙ 𝐼 2𝑇 𝑏 ∗ ) 𝐼𝑚(𝑍1𝐿∙(𝐼𝐵𝐺+𝑘0∙𝐼𝐺)∙ 𝐼 2𝑇 𝑏 ∗ ) 𝑚𝐶𝐺= 𝐼𝑚 𝑉𝐶𝐺∙ 𝐼 2𝑇 𝑐 ∗ 𝐼𝑚 𝑍1𝐿∙ 𝐼𝐶𝐺+𝑘0∙𝐼𝐺 ∙ 𝐼 2𝑇 𝑐 ∗ 𝐼 2𝑇 𝑏 =𝑎∙𝐼 2𝑇 𝑎 𝐼 2𝑇 𝑐 = 𝑎 2 ∙𝐼 2𝑇 𝑎 𝐼2𝑇=𝐼2𝐿𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙+𝐼2𝑅𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑒
ME Impedance Fault Location Multi-Phase Faults 𝑚𝐴𝐵= 𝐼𝑚 𝑉𝐴𝐵∙ 𝑗∙𝐼 2𝑇 𝑐 ∗ 𝐼𝑚 𝑍1𝐿∙𝐼𝐵𝐶∙ 𝑗∙𝐼 2𝑇 𝑐 ∗ 𝑚𝐵𝐶= 𝐼𝑚 𝑉𝐵𝐶∙ (𝑗∙𝐼 2𝑇 𝑎 ) ∗ 𝐼𝑚 𝑍1𝐿∙𝐼𝐵𝐶∙ (𝑗∙𝐼 2𝑇 𝑎 ) ∗ 𝑚𝐶𝐴= 𝐼𝑚 𝑉𝐶𝐴∙ (𝑗∙𝐼 2𝑇 𝑏 ) ∗ 𝐼𝑚 𝑍1𝐿∙𝐼𝐶𝐴∙ (𝑗∙𝐼 2𝑇 𝑏 ) ∗ 𝑚3𝑃= 𝐼𝑚 𝑉∅∅∙ 𝐼∅∅𝑇 ∗ 𝐼𝑚 𝑍1𝐿∙𝐼∅∅∙ 𝐼∅∅𝑇 ∗ 𝐼 2𝑇 𝑏 =𝑎∙𝐼 2𝑇 𝑎 𝐼 2𝑇 𝑐 = 𝑎 2 ∙𝐼 2𝑇 𝑎 𝐼2𝑇=𝐼2𝐿𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙+𝐼2𝑅𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑒 𝐼∅∅𝑇 =𝐼∅∅𝐿𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙+𝐼∅∅𝑅𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑒
Multi Ended Negative Sequence Using Remote terminal voltage and current ref V2F +
Use Synchronized Measurements to Calculate Voltage at Fault Point
Double End With V2 and I2 Fault resistance System nonhomogeneity Accuracy of measurements Accuracy of positive-sequence line impedance Accuracy of zero-sequence line impedance Effect of zero-sequence mutual coupling from parallel lines Time synchronization Communication
Multi-End Fault Location That Does Not Require Data Alignment Each Relay Receives: Magnitude and Angle of Z2R ½I2R½
Local and Remote Data Necessary for Fault Location Rearrange Above Equation to Form a Quadratic Equation Solve Quadratic for Fault Location m Download Paper
Multi-End Methods Needs Time Synchronized Data Synchrophasors Synchronized samples Devices with data acquisition synchronized to a common time source Fixed sampling rate
Series Compensated Lines Line Side PT Bus Side PT Challenges Steady State Transient (phasor estimate is not stable) Subsynchronous MOV and bypass breaker switching Download Paper
Three-Terminal Line
Reduce From Three-Terminal Line to Two-Terminal Equivalent V2_SP = V2S – Z2L_SP • I2S V2_TP = V2T – Z2L_TP • I2T Same Result V2_UP = V2U – Z2L_UP • I2U
Use Two-Terminal Equivalent to Solve for m I2_Eq = I2T + I2U V2_Eq = V2_TP Solve for m using SE or Multi-terminal (ME_I, ME) ME_I
Mutually Coupled Lines Download Paper
Composite Lines Identifies faulted line section Calculates distance to fault
Intersection of Voltage Profiles Identifies Faulted Section
Calculate Distance to Fault Within Faulted Section using ME method Download Paper
Impedance Method Approach Summary Measure VA, VB, VC, IA, IB, IC Extract fundamental components Determine phasors and fault type Apply impedance algorithm
Impedance Fault Location Methods Single-End Method using local voltage and currents SE Multi-End Method using local voltage and currents, and remote currents MEI Multi-End Method using local and remote voltage and currents ME
Some of the Challenging Situations for Z based Fault Location Methods Short faults: faster relays and breakers- phasor estimate is not stable Faults associated with time-varying fault resistance-phasor estimate is not stable Series compensation
Short Duration Faults Raw-Blue, Cosine Filtered-Green Magnitude of Filtered Quantity-Red
Lightning and Faults Launch Traveling Waves tL tR Download Paper
Double Ended TW Fault Location
Single-End TW Fault Locator
Image courtesy of Google Results From Field 117.11km, 161 kV line 18 sections with 4 different tower configurations Challenges with existing impedance based fault location methods Image courtesy of Google
Fault Location Results (161kV, 117.11km long line) TW Patrol SE_Z ME_Z_I ME_Z CG 109.74 109.29 105.44 106.24 106.56 BG 61.12 61.41 54.75 60.69 60.70 108.23 107.60 101.59 106.43 98.85 98.98 95.20 98.37
Temporary Fault Due to Insulator Flashover
Insulator Flashover