Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soybean Plant Population. How Low Can We Go?. Introduction  Recent research indicates we may be planting higher populations then necessary Improved varieties.
Advertisements

Duane Friend Extension Educator.  Funding for the study was through the Illinois Department of Agriculture Sustainable Ag Grant program  Additional.
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Manure is a Resource Ron Wiederholt Nutrient Management Specialist NDSU Extension Livestock Manure Nutrient Management Series March, 2006.
Current Nitrogen Fertilization Strategies for Corn in Nebraska Richard Ferguson Bob Caldwell.
EVALUATION OF GREENSEEKER FOR NITROGEN FETILIZATION IN COTTON ALABAMA REPORT 1 Evaluation of Green Seeker for Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton – Preliminary.
Experiences with PSNT in North Carolina David H. Hardy Soil Testing Section Agronomic Division- NCDA&CS.
Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is estimated to be 33% throughout the world, and can be lower in single, pre-plant applications compared with split nitrogen.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Immediate and Residual Effects of Urea and Pelleted Poultry Manure on Corn and Soil in.
Evaluation Nitrogen and Phosphorus Placement With Strip Tillage for Irrigated Pacific Northwest Corn Production David Tarkalson and Dave Bjorneberg Agricultural.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
Fertilizing potatoes with biofuel byproducts Amber Moore, Ph.D University of Idaho Twin Falls Research and Extension Center.
Triticale For P Removal Brad Brown University of Idaho 2008 Idaho Nutrient Management Conference.
2008 Utah Oilseed Crop Performance Trial Pace*, M.G. and Israelsen, C. Michael Pace Extension Agent Utah State University 195 W 1100 S Brigham City UT.
Sensor research and algorithm development for corn in ND L.K. Sharma, D.W. Franzen, H. Bu, R. Ashley, G. Endres and J. Teboh North Dakota State University,
Due to (1) the impact of N on plant production, its economical and environmental impact, (2) the scale of energy needed to face worldwide demand, (3) the.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Managing Manure for Crop Production when Feeding DDGS Kyle Jensen ISU Extension Field Specialist-Crops.
Outline Introduction – Importance for SE Mississippi State – Sensor Comparison – Wavelength/Index Analysis University of Arkansas – Active detection of.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
The Effects of Topdressing Organic Nitrogen on Hard Red Winter Wheat - Year 2 Name: Erica Cummings Date: March 15, 2012 Title: Crops and Soils Technician.
Nitrogen Use Efficiency Workshop Canopy Reflectance Signatures: Developing a Crop Need-Based Indicator for Sidedress Application of N Fertilizer to Canola.
1 Cotton 2005 Ouachita Fertilizer River Parishes.
Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations and N Issues Dave Franzen, PhD Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University, Fargo,
Matt Ruark Dept. Soil Sci. CORN STOVER REMOVAL AND SOIL FERTILITY.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Tracy Blackmer Peter Kyveryga Advancing Agricultural Performance ® 1 Iowa Soybean Association On-Farm Network®
Evaluation of the System of Rice Intensification in Bhutan Karma Lhendup Faculty of Agriculture College of Natural Resources Royal University of Bhutan.
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
Active-Crop Sensor Calibration Using the Virtual-Reference Concept K. H. Holland (Holland Scientific) J. S. Schepers (USDA-ARS, retired) 8 th ECPA Conference.
Chapter 3: Soil Sampling And Soil Sensing
Insecticide Application Method and Chemistry Evaluation for Sweetpotato Production in the Mississippi Delta Larry C. Adams and Randall G. Luttrell USDA-ARS,
Current N Fertilization
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Jac J. Varco1, Robert E. Earnest1, and Jimmy D. Johnson2
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Highway 56 West Adams, MN Lynn Lagerstedt.
Current N Fertilization Strategy for Corn in Missouri Newell Kitchen Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri USDA-ARS.
Moving Beyond NDVI for Active Sensing in Cotton
N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.
Demonstration of In-Season Nitrogen Management Strategies for Corn Production John Sawyer John Lundvall Jennifer Hawkins Department of Agronomy Iowa State.
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
Manure and Environmental Impacts Amber Moore et al. Extension Soil Fertility Specialist University of Idaho Twin Falls, Idaho.
IRRIGATED CORN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN FERTILIZATION IN THE COLORADO ARKANSAS VALLEY Ardell Halvorson 1, Frank Schweissing 2, Michael Bartolo 2, and Curtis.
Phosphorus Fertilization Reduced Hessian Fly Infestation of Spring Wheat S. E. Petrie and K. E. Rhinhart Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon.
Regional Project Objectives  To evaluate the performance of sensor-based N recommendation algorithms across a wide range of soil and climate conditions.
Irrigation Method Impacts on Peanut Pod Yield. S. Leininger 1, L. J
Exploratory Research in Corn
Economics of Crop Production
Variable Rate Nitrogen
Evaluation of early drought tolerant maize genotypes under low nitrogen conditions Nyasha E. Goredema1, Ms Nakai Goredema2, Ezekia Svotwa1, Gabriel Soropa1,
Agronomic Crops & Field Management
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech
HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES?
RISER Row-crop Irrigation Science Extension and Research
Fig 1: Nitrogen fertilizer application at V7.
Evaluation of Pre-Side Dress Nitrate Test for Corn in Minnesota
Dhurba Neupane1, Juan Solomon2 and Jay Davison3
How High Should NUE Be, and Can Knowing Soil N Help Us Get There
and No-Tillage under Various Crop Rotations.
2017 NUE Conference Baton Rouge, LA – August 7 - 9, 2017
Strategies for Split N Applications for Corn
Predicting Winter Wheat Grain Yield under Grazed and Non-Grazed Production Systems Jason Lawles.
Objective: To discuss the current regional project and identify improvements needed for conducting future collaborative sensor-based research.
HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES?
Variability in Corn Response to N Fertilizer along a 1000-ft Hillslope
Validating the effects of Plant Catalyst in Fertilizer Reduction on Yield and Quality of Burley Tobacco and Maize in Malawi.
Presentation transcript:

Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress

Acknowledgement Research was funded by Arkansas Corn and Grain Sorghum Promotion Board

Presentation outline Backgrounds Information Presidedress soil nitrate test (PSNT) Using chlorophyll meters

Mississippi Delta Region of Arkansas (MDRA) MS River Delta Region of Arkansas Soils: predominantly alluvial Topography: relatively flat land One of the oldest row crop production regions

Corn Production in Arkansas YEAR Acres Planted X 1000

Urea Price YEAR $ / Ton

Current AR corn N fertility recommendations Yield Goal Silt and sandy loams Clay loam and clay soil - bu/acre lb N /acre >

Long-term sustainability of corn production Protect water quality Profit margin

Presentation outline Backgrounds Information Presidedress soil nitrate test (PSNT) Using a chlorophyll meter

The PSNT idea Apply a small amount of N (30-40 lb/acre) at planting Collect a soil sample from 0-12” depth at 6-8-leaf stage Use the PSNT result as a guide to identify and apply the optimum N rate

Objectives For irrigated corn production in MRDRA Evaluate the effect of sidedress N-fertilizer rate on corn grain yield Assess the suitability of PSNT for improving corn N fertility management

Research Approach 21 replicated field experiments – Production fields and AES sites across the MRDRA – Experimental Design: – Randomized complete block with 4-5 replications – Five or six N rates Total N rates: lb N/acre – Year 1 and 2: 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 300 lb N/acre – Year 3: 0, 60, 120, 180, lb N/acre Cultural Practices: – AES Sites: Cooperative Extension Service recommendations – Commercial sites: Growers’ Practices

Nitrogen fertilizer application schedule Total N ratePre-plantAt 6-8 leaf lb N /acre

Important dates: –planted: 17 March to 4 June –sidedress N date: 4 May to 6 June (6-8 leaf stage) –harvest: 10 Aug to Sep 18 Soil sampling and analysis: – pre plant, top 6”, six cores/replication – measured NO 3 -N, pH, texture, Mehlich-3 nutrients – PSNT samples 6-8 leaf (before 2 nd N application) – zero to 12’’, six cores, 0 N plots – measured NO 3 -N by ISE Research Approach

Analysis of Variance: – to evaluate the effect of N rate on grain yield – sites were analyzed separately Calculated Relative Yield as: – (check plot yield/highest plot yield) X 100 Data Analysis

Results and Discussion

Properties of soil samples collected from the 0-6” depth before planting RangeSoil pHNO 3 -NSOMSandSiltClaySoil texture -- ppm % Min sandy loam Max clay

Summary of the Results PSNT (mg/kg): 4-36: all sites 4-10: 12 sites 10-20: 5 sites > 20: 4 sites Grain yield: – Significant N response: 20 sites, P≤ – Zero N treatments: (bu/acre) –Highest N rate: (bu/acre) –State average: (bu/acre) Agronomic Optimum N rate: – (lb/acre)

Correlation between PSNT and relative yield of the check plot (All 21 sites) PSNT (ppm) Relative yield (%)

Correlation between PSNT and relative yield of the check plot (sandy loam and silt loam sites, 16 sites) PSNT (ppm) Relative yield (%)

Conclusions of PSNT Study In irrigated corn production in MRDRA Sidedress application of N significantly increased corn grain yield in 20 of the 21 sites Agronomic Optimum N rate was lb/acre Presidedress soil nitrate test shows great promise for improving corn N fertility management

Presentation outline Backgrounds Information Presidedress soil nitrate test Using a chlorophyll meter

Basic Idea Establish a well fertilized N reference strip in your field Collect chlorophyll meter reading from plants in area you may want to fertilize Collect chlorophyll meter reading from your reference strip Calculate relative chlorophyll meter value (RCM) CM reading from are you want to fertilize RCM = CM reading from the reference area 34.6 RCM = 58.0 = 0.59

Research Approach 5 replicated field experiments – Production fields and AES sites across the MRDRA – 07 Experimental Design: – Randomized complete block with 4-5 replications N fertilizer management: – Five N rates 0, 60, 120, 180, lb N/acre – Split N application: preplant and four leaf stage Cultural Practices: – AES Sites: Cooperative Extension Service recommendations – Commercial sites: Growers’ Practices

Important dates: –planted: 4 April to May 5 –harvest: 15 Aug to Sep 17 Soil sampling and analysis: – pre plant, top 6”, six cores/replication – measured NO 3 -N, pH, texture, Mehlich-3 nutrients Leaf and CM data collection: – 9-12 leaf stage Research Approach

Analysis of Variance: – to evaluate the effect of N rate on grain yield, leaf N, and CM – sites were analyzed separately Calculated Relative Yield and Relative CM Data Analysis

Results and Discussion

Properties of soil samples collected from the 0-6” depth before planting RangeSoil pHNO 3 -NSOMSandSiltClaySoil texture -- ppm % Min sandy loam Max silty clay loam

Summary of the Results Grain yield: – Significant N response: all sites, P≤ – Zero N treatments: (bu/acre) –Highest N rate: (bu/acre) –State average: 148 (bu/acre)

Correlation between RCM and relative yield at five sites PSNT (ppm) Relative yield (%)

Concluding Remarks PSNT and CM are promising tools for Improving N use efficiency in Arkansas Additional work is underway