Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement in High School: A Cross Subject Analysis with Student Fixed Effects Charles T. Clotfelter Helen F. Ladd Jacob.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Minority Achievement and Achievement Gap.
Advertisements

Understanding the North Carolina School Report Card.
Developmental Education in North Carolina Community Colleges Charles T. Clotfelter Helen F. Ladd* Clara Muschkin Jacob L. Vigdor Sanford School of Public.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
SARAH FULLER HELEN LADD DUKE UNIVERSITY SANFORD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY School Based Accountability and the Distribution of Teacher Quality Across Grades.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
Teacher Effectiveness in Urban Schools Richard Buddin & Gema Zamarro IES Research Conference, June 2010.
Cleveland Municipal School District Educating Cleveland’s Children.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
A “Best Fit” Approach to Improving Teacher Resources Jennifer King Rice University of Maryland.
Standardized Tests What They Measure How They Measure.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
Explaining Race Differences in Student Behavior: The Relative Contribution of Student, Peer, and School Characteristics Clara G. Muschkin* and Audrey N.
Human Capital Policies in Education: Further Research on Teachers and Principals 5 rd Annual CALDER Conference January 27 th, 2012.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Informing Policy: State Longitudinal Data Systems Jane Hannaway, Director The Urban Institute CALDER
Using State Longitudinal Data Systems for Education Policy Research : The NC Experience Helen F. Ladd CALDER and Duke University Caldercenter.org
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
Superintendent’s Proposed Budget Recommendation April 12, 2011.
Treatment Effects: What works for Whom? Spyros Konstantopoulos Michigan State University.
Understanding Student Achievement: The Value of Administrative Data Eric Hanushek Stanford University.
SCHOOLING POLICIES FOR QUALITY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Eric A. Hanushek Stanford University May 2013.
Center for Education Policy Research | Regional Strategic Data Project Meeting Kentucky Department of Education Fall 2014.
Production Functions and Measuring the Effect of Teachers on Student Achievement With Value-Added HSE March 20, 2012.
Different Skills? Identifying Differentially Effective Teachers of English Language Learners Ben Master, Susanna Loeb, Camille Whitney, James Wyckoff 5.
Institute of Education Sciences (IES) 25 th Annual Management Information Systems Conference (Feb , 2012) Useful and Fair Accountability Data in.
Review Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY.
1 Highly Qualified Teachers New Results for
The Narrowing Gap in NYC Teacher Qualifications and its Implications for Student Achievement Don Boyd, Hamp Lankford, Susanna Loeb, Jonah Rockoff, & Jim.
Measuring the Achievement Effects of Charter Schools in North Carolina Helen F. Ladd (Duke) Presentation for SREE conference Based on joint research with.
Teaching Credentials. What is a Teaching Credential? A credential is an authorization to teach a subject or subjects in a school setting grades K-12.
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model June 2011.
The Determinants of Student Achievement: Different Estimates for Different Measures Tim Sass Department of Economics Florida State University CALDER Conference.
The EXPLORE Test: What?/When?/Why? From ACT.  Taking EXPLORE ® in 8 th grade tells students (and parents) things they need to know  to plan your high.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Does Formative Feedback Help or Hinder Students? An Empirical Investigation 2015 DEE Conference Carlos Cortinhas, University of Exeter.
Slide 1 Estimating Performance Below the National Level Applying Simulation Methods to TIMSS Fourth Annual IES Research Conference Dan Sherman, Ph.D. American.
Welcome Class of  Nancy Brightwell: Principal  Crystal Davis: 9 th Grade Dean of Students  Charlene Jones: 9 th Grade School Counselor.
Assessing Teachers with Value- Added Models (VAMs) Erik Ruzek October 14, 2010 UCI Department of Education, Chair’s Advisory Board Presentation.
Employing Empirical Data in Judgmental Processes Wayne J. Camara National Conference on Student Assessment, San Diego, CA June 23, 2015.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 Effect Size Lens on Local SAT and State Math Test Results.
1 Is the Achievement Gap in Indiana Narrowing? September 19,
Portability of Teacher Effectiveness across School Settings Zeyu Xu, Umut Ozek, Matthew Corritore May 29, 2016 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Evaluation.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
Strategies for estimating the effects of teacher credentials Helen F. Ladd Based on joint work with Charles Clotfelter and Jacob Vigdor CALDER Conference,
Teaching Credentials. What is a Teaching Credential? A credential is an authorization to teach a subject or subjects in a school setting grades K-12.
Value Added Model and Evaluations: Keeping It Simple Polk County Schools – November 2015.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Proposed End-of-Course (EOC) Cut Scores for the Spring 2015 Test Administration Presentation to the Nevada State Board of Education March 17, 2016.
Evaluation of Teachers Trained Through Different Routes to Certification Presentation at the IES Research Conference June 2009 Jill Constantine Mathematica.
High School Graduation Requirements
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Examining Achievement Gaps
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Gloria Ladson-Billings University of Wisconsin
School Quality and the Black-White Achievement Gap
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Shudong Wang NWEA Liru Zhang Delaware Department of Education
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Portability of Teacher Effectiveness across School Settings
Dan Goldhaber1,2, Vanessa Quince2, and Roddy Theobald1
30% African American 12% Latino 43% White 28% Low-Income
Secondary Data Presentation
Collaboration In Research
Schooling policies for quality and economic growth
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement in High School: A Cross Subject Analysis with Student Fixed Effects Charles T. Clotfelter Helen F. Ladd Jacob L. Vigdor Presentation at CALDER Conference, Oct. 4, 2007

Motivation Focus on teacher credentials. –Lively policy debate about whether teacher credentials are predictive of student achievement. –Credentials are potentially important policy levers. Focus on high schools –Compare use of administrative data sets to examine teacher credentials in the elementary grades

North Carolina data End-of- course (EOC) tests in high schools. -- Preferable for this purpose to the comprehensive exit exams used in many states -- Based on standard course of study -- Scores count for 25 percent of a student’s grade in the course. => Teachers have strong incentive to teach the material and students to learn it. Availability of data on a wide array of teacher credentials.

Approach We use test scores on five tests typically taken by 9 th or 10 th graders: English I, algebra I, biology, geometry, and ELP (economic, legal and political systems) Four cohorts of students matched to their specific teachers Students in 10 th grade in 1999/2000; 2000/01; 2001/02; 2002/03 Concern about selection into courses

Models Preferred model. Student a chievement in subject S = f(teacher credentials and characteristics, classroom characteristics, student fixed effects) Student fixed effects VIP. They control for all subject-invariant characteristics of students, such as basic ability or motivation. Equivalent to expressing everything relative to the mean for that student (Some remaining technical concerns, but see paper) Alternative model. No student fixed effects; but include student level time- invariant characteristics, such as race and gender.

Strategy Basic model and many variations on each credential to examine in detail the achievement effects of credentials. All test scores are normalized by subject and year to have mean of 0 and s.d. of 1.. Magnitude – for purposes of comparison. Effects of being black with low SES : s.d. (From alternative model)

Credentials I Teacher experience (base = no experience) 2-3 years years [not diff. from 0.050] (With addition of teacher fixed effects, coefficients rise with experience) Teacher licensure (base = regular license) Lateral entry other

Credentials II Master’s degree (base= no grad. degree) Received after 5 years of teaching Comparable results for NC elementary teachers in reading National Board Certification (base = never certified) –Pre-certification –Cert. app. year –Has certification (sig. dif from 0.022) Compare NC elementary results. No human capital effect.

Credentials III Teacher test scores (base= within 1 sd of average) < 1 sd below average > 1 sd above average (By subject – matters most for math courses) Teacher certification (base =no certification) -- in subject in related subject in other subject (not sig.) (Disaggregated. Biggest for math and biology)

Magnitudes Predicted achievement difference for teacher at the 90 th percentile compared to a teacher at the 10 th percentile of the predicted achievement distribution standard deviations Large effect Relative to class size reduction of 5 students – Relative to SES effects (from alternative model) –0.116 But, nonetheless, credentials explain only 1/5 to 1/3 of the overall variation in teacher quality.

Distributional concerns Uneven distribution of teacher credentials across high poverty schools, defined by poverty quartile Q 1 (high) Q4 (low) Non reg. license % 13.3 % Lic.test score –

Across classrooms – algebra I Novice teacher (%) Lateral entrant (%) Teacher test score <1 sd Blacks Whites

Distributional effects Consider black vs. white differences in teacher credentials in algebra 1 multiplied by estimated achievement effects. Across a large number of credentials – total adverse effect on black achievement = <0.02 May seem tiny, but looms larger relative to the coefficient for a black student (controlling for other factors) of => Maldistribution of teachers contributes to black- white achievement gap.

Conclusions Teacher credentials matter in high school Aggregate effects are quite large Some differences with findings at the elementary level. E.g. master’s degree; National Board Certification Uneven distribution of teacher credentials across students by race contributes to the black-white achievement gap.