1. 2 Thruway Authority Goals The Authority is committed to: Maintaining & operating the highway Implementing capital improvement program to deliver high.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Public Transit Alliance (NuPTA) RIPEC Study: Transportation at a Crossroads (2002) Growing Smart with Transit: A Report of the Transit 2020 Working.
Advertisements

Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission Freight Rail Day 2012 October 26, 2012.
County Transportation System Governor’s Transportation Advisory Committee September 14, 2012 Abbey Bryduck, AMC Policy Analyst.
School Facilities Financing Work Group Summary of Report and Recommendations Tom Melcher School Finance Director, MDE House Education Finance Committee.
Act 44 Transportation Funding John Dockendorf Pennsylvania Department of Transportation November 2007.
Preliminary Budget March 18, Previous Year’s Budget Reductions Elimination of Teaching Positions Special Education/Two Elementary Elimination.
Revised FY 2007 & Proposed FY 2008 Operating & Capital Budgets Retail Rates Committee January 4, 2007.
American Trucking Associations National Association of Steel Pipe Distributors March 2007 Ray Kuntz Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Watkins and.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Local Highway Technical Assistance Council Joint Senate and House Transportation Committees January
MacombGov.org Whether it’s Business, Family, or Pleasure…… Make Macomb Your Home! July 11, 2013 Annual Budget and Forecast Fiscal Years Ending December.
Walnut Valley Unified School District Board of Trustees March 19, Second Interim Financial Report.
City Transportation Funding Overview House Transportation Committee January 13, 2004 Ashley Probart AWC Transportation Coordinator.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Introduction of the City Manager’s Proposed Fiscal Year 2012 Budget January 3, 2011 Sanford Miller, City Manager Robert Rusten, Assistant City Manager.
Doug Brown October 23, Budget Overview A Budget Planning Process (Overland Park’s) Financial Management.
TOWN OF MONTREAT FISCAL YEAR Annual Budget Public Hearing and Presentation to the Board of Commissioners June 13, 2013.
First Interim Report December 18, Tonight’s Presentation District’s First Interim Report Provides a summary to the Governing Board of the District’s.
2006 Budget Challenges Additional Increases in Pension Contributions = +$451,200 Additional Assessment from RVSA = +$315,000 Increases in Fuel and Utility.
2004 Budget Presentation City Commission Budget Study Session July 2, 2003.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA Budget Overview APA Citizens Academy Paul Casey, Assistant City Administrator October 15, 2013.
Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.
State of the Agency Mike Snyder, P.E., Executive Director.
Budget Montrose Area Public Budget Presentation June 3, 2002 Lewis Plauny.
Mississippi River Bridge An Analysis of Alternatives DRAFT Final Report Presentation January 31, 2007.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
FY Budget Briefing General Fund Operating Budget and Fees & Charges.
Jennifer Wislocki, Board of Finance Thomas E. Marsh, First Selectman Pamela Christman, Chester Elementary School 10/20/20151.
Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Program June 20, 2012.
Fueling Transportation in Pennsylvania Frank Kempf, Chief Engineer Joe Brimmeier, CEO.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
Proposed Fare and Service Change Public Workshop Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.
Presented to the Board of Selectmen, School Committee, Finance Committee Andrew Maylor Town Administrator November 10, 2008 Town of Swampscott Fiscal 2010.
IFTA Annual Business Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 17, 2011 Federal Highway Administration.
New Jersey School Boards Association – Serving Local Boards of Education Since 1914 State Budget Overview Presented by: Michael Vrancik NJSBA Director.
East Penn School District Budget Outlook May 23, 2011.
FY08 PARKING PERMIT FEE PROPOSAL November 20, 2006.
O hio C ontractors A ssociation Jana Cassidy Administrator, Budget & Forecasting October 2015.
BUDGET WORKSHOP FY13 April 4, City of Hendersonville Budget Workshop – April 4, 2012 GOALS and OBJECTIVES for 2013 To present a balanced budget.
Presentation to the Washington Transportation Commission March 16, 2010 Washington State Association of County Engineers.
FEBRUARY 22, 2016 FY 2017 County Administrator’s Recommended Budget.
1 Municipal Budgeting Presented by: Alfred E. Martin, CPA, Retired Finance Director City of Hagerstown, Maryland With research assistance by Jeanne E.
2008 PROPERTY TAX LEVY RICHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEVY INFORMATION.
Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Council Workshop January 29, 2008 Council Chambers 6:00 p.m.
PRESENTED AND PREPARED BY CITY OF MISSOULA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
PUBLIC WORKS FY 2012 Proposed Budget May 24, 2012.
1.  Quick Overview of the History and Need  What is Planned for the Fire Department  What is Planned for the Police Department  Financial Details.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
MARTA 2009 Budget Summary Review
Rebuilding Rhode Island’s Aging Bridges with Truck Tolling
Proposed School Bond Referendum September 26, 2017
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
Regional Roads Committee
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
2018 Adopted Budget February Financial Plan
Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget.
MTA 2019 Final Proposed Budget November Financial Plan
Maumelle’s Financial Future
Property Tax Levy – Taxes Payable 2019
I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan
Davidson County FY County Manager’s Proposed Budget
Agenda FYE June 30, 2020 Operating Budget
Agenda FYE June 30, 2020 Operating Budget
Presentation transcript:

1

2 Thruway Authority Goals The Authority is committed to: Maintaining & operating the highway Implementing capital improvement program to deliver high levels of safety & service Improving the travelers’ experience

3 Fatality Rate 1954 through 2006

4 Why Tolls In 1989 (Chapter 634), Governor Cuomo and the State Legislature created the Thruway Authority Transition Advisory Council and charged it with the responsibility to "make recommendations concerning the future of the Thruway and the Thruway Authority after the scheduled retirement of the Authority's bondable debt in the year " The Advisory Council concluded that tolls were the preferable choice because it was more appropriate for those who actually use the Thruway to pay for its maintenance and upkeep rather than the taxpayers of New York generally. Therefore the Advisory Council recommended to the Legislature and the Governor, that tolls be maintained and that the Authority, with its bonding ability, be retained to meet the highway transportation needs along the Thruway corridor.

5 Why Tolls Instead of making the Thruway toll free and turning over operation to DOT, in 1992, the Governor and the State Legislature enacted legislation to further expand the responsibilities of the Authority to include the operation and maintenance of the canal system and authorized additional indebtedness secured by toll revenues to assist with the financing of this new responsibility. Unlike other highways in New York State, the Thruway Authority receives no state tax dollars and depends on tolls to maintain, operate, and police its roads and bridges. Because the Thruway is a toll road, only the people who use it pay for it. In addition, an estimated one-third of the tolls collected are paid by out-of-state drivers who use the Thruway.

6 Support to Retain Tolls in 1991

7 Mandated Responsibilities in the Early ’90s

8 Thruway Funds Expended Cross Westchester Expressway (I-287)$100.7 Canal System700.4 Interstate Syracuse Inner Harbor22.6 Buffalo Inner Harbor11.7 Tonawanda Harbor and Trail3.3 Syracuse Inter-Modal Center4.7 Tappan Zee Ferry0.2 Stewart Airport14.4 Interchange 26 Bridge2.8 Interchange 32 Tandem Lot1.7 Local Bridges5.6 Total$1,032.2 Over $1 Billion in Mandated Projects (millions of dollars)

9 Capital Program

10 Summary of Multi-Year Capital Plan 78% of the Thruway Authority’s $2.74 billion Multi-Year Capital Plan is for capital improvements to the system’s highways and bridges $ in millions

11 More than 300 projects in the Capital Plan; between 2005 and 2007 the Authority has let 86 projects at a cost of $746 million statewide; more than $1.3 billion statewide remains to be let through 2011 (214 projects remain) 520 miles of new and/or rehabilitated highway 196 new, rehabilitated, or improved bridges 195 additional truck parking spaces 7 additional noise barrier locations 56 additional higher-speed E-ZPass lanes 13 additional highway-speed E-ZPass lanes 6 additional dedicated E-ZPass lanes Maintaining the Infrastructure

12 New York Division’s Significant Infrastructure Improvement Projects Tappan Zee Bridge - Deck rehabilitation and substructure repairs ($147 million) Woodbury Toll Barrier - Reconstruction for Highway Speed E-ZPass ($60-$70 million) I-84/I-87 Interchange17 Contract 3 - Reconstruction, new bridges, direct connection to I-84 ($67 million) 77 miles of roadway improvements; 46 bridge rehabilitation, replacement or improvement projects

13 Albany Division’s Significant Infrastructure Improvement Projects Interchange Pavement reconstruction with congestion relief ($72 million) Interchange Pavement reconstruction ($68 million) Castleton Bridge - Substructure rehabilitation ($32 million) 150 miles of roadway improvements; 24 bridge rehabilitation, replacement or improvement projects

14 Syracuse Division’s Significant Infrastructure Improvement Projects Interchange 39 to 40 - Pavement reconstruction ($120 million) Interchange 37 to 39 - Pavement rehabilitation ($25 million) Interchange 33 to 34 - Pavement rehabilitation ($14 million) 138 miles of roadway improvements; 41 bridge rehabilitation, replacement or improvement projects

15 Buffalo Division’s Significant Infrastructure Improvement Projects Interchange 57 to 58 - Pavement and bridge rehabilitation ($69 million) Interchange 54 to Lackawanna Barrier - Pavement and bridge rehabilitation and replacement ($77 million) Williamsville Toll Barrier - Relocation ($67 million) 155 miles of roadway improvements; 85 bridge rehabilitation, replacement or improvement projects

16 Capital Projects Looking Ahead The Authority is committed to continuing to provide high levels of safety and service to its customers by investing more than $2.1 billion from 2005 to In 2008 there are 66 projects planned system wide totaling approximately $370 million. In 2009 there are 47 projects planned system wide totaling approximately $232 million. In 2010 there are 52 projects planned system wide totaling approximately $ 366 million. In 2011 there are 44 projects planned system wide totaling approximately $355 million through 2011, there is approximately $1.3 billion earmarked for future improvement projects system wide.

17 Project Selection Process Overview Division and Headquarters maintenance engineers evaluate overall condition data on a system and project level basis Review the work history (both capital and maintenance) on each project Evaluate treatment options (including continued maintenance) Select projects for inclusion in proposed capital plan Evaluate proposed program versus available financial resources and, based on priority, adjust project selection and project scopes as needed to meet the available finances

18 Surface Pavement/Bridge Condition Trends

19 Historical Capital Expenditures (millions of dollars)

20 Historical Capital Expenditures Adjusted for Inflation (millions of 2006 dollars)

21 Impacts of Deferring Capital Program on Pavement Uneven pavement Increased number of potholes Increased chance of hydroplaning (rutting) More frequent unscheduled lane closures for repair Deferring preventative maintenance of highways allows for accelerated deterioration of the underlying pavement structure and reduces the life of the pavement increasing future costs Reduction in overall safety

22 Maintaining Pavement Conditions Current pavement conditions near Interchange 39 (Syracuse, Fulton, I-690) westbound

23 Impacts of Deferring Capital Program on Bridges Deferring major rehabilitations and replacements results in negative impacts to the structural integrity of the bridge Deferring preventative maintenance will accelerate the deterioration of the structural elements of the bridge – leading to more extensive repairs and/or replacements While the Authority has never had to post a mainline bridge, eventually there could be a need to institute weight limit restrictions (load posting), which would significantly impact commerce. Reduction in overall safety

24 Maintaining Bridge Conditions Current Tappan Zee Bridge conditions

25 Bridges: Authority has maintenance responsibility for 807 bridges 131 bridges have been replaced since original construction 20 bridges will be replaced under this Capital Program After 2011, the Authority will have reconstructed less than 19% of the bridges on the 55 year old system Average rating: 5.15 in 2007, 5.06 in 2011 Highway: Authority has 2,430 lane miles of pavement 254 lane miles have been reconstructed since original construction 152 miles will be reconstructed under this Capital Program Average rating: 7.66 in 2007, 7.63 in 2011 Surface Pavement/Bridge Conditions

26 Out-Year Gaps in Multi-Year Financial Plan

27 Stantec Toll Revenue Projections As a result of several factors, Stantec, an outside traffic engineering firm, has revised its traffic and revenue projections for to show the following: Traffic Growth Revised Downward Shorter Average Trip Lengths Increased E-ZPass Usage Larger & more frequent fuel price spikes

28 National Traffic Growth Trends The national average of vehicle miles traveled has been nearly flat since January 2005 This 2 ½ year period is the longest period with no growth patterns since statistics were first reported by the FHWA in 1981

29 Thruway Traffic Growth Estimates

Baseline Multi-Year Financial Plan (millions of dollars) Total Revenues$580.6$607.8$615.3$628.3$641.5 Operating Expenses Operating Reserves Net Revenue (A)$238.6$252.3$246.8$245.4$245.7 Debt Service (B) Reserve Maintenance Fund OAP (Canal and I-84)82.4* Operating Balance$0.0 ($28.5)($42.6)($64.7) Pay-As-You-Go Financing44.1%16.3%12.1%11.4%12.6% Debt Service Coverage Ratio Note: Includes 10% increase in cash rates effective in January 2008, as approved in May 2005.

31 Closing the Gaps Preserve the $2.7 billion Capital Program Preserve the Commercial Volume & Commuter Discount Programs Eliminate any anticipated out-year operational gaps Maintain debt service coverage ratios of at least 1.7 in 2011 Increase pay-as-you-go financing of the Capital Program Enhance real property revenue Limit Thruway & OAP operating expenditure growth to 3.1% in 2008 Continue cost containment through more than 450 positions eliminated since 1995; additional 50 positions eliminated through 2011

32 Proposed Toll Adjustment Phased in approach so that the proposal can be revisited if circumstances change E-ZPass Discounts to 5% off cash rates for both passenger and commercial vehicle classes in June 2008, that will remain throughout the plan 5% general toll increase in January % general toll increase in January 2010 Implement an increase at the barriers and bridges in 2009 only (except Grand Island where passenger cash customers will see no increase under this proposal) Increase commercial and towing congestion pricing rates at the Tappan Zee Bridge and Spring Valley in 2010

33 Proposed Toll Adjustment Continued Increase the fee for mainline commuters under the E-ZPass Annual Permit Program - from $80 to $84 in 2009, and $88 in 2010 (note: the permit plan has been $80 since 1988). Bridge & barrier commuter discount plan rates increase by 5% in 2009 and 2010 (except Grand Island where residents will see no increase). The E-ZPass Tappan Zee Bridge Commuter Program will see an increase from $2.00 to $3.00 per trip. Retain a 10% additional E-ZPass discount for vehicles with high fuel efficiency and super ultra low emissions (Green Pass Program). Preserve the existing Commercial Volume Discount Program.

34 Impact of Toll Adjustment If the cash rate for passenger vehicles increased by the rate of inflation, it would increase from 3.1 cents per mile in 1988 to 5.5 cents per mile in By the end of the proposed plan, in 2011 the cash rate will be 4.7 cents per mile. Despite the rate of inflation and additional responsibilities given to the Authority since 1991 totaling $1 billion, the proposed increase is less than 1 cent per mile The cash rate for passenger vehicles under the proposed plan will increase by 0.43 cents per mile and the E-ZPass rate will increase less than 1 cent per mile.

35 Commuter Plan Rates Annual Permit TZB Commuter New Rochelle Commuter GI Bridge Commuter Harriman/ Yonkers Commuter 2005$80.00$2.00$1.00$0.25$ $80.00$2.00$1.00$0.25$ $84.00$3.00$1.05$0.26$ $88.00$3.00$1.10$0.28$0.55 *The Annual Permit can be used anywhere along the ticketed portion of the system for a flat fee, the first 30 miles or less of each trip is free.

36 Protecting the Daily Commuter Annual Permit Plan is $80 (unchanged since 1988), the first 30 miles of each trip is free; proposed to increase from $80 to $84 in 2009, and to $88 in Commuter making 200 round trips annually pays 20 cents per trip if 30 miles or less ($80 fee/400 trips). If implemented, the same trip would be 22 cents when fully phased- in, an increase of 2 cents per trip ($88 fee/400 trips).

37 Commercial Volume Discount In 2006, commercial vehicles participating in the Volume Discount Program saved a total of $21 million. A commercial charge account customer qualifies for a discount when toll charges total more than $1,000 per month. The discount applies to the monthly toll billing as follows: Total Charges Discounts $1,001 to $2,000 10% $2,001 to $3,000 15% Over $3,000 20%

38 Comparing Passenger (2L) Toll Rates Delaware Turnpike Pocahontas Parkway Dulles Greenway Chesapeake Expressway John F. Kennedy Highway Dulles Toll Road Blue Star Turnpike Pennsylvania Turnpike New Jersey Turnpike Illinois State Toll Highway NYS Thruway (2011) Mass. Pike NYS Thruway (2008) West Virginia Turnpike Garden State Parkway Cents Per Mile

39 Comparing Commercial (5H) Toll Rates Cents Per Mile Delaware Turnpike Pocahontas Parkway Dulles Greenway Chesapeake Expressway John F. Kennedy Highway Dulles Toll Road Blue Star Turnpike Illinois State Toll Highway NYS Thruway (2011) NYS Thruway (2008) Pennsylvania Turnpike New Jersey Turnpike Mass. Pike West Virginia Turnpike Garden State Parkway

40 Revised Multi-Year Financial Plan (millions of dollars) Note: Includes 10% increase in cash rates effective in January 2008, as approved in May Total Revenues$580.6$632.7$713.9$757.4$773.8 Operating Expenses Operating Reserves Net Revenue (A)$239.6$278.0$346.9$378.6$384.9 Debt Service (B) Reserve Maintenance Fund OAP (Canal and I-84)82.3* Operating Balance$0.0 Pay-As-You-Go Financing45.1%21.1%28.5%33.3%33.5% Debt Service Coverage Ratio

41 The Public Process Preliminary Board approval to commence the public process Submission of Financial Reports to the Governor, State Comptroller and Legislative Fiscal Committees (Section 2804 of the Public Authorities Law) Submission of proposed regulations for filing and public comment in accordance with requirements of State Administrative Procedure Act (SAPA) Staff conducts public hearings (minimum of three statewide) 60 days after OSC’s review period Preparation of environmental review in accordance with State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and assessment of public comment (assesses potential for diversion among other things) Final Board approval of toll adjustment, adoption of SEQRA findings and filing of Notice of Adoption in State Register.

42 Customer Service Initiatives

43 Providing High Levels of Customer Service Snow and Ice Removal Interactive Mapping Free WiFi Connectivity at Travel Plazas E-ZPass Improvements System wide Newly Renovated Travel Plazas new & improved concepts

44

45 The Future

46 The Future Highway-Speed E-ZPass

47 Toll Study Stantec, an outside engineering firm that specializes in traffic and transportation planning, is conducting a study to examine the costs, benefits and impacts of alternatives to the way Thruway tolls are collected. The framework for the study is expected to be completed near the end of 2007

48 Commitment to Service The Authority is committed to: Maintaining & operating the highway Implementing capital improvement program to deliver high levels of safety & service Improving the travelers’ experience

Revised Budget and 2008 Proposed Budget

Proposed Budget - $977.4 Million Expenditures revised downward by $51.3 million or 5.0% from original estimates. –Capital Program revised downward by $46.7 million. –Operating revised downward by $3.0 million, primarily due to cost containment efforts. –Debt Service revised downward by $1.6 million. Revenues revised downward by an equal amount. –Reduced toll revenues due to Elimination of toll collection at Black Rock and City Line Barriers in Buffalo. –Additional federal/state/other funds due to reimbursement for removal of Black Rock and City Line Barriers. –Reduced toll revenues due to impact high gas prices are having on traffic. –Above reductions partially offset by small increase in additional other income (interest income, real property revenue and fee revenue). Financial Benchmarks: Coverage ratio expected to equal 1.81x and PAYGO at 45.0%.

Proposed Budget - $1.13 Billion Ensures: high levels of safety and service through a preserved Capital Program. Retains: financial strength through additional revenue actions and spending restraint. Total budget increases by $150.0 million or 15.3% over 2007 Revised Budget. Nearly ¾’s of this increase is due to growth in Capital Program. Thruway and OAP Operating: $418.8 million, $12.7 million or 3.1% over Includes continued discretionary cost containment and staffing reductions. –After adjusting for non-discretionary costs (such as health insurance, fuel and energy prices, diesel fuel emission requirements, et. al.) operating expenses would have grown by less than 1.0% - highlighting the success of ongoing cost containment. Capital Program: $545.4 million, $106.5 million or 24.3% over Capital expenditures in 2008 one of the largest investments in the Thruway’s highway and bridge infrastructure in history. Debt Service: $163.1 million, $30.8 million or 23.3% over Increases due to greater reliance on financing the Thruway’s Capital Program. Financial Benchmarks: Despite additional revenues expected from proposed toll adjustment, coverage ratio expected to drop to 1.7x and PAYGO to 21.1%.

Proposed Budget – Sources (millions of dollars) Total Budget = $1.13 billion

Proposed Budget – Uses (millions of dollars) Total Budget = $1.13 billion

Contracts Program

Proposed Capital Spending – Uses (millions of dollars) Total Budget = $545.4 million

Proposed Capital Spending – Sources (millions of dollars) Total Budget = $545.4 million