Regional Sea Conventions indicators and data flows for eutrophication TG DATA workshop on Eutrophication (D5) and Hazardous substance (D8) indicators and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Towards the UKs MSFD Initial Assessment and Data Management M. Charlesworth (BODC)
Advertisements

Environmental data collection and information systems in the Baltic Sea Juha-Markku Leppänen Marine Research Centre of SYKE EEA/EIONET Workshop Maritime.
EMODNet Chemistry support to MSFD data reporting Examples from IT and Black Sea Giordano Giorgi (ISPRA) TG DIKE, 4 July 2013.
Session 2 – WISE SoE TCM data processing and quality issues.
1 ‘Role of the Marine Conventions in Eurowaternet development’ European Environment Agency (EEA) Anita Künitzer.
EUTROPHICATION BSAP ECOLOGICAL OBJECTIVES i.Concentration of nutrients close to natural levels ii.Clear water* iii.Natural level of algal blooms iv.Natural.
(16 JUNE 2015) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
MSFD Interactions EMODNET Chemistry 2 Kick-off meeting Giordano Giorgi Trieste (Italy), 3-5 June 2013.
SEIS CV Norway November 2008 WISE-Marine Water Information System for Europe with marine data (coming in 2010 with Marine data to a web-site near you)
The Development of an Assimilative Capacity Model for the Sustainable Management of Nutrients within the Ria Formosa, Portugal Ana Cristina Brito January.
(18 JUNE 2014) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
26 February 2014 EU Service contract: Development of a shared data and information system between the EU and the Regional Sea Conventions (phase 1) WG.
Regional Sea Conventions indicators and data flows for hazardous substances TG DATA workshop on Eutrophication (D5) and Hazardous substance (D8) indicators.
Professionalising knowledge and data products It works!! Data –> Information flow for MSFD.
Annual Meeting, June , Split, Croatia WP3: QA/QC Validation – MSFD Interactions current status EMODnet Chemistry Partner contribution: ISPRA.
Expert Workshop, June , Split, Croatia Output from TG Data for MSFD implementation EMODnet Chemistry Giordano Giorgi - ISPRA.
European Topic Centre for Water Marine Team Status/plans for developing coastal waters indicators Dr. Monika Peterlin Date/event: ECOSTAT meeting, 1./ ,
Marine assessment workshop th April 2015 EEA, Copenhagen Indicators – state of the art Natural Systems & Vulnerability, NSV4, EEA.
1 JRC – Ispra, Eutrophication Workshop 14 th -15 th September 2004 A conceptual framework for monitoring and assessment of Eutrophication in different.
21 November 2014 EU Service contract: Development of a shared data and information system between the EU and the Regional Sea Conventions (phase 1) Meeting.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation INSPIRE Marine Pilot Progress & status November 2015.
Trine Christiansen European Environment Agency (EEA) Regional and EU level data streams for D5 Copenhagen, 28 April
Trine Christiansen(EEA) Neil Holdsworth (ICES and ETC/ICM) Regional and EU level data streams for D5 and D8 WG-DIKE, 30 September
ECOSTAT WG2A meeting 7-8 October 2004 Eutrophication Activity Status report Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso.
Counselor dr. Otilia Mihail Ministry of Environment, Water and Forest Constanta 17 June
26 February 2014 Views to practical support on management of HELCOM biodiversity data by an EU Service contract Hermanni Kaartokallio (SYKE) EEA workshop.
WISE and WISE-Marine Water Information System for Europe and Water Information System for Europe (coming in 2010 with Marine data to a web- site near you)
1 SoE content review - Maintenance and content development of data flows (SoE and WFD) Freshwater Eionet Workshop, June 2015 Ursula Schmedtje, Federal.
(21 October 2015) Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) EMODnet-MSFD Cooperation process.
(9 June 2016) Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
EMODnet Chemistry 3 Kick-off Meeting May 2017
‘Work of the EEA aimed at streamlining marine assessment processes’
MSFD integrated reporting
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Marine Strategy Framework Directive:
D5 EUTROPHICATION REVIEW PROCESS
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Regional and EU level data streams for D5 and D8
Agenda item 6 - INSPIRE Marine Pilot Progress & your feedback
EU Service contract: Development of a shared data and information system between the EU and the Regional Sea Conventions (phase 1) WG DIKE , Brussels Deltares.
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Strategic Coordination Group Eutrophication Guidance
MSFD Com Dec 2010/477/EU review Recommendations for D5; Outcomes of the D5 workshop 14th meeting of the Working Group on Good Environmental Status.
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
European Commission DG Environment
Progress SOE Reporting NRC/NFP water workshop – 2nd October and SOE-DG/NRC meeting – 3rd October Beate Werner; EEA.
MSFD list of criteria elements
The normal balance of ingredients
Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT)
Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2008/56/EC
Jannica Haldin HELCOM Professional Secretary
COAST Lisboa Feb Methods Discussion
MSFD list of criteria elements
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
HOLAS II: project to develop a 2nd Holistic Assessment of the Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea Ulla Li Zweifel, Professional Secretary.
Typology and classification of coastal waters in Estonia
Towards integrated environmental policy for the marine environment
HELCOM and the Baltic Sea
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
Availability of Methodological Standards for GES Assessment
Use of WFD methods in MSFD initial assessment, GES definition and target setting Preliminary results of in-depth analysis focusing on eutrophication.
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Assessment scales and aggregation
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Access to and standards for data from MSFD reporting
Uli Claussen Co-lead ECOSTAT
Item 4 b) Marine Strategy Framework Directive and CIS WFD
Presentation transcript:

Regional Sea Conventions indicators and data flows for eutrophication TG DATA workshop on Eutrophication (D5) and Hazardous substance (D8) indicators and data flows, April 2014, Copenhagen Commission EU support contract: Development of shared EU-RSC data and information system

Context Need for integration and streamlining of marine reporting data across EU policies and Regional Sea Conventions (RSCs) in order to support policy implementation EU relevant RSCs: the OSPAR Convention (OSPAR) the Helsinki Convention (HELCOM) the Barcelona Convention, implemented by UNEP/MAP the Bucharest Convention, implemented by the Black Sea Commission (BSC) EEA together with the Eionet, manages and updates the WISE-SoE data flows

EU support contract main objectives 1.Review data & info flows from MSs to RSCs relevant to MSFD (what) 2.Review processes & methods at RSCs (how) 3.(Further) Develop a “data and information stream schema” for a shared marine information system [ WISE-MARINE] 4.Prepare a feasibility study of a shared information system 5.Describe an EU WISE-RSC data and information portal 6.Implement first elements of the system for OSPAR & HELCOM Project time line – appr. 1 year

Objectives of the current work Review of the data and information holdings within each of the four RSCs and EEA, as well as the respective flow processes and management systems for the topics of the MSFD With the aim of characterising the present information flow processes in place across Europe, in the light of their ability to support the MSFD and WFD objectives Provide input for a graph database model “data and information flow schema” for a shared marine information system

Methods (1) Collection of information Meetings with RSCs Deltares and AZTI met with OSPAR on Feb 5-6 SYKE and Deltares met with HELCOM on March 4 HCMR held brief meetings with UNEP/MAP and BSC on January 28 followed by communications ICES data center MED POL database IRIS SES project Web sites of the RSCs Inventory on data flows, data products, indicators, assessments etc

Methods (2) Overview of the indicators established or proposed by each RSC relevance to MSFD and EEA indicators methodologies and data they are based on Overview and analysis of data flows that can produce MSFD and RSCs indicators Data reported to the RSCs in 2012 by the CPs that are EU MS used in the analysis RSCs data flows assessed in comparison to parameters reported by the MS under articles 8, 9 and 10 of the MSFD

Results (1) – Eutrophication indicators ΜSFDOSPARHELCOMUNEP/MAPBSCEEA Indicators Common indicators Core indicators Proposed common indicators Indicators in Diagnostic Report, 2010 Indicators Waterborne nutrient inputs Core indicators of nutrient inputs under development Inputs of nutrients from direct (point) sources Atmospheric nutrient inputs Nutrients concentration in the water column Winter nutrient concentrations Concentration of dissolved inorganic nitrogen Concentration of key nutrients in the water column NO 3 +NO 2 CSI021-Nutrients in transitional, coastal and marine waters Concentration of dissolved inorganic phosphorus PO Nutrient ratios (silica, nitrogen and phosphorus), where appropriate Chlorophyll concentration in the water column Chlorophyll concentrations Concentration of chlorophyll a Chlorophyll-a concentration in the water column Chlorophyll-a CSI023 -Chlorophyll in transitional, coastal and marine waters Water transparency related to increase in suspended algae, where relevant Water transparency (Secchi depth) Abundance of opportunistic macroalgae Considered and adopted by the CBD AG in Species shift in floristic composition such as diatom to flagellate ratio, benthic to pelagic shifts, as well as bloom events of nuisance/toxic algal blooms (e.g. cyanobacteria) caused by human activities Species shift/indicator species: Nuisance species Phaeocystis Considered and adopted by the CBD AG in Abundance of perennial seaweeds and seagrasses (e.g. fucoids, eelgrass and Neptune grass) adversely impacted by decrease in water transparency Lower depth distribution limit of macrophytes State of soft-bottom macrozoobenthos (under development) Considered and adopted by the CBD AG in Dissolved oxygen, i.e. changes due to increased organic matter decomposition and size of the area concerned OxygenOxygen concentrationHypoxic situations, expansion of zones of hypoxia

Results (2) – Eutrophication assessment methodologies RSCDescription of assessment procedure OSPARIndicator methodologies and assessment levels developed under the Common Procedure, the OSPAR assessment tool for eutrophication HELCOMIndicator methodologies and targets developed under the HELCOM TARGREV project and the HELCOM EUTRO PRO process, HELCOM Eutrophication Assessment Tool (HEAT) UNEP/MAPGuidance on relevant sampling and analysis techniques available, indicator methodologies under development BSCIndicator methodologies under development EEAIndicator methodologies developed, will be aligned with WFD and MSFD WFDChlorophyll a (phytoplankton biomass) is the most region-wide inter-calibrated parameter for the biological quality element Phytoplankton Nutrient status is included in the physico-chemical quality elements

Results (3) – Overview of data flows relevant to MSFD eutrophication indicators MSFD Nutrients concentration in the water column MSFD art 8, 9, 10 reporting from Palialexis et al X denotes reporting % of CPs reporting100-81%80-61%60-41%40-21%20-1% no reporting

Results (4) – Overview of data flows relevant to MSFD eutrophication indicators MSFD art 8, 9, 10 reporting from Palialexis et al MSFD Chlorophyll concentration in the water column MSFD Water transparency related to increase in suspended algae, where relevant X denotes reporting MSFD BSC reporting on phytoplankton blooms % of CPs reporting100-81%80-61%60-41%40-21%20-1% no reporting

Results (5) – Overview of data flows relevant to MSFD eutrophication indicators MSFD art 8, 9, 10 reporting from Palialexis et al MSFD Dissolved oxygen, i.e. changes due to increased organic matter decomposition and size of the area concerned X denotes reporting MSFD BSC reporting on phytobenthos species level taxonomy, phytobenthos species biomass, total biomass % of CPs reporting100-81%80-61%60-41%40-21%20-1% no reporting

Results (6) – Overview of data flows relevant to MSFD eutrophication indicators Nutrient loads Atmospheric deposition X denotes reporting CLRTAP: Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Unmonitored coastal flow is estimated % of CPs reporting100-81%80-61%60-41%40-21%20-1% no reporting BSC data is for the period UNEP/MAP data is from the National Baseline Budget (NBB) of emissions and releases (2008)

Summary All RSCs have adopted (HELCOM, OSPAR) or are in the process of adopting (UNEP/MAP, BSC) indicators for eutrophication nutrients, chlorophyll a and oxygen are reported by most contracting parties across RSCs and WiseSoE data flows Nutrients: >60% of CPs of all the RSCs, apart from UNEP/MAP; lower % for reporting under the MSFD (partly because they are expressed differently) 20-60% of MS through WiseSoE Chlorophyll a: >80% of CPs of all the RSCs, apart from UNEP/MAP >80% under the MSFD 40-60% of MS through WiseSoE Oxygen: >80% of CPs of all the RSCs apart from UNEP/MAP lower % for reporting under MSFD 40-60% of MS through WiseSoE

Summary Water transparency: reported only to HELCOM and BSC, although it was used in all regions for MSFD reporting Nutrient inputs: HELCOM: >20% of CP’s report riverine and point sources OSPAR: >40% of CPs report riverine and point sources UNEP/MAP: inputs from point sources are reported every five years BSC: >40% of CPs reported riverine and point sources for Atmospheric deposition: HELCOM: all CPs report to UN ECE OSPAR: >40% of CP’s report to UN ECE UNEP/MAP: no reporting BSC: no reporting

Summary There are RSC data flows for MSFD indicators: Nutrients Chlorophyll Water transparency Dissolved oxygen But even with existing data flows and well established indicators (nutrients, chlorophyll-a), many gaps between RSC/MSFD reporting There are no RCS data flows for MSFD indicators: Nutrient ratios Abundance of opportunistic macroalgae Species shift, bloom events of nuisance/toxic algal blooms (except in BSC) Abundance of perennial seaweeds and seagrasses (except in BSC)

Next task: Development of a ‘data and information flow schema’ Project objective To optimize MSFD reporting data flows, information traceability, and data sharing between MSs, RSCs and EC/EEA Method: Insert RSC inventory information on data/information/flows in a graph database Visualize & analyse (parts of) information flow for missing “links” and doubles Discuss analysis and suggest changes for optimized data and information flows