Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Laying the Groundwork ISLN September 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness Podcast 4.
Advertisements

Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 2.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
Arkansas Teacher Excellence Support System (TESS) TESS Law and Process for Administrators January – March 2013.
Integration: LDC/MDC Strategies & the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) SREB August 26, 2013 KDE Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
Domain 3: Instruction. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Expectations for learningTeacher’s purpose in a lesson or unit is unclear to.
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
PD Plan on the Danielson Framework ADSUP 731 Kelli McDaniel May, 2013
Arkansas Teacher Excellence Support System (TESS) TESS Law and Process for Teachers April, 2013 to May 31, 2014.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Learning Teaching Enhancing Supporting Sharing. Agenda  Student Growth  Alignment  Student Growth Revisited.
What makes great teaching?
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Learning Teaching Enhancing Supporting Sharing Social Studies Leadership Network October 24, 2014.
Bell-ringer: Pick your school AESBESCHESDPESEVESHESMLES SESSOESTESVSWLESWESCO BMSCVMSDCMSAHSBCHSDCHSODT.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
Utilizing FfT to Enhance Teaching and Learning
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Panorama High School Professional Development Teaching and Learning Framework January 10, 2013 California Standard for the Teaching Profession Engaging.
New Teacher Preparation: Compass Teacher Evaluation
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Mathematics Leadership Network September 17, 2012 METS Center.
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
Instructional Support Leadership Network September 10, 2012 METS Center.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
P-12 Education in Kentucky How It All Fits Together.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
INSTRUCTION DOMAIN #3. GROUP WORK How it works: 1.Look at your assigned group and move to the corresponding table. Everyone will take their materials.
to Teacher Effectiveness
ISLN January Domain 1: Planning & Preparation Domain 2: Classroom Environment Domain 3: Instruction Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Domain.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader Math Professional Development Election Day Presented by: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Welcome! OVEC/KDE Instructional Support Leadership Network Your facilitators are: Dr. Molly Sullivan Mr. Buddy Berry Mr. Thom Coffee Mr. Bill Hogan Mr.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness coaches.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
LESSON PLANNING What? Why? And How?. Goals of this session Participants will be able to identify and explain: 1.What is a lesson plan and how to develop.
Peer Observation & Connecting to the Kentucky Framework for Teaching.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Teacher Leader Network Connection Robin Hebert - ELA Renee’ Yates - Math.
Copyright © Los Angeles Unified School District 2011 Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework Module 1: The LAUSD Teaching & Learning.
Teacher Talk Based on what you know now about LDC... What would you expect to see if you walked into a classroom that was implementing LDC at what you.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 2 Developed by Teaching.
How to design better questions!
ACCOUNTABLE TALK Instructional Coaches: Chuck Force, Carrie Hogue, Mac Moore, and Diana Roth AIR Senior TA Consultant: Teresa A. Lance.
Instructional Support Leadership Network September 13,
Compass- Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric
Designing a Culminating Task Presented by Anne Maben UCLA Science & Literacy Coach Based on the model by Jay McTighe, Maryland Assessment Consortium.
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Goals and Objectives  Why Use Questioning Strategies?  Effective Questioning Techniques  Levels of Questioning…Increasing Understanding, Models for.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Advancing Oral Proficiency in our World Language Classrooms Jie Tian 1 Taiwan Teacher Professional Development Series.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning
Questions that Promote Reasoning in Math
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Analyzing Student Work & Formative Jurying
Bellwork: Student Engagement Chart
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Laying the Groundwork ISLN September 2012

Let’s Reflect What am I doing now to support my teachers’ understanding of the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)? What do I need to do?

LEARNING TARGETS  I can make connections between Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching & Learning (CHETL) and the new Framework for Teaching.  I can apply a process for digging deeper into the elements of the Framework for Teaching.  I can support my teachers’ understanding of the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES).

The Goal of the Kentucky Leadership Networks “Ensure that every participant has a clear understanding of how to implement/support the implementation of the KCAS within the context of highly effective teaching, learning, and assessment practices so that all Kentucky students have the knowledge, skills, and abilities they will need to be successful and prepared for college and/or career.”

Proposed Multiple Measures Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Observation Peer Observation Professional Growth Reflective Practice Student Voice Student Growth All measures are supported through evidence.

Domain 1: Planning & Preparation Domain 2: Classroom Environment Domain 3: Instruction Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Domain 5: Student Growth DRAFT

Common Language

The Art of Effective Questioning

CHETL & 3b: Questioning & Discussion Techniques Instructional Rigor & Student Engagement C - Teacher orchestrates effective classroom discussions, questioning, and learning tasks that promote higher-order thinking skills. E -Teacher challenges students to think deeply about problems and encourages/models a variety of approaches to a solution. G -Teacher structures and facilitates ongoing formal and informal discussions based on a shared understanding of rules and discourse.

3b. Questioning & Discussion Techniques Why Focus on Questioning?

Think about it... What is the relationship between Effective Questioning and Effective Class Discussion?

Effective Questioning + Discussion Leads students to... Deeper understanding of content Rethinking hypotheses and viewpoints Making connections Effective questioning also... Sets the stage for engaging discussions

Elements of Questioning & Discussion 1.Quality of questions 2.Discussion techniques 3.Student participation

Quality of Questioning/Prompts High Quality Prompts Cause students to think and reflect Deepen student understanding Test student ideas against those of their classmates. Framework for Teaching Proficiency System. ©2011 Teachscape, Inc

What is the difference between high cognitive level and low cognitive level questions? Think about it...

High Quality Questions Are open-ended Allow multiple answers Allow multiple approaches to the answer Cause students to think critically Are challenging Short answer Usually a single “right” answer Single line of inquiry Usually recall questions which do not require critically thinking Low Level Questions

Think about it... Should all questions be high level questions?

Discussion Techniques “In a true discussion, the teacher poses a question and invites all students’ views to be heard, and also enables students to engage in discussion directly with one another, not always mediated by the teacher.” Framework for Teaching Proficiency System. ©2011 Teachscape, Inc

Student participation ”Experienced teachers use a range of techniques to ensure that all students contribute to the discussion, and they enlist the assistance of students to ensure this outcome.” Framework for Teaching Proficiency System. ©2011 Teachscape, Inc

Effective Questioning Skills What is Accomplished? 1. Read the 3b Performance Levels. 2. Highlight the language that differentiates between levels. 3. Discuss with your table group.

Accomplished Although the teacher may use some low-level questions, he or she asks the students questions designed to promote student thinking and understanding. The teacher creates a genuine discussion among students, providing adequate time for students to respond and stepping aside when appropriate. The teacher successfully engages most students in the discussion, employing a range of strategies to ensure that most students are heard.

Accomplished Although the teacher may use some low-level questions, he or she asks the students questions designed to promote student thinking and understanding. The teacher creates a genuine discussion among students, providing adequate time for students to respond and stepping aside when appropriate. The teacher successfully engages most students in the discussion, employing a range of strategies to ensure that most students are heard.

Exemplary Teacher uses a variety or series of questions or prompts to challenge students cognitively, advance high-level thinking and discourse, and promote metacognition. Students formulate many questions, initiate topics, and make unsolicited contributions. Students themselves ensure that all voices are heard in the discussion.

Exemplary Teacher uses a variety or series of questions or prompts to challenge students cognitively, advance high-level thinking and discourse, and promote metacognition. Students formulate many questions, initiate topics, and make unsolicited contributions. Students themselves ensure that all voices are heard in the discussion.

Accomplished Although the teacher may use some low-level questions, he or she asks the students questions designed to promote student thinking and understanding. The teacher creates a genuine discussion among students, providing adequate time for students to respond and stepping aside when appropriate. The teacher successfully engages most students in the discussion, employing a range of strategies to ensure that most students are heard.

Developing Teacher’s questions lead students through a single path of inquiry, with answers seemingly determined in advance. Alternatively, the teacher attempts to frame some questions designed to promote student thinking and understanding, but only a few students are involved. Teacher attempts to engage all students in the discussion and to encourage them to respond to one another, but with uneven results.

Developing Teacher’s questions lead students through a single path of inquiry, with answers seemingly determined in advance. Alternatively, the teacher attempts to frame some questions designed to promote student thinking and understanding, but only a few students are involved. Teacher attempts to engage all students in the discussion and to encourage them to respond to one another, but with uneven results.

Ineffective Teacher’s questions are of low cognitive challenge, require single correct responses, and are asked in rapid succession. Interaction between teacher and students is predominantly recitation style, with the teacher mediating all questions and answers. A few students dominate the discussion.

Ineffective Teacher’s questions are of low cognitive challenge, require single correct responses, and are asked in rapid succession. Interaction between teacher and students is predominantly recitation style, with the teacher mediating all questions and answers. A few students dominate the discussion.

Let’s practice. Read the scenarios on the handout provided. Using your 3B page of the framework, decide which performance level each scenario reflects. Talk with your table group.

Check your accuracy. Continue your discussion. 1 - Accomplished 2 - Exemplary 3 - Ineffective 4 - Developing 5 - Developing 6 - Ineffective 7 - Accomplished 8 - Exemplary

Questioning & Discussion in Practice Watch the video. Note what you see and hear regarding questioning and discussion. Next: Based on your evidence, decide which performance level you think is reflected in the video.

Process for Digging Deeper Into the Framework for Teaching Choose a component, or components, of focus. Read the whole component. Discuss each element referencing the component description and the accomplished performance level. Highlight language that differentiates between the 4 performance levels. Develop a statement that differentiates the levels. Find/create examples (scenarios, descriptions) that reflect the 4 levels of performance. Search related PD360 videos that support understanding of the component OR view training videos from TeachScape if accessible.

Extending our Reflection What am I doing now to support my teachers’ understanding of the TPGES? What do I need to do? What are my next steps?

Where To Learn More Go to KDE Website. Enter “Field Test District Page” into Search Bar.

resource - If you have questions about the field test