State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Michigan Local Government Benchmarking Consortium slg.anr.msu.edu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting Your Best Foot Forward with Council Presented by: Anne Marie Madziak, SOLS OLA Super Conference February 3, 2011.
Advertisements

1 MICHIGAN MUNICIPAL SERVICES AUTHORITY COLLABORATE INNOVATE SERVE Michigan Local Government Benchmarking Consortium Conference: Benchmarking for Success.
Creating a Blueprint for NCCF Affiliate Success. Why is this work necessary? To achieve greater impact in our local communities and together achieve greater.
Web Portal Governance Roles and Responsibilities.
City of Pittsburgh 2015 Budget and Five-Year Plan September 22,
Form of Government 1 Responsibilities of the Strong Mayor drafted by the City Attorney’s Office December 2010.
Whitestown: 20 Year Strategic Plan for Municipal Services “The best possible service at the lowest possible cost.”
Agenda Define Efficiency. Where do we start? –Expenditures –Revenue Establish Performance Indicators. Cost savings measures. Things to think about. Bottom.
Montgomery County 2012 Charter Commission April 18, 2012 Meeting.
ORANGE COUNTY FY COUNTY MANAGER RECOMMENDED BUDGET 8/15/2015 ORANGE COUNTY BUDGET 1.
Eric R. Johnson Hillsborough County, (Tampa) FL
South Seattle Community College BUDGET HEARING Fiscal Year June 7, 2005.
Strategic Plan. April thru November 2011 Strategic Planning Cmmte/Staff Emerging Issues Document Trustee/Staff Meeting Community Listening Campaign SPC/Staff.
 Planning provides the foundation for conservation district programs and operations.  The planning process broadly defines the vision of the future.
COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY DEVELOPING A STRATEGY FOR REGION 6 Region 6 Planning Commission 903 East Main Street Marshalltown, IA
City of Houston Long Range Financial Management Task Force City Financial Overview Part 2 September 6, 2011.
Edward M. Haugh Jr. ESC Consultant. III. Recommendations for Applying Outcomes Planning to ESC  I. Introduction to Outcomes Planning II. A Sample ESC.
VILLAGE OF SHOREWOOD WISCONSIN Dashboards on a Shoestring An Organic and Intimate Development Leading to a Common Vision and Language for Collaborative.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Partnerships for the Future 1 Our Relationship and Our Future: The Role of State Associations Florida Regional Councils Association Sheri Coven Director.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FY07 BUDGET HEARING Mayor – Tammy de Weerd Council President – Shaun Wardle Council Vice President – Joe Borton Council – Keith Bird Council.
Indicators of Success -- Applying the TOC What will change? You must be able to test your theory!
Managed Competition: Part of a Successful City’s Strategy Teresa Curlin City of Charlotte May 2007.
County Government. A quick review All of Michigan is divided into counties. There are 83. Counties have a dual role As agents of state government As local.
UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
Presentation to LWM: Performance Measurement in WI Municipalities Craig Maher Associate Professor UW-Oshkosh MPA Program Alan Probst Local Government Center.
Who are we? And what is it that we do? LCC--Business Department Advisory Committee.
Dkl D. Kerry Laycock, CMC  Organizational Consultant  dklaycock.com Kent County, Michigan Citizens Committee Meeting November 14, 2011 Multi-Jurisdictional.
The Life of a Policy Council Member
FBC Moving On UP! April 25, 2014 FBC Moving On UP! April 25, 2014.
AzLA Marketing & Advocacy Committee 2013 AzLA Conference.
Using Performance Measures to Implement Your Strategic Plan CHRISTINE THROWER, MBA DIRECTOR CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION & STRATEGIC.
August 13-14Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2014 Annual Business Meeting IFTA, Inc. Strategic Plan Update 2014 Annual IFTA Business Meeting Pittsburgh, PA Trent.
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
1 ACLA: An Overview and 2010 Proposed Budget. Topics to be Covered Overview of ACLA Program Services Outreach Services 2009 Focus 2010 Agenda and Budget.
ASA Board Membership Board Members: (vote) Four Paraguayan Citizens Four U.S. Citizens One Third-country National Ex-Officio Members: (voice but no vote)
Strategic Planning Process Aug-Sep 2005 – Pre-retreat teams with assignments Sep 2005 – System-wide retreat with President, Vice Presidents, Chancellors.
Copyright 2003 – Cedar Enterprise Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Process Redesign & Innovation University of Maryland, University College.
Centre Region Council of Governments. 150 Square Miles 83,000 Population *Includes Students.
H 2 Opportunities, Collaborative Asset Management A Dual Approach to Cost Savings J ohn P. McCulloch H 2 Opportunities, Collaborative Asset Management.
K-State Research and Extension Community Board Leadership Series You are serving on a board-now what? K-State Research and Extension Community Development.
TPAS Annual Conference 2014 Registered Tenant Organisations What are they & what they’re not?! Ann Marie Stanley Tenant Priorities Team.
Florida Benchmarking Consortium (FBC): An Overview © The Florida Benchmarking Consortium.
STRATEGIC BUDGET COMMITTEE CHARGE Develop model for a 5 year sustainable budget. The model budget should include strategies for cost reductions, recommendations.
Budgeting 101. Class Activity Describe what you think the school district budget process looks like – steps and time lines. Completing some of the steps.
Voluntary Standards and Government: Working Together A Positive Collaboration Benefits Both the Public and Private Sectors Presentation by Mary C. McKiel,
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
Financial & Budget Outlook City Council Strategic Planning Retreat March 19, 2012 Pueblo, Colorado.
Recommended Citizens Budget for 2016 Presented to Summit County Council December 28, 2015.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – APRIL 12, Strategic Action Plan Evaluation Results.
Is Your Jurisdiction Taking Advantage of What the FBC Offers? Randy Phillips, FBC Chair & Susan Boyer, FBC Executive Director April 21, 2016 Is Your Jurisdiction.
Rob Henken, President Public Policy Forum March 3, 2011.
Council Improvement Plan Council Meeting 1 June
FINANCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT. Financial Services Department.
City Services Auditor Charter Appendix F Discussion
Procurement Development Programs
Creating a SUSTAINABLE Utility
City of Tucson: Financial Sustainability Plan
Sheryl Loesch Swakopmund, Namibia October 17, 2017
Revolutionizing Government in the 21st Century
CCC Library Strategic Plan
DRAFT FY Resource Allocation Plan / Two Year Plan
City of Richmond, California FY Draft Budget
2018 Staffing Recommendation
Kitsap County 2019 Annual Budget
Six Month Financial Status Update and Mid Year Budget Reconciliation
Slide Deck: Local Governments
Administration and Corporate Services
Slide Deck: Local Governments
Presentation transcript:

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Michigan Local Government Benchmarking Consortium slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Purpose “…to bring together municipal service providers from all over the state and produce meaningful and relevant performance measures for the purpose of benchmarking.” –MLGBC Charter slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Measurement Performance If organizations want to improve program effectiveness and efficiency, they need to manage performance, and to do so, they have to measure it. Measures chosen need to be meaningful and linked to a desired goal, result or benchmark. The MLGBC assists Michigan’s local governments in learning from their peers and implement best practices that enhance service delivery. slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension “It’s a real challenge addressing your local government’s fiscal issues without comparable operational data such as provided by MLGBC. Their performance metrics readily show the gaps and in turn the opportunities for efficiencies and improvements leading to balanced budgets.” Dave Boerger, Director of Fiscal Consulting Services, Southeast Michigan Council of Governments slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Manage Performance The City of Warren used performance measurement techniques to dramatically improve the efficiency of their water department. Actions included better sludge grinder function via process control to eliminate storage tank de- ragging saving $100,000 annually and more precise level sensing in blending tanks that eliminated overflow problems saving $30,000 per year. slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Manage Performance The City of Madison Heights uses the benchmarking data to support labor negotiations by learning from other MLGBC members about potential contractual enhancements and having access to information from comparable communities, which helped them make their case for changing contractual terms. slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Manage Performance The City of Birmingham finds that the process of collecting and analyzing the performance indicator data is the most beneficial aspect of being a MLGBC member. This gets the department personnel engaged and energized to improve on the indicator to the benefit of the city and its citizens. The data also helps city officials ask the right questions to the right people. slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Manage Performance Meridian Township’s fire department has optimized its staffing levels by utilizing the comparable benchmark data and thus meeting peak time emergency service needs as well as reducing overtime expenses. slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Goals Information Strategy –Ease in data collection –Accuracy and reliability –Annual report Financial –Minimize costs of membership –Capitalize on outside funding opportunities slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Goals Marketing and Networking –Host annual conference –Maintain strategic marketing plan –Promote benchmarking at citizen-friendly level –Diversify and increase membership –Facilitate learning process among members slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Participants 34 members: –21 cities –4 townships –6 counties –3 road commissions Population of participants range from 1,700 to 120,000 slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Organizational Plan Executive Board Michigan State University Conference Planning Committee Service Area Committees Local Government Organizations slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Executive Board Model In charge of, –Decision making –Recruiting –Approving data and revising final report –Ensuring service area committees are meeting member needs –Assess member needs and demands and take action as necessary 11 local government members Ex-officio members on board as approved by voting members slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Service Areas Assessing and Equalization Clerk, Register of Deeds, & Elections Code Enforcement & Building Inspections Emergency Dispatch Fire and EMS Fleet Maintenance Human Resources Info Technology Library Services Parks maintenance Police& Sheriff Refuse/Recycling/Yard Waste Collections Road Maintenance Water/Sewer Treatment & Distribution slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Service Area Committees Members… Are experts or practitioners Meet to –review draft benchmark report –Network with peers about best practices Benchmarks are from ICMA and other resources provided by MSU slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Website slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Benchmarks Police –Police budget as a % total jurisdiction –Average caseload per officer –Cost per officer –Training per officer –Part 1 cases cleared as a percent of total part 1 cases Road Maintenance –Total cost per road mile for routine maintenance (in house versus contracted) –Ratio of budgeted project expenditures to actual project expenditures for reconstruction projects –Total man hours of snow removal per lane mile –% of ice/snow related accidents per year (or per VMT) slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Benchmarks Water and Sewer Treatment and Distribution –Cost per million gallons of treated water –Chemical costs per million gallons –Cost per dry tons of waste –Number of sewer backups per customer –Number of water main breaks per mile of water main by main type Fleet Maintenance –Total cost per gallon of fuel by fuel type –Fleet size per FTE –Average open work order time –Cost per job by vehicle/equipment type slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Data Flow Chart 1. Service area committees determined performance measures for benchmarks 2. Specified data is collected by local governments and returned to MSU 3. MSU turns data into performance measures and benchmarks each local government 4. Local government’s receive their measures and benchmarks 5. Learning from peers who perform services more efficiently slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension “THE BENCHMARKING CONSORTIUM GIVES US THE FACTS WE NEED TO IMPLEMENT A TRANSFORMATION OF PROCESSES THAT IS NEEDED TO SERVE OUR CONSTITUENTS BETTER.” Michael “Bud” Norman, County Administrator/Controller, Branch County slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Obstacles Time –Smaller governments with less staff –Delays caused data collection to coincide with some budget cycles Privacy of Data –MSU owns data –Current members have access to it –MSU staff verifies data prior to distribution slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Making the Most of Benchmarking We are benchmarking, now what? -Formalize learning from better performing governments -Assist with labor negotiations -Recognize need for and find opportunities to cooperate -Track organizational objectives and budget priorities -Offer feedback and encouragement for employees -Share with public via media or annual report LearnGrowShare slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension “The Benchmarking Consortium has encouraged the City of Petoskey to start thinking about the delivery of services quantitatively, and has allowed us to easily compare our services with communities across Michigan. This has led us to ask critical questions about the efficiency of the services we deliver – questions that we would not have asked had we not participated in the Benchmarking Consortium.” Dan Ralley, City Manager, City of Petoskey slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Endorsements & Partnerships Citizens Research Council County Road Association of Michigan Michigan Association of Counties Michigan Municipal League Michigan Township Association Michigan State University Southeast Michigan Council of Governments slg.anr.msu.edu

State and Local Government Program, MSU Extension Contact MSU State and Local Government Program Mary Schulz, M.S. Program Director MLGBC Michigan State University slg.anr.msu.edu