Building a caring correctional system that truly belongs to all INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM – SEPTEMBER 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES - PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS.
Advertisements

1 Department of Correctional Services FIVE-YEAR REVIEW ( ) Considerations for Parliament 10 June 2009.
PUBLIC SERVICE M&E LEARNING NETWORK Results Based Management NATIONAL TREASURY BUDGET COUNCIL MAY 2007 Michael Acres Principal Technical Advisor.
Norfolk and Suffolk Police – the story so far Assistant Chief Constable Charlie Hall Norfolk Constabulary (Collaboration) & Anne Campbell Head of Corporate.
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATIVE GOVERNANCE AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) Projects and.
7.2 System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Our Focus On Benefits Realisation >> Delivering Accelerated and Sustainable Business Benefits An introduction to our Project Definition & Benefits Templates.
INTEGRATED JUSTICE SYSTEM 1 INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM PROJECT.
© 2008 Prentice Hall11-1 Introduction to Project Management Chapter 11 Managing Project Execution Information Systems Project Management: A Process and.
Project Execution.
1 Building a caring correctional system that truly belongs to all DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON CORRECTIONAL.
INTEGRATED JUSTICE SYSTEM 1 INTEGRATED JUSTICE SYSTEM FINGERPRINT PROCESSES.
Slide 1 Introduction to Central Services Branch Building a caring correctional system that truly belongs to all Electronic Monitoring in Community Corrections.
Chairpersons for Finance Portfolio committees The role of Council in Supply Chain Management (SCM) 29 May
SITA Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Police on SITA Services Provided to SAPS - FY2010/ October 2011 By: Acting Chairperson of Board Ms Fébé.
PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE 2013 ESTIMATES OF NATIONAL EXPENDITURE (ENE)
Portfolio Committee on Police Briefing: 4 th Quarter Financial Report 2012/13 17 SEPTEMBER 2013.
Meeting the Challenges of the Changed Economic Environment Annual Conference September 2009 Water Services Training Group 13 th Annual Conference 10 th.
Technology Planning. Primary Elements Stakeholders Leadership team Needs assessment Technology components Work plan Budget Policies Evaluation.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
SAHPRA proposals Nov 2009 A GLIMPSE OF WHAT SAHPRA IS INTENDED TO BECOME KEY PROPOSALS FOR SAHPRA NOVEMBER 2009 DR NICHOLAS CRISP.
Lecture 11 Managing Project Execution. Project Execution The phase of a project in which work towards direct achievement of the project’s objectives and.
1 Mpho Mathabathe: Researcher Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services Analysis of DCS Annual Report (2011/12)
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON CORRECTIONAL SERVICE PRESENTED BY SITA 27 February 2013.
Manage the person and the associated case through the system SA Police Services Investigation Department of Justice Adjudication Department of Welfare.
1 DPW Presentation to the Portfolio Committees on Correctional Services and Public Works Kimberley Correctional Centre 24 November 2010.
Building a caring correctional system that truly belongs to all BRANCH CORRECTIONS Parliament :Cape Town: 09 June 2006 Presentation by Department of Correctional.
PRESENTATION ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE “NEW GENERATION” CORRECTIONAL FACILITY PROTOTYPES Department of Correctional Services 17.
PRESENTATION: PORTFOLIO COMMITTEES ON CORRECTIONAL SERVICES AND HEALTH PROVISION OF HEALTH CARE WITHIN CORRECTIONAL CENTRES 1.
Presentation to Portfolio Committee on “Management of Security incidences” 5 June 2007.
ACTING Chief Financial Officer Water Trading Entity
11/12/20151 PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL SERVICES JANUARY 2009.
Changes to the Youth Re-offending Measure. YJB position statement The YJB supports the concept of the new measure and the advantages it presents for aligning.
SELECT COMMITTEE ON FINANCE – 18 JANUARY 2006 DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE PRESENTATION BY THE MEC & CFO.
1 Mpho Mathabathe: Researcher Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services Analysis of DCS Annual Report (2008/09)
Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Police on SAPS Communication Projects By: Mr Sithembiso Freeman Nomvalo
Portfolio Committee on Police Presentation: 2010/2011 Annual Report Programme 1: Administration Technology Management Services 19 October 2011.
Technology Management Services (TMS) CJS/IJS/FSL/ICDMS 13 May 2015.
Introduction to Central Services Branch Building a caring correctional system that truly belongs to all PROGRESS ON THE 7 DAY ESTABLISHMENT PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE.
Chapter 12 The Network Development Life Cycle
By: Nthabiseng Mosupye GITO Portfolio Committee 30/05/
Transforming prisons into correctional centres - places of new beginnings May 2005 Overview of Overcrowding within DCS dcs Department of Correctional Services.
Presentation to Portfolio Committee Progress on the Departmental Under-Expenditure and Recovery Plans -Mr. T. Zulu Director-General 1.
Briefing: 4 th Quarter Financial Report 2011/12 Vote 25: Police.
DPW PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON CORRECTIONAL SERVICES 09 FEBRUARY 2010.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE BRIEFING: IMPACT OF THE 2012 SPECIAL REMISSION OF SENTENCE Date: 08 August 2012 Received on: 6 Aug 2012.
SECRETARIAT OF POLICE1 Presentation to Select Committee on Security and Constitutional Affairs on the Criminal Procedures (Forensic) Amendment Act 28 July.
1 Department of Correctional Services Vote 19 CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE: 2001/2002.
1 MEDIUM TERM BUDGET POLICY STATEMENT(MTBPS) CORRECTIONAL SERVICES 2006/ /09 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES.
STANDING COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Fourth Quarter Report – 2011/12 Financial year 29 February 20161Standing Committee on Appropriations.
QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE OF THE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT (MIG) – 2005/06 AND 2006/07 FINANCIAL YEARS Presentation to the Select Committee On Finance.
Transforming prisons into correctional centres - places of new beginnings Monitoring of offenders placed under Section 62(f) – Criminal Procedure Act (No.
1 Mpho Mathabathe: Researcher Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services Analysis of SONA (2010)
Public Hearing: 3 rd Quarter Expenditure and budget Implementation Vote 24: Police 1.
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN 2016/17 1. PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION 2 Key Performance Indicator Reporting Period Annual Target 2016/17 Quarterly Targets Q1Q2Q3Q4.
Presenter: Igna Visser Date: Wednesday, 18 March 2015
Technology Management Services (TMS)
2014 Adjustment Appropriation
Audio Visual Remands Presentation to the NCOP Security Committee
DCS Presentation to the Portfolio Committee of Justice and Constitutional Development: Implementation of the Child Justice Act : 23 February 2010.
ICT ENVIRONMENT PRESENTED BY CDC: GITO 23 FEBRUARY 2016
Presentation to Project Certification Committee, DoIT August 24, 2008
PRESENTATION ON 2ND QUARTER PRELIMINARY PERFORMANCE REPORT (2015/2016) BY CDC: STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT 18 November 2015.
CURRENT STATE OF EXPENDITURE: 2001/2002
ProZorro : Innovations in Digital Ex-Ante Monitoring Tools for Public Procurement in Ukraine Eliza Niewiadomska
HOME AFFAIRS IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (hanis)
Department of Corrections FY16 Budget Request
Presentation transcript:

Building a caring correctional system that truly belongs to all INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM – SEPTEMBER 2005

INTEGRATED JUSTICE SYSTEM STRATEGIC GOAL The strategic goal of the IJS Programme is to achieve the objective to Integrate and Automate the Justice System. Achieving this goal will contribute to the greater efficiency in the management of cases, persons and exhibits, in conjunction with the measures instituted by the various role-players insofar as attaining: Shorter case cycle times; A greater throughput of cases through the system; Fewer withdrawals of cases; No lost case files; Fewer postponements of cases; Reduced awaiting trial prisoner population; Greater conviction of the guilty; A better prioritisation of cases involving young offenders, sexual offences, and priority crimes; A contribution towards the eradication of corruption. Improvement of Crime Intelligence.

INTEGRATED JUSTICE SYSTEM STAKEHOLDERS Stakeholders of this programme are the following: Crime Prevention & Security (CPS) Cluster Director-Generals; Development Committee; Integrated Justice System Board; Department of Correctional Services; Department of Justice and Constitutional Development; Department of Safety and Security; Department of Social Development; and National Prosecuting Authority.

INTEGRATED JUSTICE SYSTEM BUSINESS REQUIREMENT Purpose: To manage a Person and an associated Case through the System Business Processes cut across all Departments Docket/s Witnesses Exhibits Persons South African Police Service Department of Justice & Constitutiona l Development Department of Correctional Services Department of Social Development National Prosecuting Authority

INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES Supportive towards decreasing the detention cycle time of detainees. (cost & operational benefits). Optimise the management of facilities and population. Improves the accuracy of facility management information. Assist towards security within the detention facilities. Support operational processes: Admissions, Releases, Roll Calls, Bail, & Visitations. In line with strategic goals of the Integrated Justice System.

THE TOTAL INTEGRATED SOLUTION NPIS CPS CRIM AFIS A&R The Focus of the Project The Future Concept The Future Concept Sentenced Inmate Module Other Systems in the Process Cycle Awaiting Trial Detainee Module Links with Major Police Stations & Secure Care Units Inmate Tracking System INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM THE TOTAL INTEGRATED SOLUTION

INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM BENEFICIARIES Department of Correctional Services: Provide capabilities for tracking, placing, & locating of detainees. Manage individual detainees & not population numbers. Allow for verification of identity through biometric fingerprint & photo image capabilities. Provide more efficient access to detainees by officials within sections. Enhance daily operations e.g. roll calls, daily lockups, cell register, added secure environment. South African Police Service: Enhance presentation of detainee for transportation to court. Assist towards investigations. Department of Justice and Constitutional Development: Supportive towards minimising court delays – detention cycle time. Department of Social Development: Allow greater access to detainees for social work activities. Community: Improve community interaction. e.g. bail payments, visitations, etc.

INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM CORRECTIONAL SERVICES REQUIREMENT Requirement for an Inmate Tracking System: Durban Medium A Correctional Centre – population average 6,500 detainees. Johannesburg Medium A Correctional Centre – population average 8,000 detainees. Problem: overcrowding. Detainees must be physically identified when: - Admitted (nationally approximately 23,000 monthly). Released (nationally approximately 22,000 monthly). Monthly Roll Call (Can take up to 5 days to complete). Visitations (nationally Over 23,000 visits per day). Bail is paid (nationally approximately 5,000 payments per month).

Problem: Daily, upto 500 detainees scheduled for court appearances at Johannesburg & Durban Medium A Correctional Centres – per day, 30 to 40 CANNOT be found for court OR are erroneously identified during presenting. INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM CORRECTIONAL SERVICES REQUIREMENT

INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM PROJECT CHARTER STATEMENT “The Inmate Tracking System with its interfaces is designed to incorporate an automated solution, to track the movement of each detainee within the holding facility, also replacing the manual fingerprint verification procedure within the processes of Admissions, Releases, Roll Calls, Visitations, Bail Payments, Incarceration, and Rehabilitation”.

INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM SOLUTION

Five Basic Components: Personal Tracking Device (PTD) – radio frequency (RF) transmitter tag. Transceiver Unit (TU) – radio frequency (RF) receiver. Personal Digital Assistant (PDA). Tracking and Application software. Computer platform & interface to existing facility management system (Admission, Detention, & Release System). INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM COMPONENTS

INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM PERSONAL TRACKING DEVICE (PTD) Comprises of four primary components: Active radio frequency (RF) tag: Tamper resistant bracelet & housing: Unique identification device: Battery (5 year lifespan)

INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM TRANSCEIVER UNIT (TU) Grid of Transceivers – radio frequency area covers entire holding facility. Individual transceiver radio frequency reception fields overlap. Each radio frequency transmission includes: Identification Number Tamper status Battery status.

The detainee moves through the facility with the PTD attached, transmitting a radio frequency signal, which is picked up by a number of RTLS transceiver units, effectively tracking & placing the movement within the facility, & depicted as a 2D text-based or a 3D graphic output.

Each section allocated a Personal Digital Assistant which is connected to system network through Wireless network. Personal Digital Assistant contains: Detainee personal data (registration number, name, photo image). Location detail (position, instructions, alarms). Unique radio frequency asset tag number. Identification reader – verify detainee identification. Battery status. Allows wardens within the sections to interact with the system. INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT (PDA)

2-Dimension (2D) & 3-Dimension (3D) displays of facility. Continuous, simultaneous tracking & placing of all detainees - within a 3 Meter radius. Provides detainee identity verification capabilities. Tamper alarm monitoring. Presence / Absence alarm monitoring. “Go / No-Go” area alarm monitoring. Roll call (“lockup”) functionality. Audit / history trails Unauthorized Personal Tracking Device detection. INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM TRACKING & APPLICATION SOFTWARE

INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM PROJECT APPROACH System is “1 st in the World” within incarceration environment – technology mainly untested! Decision to publish a Request for Proposal for procurement of a pilot solution for 2 x Correctional Centres. Solution Provider to implement & handover to department for evaluation. Department to undertake evaluation of pilot in terms of strategic business aspects including economic feasibility, functionality, & security. Executive to decide on further rollout. Inmate Tracking System to continue as an operational system within pilot sites.

INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM PROJECT MILESTONES The Inmate Tracking System Pilot Project launched 16 th May Request for Proposal published October Request for Proposal responses evaluated March Contract awarded February 2003 – to the Exponant Consortium. Tripartite Contract signed July 2003 (DCS, SITA, & Exponant). Durban Medium A Correctional Centre Handover: 5 November Johannesburg Medium A Correctional Centre Handover: Scheduled 2 nd September 2005.

INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM ISSUES EXPERIENCED SITA involvement in Request for Proposal approval & contract awarding protracted. Technical solution was problematic and the resolving thereof was time consuming – unique environment! Human involvement in Durban was undependable - commitment & resistance towards acceptance of new working procedures! – still not fully functional. Shortages of supplied equipment experienced due to inadequate stock control in Durban – re-procurement process lengthy. Financial implication of implementation & operation – change to local manufacture of all components in progress. Negative & inaccurate media reporting experienced.

INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM BENEFITS REALISED Identity verification functionality utilised and benefits realized. e.g. Detainee prevented from presenting himself to be released on bail payment, which was resolved through utilizing the system. Security advantages – already provides degree of security to officials and detainees through monitoring & identity verification capabilities. Facility management capabilities – juvenile control functionality, court categories, cell balancing, overcrowding monitoring. Cost benefit – strategic objectives should realise gains. Number of additional functionalities have been identified. e.g. cashless environment, and visitations, bail, & investigations process enhancements. Officials have noted the value to the broader correctional environment which has become apparent, & requires suggested policy changes. Personal achievement & development of officials within Johannesburg accomplished – functionality implemented within 2 months!

Total Budget Expenditure – Current:R 26,701, Total Project Expenditure – Current:R 1,853, Total Additional Expenditure – Current:R 5,799, Total Credit Received – Current:R 1,396, TOTAL:R 32,958, Total Budget Payable – Current:R 1,841, Total Additional Payable (2005/2006):R 1,861,350.00

2005/ / / / /2010 Implementation Costs: R 21,341, R 21,341, R 37,080, R 37,080, R 43,641, R 43,641, R 38,726, R 38,726, R 45,923, R 45,923, Operational Costs: R 5,793, R 5,793, R 10,479, R 10,479, R 17,490, R 17,490, R 24,701, R 24,701, R 32,105, R 32,105, TOTAL Costs: R 27,135, R 27,135, R 47,559, R 47,559, R 61,132, R 61,132, R 63,428, R 63,428, R 78,028, R 78,028, Capital Cost Per ATD per day: R 0.90 R 0.90 R 1.60 R 1.60 R 2.00 R 2.00 R 2.20 R 2.20 R 2.56 R 2.56 Operating Cost Per ATD per day: R 1.18 R 1.18 R 1.46 R 1.46 R 1.74 R 1.74 R 2.09 R 2.09 R 2.34 R 2.34 Total Cost per ATD per day: R 2.08 R 2.08 R 3.06 R 3.06 R 3.74 R 3.74 R 4.30 R 4.30 R 4.90 R 4.90 Notes: 1. Implementation Costs refer to the cost of implementing the Inmate Tracking System into identified Correctional Centres implemented through to Operational Costs refer all costs pertaining to the ongoing operation of each installation and includes maintenance, license fees, consumables, etc.

3. Costs include annual escalation (8% per annum). 4. Above costs include imported components. All imported costs are based on exchange rate of $1 = R10. costs are based on exchange rate of $1 = R All imported content will be locally manufactured. Costs based on current imported content - total envisaged saving based on current imported content - total envisaged saving of average 30% from 2005/2006. of average 30% from 2005/ Capital & Operating costs are estimated.

INMATE TRACKING SYSTEM WAY FORWARD The Commissioner has approved the evaluation of the pilot system. An evaluation team has been appointed. The Evaluation Team will become operative from October 2005 and would provide an Evaluation Report focusing on aspects including economic feasibility, functionality, & security. This report would be critical in determining whether further rollout will occur and the extent thereto. The DCS would like to extend an invitation to the Portfolio Committee to see the Inmate Tracking System in operation at Johannesburg Medium A Correctional Centre.

Building a caring correctional system that trully belongs to all Thank you Together we can…